A Negative Review of Halo 2 110
KaiEl writes "An avalanche of glowing reviews has already made Halo 2 the second-highest ranked game of all time on GameRankings.com. Looking for an alternative viewpoint? The Video Game Ombudsman has gathered the bad points from nine separate Halo 2 reviews into the only negative review of Halo 2 you're ever likely to read. Useful as a cautionary tale about out-of-context quoting and as a reference manual for rampant Microsoft haters who might want to make the Halo 2 argument a little less one-sided."
Rampant Microsoft Haters (Score:4, Funny)
Next thing, you'll try telling me that the Earth is round.
Re:Rampant Microsoft Haters (Score:2)
XBox Nation has a middling review of Halo 2, although they've given it the obvious 10 out of 10.
I'm not that surprised - Secretly, I'm waiting for GTA:SA on the XBOX myself, not the new chief on the box and I've blogged thus [blogspot.com].
While we're on the subject... (Score:2, Interesting)
Here's a not-so-great review [somethingawful.com] of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Not that I have ever played a Hentei game or anything.
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:2, Informative)
From the something awful site:
"This is a good thing because each and every single "TruthMedia" review in this section is complete and total bullshit created solely to generate flame mail from Internet citizens who, for some pathetic reason, have attached their egos to a movie, band, or game company. The sheer intensity that some people exhibit while defending whatever silly movie or band just boggles our minds, so this section of the site was created to
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:2, Interesting)
And no online support?!?! Come one. It doesn't take a rocket scientest (just a computer one) to do this. In GTA, you can just walk around the city, and rape, pilage, and murder to your little hearts content. However, no one ever attacks YOU out of the blue. Imagine a massivly networked came of GTA. You'd never know who i
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Don't have everyone join the same city - have a lobby where players team up and go on missions together. Sure, you don't have the single player missions enabled but multiplayer missions are possible. Of course, it would really add quite a bit of work
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:3, Informative)
Thank god they didn't.
If you want Online gaming go get an Xbox. Some of us don't want to deal with all the immature little brats that populate most online titles. Even worse, the online segments of practically every online game fall into one of two categories; Either the game has depth and length but only hardcore players with no lives or jobs get to see all of it, or the game is broken up into little
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:2)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
I will see down the road if PC Halo 2 is a victim of the same.
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
Carry on.
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:2)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:2)
Re:While we're on the subject... (Score:1)
almost got me! (Score:1)
{sigh} (Score:1)
Re:{sigh} (Score:1)
Only it's less fiction.
Re:{sigh} (Score:1)
Re:{sigh} (Score:3, Insightful)
Rob
Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:1)
Re:Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:1)
How, I got to use 'donkey-balls' in a sentence. That should be worth something.
Re:Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:4, Insightful)
Here is the simple solution. Don't listen to the hype. Don't read the site to see what new features are going to be added...don't watch the E3 videos, don't read the reviews. When you play a game based on no assumptions, you can just enjoy the game (or not) and you don't have any expectation that need to be met or exceeded. Just don't buy in...if you do, well, you get what you deserve. I'm sorry that marketing makes things look good...that is kind of what it supposed to do. As a consumer, it's your job to read through the lines. If a mass of people can't do that, then they can only blame themselves.
Re:Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:1)
Re:Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:2)
If I have enough beer, almost any girl is hot.
This is slashdot. You don't need the beer. Statistically speaking, every girl is hot.
Re:Marketing Hype Strikes Again (Score:1)
As I posted a few articles back... (Score:5, Insightful)
If it's mainstream, we hate it.
HALO is popular? I hate it. I think it's boring. Millions of people watch network TV? All the shows are crap. Thousands go to a Britney Spears concert? She sounds like a banshee. 90% of the people use Windows? God I hate Windows, it crashes all the time.
See how it works? Now that you know the prime directive you can mentally discard all the messages that fit this mold and find the *real* conversation in the thread hidden underneath... good luck!
Now let's try to fill this discussion up with better comments than "HALO 2 *does* suck," ok? We can make the world a better place.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:5, Insightful)
If you would at least read the summary, by the way, you'd notice these words:
Useful as a cautionary tale about out-of-context quoting (..)
You could even go as far as to RTFA which has the title:
"Eliminate the Positive (or "The Only Negative Review of Halo 2 You're Ever Likely To Read")
Add the ability to abstract thought into the reading of these things and you might detect some attempts at making people laugh and/or smile.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
You forgot the True Slashdot Prime Directive:
Don't RTFA. Ever. Or at least post before. And rant.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
The least they could do is return thousands of pornography sites before listing any credible related material. At least then, I could justify researching for months instead of minutes.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2, Flamebait)
But lets talk Halo2. I won't be buying it. Forgetting the fact that I do not own an XBox the reason I won't buy it is that it's an FPS. I gave then up a long time ago when they became mainstram, because everyone and thier brother put them out.
