Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
PlayStation (Games) Science

PS3 Owners To Simulate Gene Folding 74

Posted by Zonk from the so-far-we-have-not-found-the-science dept.
fistfullast33l writes "According to IGN UK, the next version of Playstation firmware will include a joint venture from Stanford University and Sony called Folding@Home. Similar to the infamous SETI@Home project, Folding@Home will be an idle application that participates in a simulation that 'aims to map the way that genes change shape (or fold), so they can be studied by scientists and, potentially, cure illnesses such as Parkinson's or a variety of cancers.' The application will download a 'work unit' that it will unravel to completion, update Stanford's servers, and then download the next unit and continue." We've previously discussed the client; it will be available as an update at the end of the month, and should appear on your cross-media bar once installed.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

PS3 Owners To Simulate Gene Folding More

PS3 Owners To Simulate Gene Folding

Comments Filter:

  • Who? (Score:5, Funny)

    by patternmatch ( 951637 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:22PM (#18364661)
    So who's Gene Folding?

  • Tis a shame... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Raynor ( 925006 )
    Usually you release distributed computing applications on computers which have a large market share... Meh, I'll be doing my part though (when i'm not playing FF-(fill in the blank))

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Seumas ( 6865 )
      So let me get this straight. I pay the energy bill for cycles used to crunch genetic mapping data that will be used by corporations to develop drugs for lifelong treatment (like they'd develop a cure when they could profit more from treatment?) so that when I'm sick, I can pay a few thousand dollars a month to afford the pills?

      Just because the project is managed from a university doesn't mean the project, its goals and it's results are altruistic.

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by evilNomad ( 807119 )
        Okay, so save your money, and then when you need the drug you die, too bad..
        • Okay, so save your money, and then when you need the drug you die, too bad..

          Yes... but he'll have won. No corporation is going to get his spare change!

          This is exactly what is wrong with our country today. We are so afraid of someone else winning that we will hurt anyone to stop them.
          • I think the opposite is true. Our country is going wrong because our corporations try so hard to do well, they don't care who they have to hurt to gain their profit.

      • Re:Tis a shame... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by king-manic ( 409855 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @01:58PM (#18365937)
        Academic research has a much greater chance of being widely distributed and public domain then corprate research. So someone will do it eventually. I'd prefer it to be a university who will at least share their findings thena propriatary research group which would hoard their results much tighter.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Hellkitten ( 574820 )

        I pay the energy bill for cycles used to crunch genetic mapping data that will be used by corporations to develop drugs for lifelong treatment (like they'd develop a cure when they could profit more from treatment?) so that when I'm sick, I can pay a few thousand dollars a month to afford the pills?

        For some of us that's not entirely accurate. A large number of homes around the world are heated electrically during winter. All the power you would normally use for electrical heating you could just as well

        • "All the power you would normally use for electrical heating you could just as well run through a computer of some sort (a game console is just a specialized computer). The energy will eventually end up as heat (a cpu is just a special electrical oven that also does computations). Essentially you get the cycles for free (minus minimal wear and tear on the computer) if the computer would just sit idle and you would use that power to heat your home anyway."

          That is a load of crap, ever hear of a heatpump? I h

          • That is a load of crap, ever hear of a heatpump?

            Yep. Ever heard of the cost of it sompared to a basic electrical oven? Unless you actually already have a heatpump installed it doesn't make sense to compare the heat from any electrical appliance to the one you get from a heatpump. The investment literally takes years to recoup from the power savings (this may obviously differ depending on power costs). Where it's cold enough they are ineffective (unless you invest even more and drill down to get that heat

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by DogDude ( 805747 )
      Folding @ Home is already widely distributed on PC's. It's probably a 5-6 year old project. Plus, if you think that the PS3 isn't going to have a large market share eventually, you're nuts.

  • Hmm... Folding@Home has been around forever (Score:5, Informative)

    by bad_fx ( 493443 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:25PM (#18364711) Journal
    Yet the article and blurb seem to imply that it's a new thing.

    Also, here's the info on the Folding@Home website:

    http://folding.stanford.edu/FAQ-PS3.html [stanford.edu]

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by _xeno_ ( 155264 )

      Hmm... Sony pretending that something that's been around forever is something new and exciting because it involves the PS3? Surely you jest!

      (Sorry, sorry, I know, cheap shot. I just couldn't resist.)

      • Eh, I'm still glad to see a company put that out there. It's good work, pure science, and the results aren't "owned" by anyone.

        Definitely makes me think more kindly of Sony...It's obviously a PR scam, but I really don't care...They could have done a lot of different things for PR, and this one will actually do some good.

