Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Games

AbleGamers Reviews Games From a Disability Standpoint 125

Posted by Soulskill
from the gaming-for-all dept.
eldavojohn writes "Early last month a visually impaired gamer sued Sony under the Americans with Disabilities Act (and if you think that people with disabilities don't play games, think again). The AbleGamers Foundation has decided to step forward and provide a rating system for games that blends together a number of factors to determine a score with regard to accessibility. Visual, hearing, motion, closed captioning, speed settings, difficulty settings and even colorblindness options are all taken into account when compiling these scores and reviewing these games."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

AbleGamers Reviews Games From a Disability Standpoint

Comments Filter:
  • The equivalent... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2009, @05:16AM (#30295054)

    ...of forcing Hollywood to make all movies accessible to the blind.

    I feel sorry for those with disabilities, but be realistic. Game producers don't need the extra delays and budgetary nonsense programming in these concessions to the disabled would bring.

  • by Gadget_Guy (627405) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @05:24AM (#30295082)

    I have just started to look at their site and the first thing that I notice as the page was loading was that the pictures that you click on near the top to go to choose the platform all have the same alt text of "xbox reviews". That will be confusing for someone using a screen reader.

    I thought the whole layout seemed a bit complicated and confusing, with javascript menus and a very busy interface. Gray text on a gray background seems an odd choice for the color blind people out there.

    Still, at least they are raising public awareness. Even if you don't think that game makers should HAVE to provide support for all disabilities, this kind of site fills in the role that most game reviewers would not consider.

  • by executivechaos (1576131) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @08:24AM (#30295956)
    If you're blind...guess what? You're never doing to drive a car. End of story.

    If you have no legs or can't walk, you're never going to learn karate and becoming a kickboxing champion. End of story
    There are certain things, of course yes we can make more accessible to the disabled, but I'm sorry, gaming is NOT one of them. A recreation that refines split second reflex and hand eye coordination SHOULD NOT BE MUCKED UP so someone with fucking parkinsons can play it 'easier'.
    If you have Parkinson? Sorry you simply can play games that require a steady refined hand. END OF STORY.
    I know im going to get modded as troll / flamebait but i am SICK TO DEATH of people who are PHYSICALLY LIMITED EXPECTING TO BE ABLE TO DO THINGS AS IF THEY ARE NOT: REALITY CHECK, YOU CAN'T AND YOU NEVER WILL, DEAL WITH IT
  • by TheRaven64 (641858) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @09:01AM (#30296204) Journal
    That really surprises me. Testing for red-green colour blindness issues is one of the standard things that you do when designing a graphical user interface. It's easy; on most platforms you can map the red and green channels together so you get a rough idea of how our UI will look to colour blind people before you even send it off for testing (and there are a number of automated tests you can run for other common forms of colour perception problems). These affect so many people that if you sell more than ten copies of your program you're likely to have at least one user who will complain if you don't. I'm astonished that it isn't a part of the testing process for games.
  • Re:Sueing? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by yuna49 (905461) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @10:07AM (#30296764)

    I have a mild red/green color blindness and find some games with color codings difficult to navigate. I had an especially hard time distinguishing the green and yellow elements in Chrono Cross where color is a primary component of the game play.

  • by IndustrialComplex (975015) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @11:21AM (#30297574)

    That's how I found out. People thought I was kidding when I said I couldn't read the ishihara tests.

    It's a bitch of a disability too, I've had many job opportunities pulled from me because of it, and the misunderstanding of what color blindness actually is.

    Why is that a problem? Because the government doesn't consider color blindness a real disability. Increasing numbers of jobs tack on 'normal color vision' into their job descriptions because some person up the chain thought it would be a good thing to toss in.

    I once had to fight for my job as a test engineer because I worked with aircraft. Naturally the government decided that since it dealt with aircraft, you had to have normal color vision. Because you know how important color vision is when testing god damned communication links.

    I had to go to vision specialists to 'prove' that I could do my job. It took 2 months to get everything sorted out.

    Too many people don't understand what this disability is, and think it is ok to just slap the 'normal color vision' requirement into a job without actually considering what that means.

  • Re:Sueing? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Your.Master (1088569) on Wednesday December 02 2009, @02:06PM (#30299792)

    Let me tell you, until you've watched the Imagination-land part 1 episode in descriptive video, you have NEVER truly seen South Park.

    Sadly, parts 2 and 3 were done with a different voice actor who seems to be a moron whose writer wasn't paying attention. But the first one is fan-bloody-tastic.

Think of it! With VLSI we can pack 100 ENIACs in 1 sq. cm.!

Working...