Sci-Fi Author Timothy Zahn Is Creating a Video Game 116
An anonymous reader writes "Timothy Zahn, one of the most influential Star Wars Expanded Universe authors (creator of Grand Admiral Thrawn and Mara Jade), and writer of 40 novels and 90+ short stories, will be trying his hand as the Creative Director for a new video game, Timothy Zahn's Parallax. From the Kickstarter page: 'The game concept is heavily inspired by the original Master of Orion but, because Timothy Zahn is the co-creator, a major focus is going to be on making sure that each alien race is as fully-realized as possible, and that the interactions with the other aliens are realistic: talking to one alien race will be different than talking to another, and the choices you make in the game will have side effects and the computer players will remember them — and treat you differently because of them.' Other highlights:
'The game will include at least 5 of his non-Star Wars alien races (Modhri, Kalixiri, Zhirrzh, Qanska and Pom); Backers will be active participants in the game creation process; No Digital Rights Management foolishness.' The Kickstarter starts at 6pm MST today."
My eyes must be going (Score:1)
Pom/Porn
And don't even ask about the hairy palms.
Re: (Score:3)
I had to zoom the screen to 150% to verify that the first po was followed by m, and the second by rn.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Priced out of Market (Score:5, Informative)
$30 for the game?
$10 only gets you a star name?
Seeing how they can still sell the game after, I think he could do better on (digital-only) pledges.
I have been priced off kickstarter (at least for games) which used to be more reasonable about my support, where I could afford to have little expectation, and the possibility of getting a lot for my money. Now I have stopped looking at all.
My money will go to Humble Bundle 9 https://www.humblebundle.com/ [humblebundle.com] which currently includes FTL, Fez and Trine 2 and others(the weekly bundle is Duke Nuken 3D and Shadow Warrior with DLC which is better than the original games). In contrast Humble Bundle has hit $2million already with another 11 days to go.
Re:Priced out of Market (Score:5, Interesting)
Anti: $10 doesn't just get you a star name, it gets you an entire year of talking about the game, and having a vote and a voice in the final product. As for the $30 license (and the $500k Kickstarter comment as well), we're putting everything into it up front, so it's the game we want to make right from the beginning, and the customers/ backers get as much as we can give them (rather than hoping to get funded for stretch goals). There's going to be a lot of content, and it's going to be expensive to generate - aside from paying my living expenses, the rest is going to be spent developing the game. "No DRM foolishness" means everybody in your family can use it if they want (yes, all at the same time), so it's not exactly price-gouging.
Pro: I'd actually rather charge less, but I had to find a balance between reasonable reward levels and enough to meet the Kickstarter goal, and I made a judgment call. And yes, there are some projects on Kickstarter that don't need to be there, or are too high, because the creators don't actually need that much money to complete the project. Timothy Zahn knows my plan for the game, and he was also worried that we might be setting the Kickstarter target too high (but it's not just my name on the line, and there's no way I'm going to waste all the time and energy he is putting into this by turning out a sub-par game that will disappoint the backers, or risk running out of funds because I cut the budget too close).
In general, it's a valid comment/ concern, but it's not as cut and dry as it seems from the outside, when you're dealing with all the myriad variables and considerations.
Re: (Score:1)
There was actually a lot of support for NOT having Kickstarter-exclusive content, and nobody even tried to make an argument for it. The general consensus was that, while it might be good encouragement for the backers to pledge more, it's incredibly annoying for anyone that happens to miss the Kickstarter campaign for some reason (tight month financially, mil
Re: (Score:1)
Ok, seriously... Play my other game, Blobs [prototypexsoftware.com] - whether you love it or hate it (or give it 3 stars on Amazon because you got bored with it after 3 months like one player did), the level of technical difficulty to create that game is no different than this one will be, and I wrote it in a couple of months, in the evenings, after work. The only name I could drop would be the original author of
Re: (Score:1)
Follow the hyperlink to check out the game [prototypexsoftware.com]
Sorry for not being clear - "you win either way" was directed specifically toward VertexCortex's argument ("I fear this will not end well" and such), in that he will have "won" by being right if I fail.
