FFXIII Not Due Until Next Year 43
IGN translated an article discussing a financials meeting recently held by Final Fantasy creator Square/Enix. According to company president Yoichi Wada, don't expect FFXIII until next year. At least. "'It will still take a bit more time. At the very least, [a release] this fiscal year is definitely out of the question.' Japanese is known for being a pretty vague language, but Wada's words were pretty clear. No FFXIII in Japan until some time after March 2008. Let's hope Square Enix starts the translation before development finishes up." The implication there, of course, is that if we follow the trend from FFXII the U.S. may not see the game until Winter 08, or even early 09.
Wishful thinking (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Mark my words: the primary Final Fantasy XIII will not be a PS3 exclusive even if they have to rewrite half the ga
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If no(or very few) PS3s sell between now and then, would you feel comfortable releasing a game you've just spent $30mil making on a console that doesn't have a large enough market to make back your money?
Sure, FFXIII will sell consoles, but how many people do you know will be willing to pay close to $800 (PS3, game, better cables, tax) just for _one_ game?
There are already very unsubstantiated rumors that many PS3 titles have been delayed simply so that the publishers can take more
Oh no, another year. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Oh no, another year. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
There must be some other reason for the delay.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The treatment is a success!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
::shrug:: (Score:2)
(and yes, I have played them all)
Re:::shrug:: (Score:4, Interesting)
Now I just kinda wish they'd go away.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
FF has been a spotty series to me.. (Score:2)
FF4 to me was the first with a bit of depth to the story and characters.
FF5 I found to revert to a more straightforward story with more flat characters.
FF6 was quite epic with a deeper world and characters, but I found Kefka to be a weaker concept in terms of a villain. Also while the story was deeper, it still seemed too straightforward.
FF7 I feel is different and I loved it. They took some living planet philosophy to i
Well... (Score:1)
2008 or later (Score:1)
Still at the drawing board. (Score:4, Funny)
Will his fashion sense be a hodge podge of articles from the pirate era, or the dark ages? Will his plucky love interest be a young queen society won't accept marrying him, or a rags to riches disadvantaged girl?
Will the airship be powered by magical beads, or fire? These are all important questions the developers must answer before they can even begin work on Final Fantasy 6, no 7, no 8, no 9, no 10, wait. What?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/07/ps3-is-region-f
just something to keep in mind if you don't have a HDTV
off topic (Score:1)
Good, This Give me Time to... (Score:1)
And we're surprised? (Score:2)
In any case, Final Fantasy, while not dead to me, ha really lost its charm as of late. I mean, I liked FF12 well enough, but then I went on to play Tales of the Abyss, and realized that I was enjoying myself a whole lot more, and found that title to be much more engrossing. FF12 came in a distant fourth this year after Twilight Princess, Okami, and Tales of the Abyss. That's not bad, since all those ga