Hellgate London Beta Signups Begin 52
Via Eurogamer comes the news that Beta signups for Hellgate: London have begun. Folks looking forward to the unique blend of FPS/RPG/MMOG can sign up at the official site. From Eurogamer's blurb: "If you're one of the lucky ones pulled out of the gruesome sorting hat, you'll have a chance to get to grips with the ambitious multiplayer part of the game. You might remember that there are two tiers for this; one is a limited and free version, the other asks for a monthly subscription of [about $14] in return for bundles of exciting bits and pieces - player housing, extensive guild options, enormous raid encounters, loads of items to collect, and more. It forms an integral part of the package developer Flagship Studios will be offering when the full game launches on 2nd November."
mac (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Insensitive clod (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do hope that they enjoy the respite from having to worry about product viability. But it turns out that good, synchronous mac versions have been a huge contributor to the success of Blizzard's products. And the lack of them probably a contributor to the fact that none of these Blizzard-
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess you've never heard of Guild Wars, which is a game created by some people who left Blizzard. It has sold more than 2 million copies...
Face it bud, the Mac gaming market is an afterthought for most developers. This is for a reason, not because they hate you, but because it's just not worth their time to port the game over.
I'd be really interested to see you backup your numbers to show that Mac WoW has been a 'huge contributor' to the success of WoW. Especially so, because I play WoW, and NOBO
Re: (Score:2)
I also play WoW, and most peop
Re: (Score:2)
For a game that has no Z-axis it has done very well. For me, not being able to jump over objects was a deal breaker. Nevertheless, I did buy it and the Nightfall campaign. So they got their money from me.. I
Re: (Score:2)
People can't play games on a Mac BECAUSE THERE IS ALMOST NONE.
It's a chicken-egg problem, mostly. But developers should take note that people with Macs tend to pay for their software, instead of pirating it.
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
One thing I am wondering... It *is* possible to get a two+ button mouse on a Mac now, right? Using a one-button mouse would kill games dead imho.
That probably shows you how little I know about Macs.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm afraid that it does, yes. While I don't mean to be insulting, you may want to be slightly less willing to denounce people as wrong regarding a topic about which you have very little information.
(And yes, it has been possible to use multiple-button mice with macs since os8, which was released in 1997. Multi-button mouse support has in fact traditionally been far better for macs than for Windows; the OS itself is quite capable of handling 5+ butt
Re: (Score:2)
The rest, I admit I was wrong, for the most part. Might want to read the replies back and forth on this thread with the other guy who hates me now because I talked shit about Macs
Re: (Score:2)
You mean because it is a Mac mouse with driver support already built in? My logitech mouse has 7 buttons and a scroll wheel an I can use all of them in windows without a "special driver", i just can't program them for alternate uses in the OS without a driver..
Re: (Score:2)
I had the idea that Windows tends to want drivers for anything so outre as even mice, printers, scanners, cameras, and so on. But I'll be the first to say that my knowledge of Windows is negligible, so I'll take your word for it if you say that's not the case these days.
So you know...? (Score:2)
So you know exactly what percentage of the 8 MILLION people playing WoW to back up your assertion that the Mac has not, in fact, made an impact on the game? Around .0000375% or something like that? In other words, around 300 people or so. If that. Even if you extend that an order of magnitude, your sample size is woefully small.
Even if you could say you knew 30,000 WoW players this does not make you any more of an authority than the ori
Re: (Score:1)
kiddies? (Score:2)
1) I don't think it is appropriate to sign up with a work address
2) Should they choose to spam the crap out of my email address for signing up, or give/sell my email address, my gmail address is an address I can walk away from without caring much. I use it for all of my mailing lists and online signups (including slashdot).
So i guess I fail to see what your
Re: (Score:1)
Smart move (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
After all, after posting the link on Slashdot, look at the website now?
Getting a whole bunch of "drupal" errors and a weird login screen.
Re: (Score:2)
But you didn't hear that from me.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They sate my curiosity about a game and typically prevent me from wasting money on it.
Re: (Score:1)
"Optional" subscription (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
But boy, I sure can't wait for the next 4 pokemon games to come out!
Re:"Optional" subscription (Score:4, Interesting)
Based on the last Hellgate story [slashdot.org] we had (the interview with Roper), this doesn't sound to be the case. The free online play is the exact same game you get if you play single player. The only difference between free and pay, is that the monthly subscribers get a "bonus", which at launch is a slightly larger stash, an extra character slot, and what sounds like the ability to acquire vanity items (slightly better or differently colored items).
Also based on that interview, it sounds like some of the things the submitter suggested were pay-only aren't. To quote Roper [newsweek.com]: "It's for free having that same experience online with your friends. And then we also give you access to a bunch of stuff. Like community things like being able to join guilds, trading items, auction houses; all those kinds of things that we never even had with Diablo 2." Stuff above and beyond that is for the monthly subscribers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This would filter out the 8-12 year old group pretty effectively.
It would also filter out the 12-17 year old group very well. You know the type. The ones who think they know everything. The ones who love to grief other players. The ones who act immature. From Diablo they were known as "B.net
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I disagree 100% with the remark that the older players are the biggest morons. They may cause drama at times, but they are far more enjoyable to play with than a 12 year old who can't spell and uses all caps.
Re: (Score:2)
And you missed my point- the people who can't spell and use all caps aren't generally the 12 year olds. Most of those are in their 30s. The 12 year olds tend to be a bit immature, but most of them know how to type.
Re: (Score:2)
I would play on that server in a second.
doh (Score:1)
403 Forbidden (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)