Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Intel

+ - Intel's liquid CPU cooler: Is water worth the cost->

Submitted by
MrSeb
MrSeb writes "When Intel launched its high-end 3960X CPU last month, it also debuted a new liquid cooling solution. Typical boxed Intel CPUs ship with a heatsink+fan, but the company noted that the majority of its enthusiast customers bought third-party solutions. The new liquid cooler — it goes by the inspiring moniker of RTS2011LC — is meant to offer enthusiasts and OEMs an Intel-brand solution they’ll actually use. But is water cooling really necessary? Like its quad-core "Extreme Edition" predecessors, the 3960X still dissipates 130W — and more tellingly, Intel even states that it'll be releasing a sub-$20 air cooler for Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E chips anyway. So is it worth plunking down $85 for the new RTS2011LC? Does it provide the kind of performance that Intel's stereotypical "enthusiast" customers need? ExtremeTech goes hands-on to find out."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Intel's liquid CPU cooler: Is water worth the cost

Comments Filter:

After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.

Working...