Battlefield 2 Demo Available 98
bbzzdd writes "Looks like FPS geeks aren't leaving the house this weekend. EA games has released a demo for the long awaited Battlefield 2 . The 547 MB demo is available at: Filerush (Torrent), GameSpot, Filefront, Gamer's Hell, Worthplaying, Download.com, Computer Games Romania .
The waiting isn't quite over yet... (Score:4, Funny)
Looks like FPS geeks aren't leaving the house this weekend.
Yeah, because that's how long it's gonna take to download it.
Re:The waiting isn't quite over yet... (Score:2)
Re:The waiting isn't quite over yet... (Score:2)
Hope its like BF1942 (Score:2, Interesting)
The tech look very promising in BF2, I don't like the war theme(Iraq is still too fresh, too controversial).
But, its a must try demo.
Cya you all in azureus and later in the demo
P.D.: www.3dgamer.com has a torrent too.
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:2)
Seconded!! Sorry but I don't want to fight for any of the sides provided.
And the other thing about WWII aside from the less dubious morality is that the weapons and vehicles are not such overkill and give a much better balanced game for the scale of the maps. Desert Combat was a very well done mod but nothing like as much fun to play.
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:2)
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:2)
They may well have. But not me. It's not that its a "murder simulator" (as I loved BF1942) but more like it's propaganda (like Tom Clancy novels) and that leaves a really bad taste in my mouth...
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:2)
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:1)
This is weird
Re:Hope its like BF1942 (Score:1)
I think they should do a "Battlefield 1863"...
It'd be totally awesome to fire once, then reload for 45 seconds... ohhh hell yeah... and medics, instead of med packs, have hacksaws, and they saw off limbs... and instead of tanks, there are horses
Yay karma points! (Score:2)
Fast torrent link (Score:3, Informative)
http://shuz.homelinux.com/Battlefield_2_Demo.exe.
Re:Fast torrent link (Score:2)
Re:Fast torrent link -Try again (Score:2)
Linux? (Score:1)
Re:Linux? (Score:1)
But it is fun!
So what's new in this one? (Score:3, Interesting)
I've heard about the "commander" mode, or "role", but don't know all that much about it. Is it at all similar to how the Commander role works in Savage [s2games.com]? What else are people really looking forward to? Is this one supposed to be more friendly with on-screen text? BF 1942 was awful with that, it was sometimes unreadable. Vietnam I think was a bit better but far from great.
Are there vehicles that play really differently than what's available in BF 1942 or Vietnam? One thing that was both good and bad in that one was the realism of the vehicles. It was good in that there were lots of vehicles, all of which were driveable, but it was bad because the realism mix just wasn't right. On one hand, one person could "crew" a tank completely, driving it, shooting, etc. There was a place for a second person, but their role was pretty useless -- just a machine gunner or something. On the other hand, the look and abilities of the tanks was vaguely realistic. I think it would have been much more interesting if you *needed* a crew of 3 to make a tank work, and in a ship you could either fire the main guns, or move the ship, not both.
Anyhow, I'll have to check out the demo, see what's new...
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:1)
Helicopers should be much faster (they go 240 mph in real life)
jetfighters too
The bodies should stay for the entire round, and should be able to be used as protection.
As far as artillery, it should work much better, and one should go based on coordinates: like: lay 16 rounds of 155 at 78-44. Then the arty guy should be able to calibrate his guns, and fire away.
It should be possible to hide a mine by diggin it in.
Barbed wire should actually stop the s
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:2)
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:1)
Re:So what's new in this one? (Score:2)
Not to nit pick, but there's actually two states in the game, critically wounded and dead. If you're dead-dead you can't be revived. If you're critically wounded, you're incapacitated for a short amount of time (during which time you may be revived by a medic) before you die. The system seems to take into account how much damage you take to determine whether you're wounded or dead... e.g. small arms fire and splash damage seems to leave you critically wounded, whereas big stuf
The choppers are much easier to fly than BF:Viet (Score:2)
My biggest complaint with DICE games is that they manage to make the absolute worst installers ever, and their menu's are the laggiest nightmares i've ever seen in a game...
Another complaint is that when you are first configuring the game, every time you change video settings, it has to spend a LONG time 'optimizing the shaders' for your new settings...