Even MOO2 added things I didn't li
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent! Sort of.. (Score:2)
A big fan of the Conqueror's trilogy, must have read all 3 books at least half a dozen times. It's a shame I can't stand 4X games! I'd prefer to see someone with a bit more gaming clout trying to take on such a rich universe, as the majority of 4X indies made in the past few years have been sorely lacking anything appealing. Good luck to them, however! I'll probably keep my Zahn funding to buying books rather than games, unless this one manages to turn out amazing.
Can't fathom slapping down $30 on a 4X thou
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you suck at 4x, it will be like those choose your own adventure books that have no right answer.
Re: (Score:1)
(fortunately, I plan to have a whole lot of other people keeping an eye on me to make sure I don't suck)
Re: (Score:2)
With Bioshock: Infinite (Latest, but there have been many others) showing how well that type of platform can tell a story, I can not see why he chose 2d turn based gaming.
Are you serious? Do you know how much money it cost to make Infinite? 2D turn-based games are cheap to make and can be done by 1 or 2 people.
Re: (Score:3)
Will it feature a retired baseball player? (Score:1)
They are the best kind of alien in the gaming universe.
Re: (Score:2)
They are the best kind of alien in the gaming universe.
Like the kind that creates video game companies that are actually scams to suck money out of state government?
Re:Names...? (Score:4, Funny)
make sure your readers have some way of guessing at the correct proonunciation.
Yeah, I read the Conqueror's Trilogy, and I had to rely on my imagination! Can you believe it?! In a sc-fi novel, no less!
Re: (Score:2)
As ceresabraciator says further down [slashdot.org], this type of word
always takes the reader away from absorption in the text to think, at least briefly, "Wow, those are weird letters on the page."
Imagination is key to all reading, but the text should connect as directly as possible to the reader's imagination -- understanding should be passive with as little effort as possible.
Consider Dai swung his bwyell and chopped the neidr in half. You cannot "hear" that sentence when you read it... unless you speak Welsh, because that's where I nicked all the nouns from. Presumably I'd have described the bwyell as some kind of axe, and the neidr as a serp
Re: (Score:2)
What if the bwyell and neidr are not an axe and snake, but a weapon specific to that cultu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Alien Names, Necessarily Silly, Never Believable (Score:2)
Every time I see contrived names from Sci-Fi stories, I can't help but think of a quote from an O.S. Card book.
Re: (Score:2)
I had a somewhat longer post prepared originally, which was essentially a complaint about how no one ever seems to go the imperialist route for naming and call things Betelgeusian (notable exceptions: Martians and Terrans.)
The natural thing for two cultures in contact, at least up until the later half of the 20th century, was for words to be assimilated more fully. The silly letters get massaged into something more legible, and sometimes even calqued or translated. Hence for hundreds of years we had "Canton
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're right. Someone above characterizes OP as being unwilling to use his imagination and I think this quite unfair. When we're reading sci-fi, we want to believe what we're reading and we want to be absorbed in it. We want to achieve that suspension of disbelief. But the more confused looking a name is, the more we're broken out of the experience. I can use my imagination to figure out how to pronounce Xchryxchub. But
Re: (Score:2)
I think the criticism is actually fair; it's stupid to always quote humans saying "Xchryxchub" when they're actually saying "Krikoob," as that implies they're better at pronouncing the weird alien name than they really are. Going to the trouble of inventing an orthography for their weird alien language in our alphabet, and then disregarding it, is part of the superfluous exotica complaint that Orson Scott Card levelled (and in the fantasy department, I believe Diana Wynne Jones has said something similar.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That being said, even if we applied this rule consistently, wouldn't we still have to come up with strange, seemingly unpronounceable names for aliens? We've no real word in English to describe some alien from Betelgeuse Seven, though we might opt to say Betelgeusian. Calling them Betelgeusian might seem satisfactory, but in many sci-fi contexts it would be like, just to pick a random example, applying our name for people from the subcontinent to people from a newly found continent on the opposite side of the planet because we wanted to get a grant proposal accepted by the Spanish royal family. So one must, in some situations, try to use a truly alien name to describe an alien people.