        • Re: (Score:1)

          by Seumas ( 6865 )
          What do you mean? How are the results not "owned" by anyone? The only people who will profit are the pharmaceutical companies. Other scientists may benefit from the use of this data, but in the long run all it does is provide a free pool of data at the user's expense that will ultimately benefit the companies doing research into drugs to treat disease so that they can charge an arm and a leg to keep people alive.

          Curing cancer and other disease is still beneficial to the world, but it's not like this informa

          • Re: (Score:1)

            by rhombic ( 140326 )
            Trust me, the results from things like Fondling@Home are pretty much worthless to all drug companies. Especially Pharmacia & Upjohn, since they no longer exist. If you don't like the fact that drugs are created by private, for-profit corporations, maybe you should talk to the US government about where they choose to spend their money. Developing a new drug costs ~1 billion. The US is spending $5bil a month in Iraq. That's ~60 new drugs a year. The FDA only approved ~30 NCE's last year. That's right, for

  • Make money this way? (Score:4, Funny)

    by UbuntuDupe ( 970646 ) * on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:28PM (#18364757) Journal
    I was thinking recently: if I could get the credit card cycle beginning right, I could defer payment on any electricity I buy for 110 days. (55 days from first day of electricity billing cycle to due date, 55 days from beginning of credit card to its due date.) If I use it steadily for the whole month, that's on average 95 days still, or about a quarter (of a year).

    So, if there were a way to convert electricity into roughly its monetary value, I could put it in a money market account for (on average) 95 days, and then keep the interest that accrued. (5% per year at today's money market rates)

    So, anyone know if you can charge enough for PS3 computing cycles for this to be worth it?

  • Unleash the power... (Score:3, Funny)

    by AmIAnAi ( 975049 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:28PM (#18364767)
    Maybe this is the application Sony is looking for to utilise the full power of the PS3.

    • Re: (Score:1, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Actually, this is one of the few types of the computing problems that the Cell would be good at. You have a relatively uniform stream of data that a large number of simple, unchanging operations need to be applied to and generate a relatively small amount of data that can be streamed out without any synchronization. It is perfectly suited to the architecture of the Cell. It's when you have to apply complex operations or have to randomly access a large set of data and do lots of conditional cases or synch
  • I must have missed something, since when is SETI@home infamous?
    • The story of the college IT worker canned for installing it in the labs could maybe be dubbed "infamous".

      We both know they mean famous, but nobody really cares about the difference anymore. Serial killers are hugely popular, because people not only dont know - but dont recognize the difference between fame and infamy.

      I can try to summarize for the sake of education though:

      William Shakespeare: Famous, Adolf Hitler: Infamous.

    • Re:Infamous? (Score:4, Funny)

      by 0racle ( 667029 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:50PM (#18365115)
      It's not just famous, its INfamous.

      Might even be the biggest thing to come out of Mexico.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by fistfullast33l ( 819270 )
      I wrote the article summary. I probably meant famous but for some reason infamous sounds better in my head. I will point out that maybe SETI@Home can be considered infamous in that so many people used it on their computers and it never really accomplished anything. It was billed as the first large-scale distributed programming project, but it probably was one of the most pointless applications ever. Not to mention I could never understand the interface or believe that you were actually doing anything.

      • I will point out that maybe SETI@Home can be considered infamous in that so many people used it on their computers and it never really accomplished anything.

        I think you mean to point out that SETI@Home hasn't really accomplished anything yet, as it is still alive and ticking.

        It's also taking up half the cycles on my farm; the other half being used for Folding@Home. My heart goes with SETI, though; I always hope that we'll attract the attention of some malevolent alien race, and they'll come and wipe out all those people that take 50 items throught the "10 Items or less" lane at the supermarket. Collateral damage is acceptable in the pursuit of that lofty goa

        • We can only hope they also take out the people who make the signs saying "10 items or less" instead of "10 items or fewer"
          • But if we go that far, we might as well hope that they take out all the ones that don't use "10 or fewer items." ;)

  • Genes don't fold..... (Score:5, Informative)

    by charon_1 ( 562573 ) on Thursday March 15, 2007 @12:34PM (#18364861)
    proteins do..

  • Cost? (Score:2)

    by \\ ( 118555 )
    So, would I need to leave the PS3 running 24x7 folding@home, racking up $100+ in costs, for this?

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Aladrin ( 926209 )
      Yes, and in case that isn't clear enough, you will also overheat your PS3, heat your house to the point that cooling is now necessary, and generally annoy your entire family by screaming 'no, it's folding!' when they want to play PS3.

      Yeah, it somehow doesn't seem like a real great idea.

