Kids' Apps Are Flooded With Ads (reuters.com) 123
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Those cute little apps your child plays with are most likely flooded with ads -- some of which are totally age-inappropriate, researchers have found. A stunning 95 percent of commonly downloaded apps that are marketed to or played by children age five and under contain at least one type of advertising, according to a new report in the Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. And that goes for the apps labeled as educational, too, researchers say. Often the ads are intrusive, spread across in a banner or even interrupting play, said study coauthor Dr. Jenny Radesky, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Michigan and the University of Michigan C. S. Mott Children's Hospital.
Perhaps the most insidious ads are the ones you need to click a little "x" to get rid of, Radesky said. "The little 'x' doesn't show up for about 20 seconds," she explained. "If you're a 2- or 3-year-old you might think the ad is a part of the game. And you don't know what to do. You might click on the ad and that could take you to the app store. Many of these ads require you to do things before the 'x' will appear." Some ads are for products that aren't appropriate for kids, Radesky said. "I've seen banner ads for bipolar treatment in some of these apps," she added. One of the problems with these ads is that kids often can't tell where the game leaves off and the ad begins. "There's science to show that children aged 8 and younger can't distinguish between media content and advertising," Radesky said.
The researchers surveyed 135 of the most downloaded free and paid apps in the "age five and under" category in the Google Play store and found that 95 percent of them "contained at least one type of advertising, which included use of popular cartoon characters to sell products, teasers suggesting the purchase of the 'full' version of the app, and advertising videos that interrupted play to promote in-app purchases or purchases of other products," reports Reuters.
Perhaps the most insidious ads are the ones you need to click a little "x" to get rid of, Radesky said. "The little 'x' doesn't show up for about 20 seconds," she explained. "If you're a 2- or 3-year-old you might think the ad is a part of the game. And you don't know what to do. You might click on the ad and that could take you to the app store. Many of these ads require you to do things before the 'x' will appear." Some ads are for products that aren't appropriate for kids, Radesky said. "I've seen banner ads for bipolar treatment in some of these apps," she added. One of the problems with these ads is that kids often can't tell where the game leaves off and the ad begins. "There's science to show that children aged 8 and younger can't distinguish between media content and advertising," Radesky said.
The researchers surveyed 135 of the most downloaded free and paid apps in the "age five and under" category in the Google Play store and found that 95 percent of them "contained at least one type of advertising, which included use of popular cartoon characters to sell products, teasers suggesting the purchase of the 'full' version of the app, and advertising videos that interrupted play to promote in-app purchases or purchases of other products," reports Reuters.
Bi-Polar Treatment (Score:2)
Hmmm... Why might a psychological doctor and researcher's kids be served ads for bi-polar treatments?
Nothing immediately comes to mind...
Unless, maybe, could it be that the psychological doctor and researcher was the actual target of the AI targeted ad?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you remember watching Saturday morning cartoons and seeing an unusual number of ads for birth control and menstrual pads? The kids weren't the target then either.
The ads aren't geared towards the kids who have no money. The ads are focused toward their parents who do.
Re: (Score:2)
Saturday morning cartoon ads get seen by everyone with a view of the TV. Phone ads are visible to everyone who can see the phone. Are you suggesting that parents are watching ads over their children's shoulders while they're playing games? Or do you think the advertisers are counting on the kids seeing the ads and then recommending their preferred brand of bipolar medication to their parents? Those scenarios seem unlikely.
Re: (Score:3)
Honestly I don't think either. I think the researcher is giving her kids her phone. The ads are the same ads that are being served to the researcher on all of her AdSense supported apps based on her Google ads profile. I think the ads think that it's the researcher playing the kids games.
That was the point of my original comment.
Re: (Score:2)
Just ban ads already. The world would be a better place with the visual vomit of ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously, some things shouldn't be on a kids application; but it is understandable these apps finance themselves through ads.
Kids don't have money typically- they can't go to the store and buy games by themselves. (they shouldn't be installing apps by themselves either- but I'm sure it happens).
Kids can't buy apps but they sure can see ads and then go to the parental units afterwards and beg for whatever toy, game, or erectile performance product they saw on an ad.
