The Chipophone — an 8-Bit Chiptune Organ 84
adunk writes "Linus Åkesson has built an 8-bit synthesizer inside an old electric organ case. 'All the original tone-generating parts have been disconnected, and the keys, pedals, knobs and switches rerouted to a microcontroller which transforms them into MIDI signals. Those are then parsed by a second microcontroller, which acts as a synthesizer.' The Chipophone is perfect for playing classics such as the Super Mario Bros in-game music or Rob Hubbard's Spellbound. A description of the build process, with photos, is available."
Two words : (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
no wait, on second thought, i wouldnt want to meet that moron.
Anyone remember the SIDstation? (Score:5, Interesting)
For those using softsynths, have a look at QuadraSID [refx.com] too (demo MP3 on the right-hand side of that page), particular with the Rob Hubbard expansion packs. I use that a fair amount in what I write. If anyone else knows of some interesting softsynths along the same lines, I'd be interested to hear.
Cheers,
In
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.linusakesson.net/hardware/chiptune.php [linusakesson.net]
Re: (Score:1)
Not a softsynth, but how about building a MIDIbox SID [ucapps.de] from a spare SID chip and some other parts?
scandinavian again. (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Torvalds is Finnish; Finland is strictly not Scandinavian. Scandinavia is the peninsula with Sweden and Norway.
Re:scandinavian again. (Score:4, Informative)
The whole geographical point here is the Scands mountain range, that runs north-south in Sweden and Norway. Hence, Scandinavian peninsula.
Whether the "cultural" argument is valid is a bit contentious -- a lot of the typically Swedish-speaking Nordists who are objectively speaking a bunch of Swedish imperialists certainly want to extend the concept of Scandinavia to include Finland ("because it is good for us").
Personally, although we all live a in typical Western European democracy with similar political leanings, I find Scandinavia to be culturally different. And of course it is linguistically different too; it's just that for some weird political reason, Finnish never is allowed to "count" in these kinds of considerations. After all, we're a bilingual country and all that, and in the future Swedish is going to be the mother tongue of all of us...
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Thanks for your reaction. I've learned a lot from it (and subsequent Googling).
I'm not going into the Swedish/Finnish discussion (as I frankly don't know the details of that, although I can guess). Suffice to say that Swedish is a language that I could learn if I tried, but Finnish, no way I could master that one.
And, seeing that my own country is rapidly declining due to insane government policy, I would like to think I'll someday move to a more pleasant country. And that would be an Scandinavian (in the b
Re: (Score:2)
The whole geographical point here is the Scands mountain range, that runs north-south in Sweden and Norway. Hence, Scandinavian peninsula.
Which is a moot point, because derivation is not synonymous with definition. Specifically: "Finland is sometimes considered a Scandinavian country in common English usage..." [wikipedia.org]
Given that English is the language in use here, one oughtn't quibble with someone's correct English usage of the term 'Scandinavian' on grounds that it would be incorrect in Swedish or Finnish.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, sometimes considered; common usage... but it's still a wrong common usage, that I will keep pointing out, in particular as there is some charged politics here :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's still wrong, and the Cold-War invention "Nordic countries" should perhaps be preferred if Finland must be included. Scandinavia is definitely not only a geographically separate entity, but a separate cultural-linguistic whole as well. Just listen to the Swedish People's Party folks who insist on us having to integrate to Scandinavia because it's so damned special compared to *us* (of course, an alternate variant of this argument is the idea that nothing except Swedishness exists, and the wrong kind of
Re: (Score:2)
Besides, when people say "Scandinavian", they usually refer to the Nordic Countries, which include Denmark, Finland and Iceland in addition to the scritcly defined Scandinavia.
Very true. In fact, the Scandinavian Studies department at my university includes courses on all of those countries, and their languages.
heh (Score:2)
oh crap... (Score:2)
this brings back oh so many hours spent in front of the NES.
a real mega man (Score:3, Interesting)
My jaw was already on the desk but when he started playing the Mega Man theme... OMG!
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed I was singing along.
I've had friends laugh at me for considering 8-bit chiptunes, but I think this is the future....
How long did it take to get a working piano? 25 years? So now we can start on our journey....
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah because someone's going to cry about making one of the billion learner organs out there into a sweet 8-bit instrument.
FYS
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Better restored as a synthesizer than in a landfill.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Has everyone completely lost their value of history in this 'throwaway' culture?
