Ten Most Anticipated Games of 2005 102
Gamemethod writes "We've highlighted ten of our most anticipated games for 2005 spanning each major platform from PlayStation 2 to Nintendo DS to PC. While our feature by no means intends to be comprehensive or to denote that we're not looking forward to other games, these ten titles stand out as the most impressive of what 2005 has to offer. There are exclusive galleries of Gran Turismo 4 and Call of Cthulu: Dark Corners of the Earth as well as a lengthy developer interview with the Call of Cthulu producer."
Re:Hey, hold on a second.. (Score:5, Interesting)
"The Legend of Zelda: New Gamecube Game" (Score:1, Interesting)
Doesn't sound that bad, eh? And it doesn't look that bad, either, a few moments later. (Oh, I'm so clever.)
Now THAT is for the people who saw the E32K4 trailer.
WTF? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:WTF? (Score:2)
Please don't let him stop with the above post; it's far too entertaining.
So where were we... oh yeah, how about that DNF on the Phantom?
You Say Cthulu, I say Duty (Score:1)
Re:You Say Cthulu, I say Duty (Score:1)
Re:Time splitters 3? (Score:2)
The game didn't do well in retail sales, but it just feels like Time Splitters, and you can't beat EBGames [ebgames.com] online price of only $15 of either version. They may even still be offering free next day delivery.
It might make the wait for Time Splitters 3 go a little faster.
Re:Time splitters 3? (Score:1)
Re:Time splitters 3? (Score:1)
and it makes the game useless with the mouse/keyboard adaptor as well, because they second you move the mouse, it makes a tiny mov
I've been following that Cthulhu game since (Score:1)
Disappoinment (Score:1)
Re:Disappoinment (Score:2)
Hell hath no fury like a Fanboy scorned.
Re:Disappoinment (Score:1, Redundant)
Tim
Re:Disappoinment (Score:1)
Re:Disappoinment (Score:2)
Re:Disappoinment (Score:2)
Man, that really ticked me off. $1 says most of those peeps complained about Wind Waker, hit submit, then turned around and watched Family Guy.
Re:Disappoinment (Score:2)
Family Guy is a cartoon. Let it look like a cartoon. Zelda is not. It looks 'stylish' or whatever, but I really wish they would have just left it alone and made it look like 'normal.' Zelda looks better the way it's 'always' looked...
Yes, I have played (and beaten) Wind Walker...
Re:Disappoinment (Score:5, Insightful)
Zelda looks better the way it's 'always' looked...
You mean like a cartoon?
About the only games where it didn't look strictly cartoonish was Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask. Other than that, cartoon all the way.
Of course, I still feel like they've been overly kid-ifying Link, and would like to play an older Link because, let's face it, I've grown a little since 1987, but still - he's always been a cartoon.
Re:Disappoinment (Score:5, Insightful)
Though I don't entirely agree with you, I understand your point of view. You'd prefer the other look, right? I don't have a problem with that statement. If that's what ya said, I doubt you'd be one of those that I was thinking of. To a point, I agree with you.
There were some who treated it like Nintendo pooped on the franchise. And man, I just don't agree with that. I think their stylistic choice was good. It was pleasing to the eye, and nicely animated. Would the game look better with the style used in the original GameCube trailer?
"but I really wish they would have just left it alone and made it look like 'normal.' Zelda looks better the way it's 'always' looked..."
Ehh... I don't see Wind Waker as being that drastic of difference from Ocarina. His head is shaped a little different, but I wouldn't say one is much more realistic than the other. What we saw in the GC SpaceWorld demo.. that was a new animal altogether.
Maybe though, I'm just looking at it from a different perspective. I create 3D art for a living. So maybe I'm seeing it like "It wouldn't be much of a switch for me to go between the styles of Wind Waker and Ocarina, but it'd take significantly more time to represent the new style Nintendo has created Zelda with recently." (Sorry for my less-than-grammatically-correct writing style here.)
Cartoonish VS 3D realism (Score:4, Informative)
For N64 and Gamecube, I think the 3D realism is a little better because, generally speaking, you're playing on a bigger screen (can't speak for the NES version 'cause I never played that one). But really, it doesn't matter as long as the story and the action/adventure/puzzles are good, because you tend to not think so much about how it looks if you're engrossed in the gameplay and having fun.
Re:Disappoinment (Score:3, Insightful)
First of all, I realize that Zelda has been pretty cartoony for most of the series, but I think that you can't really call the NES versions cartoony...maybe the SNES one, and the N64 ones did have a certain cartoony quality to them. Hence the quotes.
However, I did like the way they were going. It wasn't totally realistic, because the world wasn't totally realistic...but I liked the style of the N64 Zeldas. They struck me as very Zelda (I've play
Re:Disappoinment (Score:4, Insightful)
I think I understand what you mean - you don't like the new art style they're using. And, honestly, neither do I.
Between Majora's Mask and the Wind Waker, they completely altered the art style. The "new" style is used in the Four Swords, Wind Waker, and the Minish Hat.