Halo 2 may be a great game. It may be the best FPS ever created. But FPSs probably stopped being original back with Quake. Wolfenstien "created" the genre, Doom made movement free form and
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Off-the shelf Real Differences between Quake and Halo (not all original to Halo, but still...)
Weapons that need to be reloaded
"Attack with butt of weapon" as a universal option
Stealth
Vehicles
A plot portrayed with cut-scenes instead of hard-to-read text.
Regenerating shields
and for Halo 2:
Not knowing how dead you are
Just one of those would make for a rather different game--and most of them did. A
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
That's what made Halo. I don't like fps games but I loved the co-op in Halo. It's the best time two buddies can have.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
I *did*, however, neglect to mention "co-op on the same TV in the same room on the same couch."
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
There was stealth in Quake, just not against the AIs. If you walked, you didn't make noise, and that was key in some deathmatch games, especially cramped-quarters maps against a small number of players.
So, stealth was viable in part of Quake gaming, arguably the most enjoyable part of Quake gaming, deathmatch.
You forgot "Limited number of weapons in inventory" though, and that was, IMO, the coolest aspect of Halo... but I admit I was only able to play it for about 90 minutes before I got bored a
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
So, why're you on a website?
Everyone and their brother (and their brother's hamster, and its intestinal bacteria) has put them out...
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Study 'film'. The art of film, the history of film.
Find out how much of what you see in film, and on television is just a re-hash of something that has been done 1,000's of times before.
Other than special effects, nothing really new has been done in film since about the 50's- or even the 40's.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
For some reason that escapes the usual wrath.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
Looks unintentional, but good choice of words, considering this is a Halo story.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
I so far saw ZERO articles about any of the joke websites made for Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Wow, a website to hype up an upcoming game. yeah, that's worth 4 articles.
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:1)
If you actually visited the web site, the name Halo 2 never came up once. Although everyone knew what the game was supposed to promote, none
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
Re:As I posted a few articles back... (Score:2)
If it's mainstream, we hate it.
1. Shouldn't you be saying: "If it's mainstream we hates it, my precious?"
2. I refute you in one word: Google.
heh (Score:1)
Halo 2 is a good target, you'd think it was the next coming of the party trick bloke from what you heard. I mean, people calling it game of the year before its even been released (ok, they might have a grabbed it off a torrent a bit early), wierd.
Explain, please? (Score:2)
Is the state of console games really so bad that this one, as moderately entertaining instead of godawful, is the best currently available?
Re:Explain, please? (Score:2)
Re:Explain, please? (Score:1)
I'd say a lot of it isn't that it's just a shooter; it's a well-made shooter designed for a console with great multiplayer, a good story (for a shooter, anyway), and great controls, that isn't a port of a game for PC.
Take away the 'console' part or the 'not a port' part and you don't have much. But when was the last time you saw four guys (or girls, to avoid being an
Re:Explain, please? (Score:1)
Might have been the lack of coop modes in FPS games lately, only major coop game lately was Serious Sam and I thought that was pretty bad in SP, too.
Re:Explain, please? (Score:5, Interesting)
It brought the LAN party to the masses.
Joe Fratboy doesn't know squat about networking PCs and making sure each one has the same revision of the game and are all on the same subnet (or routed appropriately). But anybody can plug in an Xbox.
Halo was also arguably one of the best FPS to grace a console. There were a few titles that shined before (such as Goldeneye 007 for N64) but Halo had for its time had great graphics, great sound, decent story, innovative enemy A.I. and an enjoyable multiplayer that was a blast with your friends. All those things may have been surpassed now, but remember the first game is now 3 years old.
That being said, Halo 2 is the "second coming." There really are no drastic changes in the sequel. They simply took a good thing and they made it better. Tweaked the engine for better graphics, bump mapping and such. Larger more expansive level design. These sound like shallow things to the more critical slashdotter, but to the masses this is what they want. And don't forget the big addition that is probably responsible for selling a lot of units... online play.
Basically Halo and now Halo 2 offer a fun single player campaign with good graphics and above average A.I. They take the experience of a LAN party and simplify it enough for average joes to be able to do it without tech supervision. They allow people to have fun together. And I haven't even mentioned Co-Op mode.
Write me off as a fanboy, but you asked.
