Ruling Confirms Postal Service Discriminated Against GameFly 152
An anonymous reader writes "It took almost two years, but the US Postal Regulatory Commission just ruled (PDF) that the US Postal Service '...had unduly discriminated against GameFly.' GameFly recently complained that the additional postage was costing them $730,000 per month."
GameFly? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think, by definition, a summary should give people an idea of what the article is about. The summary doesn't tell me:
1. Who is GameFly and what do they do?
2. What the discrimination entailed? Did it just cost them more money to send postage?
3. If GameFly recently complained, then surely it couldn't have taken 2 years?
So many questions, if only I read TFA...
Re:Just in time to close up shop. (Score:5, Insightful)
Besides game rentals, which is Gamefly's bread and butter industry, they also make a decent amount by selling used games. Their sales are regularly featured as some of the best on the 'net over at CAG [cheapassgamer.com]. They don't really sell new games, so until physical copies of games disappear (which may only be a console generation away), they should be fairly resilient. This change just makes them more profitable, but again, they are in a dying market, so unless they position themselves to survive it, as GameStop is trying to do by making some purchases of game streaming services, they won't be around in 10 years.
Re:Just in time to close up shop. (Score:1, Insightful)
You can repeat this 'til death, downloading is not stealing, you can only steal physical things, no matter what the M.A.F.I.A. is trying to buy as law.
Re:Just in time to close up shop. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Just in time to close up shop. (Score:1, Insightful)
Bad ruling (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Bad ruling (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Bad ruling (Score:3, Insightful)