Online "Guilds" Mirror Real Life Gangs 160
j-beda writes "In June 2009, Dr. Neil Johnson published a paper titled 'Human group formation in online guilds and offline gangs driven by a common team dynamic' in Physical Review E that found the way in which WoW 'guilds' form can be described by a mathematical model that can also be applied to an unrelated group of people: street gangs in Los Angeles. Since 'Any group that satisfies these fairly autonomous, competitive criteria would also (fit the model),' said Dr. Johnson, the findings are of interest to those combating international as well as local terrorist cells."
Teams as well (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Read the abstract more carefully (Score:5, Interesting)
Sometimes the results are genuinely interesting, or even downright superior, if the area has been bogged down in excessive qualitative handwaving. Other times, you get breathtaking exercises in over-reduction, ignorant of a variety of messy details that have been common knowledge, among people who actually study the subject, for decades.
Re:Read the abstract more carefully (Score:4, Interesting)
Without SEEING the formula, it's rather difficult. (Score:3, Interesting)
It's very easy to build a "model" for something. You just abstract everything until it is meaningless.
Since this article is locked behind a pay site, it's going to be difficult to evaluate it at the moment.
From TFA:
So if GroupA lacks characteristic B and person C has characteristic B but not characteristic D which would negatively affect GroupA then GroupA may admit person C.
Writing it is simple. Defining characteristics in quantitative methodology is the difficult part. How much of B offsets how much of D?
Groups of people (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Using WoW to fight terrorism? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Wow... (Score:3, Interesting)
Are church congregations usually engaging in clandestine competitive activities?
I think you're trying to push this model past the intent and scope. I didn't get the idea that this is supposed to be some grand unifying theory of group dynamics that can apply to ANY kind of grouping of human beings, but rather that it was being used to explore groups of a fairly specific type.
Don't get me wrong - I absolutely don't think this is epochal in impact on the field or, likely, all that important actually; people put forth models of group dynamics *all* *the* *time* so this isn't anything terribly exciting. My initial response was to point out that this isn't about "Oh, gee, there are dynamics to groups of humans!" but that it was about trying to apply a model that works on one group of a given type to another, unrelated, group with some similar characteristics.
I don't think anyone needs to "legitimize" WoW (or any of those other things) - our recreational habits, as a species, have long been acceptable subjects for academics. I'd say that if "sports medicine" can be a legitimate field of study, then certainly looking at various types of entertainment that consume a LOT of time from millions of people from very different cultures from across the globe is probably pretty legit to look at.
Actually, going totally tangential - why would anyone think WoW isn't worth looking at? It's a business that has over 10 million repeat customers spending god only knows how many hours a month using the product. The customers come from virtually every single country, every single demographic group, every single line of work/school. You have large groups of people gathering to work co-operatively (or not) to achieve somewhat complicated goals, often times without even speaking much of the same language except for a form of pidgin. You also have entire side industries that have sprung up around the game (gold selling/farming, power leveling services, etc.). You have thousands of people developing (usually free!) software add-ons to make the gameplay more efficient. You have tens of thousands of websites dedicated to the game.
I'd say anyone who thinks that examining various angles the phenomenon of WoW is not legitimate is actually not terribly bright. It may seem silly at first, but giving it even a moment's thought reveals some pretty amazing things that are worth trying to understand.