Microsoft Comments on DS vs. PSP Battle 53
geekboy_x writes "At the Halo launch event a senior Microsoft VP took time out to comment on the coming battle between the Nintendo DS and the Sony PSP. In a nutshell, he thinks that Nintendo's domination of the handheld market will make this a rough go for Sony. He also, as is apparently required by Microsoft law, makes a candid yet derogatory comment about Linux." A more personal version of commentary made two days ago, as reported by GamesIndustry.biz.
Please release something (Score:2)
Re:Please release something (Score:3, Informative)
if you like nintendo, that is...
Re:Please release something (Score:2)
I remember paying $100 for my original Gameboy (or did it debut at $120? I can't remember.)
Re:Please release something (Score:2)
Re:Please release something (Score:2)
But it would have Halo!
Based on Bach's comment... (Score:5, Insightful)
Nintendo better work to maintain what they've built instead of resting on their laurels, lest they give away the top spot, all while arrogantly berating the competition...
Re:Based on Bach's comment... (Score:1)
Re:Based on Bach's comment... (Score:2)
Re:I used to LOVE to play (Score:1)
Notebook (Score:1)
Althought I am for more competition to bring down prices. The customer will be the winner if that happens.
Re:Notebook (Score:2)
Re:Notebook (Score:2)
there's several pocketpc's with enough beef to be gaming systems too, all they need is design a case with a gamecontroller..
Re:So according to Microsoft... (Score:2, Informative)
They say it was a pre-release version, but concidering IGN got theirs two weeks after, and the release is two weeks after that, that means Nintendo was manufacturing release versions at that time. If they fixed the bugs then that means they gave what they knew to be buggy units to geartest even though fixed ones exist. Not likely.
We all know the DS and PSP are different (Score:5, Interesting)
Their prices are $100 apart and their capabilities are a generation apart, it's like comparing a N64 to a PS2. There is certainly overlap between their feature sets and markets but they're not really being sold into precisely the same area. I think there's room for both of them to do fine. Certainly I'm more excited about the DS right now, because I can almost afford one (I'll probably buy a PS2 first, though) and because more of them will be sold sooner, meaning the little chat program may actually be useful.
Chat program (Score:1)
Re:Chat program (Score:3, Interesting)
And what does my favorite (Score:1)
If we get flashable or writeable media that can access all of the hardware, I'm buying one. It has enough neat stuff in it it'd be damned fun to play with from a programming standpoint, and useful to boot.
Lips are sealed (Score:1)
Re:Lips are sealed (Score:1)
Only things I'm really looking forward to are FF:CC and maybe Metroid Prime: Hunters(and those are still wait and see). Truth be told, I think it's a touchscreen testbed/feeler for their next console which also happens to double as a standalone unit.
Thing has potential in a lot of ways, hopefully they utilize it for once. As I said before, if I can write software for it w/o all
Re:Chat program (Score:2)
I'm sure Nintendo would love to learn where you got those DS's so they can fine the store, since they're not even out for another 11 days.
Um, ahem (Score:1)
Re:Um, ahem (Score:1)
Re:We all know the DS and PSP are different (Score:1)
Re:We all know the DS and PSP are different (Score:2)
The relevant quote (Score:1)
Re:The relevant quote (Score:1)
Except that the Game Boy doesn't... you know... suck.
Personally, if I worked at Nintendo I'd be insulted by the comparison.
so.... (Score:1)
"Candid" (Score:1)
doesn't mean what you think it does [reference.com].
Re:"Candid" (Score:1)
candid yet derogatory
-----
candid
adj.
1. Free from prejudice; impartial.
2. Characterized by openness and sincerity of expression; unreservedly straightforward: In private, I gave them my candid opinion. See Synonyms at frank1.
3. Not posed or rehearsed: a candid snapshot.
awesome
How does Microsoft's comments matter? (Score:5, Interesting)
I think most telling is the statement that nobody has or will make a meaningful connection between console and handheld devices. I know it's a gamble to say it, but I think that's going to go down like one of those "640k is enough for everybody" type of statements that are seriously shortsighted. The integration angle is still relatively experimental.
Right now, you've got the most marginalized console trying to perform handheld integration. The content, not technically, but philosophically, for this sort of thing flows more from the console market into the handheld then the other way around. Pokemon is a big exception to that, but it being only a single property with fairly uncompelling console counterparts to it's handheld juggernaut is a good example of why console->handheld integration is likely to be more popular.
When the biggest console, Sony, starts integrating content to a handheld, it's going to be a different story on how profound the effect of console/handheld integration is. The first must have game with meaningful handheld integration could do incredible things for the PSP sales.
Re:640k is enough for everybody... (Score:3, Insightful)
It was a massive pain for quite a while trying to use above 640k on a PC, juggling various TSRs in and out of various memory managers. The prospect of an enduser trying to get their PC to run the newest game, modifying config.sys and autoexec.bat was totally insane. Eventually memmaker was integrated into MsDos pretty late
challenge windows, eh? (Score:2)
Linux doesn't challenge Windows:
I also find it funny that the other 'little os' OS, Mac OS X, is ahead of the Windows curve.
Not that the PSP is
Good for the industry but my money is on Sony (Score:2, Insightful)
Sony has vast amounts of IP to throw at its new handheld, its not just a game system, it can play movies and cartoons. Parents (myself included) love the idea of a 'keep em quiet in the car' device, and I see Sony being able to position themselves in that market strongly.
Re:Good for the industry but my money is on Sony (Score:2)
Question for you. Since the US release price will prolly be at around $200, compared to finding a used original GBA for $30, a new SP for $80, and the DS for $150, do you really see yourself spending 200 for a system that will admitedly likely last only about 2 hours (maybe up to 6), compared to minimums of 6 for the DS an 10 for the SP?
A few things that people don't realize.
1) Most Gameboy games since 1989 have a unique fea
Re:Good for the industry but my money is on Sony (Score:1)
Re:Good for the industry but my money is on Sony (Score:2)
One AC, you realize that they're selling it for $185 in Japan, which yes, is more expensive than in the US. Two, They might sell it cheaper, but even at $200 they are likely taking a hit on the system. Nobody expected the PSP to be so cheap in Japan because of how much more powerful it is.
The PSP is as or more powerfu
He's partly right though (Score:3, Insightful)
It WILL be a rough go for Sony and the PSP. They have a fantastic piece of hardware, but they are having problems keeping it powered, and they're entering a market used to a specific vendor whose products are strong at what the PSP is currently weak at.
MS knows what entering a gaming market late is like. The Xbox is a superb piece of hardware, easily superior to the competition, but gaining acceptance has been an uphill battle the whole way. Some brilliant moves (like Xbox Live) have helped along the way, but they have had to fight the whole way.
I want a PSP a lot more than a DS because of the game lineup and the beautiful wide screen. But, I'm not a Sony fanboy that thinks it's just going to waltz in and destroy the competition. The days of a single dominant provider in a gaming market are numbered. The next console generation will be a LOT closer, and Nintendo isn't going to have total free reign of handhelds anymore.
Re:He's partly right though (Score:1)
I can't believe this got modded up. Not only do you not quantify what you mean by "a lot closer" [what? Nintendo will have 33%, MS 33% and Sony 33% of the market?] but you also offer no reasons behind this impending change.
The gaming market changes continually (Score:2)
Atari once held the entire market. Then it was Intellivision vs. Atari vs. Colecovision and Intellivision seemed to have it. Remember when Nintendo was the system to have (even when Sega was out...we don't hear that name much anymore). What's this? Sony Playstation is the thing to have now! Of course, we're seeing this split between PS2, GameCube