Link used to have a very anime-ish look to it. You can look at this album from the Ocarina of Time [zeldalegends.net], specifically young Link [zeldalegends.net] and old Link [zeldalegends.net]. Compare with art from Wind Waker [zeldalegends.net] (like Link posing [zeldalegends.net]).
I don't like the new style either. But the problem wasn't with the cel-shading - it's with the change of art styles. The new style is very "cartoony" and not quite as "animeish" as it used to be. The problem most people have with Wind Waker isn't really with the "cartoony look," it's with the change in art style.
Re:Disappoinment (Score:2)
I was fond of the graphics, but I think this was the weakest zelda game to have been released. (I think OoT was the strongest)
Zelda, January 18th? (Score:1)
The new Zelda game was released on January 18th?
If that's the case, then I'm guessing it was the Japanese release..
Anyone got a date for the Euro and US releases?
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:2)
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:1)
IIRC, Minish Cap was available in late December last year.
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:2)
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:1)
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:2)
For GBA it's probably to combat importers (no region locks to stop use importng cheaper US GBA games), for GameCube it's probably also to try and combat the Xb
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:1)
I'm sorry, I should have stated I was talking about the US.
Re:Zelda, January 18th? (Score:3, Informative)
Cthulu (Score:2)
Re:Cthulu (Score:2)
I still have hope this game with be fun (HL2 came out okay in the end), but I've given up holding my breath.
Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Interesting (Score:2, Interesting)
Or something.
*back to playing Resident Evil 4*
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:3, Insightful)
Agreed...
Urg. No. No more Final Fantasy. Square fooled me with IX, that was supposed to "return to the roots" but just sucked. (It's hard to explain, other than "lackluster plot and annoying gameplay.") Square tricked me with Final Fantasy X, offering a new gameplay style that wound up being yet another power-gamer uber-level fest system with an extremely linear and boring story.
And then Square raped the franchise with Final Farming XI, a game so plagued with flaws and outright boredom that I vowed never to buy another Final Fantasy game ever again. They finished off that convinction to never buy another Square product with Final Fantasy X-2, The Search for More Money and Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicals, The Quest for More Gameboy Advance Sales.
Final Fantasy XII is supposed to be "like Final Fantasy XI." If that's true, then NO. I am NEVER going to buy another game from Square EVER AGAIN regardless of content. Final Fantasy XI is without a doubt the WORST online game I've ever played. Combined with server issues to put World of Warcraft to shame (remember the time the servers were inaccessible for OVER A WEEK?) and a gameplay system that rewarded powergamers above all else (hey, why would someone want to only level up one class? Let's force 'em to level up two!), the game was a total stinker.
Ultimately, I'm not looking forward to Final Fantasy anything any more. Square's fooled me enough in the past, I won't be tricked by Final Fantasy XII, We Won't Try Something New.
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:1)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:2)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:2)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:2)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:1)
Why would you want them to make less games? Do you want games to be more expensive (so they can make as much while selling less) or do you want to have to pre-order games because otherwise you may never get the opportunity to play them ever? What kind of logic is that
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:2)
Re:Can't Final Fantasy die already? (Score:1)
One to knock off the list... (Score:4, Insightful)
Most anticipated games: XBox 2 launch titles (Score:3, Insightful)
Wait for E3.
Jon Acheson
Missing Option (Score:1, Offtopic)
Sorry, had to say it. It is the most anticipated game at Emerson College [emerson.edu]. It may be the only game being produced at Emerson, but it is the most anticipated!
Re:Most anticipated games? (Score:1, Flamebait)
They rebuilt the game engine from scratch, added tons of new cars and tracks, expanded previous game modes, and added more game modes, such as drift racing and B-Spec. But because it looks like the same game as GT3, you're claiming that
Re:Most anticipated games? (Score:2)
I'm Still waiting for... (Score:2)
Seriously, what kinda ending is it to stop in what seems, as far as the story is concerned, to be the MIDDLE! AARRRGHHH! Anyone else dissapointed in the story? The multiplayer is a blast, as expected.
Re:I'm Still waiting for... (Score:2)
Re:I'm Still waiting for... (Score:2)
The multiplayer is great of course.
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory (Score:2)
http://www.splintercell.com/us/splintercellchaost
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. - Shadows of Chernobyl (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:S.T.A.L.K.E.R. - Shadows of Chernobyl (Score:1)
I'm confused... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'm confused... (Score:1)
Gamespy has a larger list... (Score:2, Informative)
http://mostwanted.gamespy.com/2005/?ui=gstop1 (Working link) [gamespy.com]
In Europe... (Score:1)
KOTOR 2 ! (Score:1)
No City of Villains? (Score:1)
Nethack 3.4.4 (Score:2)
Re:Nethack 3.4.4 (Score:1)
But every fan should be aware that One Should Never Expect A Release. Nethack is beyond years! The Next Release is always the Most Anticipated Game - however, part of the thrill is that one never knows what year it's coming out. And of course, once the release is actually out, the next version immediately becomes the Most Anticipated Game...
All down hill from here (Score:2)
GT4 (Score:1)
I think not. Console games are not even close to the top driving simulations on the PC like GTR, LFS and Nascar 2003 for realism.
Re:GT4 (Score:1)
Since when are console games considered simulations?