It seems all these old games are getting re-released for NEW GRAPHICS DUDE! It is really sad that they have to sell these games again because they are out of ideas. They don't go in and tell people how remarkable these old games were because they overcame certain technological limitations of the time, like the demo scene, but they have to bank off the name and ruin the fascination behind the gameplay.
Sure, there are a lot of re-makes.
But these are re-makes that people have actually been asking for. Maybe -you- haven't been... but a large portion of nintendo fans have.They're going to make boat loads of cash with this.
There are plenty of new ideas. But many (most?) consumers are looking back to what they believe were the good old days instead of our bleak future. Just looking at Netflix right now, people are watching old TV series and movies. Youtube is showing a lot more old music and reactions to old music. People are listening to classic rock right now while they try and hide from reality.
When I go in to Best Buy or any other store that sells video games, I see mostly FPS games. I don't see why we need a 12th clone or remake of Doom, but clearly there is a market for it. I am not part of that market, tough I could be part of the market for new Mario games.
There are many younger gamers who have never had the chance to play this classics. They still hold up even to this day. And how many of us still have a TVs with composite video inputs.
There are entire communities devoted to documenting and even restoring removed and dummied-out content in games, these re-releases seldom say "Know what? Let's add in this thing we were gonna add but couldn't".
the Super Mario Brothers games for the NES are great, fun games with exceptional overall design, and Mario 64 is also a very high quality game, not exactly my taste, but absolutely worth "remastering". Eventually, it's about MAKING MONEY, they're a company, you know, but there's nothing bad about "reviving" great "old games" if it's done right.
There are some excellent new games nowadays too. By far, most games back in the NES days were also quite crappy. Very good, fun, high quality games have never been
"the Super Mario Brothers games for the NES are great, fun games with exceptional overall design, and Mario 64 is also a very high quality game, not exactly my taste, but absolutely worth "remastering""
I've recently started playing Mario 64 again, and while it looks and feels like Mario, the mid 1990s 3D graphics seem a bit dull compared to it's 2D SNES counterparts, sometimes to the point of being distracting. I would like to see a re-release of Mario 64 which makes it look and feel more like a SNE
Mario Odyssey = What if Kirby couldn't float? It was only a Mario game in the challenge sections, but they mostly wanted to make a Kirby game. Maybe because Sakurai is president?
Just curious, what else was wrong and why? It does seem a lot like a Kirby game actually. Constant respawning enemies, a focus on using their powers, few enemy types... at any rate one of the least Mario-focused games in the canon. There is a lot of gameplay where you're not using Mario's abilities, and less of a focus on objectives, more collectathon.
3D Mario games invented the collectathon, every single one of the games listed here are all about finding stars, shines, etc. The Kirby reference ignores Mario's suits, which is essentially what the hat does...except that it itself is part of a gameplay concept. Walls turning 2D, large open worlds, these little touches make Odyssey unique.
Right, Nintendo is sure struggling to release new games with new ideas...like that last Mario game, just a rehash right? Or that last Zelda that will take years for the industry to catch up to?
Of all the companies to talk this crap about, this is the least deserving of it. Even when Nintendo releases a new entry in a franchise, they ALWAYS introduce new gameplay mechanics and take things in a new direction. Why do you think it's such a big deal that these games, released across 4 different platforms, a
No, not at all. They are on a winning formula as was shown with the re-releases of classic platformers. Why not continue making money when you've shown that you can do it?
Also the release of new graphics on an old game is hardly new, and it's only a sign that you're ignoring new ideas if you don't release new ideas based on your existing IP. There was a Tokyo Olympic themed sports game, and an animated film set for release shortly as well, so they clearly have idea. Not good ideas, but ideas nonetheless.
They really are out of ideas. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
There are plenty of new ideas. But many (most?) consumers are looking back to what they believe were the good old days instead of our bleak future. Just looking at Netflix right now, people are watching old TV series and movies. Youtube is showing a lot more old music and reactions to old music. People are listening to classic rock right now while they try and hide from reality.
Re: (Score:2)
You realize they're also constantly releasing new games, right? Oh no, wait, you have no idea what you're talking about. I see.
Re: (Score:2)
When I go in to Best Buy or any other store that sells video games, I see mostly FPS games. I don't see why we need a 12th clone or remake of Doom, but clearly there is a market for it. I am not part of that market, tough I could be part of the market for new Mario games.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There are entire communities devoted to documenting and even restoring removed and dummied-out content in games, these re-releases seldom say "Know what? Let's add in this thing we were gonna add but couldn't".
Maybe there aren't that many great new ideas, but (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
"the Super Mario Brothers games for the NES are great, fun games with exceptional overall design, and Mario 64 is also a very high quality game, not exactly my taste, but absolutely worth "remastering""
I've recently started playing Mario 64 again, and while it looks and feels like Mario, the mid 1990s 3D graphics seem a bit dull compared to it's 2D SNES counterparts, sometimes to the point of being distracting. I would like to see a re-release of Mario 64 which makes it look and feel more like a SNE
Even Odyssey was an old idea (Score:0)
Mario Odyssey = What if Kirby couldn't float? It was only a Mario game in the challenge sections, but they mostly wanted to make a Kirby game. Maybe because Sakurai is president?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:0)
Just curious, what else was wrong and why? It does seem a lot like a Kirby game actually. Constant respawning enemies, a focus on using their powers, few enemy types... at any rate one of the least Mario-focused games in the canon. There is a lot of gameplay where you're not using Mario's abilities, and less of a focus on objectives, more collectathon.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:0)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
No, not at all. They are on a winning formula as was shown with the re-releases of classic platformers. Why not continue making money when you've shown that you can do it?
Also the release of new graphics on an old game is hardly new, and it's only a sign that you're ignoring new ideas if you don't release new ideas based on your existing IP. There was a Tokyo Olympic themed sports game, and an animated film set for release shortly as well, so they clearly have idea. Not good ideas, but ideas nonetheless.
I'm