Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones PlayStation (Games) Portables (Games) XBox (Games) Games

Video Game Consoles Are 'Fundamentally Doomed,' Says Lord British 374

zacharye writes "Microsoft sold nearly one million Xbox 360s last week alone, but we're nearing the end of the road for video game consoles according to one industry visionary. Richard Garriott, known for having created the fantasy role-playing franchise Ultima, says converged devices such as computers, smartphones and tablets will soon render dedicated game consoles obsolete: '... the power that you can carry with you in a portable is really swamping what we've thought of as a console.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Video Game Consoles Are 'Fundamentally Doomed,' Says Lord British

Comments Filter:
  • Good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by masternerdguy ( 2468142 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:28PM (#38245336)
    As a PC gamer I can't wait for consoles to finally die, fewer crap console ports and PC exclusives tend to be better anyway.
  • by Pontiac ( 135778 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:34PM (#38245432) Homepage

    I don't see the game console going away.. It's just going to evolve into more of multimedia device. Really it already has..
    My game consoles spend more time streaming Netflix then playing games these days.
     

  • yea but (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Osgeld ( 1900440 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:36PM (#38245456)

    your smartphone is a bit more difficult to pile a bunch of buddies on a couch and have a fuckton of fun for hours on end, and a touch screen is a bitch for complicated controls.

    now go back to whatever cave you crawled out of lord brittish

  • Already Gone (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:41PM (#38245510)

    By this definition of consoles, they died out five years ago. The current generation are already going very far out of their way to be multipurpose devices. They all have Netfllix, which is an ENORMOUS draw, and probably drives most Wii purchases these days. Two o them have browsers, they can all play music and display your photos, two of them can initiate voice/video chat over the internet. They can all send messages.

    They're locked down, yes, but so is the iPad. It's so locked down, and its base software is so limited that I'd say the only difference between it an a current-gen console is online store policy. If Xbox LIVE allowed third parties to sell utilities and productivity tools, the two platforms would be conceptually identical.

  • by blkmajik ( 3321 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:50PM (#38245626)

    A 7"/10" tablet or a 4" phone screen will NEVER replace a gaming console. There are many many factors that make this an insane and retarded statement.

    1) Game controller. Yes the kinect is interesting. Yes gyros can provide an intersting experience as well. But can you do a 16 hour gaming session waving your arms around like that (both kinect style or wii style with a large tablet). The standard game controller is a perfect interface for most games, and an OK stand in for others (FPS games should be with a mouse).

    2) As mentioned above: Screen size.

    3) Social gaming (in close physical proximity). A big screen is ideal for this. Tablets (or worse phones) are just too small to share.

    4) Touch screens suck for the vast majority of stuff. Motion control is just behind it in usability. With touch screens a large number of games are not playable because your hand is blocking critical space on the screen.

    There are more.. but there's beer in the NOC and I'm thirsty.

  • by 0123456 ( 636235 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:53PM (#38245652)

    What is going away is the console that can only play a game, which is being replaced by devices that have apps as well as games. This is already happening in the current generation of consoles.

    I've had one of those for thirty years. We call it 'a computer'.

  • Re:Good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BenoitRen ( 998927 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:58PM (#38245726)

    The obsession with high quality graphics is a large part of what's wrong these days on both platforms. Stop kidding yourself.

  • Re:Good (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 02, 2011 @07:59PM (#38245734)

    I feel its the opossite. Ive played more PC games than consoles, but even for a game as Skyrim, I m playing it in an XBOX, i m having a good time

    Why? Because playing it in my pc would mean a spend of at least US$ 400 in a new video card, plus new processor, ram, etc (was a over-the-top PC about 3 years ago) A total of at least US$ 1500, and adjust my room to connect my PC to my full screen tv.
    Instead I decided to drop pc game playing, selling my desktop and buying a notebook (which basically means: good bye pc games!)
    Maybe the XBOX doesnt give me th best graphic experiences but its good enough. And I think thats what behind Richard Garriot speech, Graphics arent everything, and I dont know about others but I cant spend in a new desktop PC every 2 years to play games in "extreme" graphic mode.

