Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Chrome The Internet Games

Chrome 70 Won't Ship With a Patch For Autoplay-Blocking Web Audio API Which Broke Web Apps and Games Earlier This Year (theverge.com) 44

An anonymous reader shares a report: Earlier this year, Google made a seemingly crowd-pleasing tweak to its Chrome browser and created a crisis for web game developers. Its May release of Chrome 66 muted sites that played sound automatically, saving internet users from the plague of annoying auto-playing videos. But the new system also broke the audio of games and web art designed for the old audio standard -- including hugely popular games like QWOP, clever experiments like the Infinite Jukebox, and even projects officially showcased by Google. After a backlash over the summer, Google kept blocking autoplay for basic video and audio, but it pushed the change for games and web applications to a later version. That browser version, Chrome 70, is on the verge of full release -- but the new, autoplay-blocking Web Audio API isn't part of it yet. Google communications manager Ivy Choi tells The Verge that Chrome will start learning the sites where users commonly play audio, so it can tailor its settings to their preferences. The actual blocking won't start until Chrome 71, which is due in December.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chrome 70 Won't Ship With a Patch For Autoplay-Blocking Web Audio API Which Broke Web Apps and Games Earlier This Year

Comments Filter:
  • Is the little icon on the tab that lets me mute tabs individually. That's beyond a killer feature.
    • by dgatwood ( 11270 ) on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @01:26PM (#57486832) Homepage Journal

      What I really want is the ability to blacklist sites from which I never want to hear audio. CNN, I'm looking at you.

      • by mysidia ( 191772 )

        Probably doable using a Chrome extension. Not to endorse particular software, but
        a search suggests Silent Site Sound Blocker might fit the bill.

        So what you really want exists --- although IMO this ought to be core browser functionality,
        along with the ability to blacklist/whitelist a site for a picklist of a variety of other commonly abused features, such as:

        * Ability to script at all

        * Ability to script beyond a very restricted feature set with many limitations to prevent web annoyances.

        * After a doc

      • Why do you even visit CNN.com? They just said "Kanye West is what happens when Negroes donâ(TM)t read." WTF? They also said Trump looked like he had racist thoughts talking to Kanye West. [t.co] How do they read minds like that? They're a discredited media operation, credible people don't consume their content.
    • I noticed the Firefox mute icon on a tab doesn't mute Flash audio for me. I don't, however, know if it's the same for other people.

    • Chrome has had tab muting for ages.

      What I want is to actually stop videos from autoplaying so they don't waste my data and slow my computer. I've got extensions that stop some videos but nothing stops them all.

    • by antdude ( 79039 )

      SeaMonkey for me. I wished it would hurry up to use newer than "User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4". :(

  • by mysidia ( 191772 ) on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @12:48PM (#57486686)

    Dear Google: You don't get to change web standards randomly. The purpose of having a standard is there's a Stable Specification that developers write their applications against, and specifications stay the same and don't get willy-nilly changes until a new major version is ready, and the application sets a flag that it is ready to use the new version of the standard; your browser should be compliant and not suddenly change from developer expectations... stop coming up with random updates (planned or not) that make your browser start randomly doing weird stuff that breaks shit.

    I'm all for muting annoying auto-plays, but you need to treat it like the PopUp blocker: Alert the user that your software has done something weird to stop a likely annoyance, and let the user easily override it for the site or disable AutoAudio blocking entirely.

    • Your number is low. I would figure you would had suffered the browser wars of the 1990's

      Where we had Internet Explorer and Netscape fighting tooth and nail to break the standard, and add features that only their browser supports. In hope there will be enough developers who use it so the end user wouldn't use the other browser.

      This type of stuff never went away. Every 10 years or so, a browser decides it will support the standard as written. Then it starts adding extra stuff, until there is a functional dif

    • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @01:29PM (#57486850) Journal

      Chrome is the new IE6.

      Google clearly figures its market share is big enough that it can just ignore standards. The world turns, and everything old is new again.

      • IE6 didn't ignore standards because they wanted to innovate and figured they were big enough to force others to follow them. IE6 ignored standards because they couldn't be bothered to implement anything and it was basically abandonware.

        • by lgw ( 121541 )

          In the early days of IE6, it was the 90% player, and MS was adding "features" left and right. They were implementing like crazy, just implementing their own stuff.

      • The only difference is that these days, web developers LOVE Chrome and its special way of doing things. That's why so many damn web sites work almost exclusively with Chrome, even though other browsers are perfectly competent.

        IE couldn't keep up with the flashy presentational stuff, and that resulted in margins being off by a pixel or two. Web developers howled. Google's stuff cause entire web pages to show up blank and otherwise not function at all in other browsers that are fully HTML5 compliant. No p

    • by Luthair ( 847766 )
      The problem is that developers at many companies are abusing the APIs. Quite frankly they should have continued with the change, the number of browser users who actually use the apps & games are in the minority compared to the number of browser users who are constantly bombarded with trash.
  • boo hoo hoo (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @12:49PM (#57486690)

    Auto-play anything harkens back to the days of <blink> markup.

    It's the same thing, only different sensory organ. And it is all intrusive, dreadful, and the perps should be locked in Gitmo until they get their minds right.

    • If you are going to have auto-play. The Video should be visible in your window (Not scrolled somewhere past your viewing angle, and on a background tab)

      However I would prefer not to have auto-play, at least with sound.

      • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

        That makes it easier to pause it, but it does nothing for the fundamental problem, which is that every time a website auto-plays a video on my laptop while I'm tethered to my cell phone, it costs me actual money for content that I usually don't care about.

        Autoplay — even when it isn't used in ads — is evil incarnate. There is no redeeming value to forcing every user's browser to start loading tens or hundreds of megabytes of video data without user interaction. There is no valid reason for do

  • Apparently I'm the only person who doesn't turn my speakers on unless I intend to use them. Nor do I have fifty tabs open on fifty different sites which play music.

    I guess keeping things simple is too difficult for most people.

    • Yes, you are the chosen one, Neo.
      Normal people often listen to some music while they surf the web and autoplay seriously ruins the experience.

  • Bullshit ... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @01:00PM (#57486748)

    Its May release of Chrome 66 muted sites that played sound automatically, saving internet users from the plague of annoying auto-playing videos

    Muting them is a start, but not good enough.

    Not downloading or playing the fecking things would be actually saving internet users from this shit.

    Muting it still wastes my bandwidth, CPU, and time as I pause the damned thing.

    And, no, I don't give a fuck about people who make shit with autoplay videos they think is useful, your autoplay garbage has no value to me, and I don't want my browser to show it.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    If I've never heard of it, it's probably not hugely popular except in your bubble.
    That said, it doesn't hurt someone to click a little more and get the content they want to work. I'd rather have that then be forced to watch/listen to crap when I'm trying to read something.
    Kids these days. It used to take me a day to craft a working DOS boot disk for the perfect himem + joystick drivers.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Chrome isn't broken, the sites needing the autoplay functionality are what's broken.

  • Before you go start learning which sites I want audio to play on, and which sites I want the autoplay videos starting up, and which sites are games I play, let me make this really easy for you: From now on, as in forever, don't play a video or sound or a game until I specifically tell you to.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...