It's often surprisingly how many names for people or places originated as exonyms, ie names given by an outside group. "Wales" and "Wallonia" (the French-speaking part of Belgium) both come from a Low Germanic root meaning "foreigner". Germany calls itself Deutschland, while the French call it Allemagne and although the Italians call it Germania, they call the people tedeschi.
I don't think humanity would have a problem coming up with exonyms for alien races.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed I think this more plausible than using names intended to look alien. Sure, if aliens have a physiology similar to ours and call themselves Vulcan, we'll likely do so as well. Though they be as culturally sensitive as a Starfleet cadet in TNG, humans will always find something else to call a people whose name can only be transcribed as Hxach'caaskhh'aik'ak'a. We might just call them Gelfs. If they're tall and hairy, the
Re: (Score:2)
Germany calls itself Deutschland...
Even more weird, Germans don't make use of the J sound--their G is always a hard g like in go, their J is pronounced like a Y--so we've invented a name for them they would never pick for themselves. They'll fudge it with a CH sound as in "chermany."
Likewise with Spain/Spanish, where it's unnatural for them to start a word with the letter S, it always starts with an "es" sound as in "Espania."
Then there's the really badly translated stuff, like say everything from China or India. (Nobody could tell the diffe
Re: (Score:2)
We've no real word in English to describe some alien from Betelgeuse Seven, though we might opt to say Betelgeusian.
We'd say that until we figured out how to talk to them, and once we did, we'd ask them what they want to be called and then use that.
Re: (Score:2)
We'd say that until we figured out how to talk to them, and once we did, we'd ask them what they want to be called and then use that.
What, like we call Deutsch people "German", and Nederlanders "Dutch"? Like we call people from Ni-hong "Japanese" and people from Zhongguo "Chinese"?
If we look further back we'll see that names are more likely to transfer from outside the group to in, rather than the other way round. The Gaelic for Scotland ("Alba") came via Ireland's old word for the island of Great Britain ("Alban") from the Latin for England (or at least part of it), whence also "Albion". "Scotland" itself comes from Latin, and has known
Re: (Score:2)
Most of those are ancient, and not representative of modern behaviour. And nobody involved wants to change them, so it's a moot point anyway.
And "native Americans" is not a name for any one specific group, so of course it is generic and artificial. Much more relevantly, we say "Inuit" rather than "eskimo".
Re: (Score:2)
Much more relevantly, we say "Inuit" rather than "eskimo".
The Inuit are only one tribe of the group referred to as Eskimos. Calling all Eskimos "Inuit" is like calling all Native Americans "Cherokee", or calling all white people "French, all black people Tutsies or all Arabs "Yemeni". Or indeed the "ancient, and not representative of modern behaviour" example of naming all Germans "Teutones"... or even "Germans" (also a name for one or the tribes).
Human nature never changes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's more a product of an inappropriate choice of orthography. I'd be willing to bet his non-English readership was somewhat better at getting the names right, as would those with a Classics education (and given the age of his writings, much of his initial fanbase would've had such.) When a real constructed language is used, the problem of conveying the correct pronunciation becomes hilariously complex, since the orthography has to be internally consistent more than it has to be transparent to the reader.
Re: (Score:2)
At least he didn't go full-retard and inject a few random bits of punctuation... Modhri could have been Mod'hr@i.
But yeah, he fails rule #1 of how people use language. Foreign words collide with a language and they get modified to suit the convention of the language.
