City of Villains and Heroes Combine Monthly Fee 67
JamesO writes "Massive game players will have lots of options. NCSoft has announced that City of Heroes and City of Villains will only require one fee to play both games." From the article: "We know that many City of Villains players will be existing City of Heroes players who are essentially playing in order to access another aspect of the universe they have grown to love ... We wanted to find a solution that would look after existing players, offer tremendous value for money and also encourage new players to investigate the world of City of Heroes. This is that solution."
Platforms (Score:5, Interesting)
I realise that as the number of major players increases, their individual share would go down - but NCSoft have some good content, and so would be able to draw in a fair market share. Now would be a good time, with the WoW demand finally slowing and people looking around for What's New. Don't let this turn into a mac vs PC thread. You know more players makes a better game, no matter what they're playing from!
Re:Platforms (Score:1)
Reason? I used it for 2 things at home: Surfing and gaming.
Surfing they did equally well as Netscape (my browser at the time) was available on both. And gaming, there was no comparison.
Only the biggest games were ported, and then only sometimes. Which was fine, since that was mostly what you wanted to play. But half the time
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
CoH is a great game, but now that my Mac is running the media room (and I have no desire to keep a second computer hooked up to my projector), I've got pretty much zero interest in PC-only games. If it ain't on either the Mac or a console, I'll
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
Sounds boring now.
Re:Platforms (Score:1)
you don't need CoH to play CoV or to participate in PvP against other players in the PvP zones.
Re:Platforms (Score:1)
Still sound boring?
All of this is in the FAQ: http://cityofvillains.com/faq/faq.html [cityofvillains.com]
Re:Platforms (Score:2, Informative)
I thought "City of Villains" was just an expansion to "City of Heroes"
If you're already a CoH subscriber, then yes, CoV is like an expansion. But if you don't already have CoH, that's fine -- you don't need CoH to play CoV. So in that sense, it's a separate game.
I thought...you could play either good or bad and have great PvP battles between the two.
Yes, you can. PvP battles will be quite prominent (if you choose to participate).
Didn't know it was separate games.
Think of it like comic boo
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
Thanks for clearing all that up.
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
That's kinda cool.
Re:Platforms (Score:1)
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
In other words, they miss out on a network effect. I don't know how much of one but they lost 5+ sales within my circle of friends.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Platforms (Score:1)
Gives a whole new meaning to "For the Horde!". As if Mac / PC wars weren't enough, now we can add Horde / Alliance to it...
And of course the Horde uses Macs - Alliance has all the Gnomes for Tech Support, and do you really expect a Tauren to use a mouse with more than one button?
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
seems the users of any platform are still the suckers.
equating bnetd with "piracy" = equating region-free devices to "piracy".
artificial restrictions come from the colon of satan.
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
Blizzard also has people who crunch numbers, and they concluded that cross-platform development is worth the money. Seeing how pretty much every damn thing they make becomes a #1 title, maybe some of those other companies should get their people to take a close look at what Blizzard is doing right.
Re:Platforms (Score:2)
You gotta be kidding - with the speed they are fixing bugs and adding content, they have one person doing the programmer - he wouldn't have time to port anything.
What a great gaming company (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What a great gaming company (Score:1)
Re:What a great gaming company (Score:1)
Re:What a great gaming company (Score:2)
No, it's not. There are a bunch of differences between City of Heroes and City of Villains. Sure, they share the same concept and a lot of the same game mechanics, but this is a LOT more than just an upgrade to City of Heroes. If nothing else, the content alone is as big as City of Heroes is, and that doesn't even take into account that a lot of features will be added for existing City of Heroes players.
If you're in the beta, you know th
Re:Wow... (Score:2)
If you actually RTFA, or even the slashdot version, you'll see that it's not. NC are combining the subscription for the two parts into the same one for the same price as the original subscription. The only cost is buying the expansion pack from the store.
What this actually means that if you don't want to play CoH any more and try out CoV
Re:Wow... (Score:3, Informative)
The OP is correct. CoV is really just an expansion in every sense (NC Soft have even explicitly referred to it an expansion), other than apparently it doesn't require the original title if you only want to play the CoV elements. I'm sure the two will be bundled for the origi
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
CoV has all new ATs (character classes), mostly new powersets, all new art, storyline, setting, and mission types. In addition, it introduces real PvP into the game. Also, once CoV is launched the code for crafting will be integrated into CoH. Though, the developers have sai
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
I don't see him as claiming he thinks that, necessarily. That NC-Soft seemed to be toying with considering it a separate game rather than just a giant expansion pack, is what is "stupid".
If anything, payment consolidation seems to be the wave of the future, with
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
It is a separate game. You don't need CoH in order to play CoV. Calling it an expansion would imply that in order to even think about purchasing and playing CoV, you must first purchase CoH.