Re:Explain, please? (Score:2)
Somebody has obviously forgotten about Faceball 2000
Re:Explain, please? (Score:1)
No, there's a game called TimeSplitters 2, for all three consoles no less. I suggest you pick it up. Single player is alright, but it really shines in multiplayer.
Why is this news? (Score:2, Redundant)
The only thing good that came out of Halo was Red vs. Blue. I'm honestly not trying to troll; I just really don't unders
Red vs Blue? (Score:2)
I thought that came out of the Nov. 2 election map, a mere few days before the official release.
Re:Why is this news? (Score:2)
It has a good underlying structure for gameplay and a polish technically regarding graphics, sound, and cinematics that give off good vibes.
For me, the reason it is such a great game revolves entirely around the co-op aspect, so I can see why you didn't enjoy the PC version, much.
If you know anyone who's into Home Theater (HT) and has an XBOX + Halo 2 I would highl
Re:Why is this news? (Score:1)
The Ending (Score:5, Insightful)
I beat it at 5:30pm. I loved the entire game...except for that ENDING.
Mein Gott, it's one thing to have a cliffhanger ending when you know that you'll only have to wait a few months for resolution. It's another when you know you'll have to wait for an additional 3-4 YEARS.
Especially since the end boss battle is a bit anticlimatic. I didn't even get in the killing shot...my AI teammates did.
Re:The Ending (Score:2)
Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:5, Interesting)
Less weapons - More weapons
Less than 10 vehicles - 200 vehicles
Microsoft/Bungie - Rockstar
Dedicated soundtrack - Rage Against The Machine, Cypress Hill and Dr Dre.
Sexy aliens - Girlfriends
Green armour - More clothes than Final Fantasy X:2. And tattoos. And haircuts.
Excellent multiplayer - Fun multiplayer
Great graphics - Good graphics
6 hours gameplay single player at least - 40-50 hours at least
No sex - loadsa a sex
Warthog racing - Monster truck racing
No stats increase - Starts increase
Just my initial notes
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:2)
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:1)
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:1)
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:1, Troll)
With a linear campaighn you know where to go next.
Less weapons - More weapons
All weapons are unique and well thought out in halo 2, I don't know how it's in GTA:SA
Less than 10 vehicles - 200 vehicles
Again, the're all truly unique, each one requiring different strategies. I know they mostly work the same in GTA:SA
Microsoft/Bungie - Rockstar
Whats wrong with bungie (or rockstar, I don't get the point you're trying to make)
Dedicated soundtrack - Rage Against The Machine,
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:1)
Re:Halo 2 vs GTA:SA (Score:2)
Xbox-only - PS2-only
(That pretty much decides it for a bunch of us)
Apples and Oranges (Score:3, Insightful)
Here's my Halo 2 review (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Here's my Halo 2 review (Score:1)
Re:Here's my Halo 2 review (Score:1)
Half-Life 2 (Score:1)
Halo 2 - my oppinion (Score:1)
For starters, there are graphical hicups in the cut scenes, where the textures or even the models take a second to load. There is no excuse for letting that through, and really gets annoying. The AI around allied vehicles kind of stinks too. It takes some time to get into a vehicle if the AI is controlling it, and if you are the shooter, sometimes it's movements stink. I've also had i
For the people who don't hate Microsoft (Score:1)
First of all: I hate Microsoft's software. They purposefully don't use or support open standards. But the XBox doesn't need to support open standards, so who cares? And I use their keyboards and mice because I think they're good products.
Second: I like Halo 2. I already beat the game, and everything that the reviewers disliked about the campaign was true. It's short (~10 hours of playtime), repetitive, there are recurring graphical glitches, and the endi
Re:For the people who don't hate Microsoft (Score:2)
"Here we are back ag... AAAAAAUUUGGGGHHHH!!!"
"So, this is what Heaven is... AAAAUUGGGHHHHH!!"
"So, anything new this ti-- AAUUUUGGGGHHHHH!!!"
"I have a new novel in my po--- AAAAUUUGGGGHHHH!!"
"Pocket, I figure I can re- AAUUUUUUGGGGHHHH!!!"
"Read a few words every ti- AAAAUUUUGGGGHHHHHH!!"
"Time, until the player hi- AAAAUUUUGGGGGG
Re:For the people who don't hate Microsoft (Score:1)
"Get up so I can kill you ag...AAAUUUUUUUUGGGGGHHHH!!"
"SUH-WING batta batta batta ba...AAAAUUUUUUGGGGGHHHHHH!11!oneone!!"