Modhri? ... probably everyone calls them Mods or Moths. Kalixiri -> clackers. Zhirrzh -> Zeroes. Quanska? Quacks or Quanks. Pom? yeh... that gets to stay Pom.
What about the Blackcollars? (Score:2)
Granted, the alien species there weren't terribly memorable in any way... the series was built more around the lower-tech methods of the human resistance, which I did find to be an interesting concept.
Re: (Score:1)
Agreed. One of my favorite books --- I'd love to see it developed as an FPS.
Similarly, I'd like to see C.J, Cherryh's Alliance-Union novels as the background for a an exploration/trading game, and her Morgaine novels as the setting for an on-line RPG.
Heavily influenced by Master of Orion (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you think that isn't what this is? I'm a big fan of the genre, and several recent efforts have been mechanically decent. Endless Space, Galactic Civilizations II, and Distant Worlds are all solidly designed (relatively) modern games. So why is MoO2 still the gold standard? Because it has character. The game is constantly giving you little touches like news reports or animated ambassadors and researchers that draw you in and make it feel like a fleshed out galaxy. You don't get that from these oth
So why is MoO2 still the gold standard? (Score:4, Interesting)
- Modular ships and technology that can make a difference. Both in tactical combat and civilization/empire building.
- Species traits that really matter during the entire course of the game. Same goes for leaders.
- A simple interface that didn't require you to go back to the main screen for every single action, select a submenu, then another one, then choose an option...
- Build queues that worked and didn't require scrolling.
Also, everything that you could build was always on a single screen, available by a single click but it was separated so you didn't have to scroll through your buildings looking for ships and vice versa.
And you could sort your colonies by how fast they will build stuff - i.e. by production.
- Pretty graphics. Planetscapes were simple yet beautiful. Elerians were hot AND a very powerful race.
- But most importantly, HUMANOID SPECIES. Even Silicoids looked somewhat bipedal.
Which is very important if you're supposed to empathize with the species you're playing.
Among other things MOO3 managed to fuck up was the look of the game - most species now looked like bad modern art.
Practically all of them could be considered "repulsive".
Really alien looking species are a nice touch from time to time on an episodic show like Star Trek but there is no appeal for a weekly show whose main characters resemble puddles of mud.
We want to see humanoid aliens with humanoid expressions on their humanoid faces.
Which is why I'm having a bad feeling about this whole "as fully-realized as possible" thing.
Smells a lot like MOO3.11 for workgroups.
Re: (Score:1)
I agree with everything denzacar said except: "We want to see humanoid aliens"... I want to show aliens that are cool, and at least interesting even if they're n
Re: (Score:2)
And fully-realized means that it's immersive enough that the AI reflects the differences when dealing with each race, rather than the same exact dialogue regardless of which alien picture is on the screen.
Ah, so it's more like designed and developed in detail.
I agree with everything denzacar said except: "We want to see humanoid aliens"... I want to show aliens that are cool, and at least interesting even if they're not completely believable
All I'm saying is, look at statistics. We tend not to popularize those few non-anthropomorphic aliens shown on ANY screen or drawing.
For every Horta there are literally thousands of centrally symmetric bipedal aliens with very distinct facial features.
And how do we instantly recognize the bad guys? No faces. [tvtropes.org]
Re: (Score:2)
- But most importantly, HUMANOID SPECIES. Even Silicoids looked somewhat bipedal.
Which is very important if you're supposed to empathize with the species you're playing.
Among other things MOO3 managed to fuck up was the look of the game - most species now looked like bad modern art.
Practically all of them could be considered "repulsive".
I disagree. I bought MOO3 at launch, after following the development unfold for over a year before that. Existence of species that are not bi-pedal or humanoid was absolutel
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not afraid to say "no": I've already said that multiplayer isn't going to happen unless someone can think of a way to avoid having
Re: (Score:2)
Who is this "we" you refer too? I would have zero problem dealing with - or empathizing with - a centipede life form. Like, say, in A Mission of Gravity, where all but one of the main characters were alien centipedes. Very engrossing.