  • I suppose I could instead buy a separate machine for my TV. Doing that I could even design/get it specifically designed for a livingroom environment. Hey- wait a minute.

    The difference between such a PC and a console is that a living room PC would have solo productions like Bob's Game and indie games developed by a 2- or 3-man family business. But then next to nobody wants to play a game developed by a micro-ISV in a small city; instead, as CronoCloud has pointed out in a previous comment [slashdot.org], they want to play games developed by people who have had to move to a different state for their video game development apprenticeship.

  • Re:yea but (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Osgeld ( 1900440 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @08:20PM (#38245930)

    yea ok, everyone is going to have the exact same phone with the same apps, and if you have not noticed motion control is clunky and only really works for a few games no matter how hard companies are trying to shove it down our throats as the whole thing has been around for decades and has never made it past "isnt that cute"

  • by JoeMerchant ( 803320 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @08:34PM (#38246070)

    1) Game controllers can be (and are) bluetooth connected accessories

    2) You can already HDMI out from some phones and drive 1080p

    3) HDMI out to an 80" plasma, if you've got the bucks

    4) see 1) re: touchscreens don't need to be used.

  • by ynp7 ( 1786468 ) on Friday December 02, 2011 @08:59PM (#38246310)

    Why are people still listening to this guy? The most relevant things he's done in the last decade are tie himself to doomed MMO projects and buy himself a ticket on a spaceship.

  • by jo_ham ( 604554 ) <joham999@noSpaM.gmail.com> on Friday December 02, 2011 @09:16PM (#38246436)

    The "anyone who has an opinion different to mine is obviously a shill" thing on slashdot is getting tiresome.

    It *is* possible for people to like things that the /, groupmind dislikes without them being paid to do so.

  • Re:Good (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Rennt ( 582550 ) on Saturday December 03, 2011 @12:22AM (#38247344)

    Not to mention that the best thing about consoles is that everybody is playing on the same machine. You don't have to worry about whether you have a good enough machine and how good the framerate will be on your machine when buying console games.

    Yeah, life is swell as a lowest common denominator. Hassle free, outdated fun. Only you DO get framerate drops on modern games, don't you? Also texture popups, cramped environments, minimal detail, and shoddy AI. Consoles aren't just holding games back - they are actually making games WORSE as developers leave more and more game on the cutting room floor just to get the latest wizbang engine to run on half a fucking gig of shared memory. Awesome.

  • by Tony Isaac ( 1301187 ) on Saturday December 03, 2011 @01:06AM (#38247500) Homepage
    PCs have had enough power (including GPU power) to compete with game consoles for a long time. Why didn't they?

    Phones and tablets are beginning to approach the level of power of a PC. But they won't replace game consoles either. Why? Because, as with PC's, it's not about the processor or GPU power.

    The game console has some strategic advantages over PC's and tablets: 1) it's cheaper than a PC or tablet, 2) it is specifically made for playing games, and 3) it sits next to the TV, permanently connected and ready to play. Just turn it on and go. No need to set up a connection each time you want to play. No need to go fetch the tablet to hook it up to the TV. It's already there.

    Simply put, a multi-purpose device will never be quite as good at gaming as a dedicated gaming device.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday December 03, 2011 @02:01AM (#38247798)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by smash ( 1351 ) on Saturday December 03, 2011 @10:35AM (#38249616) Homepage Journal

    Eventually, mobile will be the only web. Why would i bother walking over to a PC to browse the internet when i can do it from the tablet i use to control my house, or the mobile phone in my pocket? Or the device embedded in my TV (which is likely to be something ARM/mobile OS based, rather than a full blown PC).

    The vast majority of people who want to "browse the internet" don't necessarily want to use a PC to do it. Its simply that until recently, using a PC has been a requirement. Most people have no interest in computers and something like a tablet is ideal for them.

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...