Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

THQ and Big Huge Games Team For RPG

Posted by Zonk on Sat May 05, 2007 06:01 PM
from the big-huge-rpg dept.
GameDaily Biz is reporting on the project that Ken Rolston moved to Big Huge Games to do. The RPG project will be helmed by the former Oblivion designer, developed by BHG, and (it's now been announced) will be published by THQ. Slated for the 360, PS3, and PC platforms, few other details are available about the project. Just the same, the article contains an interview with Tim Campbell, VP of Business Development, THQ, and Big Huge Games' Tim Train and Rolston. "BIZ: Ken Rolston, you're a legend in the RPG field, both electronic and paper-and-pencil. Where would you like to take the genre next? What innovations can we expect? Rolston: I'm actually a pretty conservative variety of visionary. In addition to our brilliant but secret central premise, and the addition of four or five original amazing major features and implementations we can't Wait to Reveal at a Later Date, I just want to make everything... story, characters, exploration, themes, setting, interactivity, entertainment, world class whacking and looting... just a little more perfect in every way."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Oblivion Designer Moves To New Company 37 comments
Gamasutra reports on the new position that former Bethesda designer Ken Rolston has taken with Big Huge Games. The lead designer for Bethesda's hit titles Morrowind and Oblivion, Rolston is now slated to be working on an unnamed title for the Rise of Nations developer. Rolston announced he was planning to retire early last year but ... apparently not. The designer characterizes his new project as 'a strikingly original and cunning concept for a console RPG'. No name or concept was included in the announcement.
[+] THQ Acquires Big Huge Games 8 comments
Gamasutra reports that Rise of Nations (and Catan) developer Big Huge Games has been purchased by publisher THQ. Last May we discussed their RPG alliance, and the Gamastura article notes that this 'getting to know you' period was instrumental in the purchase. "We asked THQ's [executive vice president of worldwide studios Jack Sorensen] if, when working with developers to publish a title, they regularly consider bringing those developers in-house. 'We're not unique there," he conceded, "but yeah, every external group that we work with, it's always in the back of our minds. Rather than it being purely financially driven -- although that's a big component -- it's more about [finding] the next group of game developers that can really add a unique take on the studio system, either from a genre or platform perspective, but also fit in well so that we can continue the culture that we built.'" Additional commentary from RPS.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Uhh (Score:5, Insightful)

    by daeg (828071) on Saturday May 05 2007, @06:14PM (#19005863)
    How is this newsworthy yet? I mean, sure, it'll be interesting when they actually tell us WHAT they are designing, but "Look at how many cool names we have working for us! What are we working on, you ask? We can't tell, neener neener neener!' just pisses me off. I hope it wasn't as big of a disappointment as Oblivion (sans user mods).
    • Why it's on Slashdot? Paid advertising, maybe.

      Why it's 'news'? Because the market has proven that if you get the big names and spend a ton of money, your product will sell very, very well. Regardless of how good the actual product is.

      Oblivion, by the way, was excellent by a lot of peoples' standards. I've played WELL over 100 hours on that game, and I almost always get less than 40 hours out of a game, and usually more like 10 or 20 before I get bored and move on to the next game. This is without addon
      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        My major beef with Oblivion was the leveling of mobs. The gameplay was excellent, the graphics were awesome... but reaching the upper levels made mere brigands start carrying a king's ransom worth of armor and reduced monster diversity. I liked Morrowind where some areas were impossible until you reached higher levels, and beginning areas always remained easy by comparison.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      With a slight chance of sounding on the offside here, I'd like to point out the fact that Bethesda did a good job with Oblivion if the user mods made the game more enjoyable. I am one of them who enjoyed Oblivion with user mods a lot more than the vanilla game myself, and I thought it was great after you got some modifications to the various game systems!

      When you consider how many people play games now compared to how many people played games in the time of old Daggerfall, it sort of makes sense that use
    • This reminds me of a fake commercial I saw on an old spoof show form HBO called "Not Necessarily the News." It had the movie announcer voice list through 6-8 Big name stars in his dramatic way. Then says, "Wouldn't it be great if they all made a movie together?"
    • The development team is more important to me than the end result. I enjoy watching a developer grow professionally and artistically through their subsequent releases. Just like some film makers, certain developers for me have earned a place where I wish to experience everything they produce good or bad.
  • The names are big, they're obviously pleased with their ideas, and they give every indication that they think they're going to make a great game. At this point, though, that's not saying much. I'll wait on getting excited until at least some aspect of the game is up for discussion; as for now, all the article says is that some people who've made good games in the past are teaming up to make a game in the RPG genre, and they want to make it a good one. Allow me a moment to rearrange my face into a suitable e
    • Games are often made nowadays for the 360 when they are made multi platform.