For myself, I have no idea how much I can tweak the video options to get the best visuals/per
Re:The choppers are much easier to fly than BF:Vie (Score:2)
First is just 'Battlefield 2' and then it makes a second folder called 'Battlefield 2 Demo'...
I absolutely hate programs that insist on dumping shit into the my docs folder like this...no matter how much microsoft wants developers to do this, the my docs folder is for shit i actually use - profiles and other garbage that I'll never actually need to look at should be
torrentspy link... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Can you imagine this on an Intel Macintosh? (Score:3, Insightful)
You mean OpenGL and OpenAL, right? 'Cause that's what you're talking about. Those are available on pretty much all OS's
What it would take to "move PC gaming away from being a Microsoft OS-specific activity" (if that were true, which it isn't) is for a platform to come out that has as easy of a game development SDK, hardware and driver support from ISVs, and enough of an installed base for game development to look lucrative to developers.
The Mac
Re:Can you imagine this on an Intel Macintosh? (Score:2, Insightful)
The transition to the Intel platform may very well give it the userbase it needs. In fact, it may be a case of the two building off one another: the increased userbase will increase its appeal to game developers, who will provide more games, which will further entice current Windows gamers t
Re:Can you imagine this on an Intel Macintosh? (Score:1)
Re:Can you imagine this on an Intel Macintosh? (Score:1)
Also a note to ATI video card owners... (Score:4, Informative)
"ATI Cards and Battlefield 2 Demo -- In testing the demo, EA has encountered some visual issues on certain ATI cards with the previous Catalyst drivers (5.5) and are working with yesterday's 5.6 release to discover if the issue is resolved. If in playing the Battlefield 2 demo you encounter texture corruption of any kind, we recommend rolling back to the Catalyst 5.1 drivers. ATI is aware of this issue and is working to resolve it."
I played it with v5.2 driver... (Score:2)
How about those recommended specs? (Score:4, Informative)
WINDOWS
- Minimum Specification, based on playing a 16 player game:
CPU: 1 Ghz
RAM: 384 Mb
- Recommended Specification, based on playing a 64 player game:
CPU: 3 Ghz. For AMD Athlon 64 CPU: 3500+ (2.2 Ghz)
RAM: 1 Gb
BANDWIDTH
- Minimum
2.5 Mbit
- Recommended
5Mbit
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:3, Informative)
You forgot some other important points:
Must use a Direct X 9.0c compatible card
These cards must have at least 128MB of RAM
Minimum cards are the GeForce FX5700 and Radeon 8500 or greater
This will probably change a few people's minds as to whether they download or not. I'm not even going to attempt it until I hear otherwise on my Ti4200 w/128MB.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Almost everybody who games and has an LCD has a 17" lcd.
Almost every 17" LCD has a native resolution of 1280x1024.
Getting stuck with 1280x960 is an insult to everybody who's paid for a videocard that will run this game at 1280x1024
BF1942 had some horrible text rendering/pixel interpolating since it actually rendered at 1280x960. EA had better release a patch for this, or they are in for a lot of complaints.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
And what exactly do you use to base this assumption on?
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:3, Funny)
And what exactly do you use to base this assumption on?
Oh, I'm sure that this being Slashdot, he spent hours of his time researching sales data for various demographics and then consulted with his local university's statistics department in order to be sure that the information fits with his hypothesis.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Mod Parent Up (Score:1)
Re:Mod Parent Up (Score:1)
Re:Mod Parent Up (Score:1)
Back on topic, Isn't it possible to change to supported resolutions by modifying an ini file or the shortcut? This was a solution with the original 1942.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
I don't have any real data to back this up, but I'm pretty sure most players have come to the same conclusion as I have.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
If there was any point to that I'd start a petition for 1280x960 LCDs because I'm sure as hell not getting a 1280x1024 one. Or a widescreen LCD (yes, that's really useful for text editing, right?).
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
Not only that, nvidia users need to upgrade to the *beta* drivers included in the demo. Otherwise there are graphical errors.
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Thanks for telling me that (Score:1)
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Now the question is, do I get a new video card for my current computer (AGP) or upgrade the whole deal to get PCIe?
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
It does have a fairly nice draw distance though.
The full version will only have 12 maps, however, and this demo doesn't look incredibly bright. Maybe
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
Really? I have a 9800XT, gig of RAM and a P4 3.06, and I can play OK at high settings, with res. set to 1024x768, 6xAA, just turn down dynamic lighting, shadows to medium and it runs like buttah 99% of the time... but yeah the load times are pretty long (but well worth the wait!)