Yep (Score:1)
Kid applications are horrible. Its hard to find decent ones. We basically ended up ditching android, getting a reasonably cheap ipad on a Christmas sale and only loading it with PBS Kids and then paying for ABC Mouse. The iPad is easier for them to hold, and the little home button is very intuitive for kids. This then allows apps to take the whole screen and not having the other UI elements on the edge for an accidental hit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Both PBS Kids and ABC Mouse are on Android too.
Re: (Score:2)
DO NOT ALLOW YOUR KIDS TO GROW-UP USING SMARTPHONE/TABLET/IOT!!!
Make them grow-up (tried and true!) good old fashioned way: Books/toys (but NOT internet connected ones)!!!
Books and toys are important; but so is technology. I wouldn't want my kids growing up as luddites and unable to understand basic technology that others in their age range were competent at. Limiting tablet time is very important- but taking them away completely is a way to harm your child's chance at future successes.
Everything in moderation.
Re: (Score:2)
Taking a tablet away completely isn't going to hurt the kid. 4 year olds aren't learning how to program apps, they are just vegging out to paw patrol videos. A 4 year old that can use a tablet to find a Netflix video is neither surprising nor impressive because the UI's of these devices are so simple that a 4 year old can easily learn it.
Look, screen time isn't the devil people pretend it is. But ultimately it's probably no better or worse that just looking at children's picture books.
Re: (Score:2)
Taking a tablet away completely isn't going to hurt the kid. 4 year olds aren't learning how to program apps,
Why not? I had only just turned 5 when I wrote my first program on an old Sinclair Spectrum 48K... OK so it was barely above "Hello World", but still. Playing games made me curious about them, being curious about them made my dad give me a book about BASIC for my 5th birthday. In under a year I was writing my own unique crappy programs- but they were all me. Not all kids are going to be reading as well as I did at that age, but nonetheless, some kids will want to learn how to do things their own way an
Re: (Score:2)
1) A 4 year old isn't a 5 year old.
2) No you didn't program "hello world" at 5, and you weren't programming any of your own unique programs -regardless how crappy- at that time. If you had said 7, I might have believed you. 10 is completely reasonable that an advanced student would could write unique programs. But you couldn't read at 5, much less write your own unique programs. Why lie?
Re: (Score:2)
1) A 4 year old isn't a 5 year old.
2) No you didn't program "hello world" at 5, and you weren't programming any of your own unique programs -regardless how crappy- at that time. If you had said 7, I might have believed you. 10 is completely reasonable that an advanced student would could write unique programs. But you couldn't read at 5, much less write your own unique programs. Why lie?
I absolutely 100% was writing my own programs at 5. My mum was a stay at home mum, so I was reading simple baby books unassisted by the time I turned 4 (I was also speaking her native language which I have now almost entirely forgotten). They weren't great, they didn't do anything useful, but I was writing them. I didn't do things like moving graphics and stuff until I was 7 or 8. My programs were things like '10 Dim x 20 Input "What is your name?", x 30 Print x + " is an idiot.' 40 Goto 10". With the
Re: (Score:2)
Everything in moderation.
Exactly!
Be a parent, not the baby sitter. Take an active part in your kids life, see what interests them, guide them. Don't just chuck them a tablet and tell them to google it. Play a few minutes of each game, if you don't like it for any reason then remove it.
What's the least dishonest way to pay your devs? (Score:2)
Nintendo's Super Mario Run follows the same shareware model as Idthesda's Doom, putting up the paywall after a few levels. If "teasers suggesting the purchase of the 'full' version of the app" are objectionable, then what's the least dishonest way for a game studio to both allow a parent to evaluate a game and keep a roof over the heads of its programmers and artists?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By this analogy, should music in styles not quite suitable for live performance cease to exist?
Re: (Score:2)
By this analogy, should music in styles not quite suitable for live performance cease to exist?
There isn't anything preventing it to exist. But don't ask me to pay real money for your imaginary property. Ditto for software, video games, movies, etc. Find another way to fund your hobby.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me know when the majority of voters in major economies approve of the winding-up of the entire entertainment industry.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure what you meant by that, so I'll reply to each of two plausible interpretations:
Idthesda's Doom
You might have noticed how they haven't made another
Doom II, Doom 64, Doom 3, and Doom (2016) exist.