Other people are making lamphades from vintage sheet music. [associatedcontent.com]
Re:Blasphemous (Score:4, Insightful)
Throwaway culture or no, some things just aren't worth it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Let me clarify at this point that organs like these are not particularly rare. They were mass produced in the seventies, and most thrift stores in Sweden have at least one of them on display.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
He didn't throw it away, he recycled it. He could've gone out and bought a cheap MIDI keyboard and hooked it up to a softsynth, but instead he reused something he already had in a novel way. How is that throwaway culture? Reduce, reuse, recycle.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you bothered to RTFA, you'd know the thing was of no real historical or any other value. Mass produced old organ whose future was either this or the garbage heap. I think this is infinitely more awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
What a bizarre comment. The chipophone was created for live chiptune performances. The intention wasn't to destroy anything or prove how special anyone is. The organ, which is a very common model produced in the seventies, is just the shell that happened to be used for this project. Your comments about restoration of history are all the more strange considering the whole point is to resurrect 8-bit synthesized instrumentation for live play.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not like he hacked it to pieces and made a shelf from it. He turned one electronic music instrument into another. Essentially, he installed a hardware upgrade. Like installing more RAM, only a tad more involved.
Leisure Suit Larry (Score:2, Insightful)
This synth is great, but it isn't a REAL synthesizer unless it can adequately play the theme music to Leisure Suite Larry. :)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
That's not an electric piano.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_piano [wikipedia.org]
The chipophone is clearly a synth. It doesn't create the sounds mechanically, unlike an electric piano.
The guy is amazing (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, a couple of years back I was thinking of a similar project: use an Atmel AVR 8 bit (RISC) microcontroller to create a sound chip, controlled by MIDI. Well, this Linus dude did that, and MUCH, MUCH more! Pluse, the guy is a great musician (he can actually play a full organ, which in addition to hand, needs also foot coordination), and can play the whole of Rob Hubbard's Spellbound entirely by heart [youtube.com].
In a perfect world, this guy should be famous, make millions, and sportsmen like Tiger Woods would be happy to mow his lawn :o) (that's my geek utopian dream).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Way cool; online help is available (Score:3, Interesting)
More from the same guy... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
More info here. [linusakesson.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Not only involved, he did all parts of it. Also, check out turbulence which is similar hardware but with composite output (manually created signal on the fly).
8 bits are not enough (Score:2)
8 bits are not enough to measure the awesomeness of this device.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Exactly. That's why it goes to eleven! Bits, that is.
Different approach to cheap great music (Score:3, Interesting)
For cheap cool music, I took a different approach. I wrote an open-source hardware controller for an inexpensive commercial MIDI tone module. The best tone module to use is the Yamaha TX81Z, because they are cheap and very flexible. They are widely available still because there were millions sold new about twenty years ago. They are available on eBay for about $60-$80. The sound engine is a four-operator FM synthesizer that can programmed to make all kinds of weird sounds, along with classic analog-synth sweeps and 80's video game sounds.
Instead of a real organ keyboard, I use a standard PS2 (purple connector miniDIN6) computer keyboard to play the notes. The standard PC keyboard has its own internal microcontroller. It sends a scancode when a key is pressed and also when the key is released, which makes it able to be used as a music keyboard. Its advantage is that it's really cheap, about a few dollars each. The disadvantage is that the keys are small, and, certain combinations of keys (played as chords) don't sound. The specific combinations depend on the keyboard manufacturer.
Google for the Two-Pot controller at the Yamaha TX81Z Homepage. I also do have later versions of the firmware, all open-source.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That also sounds pretty cool. Might I suggest making a video of it and uploading it to YouTube?
Incredible (Score:1)
Inspiring. (Score:1)
Truly inspiring. It makes me want to get back into the microcontroller hobby. (No arduinos though, where's the fun in that?)
So...? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. If the whole point of this experience was to run the synthesizer through a MIDI keyboard then it would be much better to just spend 50 euros on a MIDI keyboard and, from there, build a small 8-bit synthesizer that supported standard MIDI input. There was no need to scrap a perfectly good organ just to cannibalize it and convert the shell into a synthesizer.
Yes, I get the spirit of the "because it's there" crowd. I also understand that economics doesn't play a major role in this sort of project. N
Re: (Score:2)
Internally it encodes the keyboard as MIDI and then again decodes them in the synthesizer. So basically the portable synthesizer you want is a subproject of this. I guess he figured he might want to use the synthesizer separately at times (much more portable).
Re: (Score:2)
Those organs are a dime a dozen. It's not like he defaced the last remaining one or anything. There are also advantages to using an organ as a starting point: the kind of synth he is using has a bunch of presets, and the sound is changed by turning them on and off in various combinations--exactly like the stops on an organ.