      Computers seem like a good idea because we geeks tend to leave our computers 24/7 anyhow. Consoles don't get the same treatment, though.
  • Explain to me why SETI is considered "in"famous? from everything I've heard and read, the project was a major breakthrough in multi-computer processing of data, opened up a new way of analyzing data on a massive scale, and even revealed some possible locations in which to begin looking for radio transmissions. Excepting a few debacles with people getting fired from using work computers, how could SETI be considered anything but a complete success?

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by bigdavex ( 155746 )

      Excepting a few debacles with people getting fired from using work computers, how could SETI be considered anything but a complete success?

      They haven't found any aliens.

      I think your other statements are spot on, but there it is.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Aladrin ( 926209 )
      How many results has it produced? How many aliens have we verified the existence of? How many areas of the known universe can we say are probable to contain extra-terrestrial life?

      None.

      While there was tremendous success in the technical aspects of the project, there has been absolutely no success in the actual goal.

      I'm sure any tea-totaler would count the project as a loss so far, but most people with any scientific background understand that there have been many benefits from the project that were not an

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by 7Prime ( 871679 )
        Well, in seeing the scope of the data to be analyzed, one would not expect to be finding anything this early. Yet, in fact, SETI has revealed quite a few possible sources to look into further. The fact that it's recovered anything at all is pretty remarkable, if you ask me. I don't think they were expecting to find ANYTHING this soon, so it has past expectation.
      • Exactly. The problem is that SETI is a long shot.

        When you participate in gene-folding, or protein-folding (as in the Baker Labs at the University of Washington [washington.edu], which win year after year in best predictions), you know that it's going to useful research that actually helps us understand how things actually work.

        Nothing against SETI - I did many packets for them back in the day.

        But, practically, it's more fun to do something like cure cancer (UK site) or fold proteins (UW - search for Baker Labs in Biochemist

  • ...but the numbers keep on circling me [lyricsdepot.com].

    Just a little help for those who were wondering what the department's name was all about.

  • Why in a firmware update? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MikeBabcock ( 65886 ) <mtb-slashdot@mikebabcock.ca> on Thursday March 15, 2007 @01:00PM (#18365225) Homepage Journal
    Stupid question maybe, but why would this be distributed as a firmware update and not as a downloadable 'game' from the Playstation(R)Network Store?

    I can understand (and have commented before on the need for) a firmware update to add 'applications' or some such option to the XMB for non-game software, but I can't see that the software itself should require this distribution method.

    Anyone able to shed light on this?

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by tapo ( 855172 )
      I assume to get it on as many machines as possible. This also isn't the only new feature in the March 23rd update, other things - like background downloading - will also be implemented.

  • Games? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Rydia ( 556444 )
    Maybe they can use this massive amount of distributed processing power to come up with a game worth playing.

    Really, really. It's the games. Home might be nifty (although also microtransactiony) and this might be a good idea, but neither of these are going to move systems. I get the feeling Sony's treading water, hoping for something to pop up.
  • Why was the SETI@Home project "infamous"? What did it do that was evil or malicious?

    These isn't even a malapropism because you didn't use it to mean "not famous" as most do. Why don't people proofread a single paragraph that goes to millions? (I'll never no...oops, I mean "know")

  • A a good game for the Ps3...heheheh

    I kid I kid
  • Wake me when my PS3 can fold all my laundry. I don't even have that many jeans, anyway.
  • Cause if it isn't... I imagine there'll be a huge backlash when people notice their PS3 is constantly drawing 0.4kW whenever it's on.
  • The PS3 actually will cure cancer?
  • So essentially, we're taking a console that's notorious for overheating (just visit a few stores with kiosks and count how many are functional), and running the CPU at full throttle, 24 hours a day nonstop. Does anybody else find this slightly unnerving?
  • I thought Folding@Home was bad because they do work for large private companies. So basically you are doing their work for them, and they get all the $$$.
  • The PS3 sucks too much power for me to be part of any @Home program. Since I've had my PS3 hooked up (November) I've let it idly on at times, and other times turned off. That's how I've operated my frequently played video game systems my whole life. If I've just finished a game of basketball, maybe I want to leave it on the screen where I can come back later and have a rematch, or maybe I want to pause my game when I get to a boss and pick it up the next day... Well, treating my PS3 like this has resulte
  • Actually, they started the project way back in 1976, and time-travalled to our time to get PS3s to start working early, as you can see in http://folding.stanford.edu/abeta-PS3.jpg [stanford.edu].

    Visualizing these largish molecules is going to be interesting.

  • Alright, we have phong shading, but at least some specular bloom [stanford.edu]. Folding@home are taking their first steps into next-generation graphics [vgcats.com]!

Slashdot Top Deals

If all the world's economists were laid end to end, we wouldn't reach a conclusion. -- William Baumol

Close