Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Classic Games (Games) Entertainment Games

Play GNU Chess On Your Scanner 157

leighklotz writes "Debian developer and Internet Mail Archive founder Jeff Breidenbach of PARC has made GlyphChess, a chess-playing copier using Python, GNU Chess and DataGlyphs attached to the bottom of the pieces. DataGlyphs are cool 2D barcodes made out of / and \ marks for ones and zeros that use the coding from CDs for error coding. If you don't happen to have a Xerox machine at home, it also works with SANE..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Play GNU Chess On Your Scanner

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @05:04PM (#6061028)
    There's no crying in baseball, and there's no undoing a move in chess.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @05:06PM (#6061042) Journal
    The Ubiquitous Reed-Solomon Codes
    by Barry A. Cipra

    Reprinted from SIAM News, Volume 26-1, January 1993

    In this so-called Age of Information, no one need be reminded of the importance not only of speed but also of accuracy in the storage, retrieval, and transmission of data. It's more than a question of "Garbage In, Garbage Out." Machines do make errors, and their non-man-made mistakes can turn otherwise flawless programming into worthless, even dangerous, trash. Just as architects design buildings that will remain standing even through an earthquake, their computer counterparts have come up with sophisticated techniques capable of counteracting the digital manifestations of Murphy's Law.
    What many might be unaware of, though, is the significance, in all this modern technology, of a five-page paper that appeared in 1960 in the Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The paper, "Polynomial Codes over Certain Finite Fields," by Irving S. Reed and Gustave Solomon, then staff members at MIT's Lincoln Laboratory, introduced ideas that form the core of current error-correcting techniques for everything from computer hard disk drives to CD players. Reed-Solomon codes (plus a lot of engineering wizardry, of course) made possible the stunning pictures of the outer planets sent back by Voyager II. They make it possible to scratch a compact disc and still enjoy the music. And in the not-too-distant future, they will enable the profitmongers of cable television to squeeze more than 500 channels into their systems, making a vast wasteland vaster yet.

    "When you talk about CD players and digital audio tape and now digital television, and various other digital imaging systems that are coming--all of those need Reed-Solomon [codes] as an integral part of the system," says Robert McEliece, a coding theorist in the electrical engineering department at Caltech.

    Why? Because digital information, virtually by definition, consists of strings of "bits"--0s and 1s--and a physical device, no matter how capably manufactured, may occasionally confuse the two. Voyager II, for example, was transmitting data at incredibly low power--barely a whisper--over tens of millions of miles. Disk drives pack data so densely that a read/write head can (almost) be excused if it can't tell where one bit stops and the next one (or zero) begins. Careful engineering can reduce the error rate to what may sound like a negligible level--the industry standard for hard disk drives is 1 in 10 billion--but given the volume of information processing done these days, that "negligible" level is an invitation to daily disaster. Error-correcting codes are a kind of safety net--mathematical insurance against the vagaries of an imperfect material world.

    The key to error correction is redundancy. Indeed, the simplest error-correcting code is simply to repeat everything several times. If, for example, you anticipate no more than one error to occur in transmission, then repeating each bit three times and using "majority vote" at the receiving end will guarantee that the message is heard correctly (e.g., 111 000 011 111 will be correctly heard as 1011). In general, n errors can be compensated for by repeating things 2n + 1 times.

    But that kind of brute-force error correction would defeat the purpose of high-speed, high-density information processing. One would prefer an approach that adds only a few extra bits to a given message. Of course, as Mick Jagger reminds us, you can't always get what you want--but if you try, sometimes, you just might find you get what you need. The success of Reed-Solomon codes bears that out.

    In 1960, the theory of error-correcting codes was only about a decade old. The basic theory of reliable digital communication had been set forth by Claude Shannon in the late 1940s. At the same time, Richard Hamming introduced an elegant approach to single-error correction and double-error detection. Through the 1950s, a number of researchers began experimenting with a variety of error
  • by Larthallor ( 623891 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @05:18PM (#6061166)
    DataGlyph techology is patented by the Xerox corporation. The DataGlyph toolkit is a binary only library that you must license to include with your "product". Despite the use of Python and GNU Chess in this example, I doubt very much that DataGlyphs are going to be of much use to the open source community.
  • Re:Award winning... (Score:5, Informative)

    by autocracy ( 192714 ) <[slashdot2007] [at] [storyinmemo.com]> on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @05:25PM (#6061236) Homepage
    Helicopters with eject seats do exist and work... Just cut the blades loose from the rotor right before loosing the seat.
  • Re:Picture (Score:2, Informative)

    by easychord ( 671421 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @05:29PM (#6061263)
    Here you go. [cmu.edu]
  • Re:Resources (Score:3, Informative)

    by metamanda ( 662939 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @06:54PM (#6061961) Homepage
    Is this an appropriate use of resources?

    Well, first of all, he started the project over christmas since he was laid up with a broken leg, and not actually expected to do any useful work.

    Second of all, his manager seemed to think so.

    Thirdly, most research looks "useless" at first glance. PARC is a research place. If people like you were running it, I guess ethernet and GUIs would never have been invented.

    Now if only we could figure out how to profit on any of those cool useless inventions.

  • by hqm ( 49964 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @07:41PM (#6062431)
    For people who want to play with error correcting codes, you can get the source code for a Reed-Solomon decoder/encoder I wrote here:


  • Re:Finally! (Score:2, Informative)

    by metamanda ( 662939 ) on Thursday May 29, 2003 @04:53PM (#6070728) Homepage
    Uh, for what it's worth, PARC developed this. [xerox.com]

    For those who are too lazy to click on the link, here is the relevant info:

    Integrate critical business information into electronic workflows with FlowPort. Enable the integration of paper documents with groupware, e-mail/messaging and document management systems. Leverage network digital devices, such as digital copiers and Internet fax machines.

    FlowPort(TM) features a unique user interface that gives users the capability to access and control documents without using a PC. FlowPort(TM) is Xerox's answer to being limitless, not paperless.

    Oh, and blue lasers [xerox.com] were also developed at PARC. Excerpt from the page: The shorter wavelengths of blue lasers are ideal for achieving high resolution in printing systems and high density in optical storage.

    It's a cute myth that PARC never did anything relevent to Xerox's core business. But it's a myth.

"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt." -- a saying at RPI