Anarchy Online to be Subscription Free 74
According to the offial site, Anarchy Online is removing fees for new users who subscribe to the game between the 15th of December 2004 and the 15th of January 2005. From the release: "We feel very confident in the unique features and heralded qualities of our game, and are now openly inviting everyone playing MMO's to find out what Anarchy Online is all about, completely free of commitment" said Ole Schreiner, Project Director for Anarchy Online. "Not only can we boast of a fantastic game which has been expanding for years, we are also constantly adding exciting new content, progressively making the ultimate sci-fi MMORPG even better." Commentary on the Zen of Design blog.
Here's the Torrent (Score:2)
http://r047.d1.funcom.com/torrents/AOInstall15.7.
I'm gonna check it out, anyways.
A more accurate headline..... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:2)
so, yes, you get a year's worth of MMORPGing for the price of a download. must figure no one's going to buy the game anymore; but if they can get them in, perhaps they can be nickel and dimed for an expansion or 2.
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:2)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:2)
Personally, I think this is good for people who want to see whats out there, but are able to not get sucked in to buying expansions. On the other hand, I can't even see why this is news. If the headline was more accurate, maybe something like "AO to offer discounted price" would anybody even be l
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:1)
I guess the obvious question is: how often will the expansions come out?
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:2)
Re:A more accurate headline..... (Score:3, Interesting)
Rob
Boy I fell old (Score:2)
Re:Boy I fell old (Score:2)
Completely forgot about archie, must be the alzheimer's.
My brothers are HUGE on this game. (Score:3, Interesting)
But are they supposed to keep paying because they have been there since the begining? To pay monthly fee's to play with a bunch of boneheads? One of the big plusses for AO was it was not well known and had a high amount of players who knew what they were doing.
Re:My brothers are HUGE on this game. (Score:2)
WoW has been giving me 132 errors on my PC, so I put WoW on my mac, and have been playing there. WoW is the only game to crash on my PC, Hl2/doom3 can run benchmarks all night without any problems...
But I suspect AO is giving free gameplay away to get people hooked, but expansions still cost. And they might come up with new a new GFX engine later that costs.
I don't see any reason not to offer a free service, but you must pay to
Re:My brothers are HUGE on this game. (Score:1)
Re:My brothers are HUGE on this game. (Score:2)
This explains it! (Score:1)
No wonder giant companies keep nixing MMORPG launches. Only EverQuest counts as well known.
They aren't the last (Score:1)
Re:They aren't the last (Score:2)
Re:They aren't the last (Score:2)
Not the first, either (Score:1)
Not entirely the same, as it is more like Runescape now, I guess - a pay premium character state or what have you - but it's a game, it's free, and c'est la vie.
EVIL (Score:3, Interesting)
The temptation is ridiculous. A year free trial? Usually I get bored of these games before a year is up. I'd have to reboot, I suppose, anyone know if AO runs under WINE. But a free year... hmmm.
Well I googled and found this: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~marius/aolinux/ [rit.edu]. Perhaps I will give it a shot...
Re:EVIL (Score:1)
Re:EVIL (Score:2)
Now on the other hand... playing it.. that had a big issue... boring. The mission system was cool and all... but I got bored quick and reinstalled EQ...
Re:EVIL (Score:2)
Re:EVIL (Score:1)
well, the price is right (Score:2, Informative)
i've been curious about galaxies, WoW, and some others, but I've always stayed away from them because of the monthly subscription fees.
I know what i'm downloading after work tonight!
And best of all they're doing it with BitTorrent!
awesome!
It's all about the expansion packs. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:It's all about the expansion packs. (Score:1)
Personally, I'd be happier to download it for free than to have to drive to pick it up at a store to pay for the media.
You can also pay for and download the expansions from the same page.
No, not a fanboy (I did beta test and played for a few months when it first came out
Re:It's all about the expansion packs. (Score:1)
So how limited is this? (Score:1)
How limited is this? Are there major graphic upgrades in the expansions? How long will I be entertained for free? It may be nice just to try out over the holidays...
Re:So how limited is this? (Score:2, Informative)
The next update shadowlands, adds a new land, two new classes. It was built just for the new classes and new lands, and although fun, do not take away from the game if you do not have it.
Alien invasion is their newest expansion, and I haven't got a chance to pla
Competition from WoW? (Score:4, Interesting)
I have played AO a fair bit, right from the start, however, I never felt I could make any progress if I didn't spend more than 3 hours on at a time. All the best gear in the game is constantly camped, and the latest expansion really only benifited high level characters who put imense amount of effort into the game.
I've now cancelled, and am enjoying WoW much more, with it's much more flexible play style and questing. Some of my friends have done the same. With WoW stealing many if not most of their players, I'm sure AO is doing this to keep their subscription levels up, but I doubt it's going to be enough.
The fine print: (Score:3, Informative)
Just the basic game with no expansions. Sounds like you might have to pay more money if you want to use the expansions. Guess they feel they finally have a product that people will want to stay and play if given the chance.
Very tempting even without the expansions.
Obviously aiming for the european market: (Score:1)
Re:Obviously aiming for the european market: (Score:1)
Appeals to cyberpunk/sci-fi fans? (Score:2)
I've always wanted an MMO cyberpunk game, where you can chill in dark bars illuminated by bright purple neon lights, and of course be reminded not to 'off' possible enemies, by the presence of well-armed hired security guys complete with artificially
Re:Appeals to cyberpunk/sci-fi fans? (Score:3, Informative)
In a word? No. There are two reasons why this game has zero appeal to your average cyber-punk fan.
