Nintendogs In-Depth Strategy Guide 59
heday writes "1up.com has a comprehensive strategy guide for Nintendogs, which was released this Monday. The article explains a lot of the nuances and idiosyncratic stuff with videos and pics." From the article: "The subtle sounds of shuffling feet running towards you. Those adoring eyes glazing at you with complete obedience. The moist soft tongue running up and down the back of your feet. That pendulum tail wagging back and forth that embodies the dog's adoration for you. If there were any companion animals vying to be man's best friend, the dog would be unmatched in terms of friendship, loyalty, and devotion. Anyone who has loved a dog would testify that raising one is truly one of the most rewarding experiences in life. But owning a dog is no walk in the park--it requires the utmost responsibility. "
Slow news day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Slow news day? (Score:1)
Re:Slow news day? (Score:1)
Re:Slow news day? (Score:2)
Besides, Nintendogs needs a strategy guide?! If you need a guide for that game, then I humbly suggest you're missing the entire point.
Re:Slow news day? (Score:2)
Re:Slow news day? (Score:1)
Re:Slow news day? (Score:2)
Nintendogs (Score:2, Informative)
What about real dogs? (Score:3, Funny)
Honestly...what the hell? (Score:4, Insightful)
"The subtle sounds of shuffling feet running towards you. Those adoring eyes glazing at you with complete obedience. The moist soft tongue running up and down the back of your feet. That pendulum tail wagging back and forth that embodies the dog's adoration for you. If there were any companion animals vying to be man's best friend, the dog would be unmatched in terms of friendship, loyalty, and devotion.
If this is what you're looking for, how about you go down to you local Animal Shelter and get an actual dog? I'm sure they'll love you for getting them off Death Row...
Anyone who has loved a dog would testify that raising one is truly one of the most rewarding experiences in life. But owning a dog is no walk in the park--it requires the utmost responsibility.
Interesting commentary on today's society...people would rather invest in a virtual dog than accept the responsibility of owning an actual pet.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)
I could see it helping from a parents standpoint. Their child is begging them for a dog but the parents "know" that their child won't take care of it, give it water, feed it on a regular basis, etc. Instead they get the child Nintendogs. It helps teach responsibility to the child (the dog will run out into the neighborhood if you neglect it) and show whether or not the child could be trusted with a real animal....maybe, I don't know, I'm just going with it.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)
For a child whose parents have forbidden a dog in the house, this could actually be a good alternative. I could also see it going over pretty well as a precursor to a real dog to see if the child is ready for the responsibilities of pet ownership. Obviously, some things can't be simulated well (walking, cleaning up mess, etc.).
And what of the people who are allergic or just prefer simulations? We don't all have the time for real pets. If you do, that's great, but there's no need to chastise those who would make choices different from yours. Couldn't the same really be said for all games? Why aren't you outside playing? Don't you like real games? Wouldn't actual physical activity be better from a societal standpoint than button-mashing?
Just to play the devil's advocate (Score:4, Insightful)
Now I'm not going to completely aggree with him or anything, and I'm not opposed to a pet simulation as such. But still, just for pointing out the obvious, there's a difference between a dog sim and, say, a jet fighter sim or a Formula 1 sim in that aspect.
You _can_ get a dog fairly cheaply, whereas I don't think most of us could afford an F-16 or MiG-29, even if it was legal to buy one.
Plus, very few people are physically unable to have a dog. Yes, people with allergies do exist, but they're not a majority. Whereas piloting a fighter jet is something which has a lot more strict requirements.
Plus, there are a lot of situations in games which are too risky in real life. If you crash a F1 car, you may well be dead or crippled. (Even a few premier league drivers discovered that.)
Even something more mundane like trying to replicate a medieval duel (e.g., if you want to do that instead of playing WoW) with something even vaguely resembling 6 ft worth of steel blade (as opposed to a silly PVC tube wrapped in foam), even unsharpened, you might break a bone or two. Historically, european straight swords were used to break ribs even through a maille hauberk: even if it didn't penetrate, a hard hit as with an axe or mace could still cause enough damage to disable an opponent.
So there are a lot of situations where doing something in a game is anywhere between the only safe choice, and the only choice, period. Having a dog, on the other hand, just doesn't fit that bill for most people. You don't absolutely _need_ a simulation to play with a dog.
The other aspect is that simulations are but an imperfect replica of the real thing. That goes doubly for any sim that involves AI. Just above anything above the intellect of a goldfish, is just too complex for a modern computer. (And not to mention it would be a full time job for academic AI researchers and psychologists to stimulate, not of a game designer who thinks "AI == hard-coded triggers for simple scripts".)
Having pretty much grown around various pets (but especially cats, hence they're still my preference), and on summer vacations around other farm animals too, I can tell you that the real thing differs _massively_ from anything I've ever seen simulated on the screen. It has quirks, it has moods, it has a personality, etc. E.g., a real dog won't be just unconditional puppy-love, but might as well one day challenge you for leadership of the "pack" if he thinks you're doing an awful job as a pack-leader.
A pet sim can be a substitute for that just about as much as a dating sim is a substitute for having a girlfriend. I.e., not at all.
