Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Nintendo Games Technology

Nintendo's CEO Says its Online Accounts Key To Its Next Console Transition (theverge.com) 33

At Nintendo's 83rd annual shareholders meeting last week, president and CEO Shuntaro Furukawa said the company is hoping for a smooth transition from the Switch to its unannounced next game console, pointing to Nintendo Accounts as being key to the generational hand-off. From a report: Nintendo has pointed to its accounts as being integral to future business in the past, as in the Nintendo Account segment of a special report it released at the end of 2021.

In response to an investor asking if the company has any specific measures in place to make the leap to a Switch successor, Furukawa pointed to the difficulty of switching customers from one console to the next, saying in the past, the company had to rebuild a relationship with its customers each time. Furukawa noted that the more than 290 million Nintendo Accounts are cross-platform and can be used with console games as well as mobile apps. To close out his answer, he said that while moving onto the company's yet-unannounced next-generation console, Nintendo would do its best to make the transition smooth for customers.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nintendo's CEO Says its Online Accounts Key To Its Next Console Transition

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    It sure sounds like the next Nintendo console will be backward compatible with Switch games. At least for the eShop purchases and cross gen multiplayer.
  • I'd have thought a headline's spelling and grammar would be key to getting a story posted on slashdot, but I guess that's old-fashioned of me.

    • Nintendo is the innovative one, but I'm not expecting any radical changes with their next console. Just a Switch 2, though they won't call it that.
      • by nonos ( 158469 )

        Since they are parteneering with Sharp for the screen, maybe the same switch but with a 3D screen ?

      • The nVidia Tegra wasn't top of the line when the Switch came out but with a good line-up of games, that doesn't matter much.
        Just take a look at the Atari2600.

        • With the side note that the current Switch line-up does already have an OLED version. I'm hoping some clever design choices will open up the possibility of an even bigger screen than the current OLED version, within the same sized case. AND I'm hoping it can do 1080p in handheld mode, perhaps available as a setting, so you can choose between 720p (more battery) and 1080p (best graphics). I have not seen the OLED version in action (apparently it's gorgeous), but I imagine it would be quite mind-blowing to s
          • by godrik ( 1287354 )

            I have not seen the OLED version in action (apparently it's gorgeous), but I imagine it would be quite mind-blowing to see.

            I used to play on my son's Switch. I got one of the first OLED when they came out.
            It is really nice to play on, it is brighter, the display size is a bit larger. And you get a bit more battery because it is a bit more energy efficient.

        • by godrik ( 1287354 )

          My guess is that they will upgrade to nvidia's most recent embedded system. We have some in the lab here and software between the tegra 3 and the new ones should be very easy to port. Most of it may just run natively or maybe just by recompiling.

          So my guess is that we will get switch 2 with the updated specs.

      • It will probably be a while before they release a new console/handheld machine. Every new hardware platform coincided with a new Zelda release and since they just released Tears of the Kingdom, it will be a while before they have a new one ready. And if they were developing a new Zelda game in parallel with finishing TOTK then their information security is better than the military's.

        • That hasn't always been true, that's really just been the last two generations, and I believe their next console was more-or-less confirmed for 2024. I certainly would expect them to do a port of Tears of the Kingdom, with some additions.
        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          There has been speculation that they might release a more powerful but compatible successor to the Switch. With backward compatibility like the PS4/5 and Xbox have, it would be a much smoother upgrade for consumers. They did it before with the Wii and Wii U, and various Gameboys.

          As long as they make Mario Maker 3 and it runs on the current Switch, that's all I ask.

        • Every new hardware platform coincided with a new Zelda release

          BoTW was a dual platform release that included the Wii U and Twilight Princess also came out on GameCube as well as the Wii.

          I suspect that if anything Nintendo deliberately released TOTK well in advance of their Switch 2 plans to throw off people like you, but it will appear on the Switch 2 either as pure backward compatible software or that and a remaster.

        • I wouldn't say that is particularly accurate, It has been the case since the wii, The N64 and Gamecube were both released a year before their zelda games, and if I'm not mistaken the wii-u just had a re-release of the wii's zelda games.
    • by Njovich ( 553857 )

      Netflix like subscription model to play all Nintendo games? It seems Switch will be good in terms of concept for a long time, just slap a better SoC and screen on, update the looks to make it distinct from the old one, and they are good for another generation. Would be pretty crazy if they ruin this run with some gimmick and botching peoples library of games.

      • by tepples ( 727027 )

        Netflix like subscription model to play all Nintendo games?

