New 2D, HD Sonic Game Coming In 2010 123
Anonymouse writes "Sonic the Hedgehog is going back to his roots, but with a fresh coat of HD paint. 'An all-new 2D side-scrolling High Definition Sonic game is coming with a 2010 release date, according to a new teaser trailer from Sega.' Sega's Ken Ballough had this to say: 'Old-school Sonic fans have long asked to see Sonic return to a more 2D style of gameplay. Many liked the daytime stages in Unleashed but wanted to see a game that plays purely similar to the early games of the Genesis. Project Needlemouse is that critical first step that brings Sonic back to his 2D roots.'"
About time! (Score:1, Funny)
About time Sonic came to Linux!
Re:About time! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
They opened two in my area... that appears to be their plan: show the ads for years with no Sonic, open a drive in, and then wait while the drones turn up and actually disrupt highway traffic waiting on lines for this shit. There is an actual police presence at both Sonics near me, and I believe someone rammed a police officer for telling him he could not come in.
Even after they open one near you, be prepared to stay FAR away from it for awhile. Ours have been here more than 6 months and it's still a scene
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the 2D Xbox live/PSN HD remake games have been about $9.99-$19.99 which is fairly reasonable.
If this came out for PC I would be happy.
Re: (Score:1)
We can't be sure this'll be a downloadable game.
Re: (Score:1)
12 hours? I recall them talking about 3 hours with Unleashed which is why they added those werehog filler levels.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I think its an average calculation based on the beta testers.
Personally when playing a 40 hour RPG it usually becomes a 100+ game as I am one of those people that has to get 100% completion. But i know people who just rush through and beat the 40 hour game in 6-10.
But platformers, even if I'm going slow are usually no more than 6 hours. This game better be $20 or less with good replay value. I replayed Sonic 1,2,3 and S&K hundreds of times. But I know replay value is not big on programmers minds any
Re:Let me guess (Score:4, Insightful)
$60 for a good game. Who cares if it's 2D or 3D? Or if it takes 12 hours or 120 hours?
If your definition of a good game is being 3D and taking forever to complete, then I have a copy of Superman 64 I'd like to sell you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The real issue is that there hasn't been a good SONIC game for over a decade. And by that it isn't allegiance to the character but the playstyle: large 2D maps with many many routes that are more fun to play when going fast but proportionately more perilous.
Let's face it, transitioning a classic non-RPG game to 3D requires supporting game mechanics to change dramatically. Compare games that jumped between 2D and 3D: Ninja Gaiden, Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Prince of Persia. All of them keep familiar elements to
Re: (Score:1)
I still prefer Mario, Zelda, and Metroid games in 2D (and Castlevania while we're at it).
For a good look at a modern 2D platformer running on a 3D engine to good effect, see Prinny: Can I Really Be the Hero? on the PSP. It's also a good example for replayability, appropriate difficulty levels, and length.
I would probably buy this Sonic game as long as it turns out to be what they're promising, rather than just another crappy post-Genesis Sonic game. The 3D games have not been able to capture anything that m
Re: (Score:2)
Just thought that warranted pointing out. Seems a bit dismissive to say there haven't been ANY good Sonic games. If you're talking about the console versions, just say so.
Re: (Score:1)
If you didn't like even one of the 3D Sonic games, then the problem is not with Sonic; it's with you. You're hard to please and won't take anything else than the exact 2D gameplay of the early 90s.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I could beat the original Super Mario Bros. in about 30 minutes, while others can apparently do it in about 5 minutes. I'd still buy a good remake or reworking of the game for $40-50 (ie New Super Mario Bros. on the Wii), because I still enjoyed the game after beating it several times.
That being said, I don't take much risk when it comes to games at $60. $50 is pretty much the upper limit of my willingness to assume any level of risk,and even then it's stretching things, since I can usually find games I kno
Re: (Score:1)
The time to consider shouldn't be the time to beat but the time to disinterest. If you lose interest exactly at the credits, well, that's fine but I found that usually the interest had a different length than the game itself.
Finally... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
GameCube or Dreamcast? I loved the Dreamcast version (the 1st one was bad) but the only Sonic game I player on the Cube was... weird.
I think that was a joke.
Sonic Adventure 2 was viewed as less fun than the original by many, and the GameCube's version of 2 suffered poor sales.
But I could be wrong.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This gives me the opportunity to ask about something that I've always had trouble finding info about... cart pulls.
A cart pull is when you yank one cartridge out, put another one in, and hit reset, based on the fact that the Genesis does not wipe RAM when you hit reset, and some games did not initialize all variables properly. This aspect is well-known in that Sonic 1 lets you get the first chaos emerald, hit reset, play from the beginning of the game until getting a chaos emerald (which will be the second
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.sega-16.com/feature_page.php?id=38&title=Cart-Swapping%20Tricks:%20Cheating%20at%20Your%20Own%20Risk [sega-16.com]
i seen they do that trick with rambo III once, but never performed it myself.