As for the "only" 12 maps, remember that map size scales to the number of people playing. Heck, the demo only ships with one "map", but for all practical purposes it shipped with three... the same map in a 16-person game is pret
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:2)
As for the settings, I did muck around a bit and run it okay at high settings, 1024x768, with shadows and something else at medium (like yours). It's still not quite good enough on 32 player
Re:How about those recommended specs? (Score:1)
Full readme is available on Gamespot [gamespot.com]
BF2 Demo: EA Launch Recalled (Score:3, Interesting)
more info:
http://bf1942.lightcubed.com/forum/viewtopic.php?
Email from EA:
From: Murphy, Mike
Date: Jun 11, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: Incorrect BF2 Linux Version
To: "Murphy, Mike"
Hey Guys,
A quick note to all of our community leaders and file partners. We
inadvertently released an out-dated Linux version for today's
Battlefield 2 Demo Server. It is imperative that you not make this
available on your web sites and that you let people from your media
outlets know not to host it for download or run demo servers with it.
We will follow up early next week with a version that works.
If you have any questions at all, feel free to call or email me.
Thanks
Mike
Bots? (Score:1)
I prefer to learn how to play offline - especially since this game will probably choke my computer to the point where I can't hit anything moving anyway.
Re:Bots? (Score:2)
Ahem... (Score:1)
Uh, looks like I am going to have to work the whole weekend just for the cash to afford the upgrades to my system that are needed just to be able to PLAY the bf2 demo!
Re:Ahem... (Score:2)
Reminds me a lot of HL2 in the way it performs actually.
Played it and my two cents... (Score:3, Interesting)
I love the special effects. I love when my visual goes BLURRY when I get hit by artillery or whatever. I love being the medic guy like in Return to Castle Wolfenstein multiplayer. Giving people med kits to use and reviving injured players get me points! Capturing flags/areas WITH buddies rock (see the attached screen shot -- see that chopper too?). Listening to poeple with voice communication (rad) -- I wished I could talk clearly!! Being on the huge aircraft. Wow. Seeing the realistic ocean. Driving through the city reminded me of videos from news and movies (e.g., Black Hawk Down).
Attached two screen shots of me playing! I am SO buying this game on the week of 22nd. I think I will sell BF:V, but might keep BF1942 for its Forgotten Hope mod (still need WWII theme!).
The game borrows cool elements from Natural Selection mod (commander, communication, etc.), Return to Castle Wolfenstein/Enemy Territory, Day of Defeat, etc. Running/Sprint is limited (you get tired after a while).
The bad parts: Long loading times. Configuring keys SUCK!! Too many introductions that can't be skipped.
Goodbye Desert Combat and Point of Existence mods! I can't wait to play more demo this weekend before my long summer of crunch times at work starts. Of course, I need to crank up my speakers and subwoofer. Muhaha!
Re:Played it and my two cents... (Score:1)
Re:Played it and my two cents... (Score:2)
DICE have acknowledged the problem with binding to different input devices (i.e forward with mouse button, backwards with keyboard), and a fix should be in the first BF2 patch. As a workaround, use the secondary column for the mouse, and the primary for the keyboard.
Too many introductions that can't be skipped.
Rename the movies folder (found inside mods/bf2).
Re:Played it and my two cents... (Score:1)
Don't even get me started on Joystick Axes......
Time to Upgrade! (Score:1)
Methinks the bar is set high so the engine can be quickly tweaked for an Xbox360 launch. Wei
Re:Time to Upgrade! (Score:2)
Re:Time to Upgrade! (Score:1)
This Game Sucks (Score:2)
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:2)
Can anyone verify this? Does this affect the official version or just the demo?
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:1)
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:2)
Ok, but is this just for the demo or also for the retail version due out on the 22nd?
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:1)
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:2)
Re:This Game Sucks (Score:2)
Sorry to inform you... (Score:1)
no win 2k (Score:1)
Re:no win 2k (Score:1)
EA is terrible. (Score:1)
Re:EA is terrible. (Score:1)
It's about maintaining a portable codebase for console releases. Battlefield: Modern Combat is being produced alongside Battlefield 2 (I've even seen it called Battlefield 2: Modern Combat). The console release will make EA ten times more cash than the PC release... which one do you think EA and DICE are going to focus their energies on?