        I thought that's what Nintendo Switch Online Expansion Pack was supposed to be about.

    • by Misagon ( 1135 )

      Microsoft is going to announce soon that Nintendo is going to release a "Switch Slim" later this year. And they also know the price for it.

  • I see a big underground market of stolen accounts in the Nintendo ecosystem's future. More likely than not this new console won't work at all without an account.
    • I see a big walled garden that Nintendo customers can't escape, inability to play offline and micro-transaction nickel-and-diming aplenty.

      • You already can't escape Nintendo if you want to play first party games, so nothing new there. That's like every platform that has exclusives, right? And since part of the Switch's idea is to take it on the go, there's no reason to think you can't play offline. And they have mobile games available for the micro transactions, so no, that's not happening on the Switch successor, either.
        • I thought I read an article about Nintendo cracking down on "microtransactions" as in a full on blanket ban on those.
      • Welcome to iOS (except not so much the inability to play off line part)
  • That is to bring reality to the rumors and create a system that is literally just the Switch but with a PS4-level (or near that level) SoC from nVidia that is 100% backward compatible with digital and physical games from the Switch 1.

    If they pull that off, the Switch 2 will sell at Switch 1 levels (3rd best selling console of all time [wikipedia.org])

    • My 10 year old has figured out that buying "online" games isn't as good for her as buying the physical versions. She's worked out that the physical ones can be shared amongst friends, and can be resold after she's finished with them. Online, not so much.

      I'd love to think they'll just give us upgraded hardware, but seeing as they're already warming us up for online accounts, I think we're headed in a slightly different direction. If either physical games cease to exist, or if they become "locked" to one onli

      • by godrik ( 1287354 )

        My 10 year old has figured out that buying "online" games isn't as good for her as buying the physical versions. She's worked out that the physical ones can be shared amongst friends, and can be resold after she's finished with them. Online, not so much.

        While it is true for many cases, there are many cases where it is not quite like that. If you are looking at a first party nintendo game, then they never go down that much in price. I bought Fire Emblem Engage at full price physically and I guess at most it will ever go half price. Similarly for Zelda and games like that.

        But third party games can often be significantly cheaper digitally than physically. I wanted to get the two ace attorney collections, they are retailling at about $70 for both games. If you

  • Could I just buy one old SNES game, and carry it forward to all consoles (via emulation, etc.) without having to rebuy it in an entirely new shop?

    Because then you might actually see a purchase from me.

    If I could buy half a dozen of the "best" Nintendo games from the last 30+ years, and have them permanently in my account, and they work on all the consoles "above" the one they were purchased for (or a decent bare minimum capable of emulating such), and it "just worked" and I could just get them from the stor

    • Nintendo is notorious for multiday outages with their shops and often with no announcement. They also drop older console shops and halt further purchases for that platform then offer some vague promise that the redownloading purchased games will remain possible for some unspecified period of time.

      No thanks, I don't wish to do business with these guys. Basically I think Valve has set the bar with Steam. Meet or exceed that bar else I'm going to play other franchises.

  • You get a case, you get physical media, you get the resale value, you get the ability to loan out a game, and you can build a collection. Digital titles are the same price, but without any intrinsic value after the game has been played.

    • by waspleg ( 316038 )

      Welcome to the digital cattle barn. Get in your pen and try not to flinch as the hammer drops - we wouldn't wanna spoil the meat.

      All of this shit has been by design for a long long time. Digital "goods" are a media company wet dream many decades in the making with the help of lawyers and anti-consumer 'lobby friendly' (corrupt) politicians; naturally.

      Own nothing. Pay rent for literally everything (from housing to healthcare to food to entertainment). Get back to work, drone. OBEY.

    • by godrik ( 1287354 )

      You get a case, you get physical media, you get the resale value, you get the ability to loan out a game, and you can build a collection. Digital titles are the same price, but without any intrinsic value after the game has been played.

      Digital games are NOT the same price.
      First party games on release week are the same price.
      Anything else you'll get 50% off without trying much; you can get 80% off when the stars line up a bit. (For instance, I picked up unravel two on Nintendo's store for $3 last week; retail is $20, used is about $17.)

      So yeah, you don't get a cartridge, can't resale, or loan. But with that much of a markdown in price, maybe I don't care...

  • Here's a company that wouldn't allow Wii store points to be carried over to the Switch store.

    Color me unconvinced that Nintendo will do anything right if they intend to move to an online-only experience.

Some people manage by the book, even though they don't know who wrote the book or even what book.

Working...