Nintendo's Super Mario Run
You might have noticed how they haven't made another
Fire Emblem Heroes exists.
to add to OP's findings (Score:2)
Why is anyone surprised? (Score:3)
Adult apps are riddled with ads. Why is anyone surprised kids apps are as well? Why anyone would be deploying apps to children without playing enough of it to get a feel for how much junk it pumps should be beyond me, but considering how many parents just hand these things off as virtual babysitters without a second thought, sadly it is not. Pile on the fact that the populous seems to be blind to intrusive, oversaturating and pervasive advertising and it's not really shocking at all.
Pony up for quality content, or enjoy your child getting indoctrinated. If you're not paying for the product, you are the product, and so is your child.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Case in point. My son thought commercials were mini-documentaries. So when at the store and sitting in the cart, he would say something like "no mommy, we need to by Tide to get the whitest of whites", "only ZipLock bags hold freshness in", and "I want a healthy heart, so I need Cherrios." None of this is true, but for kids that grow up in homes where lying is not the norm, they see all advertisements as truthful.
You started out brilliantly there and then wound up in a big pile of crazy. Lying is the norm in your home, because you let your child watch commercial-supported TV, and commercials are all based on lies. (They may contain some truth, but that's not their thrust.) And on average, young children have an inability to distinguish the difference between commercials and programming. It's not whether lying is the norm but the intellectual development of the child that determines whether they believe everything th
Re: (Score:2)
Not a babysitter (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
If you're seeking out apps from the "age five and under" category, you're an awful parent.
In other news... (Score:1)
The sky doesn't have a color.
The gov sucks more than every vacuum cleaner sold in the last 50 years combined..
Apps have intrusive inappropriate ads.
It's shameless (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Android phone? Because it takes just a few taps to disable purchases or downloads of any kind in iOS.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here's an idea (Score:2)
Don't stick a tablet in your kids' arms to "entertain" them (another word for "keep them quiet and have some peace" for many parents). Play board games with them. Buy them Legos or Playmobiles. That will develop their curiosity and their imagination - something electronic games don't do.
Only when they're old enough to understand the ugly world of big data, online scammers, profiteers and pedo predators, and you've tought them a healthy dose of cynicism and paranoia on the internet, should you introduce them
Re: (Score:2)
That will develop their curiosity and their imagination - something electronic games don't do.
Variety of activity for children is important. Some games DO develop curiosity and imagination- more than traditional toys might. Limiting time on tablet is important- completely removing it from their lives isn't helping- it hurts. Most adults who are competent with technology grew up with some technology. There's a reason why your average 60 year old needs help setting an alarm on their phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Buy this magazine or we'll kill this dog marketing (Score:4, Insightful)
NYT [nytimes.com]: "In apps marketed for children 5 and under in the Google Play store, there were pop-up ads with disturbing imagery. There were ads that no child could reasonably be expected to close out of, and which, when triggered, would send a player into more ads. Dancing treasure chests would give young players points for watching video ads, potentially endlessly. The vast majority of ads were not marked at all. Characters in childrenâ(TM)s games gently pressured the kids to make purchases, a practice known as host-selling, banned in childrenâ(TM)s TV programs in 1974 by the Federal Trade Commission. At other times an onscreen character would cry if the child did not buy something."
yea.. (Score:2)
Child abuse (Score:2)
hmm (Score:2)
Well, that's why I monitor and regulate my kids' networked computer use (yes, phones/tablets are computers). And educate them about what they see.
But I thought that made me an evil helicopter parent who is messing up my kids. So which is it?
At what age do screen time limits end? (Score:2)
I've met some children in chat rooms that tell me they want to learn to program a computer, but their parents impose harsh screen time limits, such as six hours per week, even if all homework is complete or school is on vacation, and even if the child purchased the computer himself. If one of your children shows an interest in learning to program a computer, then at what approximate age would you allow enough screen time to make this practical?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is anyone surprised? (Score:3)
If I recall, the companies fight against regulation aimed at marketing towards children higher than any other group because they can get a customer for life. There are some regulations on ads aimed at adults (alcohol, cigarettes, gambling in some states, etc.).
