Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
It's funny.  Laugh. Social Networks The Almighty Buck Games

VC Defends Farmville, Touts Virtual Tractor Sales 148

theodp writes "In a blog post, venture capitalist Fred Wilson gives his thoughts on ripe areas for tech investment in 2010 — mobile, gaming, new forms of commerce/currency, Cloud platforms/APIs, education and energy/environment. Asked to comment on scams and social gaming (he is an investor in Zynga), Wilson defended Zynga's Farmville: 'Zynga makes almost all of its revenue on virtual goods. I said in my etsy/san telmo post the other day that more tractors are sold every day in Farmville than are sold in the US every year. That's where the money is in social gaming. The "scammy ads" thing is total red herring that everyone got excited about but is almost entirely irrelevant.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

VC Defends Farmville, Touts Virtual Tractor Sales

Comments Filter:
  • by cvtan ( 752695 ) on Sunday January 03, 2010 @11:39AM (#30631902)
    but I have to get back to Farmville! My pumpkins are dying and I have 57 gifts to receive.
  • Re:So? (Score:5, Funny)

    by sopssa ( 1498795 ) * <> on Sunday January 03, 2010 @12:00PM (#30632010) Journal

    On a slightly related funny note, people really bitch about everything []:

    "Civilization IV: Colonization Called 'Morally Disturbing'"

    I literally exclaimed "holy sh*t" out loud when I was reading an e-mail this morning listing the "Games for Windows" coming out this year and I came across this:

    “Sid Meier’s Civilization IV: Colonization” (2K Games). In “Sid Meier’s Civilization IV: Colonization,” players lead one of four European nations on a quest to conquer and rule the New World."

    But goddamit, am I the only one who think it's morally disturbing to make a game that celebrates COLONIZATION? It's ironic, actually, because just a few months ago a friend sent me a link to some information about the original "Colonization" game from 1994 (pictured left) that this one updates. At first, I thought it had to be a joke, but sure enough, it was real. However, I dismissed it as a relic from a time when neither developers nor players took videogames seriously as media with moral implications.

    But the idea that 2K and Firaxis and Sid Meier himself would make and release a game in the year 2008 that is not only about colonization, but celebrates it by having the player control the people doing the colonizing is truly mind boggling.

    Remember all the debate when Newsweek's N'Gai Croal said of the "Resident Evil 5" trailer with the African zombies that "Even if you are familiar with the franchise, if you are familiar with those images and their historical weight, you look at it and say, 'Man, that’s kind of messed up.'" Well, I agreed with N'Gai on that issue, but in my opinion, a game about colonization is about 100 times more messed up. "Throughout history, colonization regularly involved stealing, killing, abuse, deceit, and the exploitation or decimation of native people," he added. "Anybody with a shred of moral conscience who studies the history will be appalled. Whether it was British rule in India or slavery in Africa or Aboriginal children kidnapped and taken to Christian schools in Australia or the dislocation of Native Americans in the U.S., there were no positive colonization experiences."

    Fritz said he's not calling for a ban on the game, emphasizing that 2K has every right to release it for sale. "But I think personally they shouldn't release it, if it's at all what it appears to be based on the early marketing," he continued. "And I'm hoping a lot of people agree with me and will say so publicly."

    That's pretty ridiculous. Imagine if he knew there were nuclear weapons and slaves in Civ 4.

  • Re:So? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Rude Turnip ( 49495 ) <valuation&gmail,com> on Sunday January 03, 2010 @02:30PM (#30633154)

    Yeah, seriously, what did the Romans ever do for us?

panic: kernel trap (ignored)