Game Tunnel Client Links Xbox, PS2, and GC Games 31
SuperStar writes "XLink Kai, the only global gaming network that allows you to tunnel all link-compatible games for Xbox, PS2 and Gamecube, launched their new client. As almost all 'Online-enabled' games also allow 'link/network play', this makes Kai a free and legal alternative for Microsoft's Xbox LIVE and Sony's online PS2 service.
Using psSDK (instead of WinPCAP) and a new MAC caching subsystem allows them to become the fastest frame tunnel available. They not only offer a win32 binary, but also one for Mac OS X and Linux. A hands on of this release is available."
DMCA? (Score:3, Insightful)
In English please (Score:5, Insightful)
I have no idea what psSDKs, WinPCAPs, caching subsystems or frame tunnels are. If I don't know that stuff despite being a regular computer/internet user and gamer, it's pretty much a guarantee that others don't know what you're talking about either.
Please make some sort of attempt to put this in language most of us can understand.
Re:In English please (Score:2, Insightful)
a) know what WinPCAP and psSDK is or
b) are interested and switched on enough to go and find out for themselves
After all, this is "news for nerds" not "news for the casual internet user". If you want this stuff explained to you then Slashdot probably isn't the sort of news site you should be reading
Re:Any good? (Score:3, Insightful)
A new tunnel system won't solve these problems, but a larger pipe and improvements to the speed of light probably will
Re:In English please (Score:3, Insightful)
Note also that this is Slashdot Games, not the frontpage or Developers section -- being a gamer shouldn't require the knowledge of obscure terms rarely used outside of the so-called nerd community.
And as for your suggestion that readers who are confused about these terms should go find out for themselves -- you're assuming that those readers are willing to put in that extra effort after being thoroughly confused and lost by a post that's complete Greek to them.
If not for the headline, I wouldn't have known the post had anything to do with console games and third-party online services.
And so I think while it's possible to write with a level of sophistication that will keep the traditional
Re:In English please (Score:3, Insightful)
Heh. I am an "IT professional" and I had no idea what the blurb really said. But I did manage to comprehend that it uses method X instead of the more popular method Y, therefore it's network performance is surprisingly good (read: it's pretty darn fast).
I think your comment just exemplifies the thing that we often forget in this side of the table: the people (management and end users), at least hopefully, don't care how you get the results, just that you get good results. Maybe the article would have been more legible if it had said stuff like "It's fast as hell" and they had put the technological discussion to next paragraph, for those who care about such things.
Re:In English please (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:In English please (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:In English please (Score:1, Insightful)