      The 360 tops out at ~7 gigs of content on a single disc, which means it's the weakest link.

      Games for the PC can have a 1 zillion DVD game if they need it, and the PS3 has Blu-Ray, which is what... 25 GB per disc?

      Let's put this in real world terms. The Sims 2 and all its games take up about 7 gigs. If The Sims 2 comes out with a few more expansion packs it'll be well over 7 gigs. EA can release, in the future, the entire Sims 2 Uber
      • Making this RPG for the 360 will limit the amount of content that it can provide

        Seriously now, this whole argument falls apart under the slightest amount of inspection. Where to begin...
        - console developers can easily code for a "please insert disc 2" prompt, same as they do with PC games, same as they did with numerous previous console titles
        - content is measured in terms of hours of enjoyable gameplay, it's not measured in terms of how many megabytes the textures take up
        - a title that takes up 10 G
        • Yeah and how many console titles out there have the "insert disc 2" prompt? Many of those games are already compressed content to begin with.

          Console gamers aren't so friendly with the whole insert disc 2 crap. Like I said, how many games do you see that have that? Not many, eh?
  • by Nazlfrag (1035012) on Saturday May 05 2007, @09:18PM (#19007065) Journal
    There were tiny hints as to what this RPG will be like..

    Mark Nelson, my colleague at Bethsoft, and lead designer of Oblivion's Shivering Isles expansion, has joined the Big Huge team, and I'll be looking to him to do all the Real Work while I Mentor him and deliver Sage Pronouncements.

    So he won't actually be doing any Real Work on this title anyway, it'll be the guy who did the Oblivion expansion. Yet we do find out it will be a Tolkienesque world.. well I can only think of a handful of RPG's NOT in a Tolkienesque world. This is almost as vague as an MS product announcement. In fact I can't think of any point to this interview at all, if they don't want to say anything of substance.

  • Rolston gone mad? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by soccerisgod (585710) on Sunday May 06 2007, @04:22AM (#19008873)

    Rolston: Usability. I was shocked to discover how difficult getting started in Oblivion was for some casual gamers, and even for some experienced fans of the genre.

    W..T..F? I think now he's finally lost it. He was never on my list of favorite games designers, mainly for his obsession with everything having to be a metaphor for something, and his complete refusal of ever having an NPC betray the player, but this really sounds like a very very very bad joke to me. Difficult? This dumbed down hackfest? You have got to be kidding me!

    For reference, here's a snippet from an interview with former TES designer Doug Goodall:

    Sinder Velvin:

    Can you remember any other rules that Ken Rolston had?

    Douglas Goodall:

    There were quite a few of them, but since I didn't understand most of them, this is something you ought to ask Ken if you get the chance. The only ones I'm sure I understood were "no betrayal" and "everything must be a metaphor/everything must be based on something."

    "No betrayal" meant that key NPCs couldn't turn on the player, lie to the player if they were honest in the past, nor could an NPC steal an item from the player, etc. This is good as a general rule, but it's the kind of rule that begs for exceptions.

    "Everything must be a metaphor" is how the quirky Cyrodiil of Daggerfall and the alien Cyrodiil of the Pocket Guide became the Roman Empire, how the Bretons got French names, etc. I felt Tamriel had been moving away from generic fantasy and medieval history with every game until Morrowind. I wanted this trend to continue and resented having to squeeze a Hermaeus Mora-shaped Vvardenfell into a Roman Province-shaped space. I think Ken uses historical examples to make the world more believable. If you just make stuff up, there's a good chance you'll make something wrong and break suspension of disbelief. That's true, but I'd argue that if you use an inappropriate or easily recognized metaphor, you have the same risk. Besides, making stuff up is more fun for both the creators and consumers. Did I mention I enjoy arguing?

  • Ah, now we know who to blame for the ludicrosity of the autolevel system of Oblivion.

    I'll avoid this game (whatever it is), at all costs.