Re: (Score:1)
I discovered this with sonic 1, though couldn't care less as the game wasn't actually all that difficult to beat properly without cheating.
What I found rather interesting was that with the game sonic 3d (and I vaguely recall this working with at least one other cart) if you gave the cartridge a good tab on the front of the game it took one directly to the cheat menu.
Was this a deliberate thing or just a handy fluke? It was discovered by a friend of mine who gave the console a thump after a fit of rage induc
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Sonic 3D Cheats menu: B,A, Right,Right, A, C, Up, Down Down, A (It spells Barracuda) one of the more memorable cheats :)
Re: (Score:2)
Sonic 3D Cheats menu: B,A, Right,Right, A, C, Up, Down Down, A (It spells Barracudda) one of the more memorable cheats :)
Fixed that for you :)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
curse my lakc fo Englihs Spelling
Re: (Score:2)
My favorite part of Reset not clearing variables is in X-Men. The game actually required you to press RESET on the console in order to finish it. Talk about exploiting a quirk and turning it into a unique game enhancement. With console operating systems and system-land and user-land distinctions, those days are gone, man.
Re: (Score:1)
You make it sound like they haven't made 2D Sonic games since then. There's 3 GBA ones and two DS games. The level design in the GBA ones was arse (hey, let's end a lengthy run sequence right on top of a set of spikes that pop up you can only know about with trial and error!), the DS versions were hit and miss (some good stages, some bad ones) though the second DS game was grindy (had to repeatedly play stages to get the parts you needed to reach the next level) from what I heard. Sure, none of them were ma
The Adventure Curse. (Score:2)
I doubt it.
One of the interesting factors I've found with Sonic is any time Sega uses the word "Adventure" in any sonic game, the quality goes towards the crapper.
For example, Sonic Rush was pretty good. although it added another friend, but Sonic Rush Adventure was a useless grindfest that made you play stages over and over and over. nowhere near the first Rush.
Also in original games, the word Adventure is almost never found. It's nowhere on Sonic 1 or 2 either on the box art of the manuals. It's on Sonic
Re: (Score:1)
If you think Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles sucked, there is no hope for you. Maybe you're arguing that they should only be viewed together, but that doesn't make the individual games suck.
Sonic Cycle (Score:5, Funny)
Before you get your hopes up, I would like to direct your attention to what is called the Sonic Cycle [imageshack.us].
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Parent NSFW (Score:1, Offtopic)
Just so you know, it's very unlikely the parent is safe viewing for your particular workplace ;-)
Re: (Score:3)
See the top of the Sonic Cycle. He gets put in the game along with new friends on step 2.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Trust me, the friends are a problem.
A problem you will want to stab repeatedly.
Play Sonic Adventure (all parts of it...) and you will understand.
As long as they dont manage to make it suck (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nice! (Score:5, Insightful)
Well mario made sense because he was a slower platformer to begin with and even in 2d had a reasonable amount of exploration already built in (mario3).
Sonic games... if you look at "maps" of the levels, they're ENORMOUS. Doing that in 3d would be almost impossible so they needed to both slow down sonic and find ways to make you feel like you were going faster and farther than you really were. Thus you get lots of grinding and levels that are basically roads floating in the middle of the air. Since Super Sonic basically went even faster still and was invincible except for crushing and falling into pits he had to go out the window too, it'd be impossible to control or map for and remove their carefully planned interruptions.
Going back to 2d and not on a handheld means there's a chance to get those looooong levels that aren't based on "haha didn't see that coming" tiny screen cheap shots and grinding/rocketing/whatevering level gimmicks back. Along with hopefully the old emerald system.
Re:Nice! (Score:4, Interesting)
I have to agree, although personally I don't think we need to throw 3D all the way out. Something along the lines of what Capcom did with Street Fighter IV would be pretty awesome. I've said it before, and will say it again. I wish these classic series would start sticking to their roots. When will companies realize it's not in their best interest to reinvent the wheel when it comes to classic series? I'm dying for modern remakes of several classic titles (Raiden, Gunstar Heroes, Radiant Silvergun, etc.), and I'm confident that doing them 2D is not only the cheaper approach, but will lead to the superior product.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You know in Japan they did a Shadowrun RPG for the Sega CD. It got bumped in the US, obvioulsy, likely for Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch: Make My Music Video.
I miss Sega's consoles, but I can't say they didn't deserve their fate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I quite enjoyed Gunstar Super Heroes (GBA).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Going back to 2d and not on a handheld means there's a chance to get those looooong levels that aren't based on "haha didn't see that coming" tiny screen cheap shots and grinding/rocketing/whatevering level gimmicks back.
2D sonic games look(ed) fast because of fast scrolling and nothing more. If you have enough time to see what's coming ahead, this means scrolling isn't that fast, hence the whole game seems comparatively slower (big screen or not, high res or not). YVMV, but I wouldn't expect substantial gameplay improvements on this aspect.
Re:Nice! (Score:5, Interesting)
Sonic's transition to 3D was the same as NBA Jam, confusing and everything that was fun about the game got lost in translation.
It's good to see it going back to 2D, heaps of 2D Xbox live games have proved to be a huge success with a HD touch up, this should be the same.
Now all we need is them to do NBA Jam TE in HD and I'll be a very happy person.
Re: (Score:2)
Many games went downhill when they went to 3D. Even HMM (a strategy game) became less playable, because stuff was harder to click on than in iso. People like 3D for the graphics, not for the ability to get lost, for the ability to lose "obvious" items behind ferns, and other annoyances.
FPS is the exception.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually I really liked Sonic and the secret rings except for the pointless story and music.
But the gameplay really was the 2d gameplay really well transitioned into the 3d realm. The trick simply was to push Sonic back on rails hence you could get the speed back.
Re: (Score:2)
But original sonic was written with emeralds not ruby?
(sorry)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't think it is much like the 2D games but it does use the advantage of 3D that you can look ahead and control Sonic at much higher speeds, it's pretty much a redesign into a racing game which IMO was the right direction to take for 3D Sonic.
Re: (Score:2)
Well I think it is not too different, the 2d games were like run as fast as possible and dont hit the obstacles in the way by jumping.
Secret rings was, run as fast as it gets and dont hit the obstacles in the way by jumping and getting sideways.
The reason why it feels like a racing game is, that burnout took a lesson from sonic and sonic in itself is a racing game sort of.
(well it has very similar mechanics)
But I think they got the formula defintively right in that game. I still wonder why this game got med
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Sonic Team was showing off too much in Sonic Adventure. You had limited control over the camera, and it would zip around all over the place on its own. An unpredictable camera is horrible, no matter how much work went into the AI to predict what the player wants to see.
The proper way to use the camera for any high-paced 3D game is a fixed viewpoint, so when controlling the character, you don't fight with the camera. It's not a visibility issue, it's a control issue, so smarter camera AI isn't going t
Re: (Score:2)
I always thought Sonic's transition to 3d was much less graceful than say, Mario's. Maybe it was the high speed and the weird feel of the Dreamcast controller that made me feel like I was influencing Sonic's motions, not controlling them.
Sonic was never meant to be 3D. He's hard enough to control in only two dimensions. I could just about handle him on the Genesis but on the Dreamcast? Forget it. Uncontrollable.
The DS version is where they needed to go. 3D engine locked onto the traditional 2D track. Looked pretty, played well, no 3D track BS. Only problem is that I'm just not very good at it.
Re: (Score:1)
Sonic's transition to 3D was the same as NBA Jam, confusing and everything that was fun about the game got lost in translation.
It's good to see it going back to 2D, heaps of 2D Xbox live games have proved to be a huge success with a HD touch up, this should be the same.
Now all we need is them to do NBA Jam TE in HD and I'll be a very happy person.
The NBA Jam series did make a successful transition to 3D. While Acclaim acquired the license to the Jam name and released a series of awful 3D titles, Midway released a 2D NBA game (NBA Hangtime) and then a 3D game (NBA Showtime: The NBA on NBC) - both of which preserved the great game mechanics of the original Jam titles.
As for an HD version of the original Jam games? That would be a fun trick. Developers would have to go through the laborious process of taking new HD photos for the game's "digitized" gr
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe, Nintendo are just much better at making games than Sega.
A list of what not to include (Score:5, Insightful)
-Every character except Sonic, Tales, and Knuckles
-Clumsy, overbearing storyline
-Rail grinding
-Furries
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Screw what the fans want. Wait, isn't that what they've been doing for the past five years?
Bring on the old school gameplay! Mm, will he go back to his old Mega Drive appearance?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I think you are underestimating the ability of game companies to screw something simple up
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, it's easy. Spikes up the wazoo. Especially in places where you're moving so fast that you won't see them until you've already got a good internal organ peeling. Maybe if spikes aren't good enough use energy beams that kill you even if you have rings left. Or just the good 'ole bottomless pit right next to the speed rail.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget Dr Robotnik.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't Tails qualify as a furry?
He gets a pass because he's one of the original characters. Plus, if they do it like the original games where he tags along with you, you get to have fun watching him blunder into things, get himself "killed", and then helicopter back onscreen by spinning his two tails.
...
Ah, the simple pleasures of yesteryear
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
No furries? Who would star in the game, Chris Thorndyke and Princess Elise?
Hedgehogs are furry (and have actual fur on the belly), foxes and echidnas are too. And lizards, dragons, snakes and birds are included in the furry fandom even if they lack actual fur.
Yeah, right. (Score:5, Insightful)
This better be good (Score:2)
If they let fans down with this one, it'll be the end of the brand, for sure. Sega cannot afford that. After all the recent letdowns, this looks promising seeing as (they say) they're looking to emulate the "old skool" Sonic feel. Play control is a must, and creativity as well. True to the Sonic Cycle, my hopes are up, but I'm not going to pass solid judgment until I know a lot more.
This isn't going to happen (Score:1, Informative)
from http://www.needlemouse.com/
You've found our Needlemouse project! Congratulations!
You may think you're looking at a sample of the upcoming Sega game, which according to recent speculation is called Project Needlemouse. What you've stumbled on is actually a fan-created game that weâ(TM)ve been calling Needlemouse: The Emerald Hills since we began working on it a few months ago.
oh well.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yesterday we were all freaking out over the announcement of Project Needlemouse, a codenamed game that promised to be a brand new 2D Sonic the Hedgehog due for release in 2010. Don't worry, the game itself and the trailer we posted is genuine. However, a Project Needlemouse site featuring Green Hill-esque artwork has been confirmed as false.
Hopefully look as good as Trine (Score:2)
Trine is a "2d" side-scroller, but makes beautiful use of pixel & vertex shaders, along with fun gameplay.
I haven't remembered a SEGA game being fun in ages (aka Dreamcast days)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really trine is 3d but in 2d/3d look like Pandemonium was. Btw. as for Sega I really liked the Nintendo DS sonics and funnily I personally loved Sonic and the Secret Rings.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, I know Trine is 3D. That's why I but "2D" in quotes.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think this will work out (Score:1)
Cycle or not (Score:1)
When it's released, I'll look for reviews and screens, and if it's released for the PC, I'll probably buy it.
Sonic 2d (Score:2)
There has been a load of 2d sonics, but they were only released on the handheld consoles, needless to say they were quite good.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I tried Sonic Rush Adventure on the DS. Took me 10 minutes of dialogs and stupid stuff before I could play a platforms level.
I never touched that game again. I usually play on my DS for short sessions, and if I want to play a sonic game I want a fast platform game. I don't care about a storyline that's as dumb as the worst teletubbies episodes.
Re: (Score:1)
I tried Sonic Rush Adventure on the DS.
Well, theres you're problem!
Re: (Score:1)
Actually, the three Sonic Advance games weren't that good. They had poor level design. Sonic Rush was a step up with the tricks system, better level design, and great music, but it's still not the same thing as the original series. Everything is still about going fast. The original series was about good level design with platforming, and momentum. Not constant speed.
Ah, Retrogaming... (Score:2)
._. (Score:1)
Also, apparently I have the complete opposite reaction than a lot of you. The 2D Sonic games are really boring and dated, yet the original Sonic Adventure for Dreamcast was by far one of the best games of its time. Seeing as it's the only 3D Sonic game I've played though, I can't really vouche for anything further.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm with you. Sonic Adventure 1 & 2 I really loved, and I didn't play the original sonics in the 80s so I don't have the nostalgia that everyone else has. But the 3d sonics after adventure 2 are horrible full of fail. I tried heroes, and it was painfully lame. Then sonic was a werewolf. then sonic got a sword. wtf?
I don't have a lot of hope for this. But the sonic advances and rushes for handhelds were pretty cool. so maybe.
Sonic Rush (Score:2)
We'll see if it is actually faithful to the original Sonic or if it ends up being more like the crap, Sonic Rush on the DS. Excluding the frustrating boss fights, the game was completely 2D. The sense of speed was present, but the stages were poorly designed with all sorts of traps, obstacles and falls to constantly trip up a player. The game was constant trial and error trying to figure how to get past sections. But even worse, pacing was awful. The game encouraged, even required high speeds but then would
Re: (Score:1)
I think you're being a bit too harsh on the game. The tricks system is there exactly to get you through the obstacles unharmed and maintain your speed. As for the level design, it's not that bad. Try the Sonic Advance games to see what bad looks like. Too many large bottomless pits.
face it those old games wern't that great (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You're obviously entitled to your opinion. While I definitely am of the retrogaming mindset, I personally didn't own a Genesis and never played the original games at the time. I did get the Sonic Mega Collection for the PS2 (a system I only got a few years ago), and enjoy them a lot.
Basically, you could argue that it's nostalgia for that *type* of game, but there are people playing the game now that weren't players of the game series originally.
(I never had a NES either, and played Super Mario Bros for a
Re: (Score:1)
The original three Sonic games are much more interesting and challenging than anything than anything that Sonic Team has put out since the 90s.
Bleh (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)