"Can't touch thi...AAAAUAUUUUUGUGUGGHGGHHH!H!!!"
My Two Cents (Score:5, Informative)
Ok, I'll start with what I liked:
The vehicles are more fun.
The banshee and ghost have a boost now.
The ghost has a gun that can actually kill someone as opposed to just stunning them long enough to run them over(though running them over is still far more fun)
Some jeeps have a cannon instead of the machine gun.
Vehicles can be detroyed and damaged, but they respawn.
You can jump higher.
The way Master Chief looks can be customized more.
You can play as the lizard thing(I never pay attention to the names) None of us used him yet so I can't comment on if that changes game play dynamics or not.
The rocket launcher can't be outrun quite as easily.
You can always zoom, though weapons without a zoom automatically retract if you fire while zoomed(It is like binocs embedded in your visor)
Dual weapons.
More than two teams.
It tracks more stats such as hit percentage and who killed who.
Ok, now dislikes:
It seems to take an hour to kill anyone.
Most of the weapons seem weak. Even saw a friend take a direct hit from a rocket with no overshield and survive.
The sword(lightsaber) is too powerful in close quarters. One direct hit and you die and it gives you super human speed when you are close to your target.
He throws grenades like a sissy girl.
When you melee you lose one of your dual weapons.
In order to throw a grenade you toss down one of your dual wepaons. (Why not put the second weapon away for a moment instead?)
If you have two weapons and you could dual wield them, you have to toss one down and then pick it up to dual wield instead of just switching to dual wield.
Can't play Xbox live in a rated room unless everyone has a Live account.
Picking your profile before multiplayer is a one at a time ordeal instead of everyone choosing at the same time.(Not sure how that got ruined from Halo 1, but it is horrible and slow and you have to do it log off as well.)
No fall damage
Still only two team multiplayer ctf.(though it seemed like you could play more. Maybe we just missed the option.)
Still doesn't track favorite weapons. Doesn't track where you shot most often though it does tell you how many head shots you had.
It added "catch phrases" to let you know how your enemy killed you. (You were assassinated means someone meleed you from behind), but they don't seem very funny or original.
Still no bots.
To play 16 player on live you have to have friends to invite or everyone has to have a live account.
Anyways, it is about time for class. That is most of what I can think of off the top of my head. I am not impressed, but I am going to give it a chance still. I haven't played single or co-op so I can't comment on that.
Re:My Two Cents (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:My Two Cents (Score:2)
If you're in a fire fight and want to toss a nade are you gonna take the time to holster it first? If they're charging at you, wouldn't u rather ditch the gun to try and get the nade off soon as possible? In a way it makes it more realistic to me.
Great Game (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great Game (Score:2)
which many gamers outside of Xbox circles
Now there in lies the issue. What this game rates at should matter not to someone who cant play it, regardless if they have a better game. People seem to think that this 98% its received is somehow mystically applied across the board, it isnt. Its a score, for Halo2, on the Xbox. Thats it. It cant be compared to something its owners can never play.
Im disapointed (Score:1)
takes forever to kill someone.
cant drive with the flag in ctf, COME ON!
cant run people over with a car, YOU FUCKING Bounce off.
Every weapon feels weak.
Things feel rubbery and have truer physics (yes that is a bad thing)
But come on, its a sequal, couldnt they have made the game better?
Re:Im disapointed (Score:2)
Halo 2 shipped with progressive scan bug. (Score:5, Interesting)
info, Radar and Shield information are all lost from the left part of the display.
There's a large discussion thread [bungie.net] about it on Bungie's forums.
Re:Halo 2 shipped with progressive scan bug. (Score:2)
Killzone (Score:1)
AI glitches, occassional graphical glitches, somewhat dissapointing story.
Oh well, it's all about marketing and IGN reviews I guess.
not anti-mainstream (Score:2)
But, I have to say:
In my opinion, Halo 1 sucked. It was difficult to play (even more so than most 3d FPS are with those damnable junky controllers that game systems have these days), the graphics sucked, the sound sucked, and the levels sucked even worse. It was like playing Doom 1, trying to imagine it was Doom 3.
I've only seen Halo 2 in play in stores so far, but IMO, it's more of the same. Garbage.
Compared to UT2004... (Score:3, Insightful)
Fewer weapons, fewer weapons fire modes, fewer vehicles, fewer game types, no multiplayer bots, slow movement, (not quite) "destructible" vehicles...
I'll be trying it out at a friend's, to see if destructible walls, etc, work well enough to justify scoring it as "surpasses UT2004" in at least one area.
2 cents (Score:1)