Plus, there's the whole aspect that it's a living being you physically touch, and which you know isn't hard-coded to just simulate puppy-love. You know that that's a real being reacting to your actions, good or bad, not just some script being triggered. Personally I just don't see how a script can possibly really replace that.
Again, personally I won't lose any sleep if you do use a simulation for that. But just saying I can see where a "get a real dog" recommendation would come from.
Re:Just to play the devil's advocate (Score:2)
But for what it's worth, my comparison does hold for sports games.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:1)
Yeah! You like Grand Theft Auto so much, why don't you get off your ass and go steal some *real* cars!
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:4, Interesting)
Why should everyone accept the responsibility of having an actual pet? If anything, this would show that people are more responsible: instead of getting a dog and not being able to care for it properly, people get a virtual pet.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:4, Insightful)
That's going a little far. There are plenty of people who shouldn't or can't have a real dog for whatever reason: living in a dorm or apartment that forbids pet ownership, too young, too old, allergies, have a job where they are out of town a lot, etc.
Also, it is just a game. You might as well look at a RTS game and say "interesting commentary on today's society... people would rather invest time in a virtual war with no consequences than accept the responsibility of starting an actual war." Or you could say the same thing for birth control: "people would rather invest in consequence-free sex than accept the responsibility of a child." Well, yeah... Having a virtual dog is fun. It's not a sign that people nowadays are all flakey and less responsible than previous generations.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:2)
I could name at least one person who probably ought to be playing a virtual war [evilninja.net] rather than destroying real lives...
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:1, Insightful)
I've been to shelters and volunteered with the SPCA, and I can honestly say that most people should not have an actual, living pet. Not that they don't want them (although that's very common; so many pets are bought on a whim, then discarded when they're no longer puppies, or the owners realize how much work they are) but a lot of people are negligent, unable to care for a pet, or just cruel. Sadly, these
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:1)
Either do I. We have two dogs. I just open the kitchen door and let them out into the quarter acre or so of our land that we fenced in for the dog yard.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:2)
Now, cats on the other hand presents more of a case. A cat never has to go outside the flat, if it's reasonably large (3+ rooms). Of course, there's still the matter of how to feed it when travelling, but that can be solved by a neighbour, or by putting it in a cat hotel. Nintencats would be harder to justify, except if you're allergic.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:2)
People not being able to handle real pets is the exact reason a lot of them are in shelters and possibly going to be put down , having a safe way to test one out is possibly a good thing.
Don't fall into the old "But there are so much more important things in life" meme
I intend on getting nintendogs , and i own 2 kittens (well they are over a year old now , bu
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:3, Insightful)
GOOD! We (at least in my area, and most big cities) have too many dogs ending up neglected and abandoned anyway, only to go to the "death row" which you recommend saving dogs from. I agree that if someone wants a cat or dog, they should go to their local "pound" or Humane Society and adopt that way, but if there were fewer pet owners in the first place those orga
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:1)
'Shaming' people into buying a dog, instead of making the impulse purchase of a video game, is a good way to encourage more flippant irresponsible pet acquisitions. Which will lead to MORE unwanted, discarded animals at the shelter.
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:1)
more flippant irresponsible pet acquisitions
Exactly. Right now, my neighbors have gone away for a few weeks, leaving their neglected dogs on their own, and these dogs have turned absolutely nasty (I live in an area with no leash laws). Nobody on our street can go outside without getting attacked, and I really need to mow my lawn before it rains again.
We have had problems with these dogs before, and when someone calls to complain, he/she gets the same response: "Oh, we'll pass the word along..." - and
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:2)
So... how many people do you know that can have a dog (i.e. they live in a place that allows dogs, or they're not allergic, etc..), but they don't already have a dog, and they chose to buy Nintendogs instead? Is there a data set large enough there to actually make a comment on society?
Personally, I wouldn't draw up commentaries on society based on assumptions I've
Re:Honestly...what the hell? (Score:2)
Re:Ugh. (Score:2)
I don't have a foot fetish.
Icky... (Score:3, Funny)
Nintendogs can simulate most of what's in the slightly disturbing blurb, but then there's this...
The moist soft tongue running up and down the back of your feet.
If the DS can simulate a moist, soft tongue, I'm never, ever going to touch one again. There's realism, and then there's just downright creepy...
"You bought a used DS? Just think about where it's mouth has been!"
Re:Icky... (Score:4, Funny)
... I'd never need to go on another date again!
News for Nerds (Score:1)
Re:News for Nerds (Score:2)
Re:News for Nerds (Score:1)
Owning a dog (Score:1)
If it's only one dog, yeah, it is a walk in the park, they only have a CR of 1/3 [d20srd.org]. Certainly not very difficult to pwn.
A Dog is just a Dog (Score:1)
The replacement of children with pets in America continues apace.
One thing about dog lovers, though: they're much more easy going than cat lovers. They are wound up extremely tight.
OMFG (Score:1, Troll)
Article error (Score:3, Insightful)
BeBop did *NOT* come out of hollywood. There is this place called Japan. They make a lot of animation these days. And often its better than the stuff out of hollywood.
Re:Article error (Score:2)
Re:Article error (Score:2)
Re:Article error (Score:2)
Corgi's are supposed to be smart however.
Kill it! (Score:1)
Re:Kill it! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Kill it! (Score:1)