Re:Wow... (Score:2)
Re:Wow... (Score:2)
I have a CoH account that I haven't played in a very long time, probably since WoW came out. I don't have it installed anymore, and I probably won't play it again.
For me, and my friends that have never played CoH, getting CoV isn't really an expansion. If it's a full stand-alone game, why aren't they entitled to charge the full $50 for it?
I think they
Re:Wow... (Score:2)
Look at UT2k4. The game was basically a massive content upgrade for UT2k3 - same game, same models, but new modes, new maps, and the game added vehicles. Nobody complained about UT2k4 being an expensive standalone because it was an e-freain'-normous game.
Imho, the best approach is to offer a small rebate for people who already own the old title... but that's only if t
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
NC are doing a great thing for MMO billing here.
Re:Wow... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
Re:Wow... (Score:2)
that's lame, what's the point of the game then?
Re:Wow... (Score:2, Informative)
The are separate games in the sense that if you're only interested in playing a villain, you don't have to purchase CoH as well.
Re:Wow... (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/cityofvillains/news
"Of course, Bloody Bay has a secondary hospital area (the area in which fallen characters are revived) that's reserved for superheroes, because City of Villains will let players that own each game square off against one another in hero-versus-villain battles, which can be entered into for bragging rights (fo
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
Re:Wow... (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, you can. You can build bases, and do base raids. You just have to agree to it. Or you can get your team together and go into the no-man's land, which is going to be a hot zone full of untimely death I bet.
I like the way they are doing it because not only do you have the option of doing PvP, but you don't have to
Re:Wow... (Score:1)
This is only... (Score:3, Insightful)
Kudos. (Score:4, Insightful)
When everquest did this they started charging 150% (I think) rather than the same price. It was kinda crap but also understandable, but here there's two things to realize,
A. The only change is storage space.
b. If the world is always the same for both games and you only log on one game at a time, there's no extra load by doing this.
Overall I'm happy they did this, but it's not going to change anything for me. (The plague in WoW got me into that though so we'll see)
Re:Kudos. (Score:2)
This could work - it might encourage me to put down $50 on it.
Re:Kudos. (Score:2)
I quite like a lot of the features they are putting into CoV. I think it will be a much needed injection of new content into the game.
Re:Kudos. (Score:1)
While players can still only play one game at a time, which means no extra bandwidth, their characters will be on completely different systems, unlike CoV where your villian character will using the same group of machines as your hero character.
Really, as several others have said this is more of an upgrade than a whole new game. The difference is that unl
Wave of the future (Score:1, Insightful)
I'm kind of surprised SOE hasn't gone this route. If they undercut all the competition (I believe right now they charge more than the average monthly fee for a group of games), they could likely force sm
Re:Wave of the future (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wave of the future (Score:1)
Re:Wave of the future (Score:1)
They actually have. [sony.com]
Re:Wave of the future (Score:1)
Awesome. (Score:2, Interesting)
Would people really pay double? (Score:1)
I'm not an MMORPG player, but would someone explain to me what alternatives NCSoft had? Everyone's made it pretty clear that noone has time to play two MMOs simultaneously. So CoH players would have stopped playing CoH to play CoV? That would either cut into CoV sales, or limit the CoH population, neither of which is good for NCSoft.
I see how this is a good thing for those people who want to play both games, but given that they
Re:Would people really pay double? (Score:1)
They already decided not to screw ov
Re:Would people really pay double? (Score:2)
Name the Everquest expansion that includes a separate monthly fee apart from the basic on.
There isn't one. I'll never understand why people have to lie to themselves and others in order to justify their hate for a game they once loved. You moved on, it happens, get over it.
Re:Would people really pay double? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think giving them credit for thinking in the long term and not squeezing every cent they can from their loyal users is worthy of praise. To me, praising companies that respect their clients is a no-brainer.
Re:Would people really pay double? (Score:2)
Well, I expected them to charge a slightly higher fee (not double) if you played both games. If you're paying $14.95 a month now (I actually subscribe six months at a time), then you'll pay $19.95 to play both games. They could have easily justified it by saying, "Even if you only play City of Heroes, you will have access to significant additional content and features by being a City of Villains member, too."
However, it looks like they're thinking along the same lines that you are: if they had charged a
Christ people (Score:1)
Re:Christ people (Score:3, Informative)
things which are controlled by NCSoft. Everything related to your Account(s) in CoH, CoV, Lineage and Guildwars is controlled through PlayNC.com
Press Release (Score:1)
This isn't current news, this isn't really even news at all.
Re:Press Release (Score:1)
I was hoping for a small bump in price and access to all the NCSoft games, but this isn't too bad a deal.