Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Prolonged Gaming Blamed For Rickets Rise 254

superapecommando writes "Too many hours spent playing videogames indoors is contributing to a rise in rickets, according to a new study by doctors. Professor Simon Pearce and Dr Tim Cheetham of Newcastle University have written a paper in the British Medical Journal which warns of the rickets uptake – a disease which sufferers get when deficient in Vitamin D. The study boils down to the fact that as more people play videogames indoors they don't get enough sunlight and this has meant the hospitals are now having to combat a disease that was last in the papers around the time Queen Victoria was on the throne." At least the kids are eating enough snacks with iodized salt that we don't have to worry about goiters.

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Prolonged Gaming Blamed For Rickets Rise

Comments Filter:
  • The kicker: (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @04:53PM (#30863328) Journal

    If you spend so much time inside playing video games that you get a case of the rickets, you've got way more problems than just vitamin deficiency.

  • Re:Via Wikipedia (Score:5, Insightful)

    by girlintraining ( 1395911 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:00PM (#30863412)

    , usually resulting from famine or starvation during the early stages of childhood.

    And that's the real story: Parents who have turned their children over to the television, computer, and daycare centers of the world and neglecting basic nutrition. My sister is like that -- she is fed a diet of fast food and microwave meals because her parents can't be bothered to cook a meal (two income family). I don't think its intentional, people just assume there's no problem if it can't be seen.

  • and of course (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sjames ( 1099 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:06PM (#30863470) Homepage Journal

    This has nothing to do with the media telling everyone that we shouldn't even risk a glimpse at the sunlight without a generous slathering with SPF 2 billion sunscreen and a hat.

  • Ugh (Score:2, Insightful)

    by rwalker429 ( 1452827 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:09PM (#30863506)
    Why are video games exclusively targeted in this? Yes, they create a pretty attractive form of indoor entertainment but the problem here isn't video games. It's the people playing them or in the case of children, THEIR PARENTS. Send the kids outside. Heck, a good video game will make a lot of kids WANT to go play outside...if only so they can emulate their favorite fictional hero of the day. The same case could be made for television, really great sex, or pretty much anything else that makes staying inside an attractive option. Give the sensationalism a rest. And if you're doing this to yourself as an adult and not climbing out of the basement bat-cave and seeing the light of day once in awhile...well then you're making a choice about your health and lifestyle. Last I recalled, being an adult involved making choices like that.
  • by socrplayr813 ( 1372733 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:15PM (#30863562)

    You're modded funny, but why not think about what activities could be moved outside? Video games may not be the best choice to do it with, but it's not a terrible idea to at least consider it. Now that I think about it, it might be nice to go sit under a tree with my laptop somewhere (if it weren't winter).

    Really though, the bigger issue is that the majority of these cases are probably caused by poor diet more than (or at least as much as) lack of sun exposure.

  • Re:Via Wikipedia (Score:5, Insightful)

    by samkass ( 174571 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:22PM (#30863638) Homepage Journal

    I'm not sure why you threw daycare centers in there. Often they are much more strictly monitored than a child's home life and probably have prevented more of these cases than caused them.

  • Re:Milk? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by blackraven14250 ( 902843 ) * on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:40PM (#30863884)
    No, listen to the guy who just said it's better to get sunlight than take a pill, and better to take a pill than to not get any vitamin D.
  • Re:Milk? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by blueg3 ( 192743 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:54PM (#30864078)

    Sources: blogs!

  • by Paul Fernhout ( 109597 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @05:55PM (#30864092) Homepage

    Vitamin D in the human body is produced mostly by the effect of sunlight on the skin, which creates the version called vitamin D3 (which is the best version to supplement with, usually from fish oil in gelcaps).