First, the game is not set in the city. The game is mostly set outside of the cities. You might hit a city now and then, but for the most part the envirnoment is that of a planet's wilderness. The cities are all relativly small when compared to the rest of the gaming world and they don't feel terribly alive.
Re:Appeals to cyberpunk/sci-fi fans? (Score:1)
Re:Appeals to cyberpunk/sci-fi fans? (Score:1)
There is Neocron, which has a really nice cyberpunk concept with FPS elements, but also a significant number of bugs and inconsistencies.
If those things don't bother you too much, try it o
I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
I'd be willing to subscribe, and maybe pay a small account setup fee (no more than $10), but no way will I spend money to "buy" a game that I can't play without a subscription.
I think AO had a great idea in
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
Eve-Online [eve-online.com]
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
I haven't played CoH because there's no free download or trial period.
I played WoW on the 10 day free trial, but even though I had the game installed, they wanted $55 to keep playing.
I played the SW:G on the 7 day free trial, but quit for the same reasons as WoW.
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:1)
Tribes (Score:1)
Re:Tribes (Score:2)
However, I'm not going to spend my money to "buy" a game that depends on remote servers to play. I don't by any games that don't have a single-player mode.
If all I'm paying is a monthly fee, then they can shut it down and stop charging me. I won't feel like I've had something stolen. But if I "bought" a game, in a box, with manuals, then I expect to be able to play indefinitely
Re:Tribes (Score:2)
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:1)
No monthly fee outside of the cell phone, which isn't bad if you have one anyway.
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
Anyway, there's a lot of perfectly fine MMORPGs with free servers if you're willing to look arround.
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
I play City of Heroes more than I watch TV, yet I pay less a month then I do for cable. If you cut it down to hours its pretty cheap. Lets say you play 2 hours a day - 60 hours a month = $.25 per hour for a $15/month subscription. Even playing at half that amount of time is $.50/
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
Would't it be cool having independent servers for MMORPGs like City of Heroes, complete with new worlds, mods, and quests? Wouldn't it be cool to be able to set a server at home for you, friends, and people you'd like to play with?
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
FPSs are simple and need not change over time, where as MMORPGs need constant change to be worthwhile.
It's a money thing, deal with it.
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
I know it's a money thing, but it shouldn't. It's easier to cash in a monthly fee though.
Re:I think they've got it backwards (Score:2)
As for would it be cool to have an independent server? Well yes and no. One of the big draws in MMOs is the massively multiplayer part. Meeting people to play with is part of the game. I'm not sure I would want a City of Heroes server to play with 10 people.
I sure wouldn't want to
My interpretation (Score:4, Insightful)
In other words:- "Because of the amount of new competition recently, and because we've largely been irrelevant to begin with, we're now so scared of the game dying completely that we're willing to temporarily commit economic near-suicide in order to attempt to jumpstart it again."
EA did this earlier this year with the "Return to Britannia" program for UO...giving people free two week periods and a free download of the Age of Shadows expansion.
Given that the amount a month's bandwidth would cost for many of these games, when the company behind a given MMOG offers you free time out of the blue, you can with certainty take it as an indication that the game is in deep trouble, popularity wise. Granted, it would make more economic sense that if they were ever going to give you free time, that they'd do it when they were doing well...but companies...especially software companies...don't work that way. When they're on a roll, they overwhelmingly tend to come down with a terminal case of hubris, and then proceed to attempt to gouge/rape you like never before, on the basis of a belief that they are invulnerable. It's only when most corporations are starving hungry that you can expect decent treatment from them.
Funcom making this offer can be very safely interpreted as a realisation on the company's part that Anarchy Online is headed for the gurgler. They're trying to save it, and if an MMOG is on life support, that should probably also tell you something about the potential quality of the game.
Two weeks is nothing against one year (Score:2)
I now feel very, very old. (Score:1)
Heh... (Score:3, Interesting)
This is perfect! (Score:2)
It may not last the year... (Score:1)
Conditions
*The offer is only valid if you sign up a new Anarchy Online account between the 15th of December 2004 and 15th of January 2005. You can play free of charge until 1/1 2006. Should Funcom deem that a too high-increase in server load or other unforeseen events will lessen the experience for existing players the offer will be terminated at our discretion. The free version does not include access to any of the three expansion packs. Should you wish to upgrade to any of the exp
Free? Im in! (Score:1)
A Great Offer to Create a Privileged Class? (Score:3, Interesting)
A few months ago, I signed up again, as they were giving away the core game and the first two expansions (there are three now overall I believe, Notum Wars (land control), Shadowlands (new second world) and Alien Invasion (new plot booster and features, I guess.) Longing for the AO of old, I promptly jumped off the edge of Jobe (a floating city) and landed on the planet (luckily for me there was a bug in falling damage that prompted the devs to disable the feature a few months prior, so I survived the fall from the stratosphere.
Where they're giving away just the core game, these users will be limited to playing on the surface of Rubi-Ka, no access to the Shadowlands or even fighting for control of the land. I obviously don't know what their motives are in the end, but it'd seem to me that this may well be an attempt to get Rubi-Ka populated again, to bring the planet back to life. In a larger sense, it could also be creating a stronger social class system, as the paying users can look down on the poor planet-bound players from high above in their Jobe luxury apartments.
The free deal sounds great, but I think I may have to keep my paid account so I can do just that.
i can't take this game seriously (Score:1)