Re: (Score:2)
It's because you're reading about them.
You anthropomorphize transparently and automatically, in your head. Empathizing while looking at images of centipedes the whole day on the other hand...
Well, let's just say that we have this thing for faces [wikipedia.org].
Also, that when we think of cuddly and friendly [amazon.com] - we tend to disregard insects.
Re: (Score:2)
MOO3 is the only game (and the last) I have ever pre-ordered. To say I was excited, and then dissapointed would be an understatement.
I think I can sum up the distinction between MOO2 and MOO3 pretty easily, MOO2 was fun, and MOO3 was not. More specifically MOO2 was a game, whereas MOO3 tried to be a simulation. There is also a subtle difference between micro management and auto management. MOO3 tried to be both, micro if you want it, and auto if you didn't. Thing was micro wasn't really A) possible, or B) w
Re: (Score:2)
I friggin' love that phrase.
When I play 4x games. (Score:1)
I could really care less about the interactions with other races. I mean, how may different noises can they possibly make when I've got my boot on their throat (or throats, aliens ya know) and they're trying to get me to stop genociding their species.
I kinda liked fleet combat in MoO, but I'd rather see a full modernized redo of that vs. something that's going to focus more on diplomacy, which is what I'd have to say this is going to be since they want to spend so much time on how the aliens communicate.
Just show me the finished game. (Score:2)
In concept this sounds great. In practice, it's probably just going to be a series of sliders that influences how likely a
Re:Just show me ANY EXISTING PRIOR finished game. (Score:3)
Honestly, I hope he can pull it off, because to me it sounds just like every ideas-man wanna be game designer who's never made a game before. Not trying to be harsh, but seriously, it does sound like the crap newbs spout about their first game when they haven't even completed a tetris or mario clone, let alone a branching world where everything has consequences. It's easier said than done, just ask Peter Molyneux. He's not really a liar, he wanted to do all the stuff he spouted off about, but it wasn't
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I've actually been developing software for 15 years, and have made a game before (XNA on Windows Phone, and Xamarin to port it to Android, ported from an original 3D WPF version that looked great but ran like crap on a phone/ tablet and had too small a playable area there) - there are screen shots on the Kickstarter page. And you can't tell from the screen shots, but the pixels do move.
That is, of course, the least of what I've done - I specialize in highly-complex modular systems t
Re: (Score:2)
So it doesn't seem so harsh, I believe OP was referring to Zahn, since he presents the video. :)
>"I'm an ideas man with a lot of reputation, and you're giving me money due to the reputation..."
So don't take it personally.
Re: (Score:1)
And Tim's not the idea man, he's the guy who's got 130+ published works of fiction in the past 30 years or so, so he's going to be focused on helping to make the content engaging and interesting. Which - despite opinions to the contrary - I think he's proven himself capable of.
Risk/reward...? (Score:2)
My problem with this project is the problem I have with almost all software projects that I've seen on Kickstarter: The biggest cost is programmer time.
So what? you might ask, it is a programming project after all.
Well, I see programmer after programmer eliminating all personal risk by writing themselves a nice middle-class paycheck at the backers' expense, but at the end of the project, the developer's the one that's going to be getting royalties on future sales. This seems like a bit of a cheat to me; ha
Re: (Score:1)
The short answer is: Whether this Kickstarter succeeds or fails, I am making this game. The only things that the Kickstarter will change are the timeline, the amount of content that will be included, and the amount of time spent on the content. It will also make it clear, to Tim, that this is something that his fans support him spending a considerable amount of his time on. If the Kickstarter fails, it will be mostly the same under the hood, but will not have
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I see programmer after programmer eliminating all personal risk by writing themselves a nice middle-class paycheck at the backers' expense, but at the end of the project, the developer's the one that's going to be getting royalties on future sales. This seems like a bit of a cheat to me; having your cake and eating it.
