Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Movies Sci-Fi Games

New Riddick Movie Made Possible By Games? 160

Posted by Soulskill
from the this-is-why-gamers-are-scarier-than-bikers dept.
Hugh Pickens writes "Scott Harris writes on Moviefone that the economics of Hollywood are often baffling, as DVD sales, broadcast fees and merchandising tie-ins balance against advertising costs and pay-or-play deals to form an accounting maze. The latest example is the untitled sequel to The Chronicles of Riddick, released in 2004 to a slew of negative reviews and general viewer indifference. Despite its hefty $105 million budget, most of which was spent on special effects, the film topped out at a paltry $57 million domestically. So how can a sequel be made if the movie lost money? The answer has to do with ancillary profits from revenue streams outside the box office. While the combined $116 million worldwide probably still didn't cover distribution and advertising costs, it likely brought the film close to even, meaning DVD sales and profits from the tie-in video game franchise may have put the movie in the black. In addition, Riddick itself was a sequel to Pitch Black, a modestly budgeted ($23 million) success back in 2000. Extending the franchise to a third film may help boost ancillary profits by introducing the Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick DVDs and merchandise to new audiences, meaning that the new film may not even need to break even to eventually turn a profit for the studio."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New Riddick Movie Made Possible By Games?

Comments Filter:
  • by Pantero Blanco (792776) on Wednesday February 17, 2010 @03:06AM (#31165992)

    The Chronicles of Riddick WAS "Riddick 3".

    1. Pitch Black
    2. Dark Fury
    3. Chronicles of Riddick

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 17, 2010 @04:33AM (#31166392)
    I don't care about CoR, not Pitch Black. But I care about the summary. I thought slashdot was pretending to be targeting the intelligent crowd?
    Despite its hefty $105 million budget, most of which was spent on special effects, the film topped out at a paltry $57 million domestically. So how can a sequel be made if the movie lost money? The answer has to do with ancillary profits from revenue streams outside the box office. While the combined $116 million worldwide probably still didn't cover distribution and advertising costs, it likely brought the film close to even, meaning DVD sales and profits from the tie-in video game franchise may have put the movie in the black.
    Distribution of the movie and advertising, last time I checked, was covered from the movie budget... This "statement" takes up half the summary and tries to convince us that $105M > $116M.
    Really, slashdot? Really?
  • Re:Ooh a sequel! (Score:5, Informative)

    by BadAnalogyGuy (945258) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 17, 2010 @06:28AM (#31167006)

    The Star Wars what? There are only 3 Star Wars movies. Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi.

    La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La

Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. -- Rich Kulawiec

Working...