A synthesizer connected to a module would have been cool. But retrofitting that synth into an organ case and using the expected behavior of an organ's controls to make an extremely pla
MIDI device (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, so converting this organ into a boring old midi keyboard similar to what everyone already has is more awesome than making a unique instrument perfect for playing back old chiptune music?
I disagree.
hmmm (Score:2)
VST keyboards? (Score:2)
You see, this guy's a genius, but it shouldn't have to be this hard.
Not so long ago, I enquired to see if there was a keyboard (preferably weighted) which can take VSTs as input to allow for an infinitude of possible instruments.
Guess what? No such keyboard exists.
It would be incredible to use and play a keyboard, but with the infinite range of VST instruments and effects out there. Unfortunately though, manufacturers like to 'lock in' their keyboards with the own limited range. It's pretty sad.
Re: (Score:2)
Just to reply to my own comment, if keyboards could use VSTs as input instruments, the quadraSID VST would be perfect for attempting something like he's done:
http://refx.com/?page=products/quadrasid/summary [refx.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Are you asking for a keyboard that can run a VST module? Frankly I think having a Windows-based synthesizer is a ghastly idea and a maintenance nightmare (the digital equivalent of lining up a 24-track without a manual), but if you really, really want to do this, I know of two products which will allow it:
The MUSE Receptor/Receptor 2. This runs Linux, and AFAIK seems to be fairly self-maintaining. It's a 19-inch rack module that can run VSTs through some kind of WINE hackery. According to Google it cost
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you can tell me though why keyboard manufacturers haven't already done this. Whatever the OS it runs on (or maybe they can create their own mini OS inside the keyboard?), the whole idea is that you have an almost infinite collection of instruments at your disposal. Each of the parameters of the VST could be assigned to a knob or button on the keyboard. It could be extremely easy to use, and the user doesn't have to know an underpinning OS is at work behind it all.
The whole idea of VST is universality,
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you can tell me though why keyboard manufacturers haven't already done this. Whatever the OS it runs on (or maybe they can create their own mini OS inside the keyboard?),
I'm not a keyboard manufacturer so I can only make an educated guess, but to put it bluntly, your question is basically the same as "Why can't I run my old VB6 application on an iPad?".
The long answer: From what I do know, most keyboards are based around cheap embedded CPUs, and maybe half a gig of flash or ROM at most for the OS and waveforms. The basic design doesn't have to change very much over the product's lifespan as the components generally have long production lives. It's cheap to mass-produce, i
Re: (Score:2)
I'm with you on the whole instant switch off/on thing. Heck, I even detest the 2 seconds I have to wait on my current Roland FP4 :) I also dislike fan noise (my own PC is silent even with a quadcore, after careful choice of components). One can always decrease the GHz if heat is a problem. SSD is perfect for VST storage, and again silent and durable.
But having said all that, I can't see why it isn't possible to interpret a VST even without a full blown OS. Software and hardware can do virtually anything, an
Re: (Score:2)
This gadget [smproaudio.com] will let you use VSTs without a computer, looks to be around $500 and has a smaller footprint than a laptop. It doesn't have a built-in keyboard, and reading a little more about it, it looks like not all VSTs will work with it. I guess it's a first step. While I'm not really surprised that a dedicated VST controller isn't out yet, I think it's only a matter of time before one is introduced. Everybody's moving to softsynths nowadays, and VST is a pretty prevalent architecture for them.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a far more reasonable price, and they seem to have done away with the HDD, which is also good. Looks like they've done the linux approach like MUSE did, and as you say, not all VSTs are liable to work on it as a result.
If I hadn't given up on the whole VST thing and gone all-hardware, I'd definitely look at getting one.
Re: (Score:2)
One can always decrease the GHz if heat is a problem. SSD is perfect for VST storage, and again silent and durable.
But having said all that, I can't see why it isn't possible to interpret a VST even without a full blown OS.
Depends what dependencies it has. If the DLL wants to create a pretty picture of a PPG Wave you'd have to at least stub most of the GDI subsystem. The fun part is when they've designed it badly so that the parameters can only be controlled by clicking on it, so to make those work you'd have to have the mouse, keyboard and screen. As for reducing the clock frequency, that SM Pro thing has a 1GHz processor, probably for that reason. You could probably run that nice and cool, but it's going to eat into you
Is it just me...or (Score:2)
Why oh why (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Having trouble operating that computer, there?