I agree 100%, which is why I'd never fund a kickstarter. I don't understand why they are so popular, or don't at least offer profit sharing. I would actually be ashamed to even make such a pitch.
Re: (Score:2)
I think Kickstarter's model is great... but not for this sort of endeavour.
The model isn't new -- it used to be called the subscription model, and we've forgotten what "subscription" means: sub=under, scribe=write... subscribers would "underwrite" the physical costs of printing a publication that was of value to them, because the authors maybe didn't have the money to pay for the first print run. If you could offset the upfront costs against subscriptions, you could get the book/magazine to market and make
Re: (Score:2)
If you could offset the upfront costs against subscriptions, you could get the book/magazine to market and make a profit over time from sales.
I'm against even this, as I wouldn't put up money to a for-profit business just to get a promised product. If you want to get rich with my help, give me a slice of the action.
Plenty of Kickstarter projects work this way -- the purest example would be bands seeking money for studio time and disc pressing -- [..] I'm happy to pay for material costs, even including travel costs for the right project. I'm not so keen on paying for time.
I don't have a problem paying a reasonable amount for time if it's going to fund something that doesn't involve the worker making a bunch of copies and becoming potentially rich. An even older example, before there was copyright, was funding for unique pieces (such as a statue). A good example of something I'd be willing to fund in mod
Re: (Score:2)
If you could offset the upfront costs against subscriptions, you could get the book/magazine to market and make a profit over time from sales.
I'm against even this, as I wouldn't put up money to a for-profit business just to get a promised product. If you want to get rich with my help, give me a slice of the action.
Small bands use subscriptions (crowdfunding) precisely because they're highly unlikely to get rich, so none of the labels is going to offer them an advance or a loan. My point is that if the backers pay only material costs, the content producer is still in a position of risk, just reduced risk, because if a singer don't sell a single copy of the CD after the backers get theirs, he'll be no better off monetarily than he was 6 months previously, with nothing to show for his time other than a CD no-one wants.
Re: (Score:2)
Small bands use subscriptions (crowdfunding) precisely because they're highly unlikely to get rich, so none of the labels is going to offer them an advance or a loan.
But the potential is always there. Big things usually start out small. Besides, it doesn't cost a lot of money to make a few copies, sell what you make for a profit, and then make more. Besides all that, the need for physical copies in the digital age makes this a moot example.
Re: (Score:1)
No, it's not a revolutionary new approach, because there aren't a whole lot of other realistic options... But I think you might have cheated and looked at the answer on the Kickstarter before you guessed that:
Under the hood, however, it all comes down to fuzzy logic and decision trees really simple, old-school decision trees, similar to a choose-your-own-adventure book.
Each computer player will have a set of numbers that indicate, on a sliding scale, how they feel about every other player, and these numbers will change over the course of the game: how much they (and their subjects) like the other; how much they trust the other player; and even whether they respect the other player, or look down on them with contempt. There will also be relative statistical numbers, for stuff like tech level, civilization size, etc.
For every type of interaction, and for every race, there will be dozens of possible things that can be said at each step in the conversation – that list will be filtered down to a few items based on how the speaker “feels” about the other player at that point in time (and also based on previous selections during the conversation). And the choices that are made during the conversation will, in turn, affect how each side feels about the other (by modifying those underlying numbers).
For the AI players, they will be given the same choices as the live player, and each available choice will be assigned a percentage chance, based on the player’s feelings and the relative standing of each civilization, and a simple (virtual) dice roll will determine their choice.
:D
Oh great (Score:2)
and the choices you make in the game will have side effects and the computer players will remember them â" and treat you differently because of them.
Oh great, yet another rep grinding system.
Ringworld (Score:2)
I would rather see a very good video game based on Larry Niven's Ringworld.
Meh! (Score:3)
I've always regarded Zahn as a bit of a hack.