Sugar Frosted Chocolate Bombs! (Score:2)
All the Cool kids eat them. Are you a "Cool Kid"?
Time to pull (Score:2)
Not Like This Hasn't Been Done Before (Score:2)
Remember Soupy Sales' gag?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch... [snopes.com]
'Kids' shouldn't even have smartphones (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The choice isn't between A) give a child a smartphone and let him be on it every waking moment to the detriment of his health and social development or B) no smartphone.
I don't see anything wrong with some screentime. Putting on some Youtube Kids videos is good for car trips. My son is 4 now, learning to read, and is actually enjoying some of the reading-related apps like learning sight words.
It is really disappointing how some apps targeted at kids abuse ads so much. I don't think your solution of "don't l
Re: (Score:2)
advertisement (Score:1)
DosBox? (Score:1)
My kids (6 and 8) have their own little Linux machines (Pocket Chips) on which I've put some DOS games via Dos Box. So they need to boot the thing, open a terminal, start Dos Box, navigate to the game directory and type in the name of the .exe file to start it. It takes a few minutes...
The love it! They play the usual DOS goodness: Commander Keen, Duke Nukem, Populous etc. Currently they're hooked on Dune 2... now they want me to read them the book...
One day, when they do get their smart phones, they'll kno
? what are they using ? (Score:2)
My kid (~ 3) has an Amazon Fire 8 for Kids. It has a huge selection of apps and videos. I have never seen an ad on it or any inappropriate apps or videos. It requires zero policing on my part.
What kid's device has this problem? Are parents actually letting their kids use adult devices or something?
Ads are a security vulnerability (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
This is not an argument for keeping Trump, your making a good argument for removing Pence too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So? (Score:5, Insightful)
Smartphones are in serious need of a thriving open source ecosystem.
Re: (Score:1)
Honestly, what smartphones are in need of is people finally realising they don't need to have their face buried in the goddamned things all the time, and for people to realise that social media is largely pointless bullshit designed to show you ads and harvest your information.
I've heard stories about people being knocked down and injured by the idiots who don't look up from their phones. I've stopped caring if some moron refuses to look w
Re: (Score:1)
lol. That guy's talking nonsense. This is the real me. Please disregard the other ACs.
Re: (Score:2)
You will once these kids grow up used to annoying adds everywhere, all over the place all the bloody time. Better get used to an idea of your phone waking you up 4am to advertise insomnia drugs to you, because if businesses could get away with doing that shit, they would. And if the next generation grows up used to adds all the bloody time everywhere, hey soon enough they will.
If kids get used to the kinds of ads they are subjected to now (which they will) then they advertisers will just get more insidious and create even more intrusive and obnoxious ads.
This kind of arms race was the exact reason many countries now have an advertising standards organisation that has the power to bad certain ads. Sure they get carried away some times (recently in the UK an ad for a Nissan Micra was banned for depicting excessive speed... a fucking Micra? but I digress) however they're better t
Re: (Score:2)
recently in the UK an ad for a Nissan Micra was banned for depicting excessive speed... a fucking Micra? but I digress
False advertising? The Micra would never make the speed limit, let alone over
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is these Ads are just a touch away from a purchase. Back when I was a kid, where we had TV Shows that were 1/2 hour commercials for toys, and even seeing a full movie which was an advertisement for Nintendo. We could want this stuff as much as anyone, but we were limited by Mom and Dad. Who often had the final say of Yes you can have this or No you can't, even a non-helicopter parent at that time had that degree of control.
Now with these Apps, you are just a click away from immediate gratifica
Re: (Score:3)
Without the kids really realizing that getting $1.00 add ins that offer 10 minutes of mediocre enjoyment, could had been used somewhere else.
And the parent is insane if they allow their kid to use a smartphone or tablet that has instant In-App purchases enabled without typing in a secret passcode which the child does not have access to until they are older.
The only complaint I have is Apple should have clearer UI standards surrounding how Ads are permitted to display themselves.
Being required to inter