    Essentially, as people in industrialized countries have been spending more time indoors at home, work, or school, often at computer screens; and as people have been following well-meant advice from dermatologists to stay out of the sun; and as we all drive more instead of walk or bicycle; and as children are less allowed to roam freely outdoors through fears of stranger abductions or whatnot, we have ended up vitamin D deficient as a society. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with a variety of issues, including cancer, depression, diabetes, obesity, schizophrenia, autism, heart disease, tooth decay, asthma, allergies, osteoporosis, and even influenza. Ironically, vitamin D deficiency may be causing even more skin cancers in office workers, because being vitamin D deficient cripples some of the immune response that prevents cancer cells from getting out of control. Modern window glass has also been "improved" to let through less UV-B rays to prevent carpet fading; so now we have faded people instead. :-(

    Consider that vitamin D deficiency is related to behavioral issues like depression that can manifest themselves in different ways in children. If kids misbehaves in school, they are often denied going outside at recess into the sunshine. If kids misbehave more, they are denied being outside all summer in the sunshine because they have to go to summer school. If they are really bad eventually, then kids get set to juvenile detention and then prison where they may be mostly indoors for years. Sadly, that is a negative spiral of vitamin D deficiency. Homeschoolers at least have the option of being outdoors more and getting more sunshine.

    I wrote some on that connection here:
    "ADHD or lack of Vitamin D? Albany Free School connection?"
    http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/2009-October/005083.html [listcultures.org]
    "I have no doubt such a play-based curriculum is a good thing and better than compulsory school for most kids. I love learner-directed education, where public schools would become more like public libraries. But, what if some of the magic with the kids labeled ADHD at the Albany Free School is that, instead of getting Ritalin, that kids who have been labeled are allowed to play outdoors in the sunlight a lot? Especially African American kids in that more northern area of the USA who will struggle more with getting enough Vitamin D at that lattitude? The Free School has an outdoor courtyard at the school kids can use when they want, and they allow kids to go to the nearby parks, plus they have some rural lands they go on field trips too."

  • Re:Via Wikipedia (Score:4, Insightful)

    by instagib ( 879544 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @06:13PM (#30864334)

    You really can't take care of a family [...] without dual incomes.

    This is only true if you want to maintain your living standard as if you had no kids. Smaller car, no vacation, no restaurants, simple clothing etc. (i.e. how most people live in this world) would allow single income plus a 100% mother - just as a few decades ago. I am not saying that this is how it should be, just that the "want to have it all" is a definitive factor.

  • by thetoadwarrior ( 1268702 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @06:25PM (#30864468) Homepage
    Parents, yet again, are the true problem. If these kids weren't gaming, they'd be chatting on the computer or watching tv or just playing in their bedroom because parents won't let them outside since there are paedophiles on every street corner. Having both parents working also stops kids from getting out because no one is there to watch them when they're out or even to ensure they go out rather than stay inside all day.
  • Re:Gaming? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Friday January 22, 2010 @07:25PM (#30864966) Journal

    The problem is you can't blame just ONE item for it all though. A vitamin deficiency such as this reflects many bad lifestyle choices, not just gaming.

    People CAN read books outside yes, but I know just as many shutins who prefer to read as I know shut ins who game obsessively.

    I have, on many occaisons, seen someone gaming on their DS, PSP, Gameboy, etc while outside.

    I haven't on any occaison, seen anyone play a board game while inside. Yet some people do so religiously every week.

    Board games one night, Reading another, Television another, Gaming another. Thats more than 50% of your week which can be attributed to regular activities in moderation. Next thing you know its a snowy cloudy overcast, just like it is in Canada and England right now, so its too cold for any outdoor activities anyways. (Before you mention building snowmen, you can't do that in -30).

    I blame Rickets Rise on a multitude of things.

  • by Hurricane78 ( 562437 ) <deleted @ s l a s h dot.org> on Saturday January 23, 2010 @12:45AM (#30867076)

    Rickets is caused by eating trash. Over generations. From being a baby (artificial milk) to growing old.

    With what we eat, it’s a wonder, and proof of the robustness of nature, that we can still reproduce and survive!

    I’ll make the following statement: >90% of what we eat nowadays, can’t be classified as “food” anymore.
    Much less as species-appropriate.

    It’s already known, that most so-called “age-related” diseases actually are coming with age, not because of age. Like hair loss, bad sight, blood pressure, multiple bone diseases, etc, etc, etc.
    And by “known”, I mean studies over 30 years, with more than 30,000 patients.
    (Most studies, which always go maybe a couple of years, can’t find anything because it’t a very long-term effect.)

    So I blame bad food, until proven otherwise.

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...