He writes what I call sausage machine books; he turns the handle and out they come, one after the other. His books are inoffensive but unmemorable, the kind of thing you pick up in a bus or airline terminal when there's nothing better to do while you're waiting for your ride to show up.
Oh well, I suppose it pays his bills, but I'm not expecting to see Zahn's name on any of the Hugo or Nebula Awards' lists anytime soon.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, he only has one Hugo already.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Insofar as serious Science Fiction goes I would agree with you (and I don't consider Star Wars serious Science Fiction).
However, Zahn from my perspective has written the only decent books in the Star Wars universe, which counts for something in my books (Admiral Thrawn, etc...).
Also the Conquerors trilogy was enjoyable.
Sci-Fi Author Timothy Zahn Is Creating a Video Gam (Score:1)
genre fiction & "influential" (Score:2)
If he's "one of the most influential Star Wars Expanded Universe authors", how many others are there? On whom did he have influence?
Personally, I'm known as one of the most influential three-toed green bunny with superpowers short-novel authors (creator of Pukey the Mighty Bunny and Horrible Emperor Zfnjor) . Not THE most influential of course, but one of the top 500 for sure. Howe
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It would have to happen at gunpoint. Thanks anyway.
SF writers, if you want money create a religion (Score:1)
Starbase Orion (Score:2)
I have been addicted to Starbase Orion lately, which is currently the best Master of Orion inspired game on iOS. As soon as I have time to read the whole kickstarter page, I'll think about contributing, but I'd like to know how they plan on implimenting their multi-platform pass with iOS. I don't think that will work.
Re: (Score:1)
In the past, Apple has allowed something very similar to this type of cross-platform unlock code approach, as long as the DLC was available in the iTunes store as well. They have a reputation for being fickle, though, so it's going
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I got that app as well. As a game I thought it was OK, as an iOS game not so much.
Either A) the game was designed poorly, or B) iOS and hardware not sufficient to handle it.
Takes forever. AI takes too long. Everything is slow.
It is essentially a game from 1995. It should play ultra fast on anything.
$250 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
that wouldn't be too bad if they had more to show for the game. like, about the actual game mechanics, ui concepts... something! coming up with the new races IS THE EASIEST FUCKING PART OF CREATING A SPACE CONQUERING GAME!
would it matter if the backstory in master of orion said that the silicoids in master of orion can ingest radiation? no, because in the game mechanics context that has no meaning at all(seriously, one of the new races is taken straight out of moo).
Trademark infringement (Score:2)
There is already a classic vintage game called Parallax.
It has lasting fame for having given name to the video game technique Parallax scrolling [wikipedia.org].
The game's soundtrack by Martin Galway is also a classic, with many covers/remixes made by video game music enthusiasts.
Re: (Score:1)
But, I could be wrong... I don't think I am, but I could be.
Re: (Score:2)
Misagon referenced a game with that name, and then linked to a Wikipedia article on the technique. Which are two separate things. I've never heard of the game, but if I said that there was an OS named Windows and linked to the Wikipedia page on glass panes, would you reply that windows have been around since, y'know ancient times and stuff and that it was perfectly okay to name your OS that?
Rather than dismissing what he said so flippantly, it might behoove you to see if there was such a game and what legal
Re: (Score:1)
I'm less concerned with the trademark issue (because the trademark isn't actively registered in association with computer games), than I am with the fact that there have actually been a FEW other games that share the same name. And a book. And a full game company. The majority of which, I only be
I am very happy about this... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Completely untrue. I don't know if you're trolling or if you just haven't read his stuff, but Zahn's Thrawn trilogy (and to a lesser extent, the Hand of Thrawn duo) are actually way *better* than the original movie trilogy. And it's not like the original trilogy wasn't great, it just didn't have Thrawn in it. (Don't bother with his SW books after those 5, though; they were pretty crap. Even great authors have off seasons.)
Zahn came up with *plenty* of new ideas. He may have started in someone else's univers