All the race titles will still exist. However they will all have the same statistics. All will be any alignment. None will have any racial tendencies towareds any alignment. Lawful good drow palidans are just as likely as human warriors. All will be able to use any weapon. All will be able to wear any armor. All will deal the same damage. No weapon will gain bonuses against any 'race' or from being used by any race.
Oh... just wait until people find out about the different modifiers for different classes of characters and Strength maximums found in ADD for some genders of 18(50) but the higher strength cap for other genders.
Because clearly a small gnome is just as strong as a hulking orc. Hey is this going to apply to monster profiles as well? Will a tiny kobold strength be the same as adult dragon? Biology, whatever...
So a halfling or gnome will have the same strength as a half-orc three times it's size?
All will be any alignment.
OK.
None will have any racial tendencies towareds any alignment.
So, a race who worships a god that is chaotic evil spider goddess who also created and controls their culture which includes sacrificing good characters to said god won't have a tendency chaotic evil? That is stupid.
Lawful good drow palidans are just as likely as human warriors.
See the above concerning the Drow.
All will be able to use any weapon.
Most weapon restrictions are related to class but I can't wait for a halfling wield a battleaxe three times it's size.
Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied.[1][2][3] The original statement, by Nathan Poe, read:[1]
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
"Nuclear war would really set back cable."
- Ted Turner
About Time! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: About Time! (Score:1)
Re: About Time! (Score:3, Funny)
All the race titles will still exist.
However they will all have the same statistics.
All will be any alignment.
None will have any racial tendencies towareds any alignment.
Lawful good drow palidans are just as likely as human warriors.
All will be able to use any weapon.
All will be able to wear any armor.
All will deal the same damage.
No weapon will gain bonuses against any 'race' or from being used by any race.
Cheers.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
All the race titles will still exist.
However they will all have the same statistics.
Actually, the "intelligence" attribute will cease to exist, as all intelligence tests are racist and used to further marginalise people of colour.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh... just wait until people find out about the different modifiers for different classes of characters and Strength maximums found in ADD for some genders of 18(50) but the higher strength cap for other genders.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: About Time! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
All the race titles will still exist.
Ok.
However they will all have the same statistics.
So a halfling or gnome will have the same strength as a half-orc three times it's size?
All will be any alignment.
OK.
None will have any racial tendencies towareds any alignment.
So, a race who worships a god that is chaotic evil spider goddess who also created and controls their culture which includes sacrificing good characters to said god won't have a tendency chaotic evil? That is stupid.
Lawful good drow palidans are just as likely as human warriors.
See the above concerning the Drow.
All will be able to use any weapon.
Most weapon restrictions are related to class but I can't wait for a halfling wield a battleaxe three times it's size.
All will be able to wear any armor.
Armor usages is related to class, not race.
All will deal the same damage.
A dagger
Re: (Score:2)
Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied.[1][2][3] The original statement, by Nathan Poe, read:[1]
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.