Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
The Almighty Buck United Kingdom Games

UK Video Game Tax Relief Cancelled 106

Stoobalou writes "UK game developers have just been dealt a financial blow by Chancellor George Osborne in his first budget, which sees the coalition government scrapping the video game tax relief plans promised by Labour. In his speech today, Osborne simply said the 'planned tax relief for the video games industry will be cancelled.' According to the government's budget report, the cancellation of video game tax relief will save the government £40 million in the 2011-2012 financial year, and a further £50 million in each subsequent year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Video Game Tax Relief Cancelled

Comments Filter:
  • However.. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by severn2j ( 209810 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @04:11AM (#32662564)
    They are cutting Corporation Tax, employer contributions to National Insurance and (if I read correctly) new start ups wont have to pay NI on the first ten employees they hire. So rather than provide a boost for that one industry, those breaks are helping out all industries, including the games industry. Makes sense to me.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @04:14AM (#32662578)

    I work in the games industry too, and I'm not at all bothered by this tax relief being cancelled. It wouldn't have helped the average developer one bit, all it'd have done is give the big cats who run the companies even more money.

    The only argument that really holds any weight in this discussion is for the giant multinationals who might decide to relocate their UK studios elsewhere for tax breaks. Even if the big companies move, those people will probably still find jobs elsewhere anyway. If they stay, we're just giving UK government money to a foreign company. Seems a bit daft really.

  • Re:Obviously (Score:2, Insightful)

    by ZeRu ( 1486391 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @04:39AM (#32662720)

    I don't that's an issue here, more like it's part of UK Govt's plan to increase taxes to get rit of its debt.

  • by Xest ( 935314 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @06:43AM (#32663166)

    "the UK one is caused because the country hasn't actually produced anything in years"

    Yeah, except the UK is still sitting at about the 5th to 7th largest economy in the world by manufacturing output and in the top 5 for service sector output. Contrary to popular belief, it's really only it's position in agriculture on the world stage that's declined.

    That's quite an achievement for a country that hasn't produced anything in years.

    No, Britain's problems were caused by it's reliance on the service sector in the face of the US' credit crisis in which it was deeply involved.

    Britain doesn't have a problem with money or assets per-se, it has so many programs it could cancel (i.e. Trident) if push came to shove to pay it's debts, the issue is that the previous government over-extended public sector, such that we have more public sector expenditure than we can realistically afford. Britain's pain is merely going to have to be a scaling back of the public sector programs we have, coupled with higher taxes to pay for the rest of it- this isn't Britain's only option, because as I say, Britain has so many schemes and so much expenditure and so forth still that it could cut if it really needed to it's really not at much risk.

    In contrast, countries like Greece don't have big things like nuclear weapons programs with money set aside for that they can cut now that it's hit crunch time. The same goes for Spain and so forth.

    So effectively, like the US and France, whilst Britain doesn't have a lot of actual cash floating round, it does have a lot of expenditure planned, or assets to sell off should things get really bad.

    In other words, Britain, like the US and France could solve it's financial situation tommorrow if the population was willing to accept the loss of some massively important albeit luxury programmes people have gotten used to having such as Trident, new aircraft carriers, child tax credits, free care for the elderly and that sort of thing. Of course, that wouldn't be pleasant for the people who depend on those schemes, which is why the government is trying to solve the debt problem a bit more slowly, and a bit more carefully.

    Effectively, it has simply deemed that the UK video game industry tax relief is one of those small things that can be cut without the vast majority of the population actually giving a flying fuck, and without any real harm to the economy.

    Conveniently the BBC have produced this tool that illustrates the rough point quite well: []

    Try moving the welfare slider to see what I mean- in one fell swoop most the deficit could be eliminated, but the key is to do it with least impact on people possible.

  • It's not a handout. It's a reduction in taxes.

    In practical terms, there is no difference.

    If the companies in question would otherwise relocate elsewhere [...] 39% of something is more than 40% of nothing.

    Propping up failing business is not the answer. Allowing businesses to fail in a timely fashion so that the results are not magnified by keeping them going up until the last, catastrophic minute only causes further financial fallout.

  • by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @09:00AM (#32663800) Homepage Journal

    Well you've pretty much summed it up, but I'll add that when it comes to having a big bloated public sector Greece and Spain (plus Belgium and France) are in an entirely different league. Jobs for life (many of which don't really need doing - just as well because they don't bother to do them anyway), early retirement with an index linked pension - and still they're on strike at the slightest excuse.

    Right now I see the ferries to the Greek islands are blocked by a bunch of hooligans. So there's hundreds of tourists stuck on the docks, fuming and swearing they'll never go back there, when they should be in shops and taverns putting money into the local economy.

    Do these morons think there's an endless pot of gold that the government is withholding from them just to be mean?

  • Re:Massive U-Turn? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Grantbridge ( 1377621 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @09:47AM (#32664302)
    Just because the minister for the Department of Jam wants more jam subsidies does not mean that the Chancellor will pay for them! I don't think he has lied or misled you, he just doesn't have the clout to persuade Osborne to cut the health budget and pay for games instead.
  • by Xest ( 935314 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @10:15AM (#32664636)

    Yep, it did make me chuckle the other day when I saw the French were raising the retirement age to 62- poor sods, however will they cope?

    Here in the UK though if you've seen the comments from the unions their attitude is no different- according to the unions in the UK we can't make cuts and we can't raise taxes. I'd love to know what planet the unions are on, I'd love to know where exactly they think we're going to find £150bn without cutting or raising taxes. That's a common trait amongst unions it seems though, they're often more than happy to whine and moan about everything, but they never actually offer any alternative solutions to the problems, just claim the solutions everyone else comes up with can't work.

  • by Xest ( 935314 ) on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @04:09PM (#32669942)

    I think you completely missed the point.

    Surviving on £30 a week less is better than the alternative of having the entire economy fail because if it did your £30 a week wouldn't be worth shit anyway.

    I'm not saying we should decrease the state pension, I'm not saying that at all, I'm just pointing out that if we really reached crisis point it would be at least one option that would allow us to avoid complete and utter national meltdown.

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein