An Anonymous Coward asks: "Here at work for internet connectivity, we share a Cisco 2600 router with the administrative folks in the other half of the building. Our development network is isolated from theirs, safely behind a Debain firewall--we just show up as one IP with _very_ few ports open. The Cisco connects directly into a Linksys DSL router, which is *supposed* to be providing NAT for both of our networks. Instead, it's acting needlessly as an extra hub, with the incoming feed plugged into its port 2 and the outgoing feed in port 3. The feed from port 3 plugs into a 24-port hub, which connects all of the admin workstations and our Debian box. Each workstation, in turn, has a static IP (we have one too). This is due to a variety of reasons--so we've been told--but what it boils down to is the incompetence of the 'Microsoft Certified (w/Internet) Network Engineer,' who's responsible for the routers, the administrative network, and their Windows 2000 corporate webserver." Now, the workplace is left with no firewall and a Network Engineer that is downplaying the problem to the higher-ups. What would be the best way to communicate that there really is a problem?
