Slashdot Log In
Arm Wrestling Machine Recalled for Breaking Arms
Posted by
samzenpus
on Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:26 PM
from the step-right-up-and-lose-a-limb dept.
from the step-right-up-and-lose-a-limb dept.
Lucas123 writes "After three players broke their arms while wrestling with a Japanese arcade machine, the manufacturer promised to remove all 150 of the mechanized appendages. Said game maker Atlus' spokeswoman: "The machine isn't that strong, much less so than a muscular man. Even women should be able to beat it.""
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Beating it (Score:5, Funny)
I dunno, I think an artificial arm would work better for helping guys to beat it...
Besides, having a woman beat it would just be so out of place for most
lol (Score:5, Funny)
Re:lol (Score:5, Funny)
Sounds like Saturday night at my place.
Parent
We had one at work (Score:5, Informative)
Re:We had one at work ... Yep (Score:5, Interesting)
My favorite arm wrestling story: I used to vacation with a bunch of farmers. One night in the lounge they had a bit of an arm wrestling tournament. The security guy came in. He was buff. He obviously exercised at least an hour a day. He was also no fool. He chose the easiest looking guy for his first match; the farm kid. He looked like he never exercised and was slightly pudgy. He was a bit bigger than the security guy but not a lot. I would have bet on the security guy to win.
Not only could the security guy not budge the farm kid, he broke a small blood vessel in his temple. Blood actually spurted from the side of his head. I was very impressed but the farmers weren't. In any event, the kid couldn't beat any of the older guys even if they were getting pretty lubed.
Parent
If you're too tall or too short... (Score:5, Informative)
Worse still, if a player is shocked by something (the sudden force of the game or your friend decides to drop an ice cube down your shirt), since the mechanical hand "grips" your hand with its thumb (assuming you held it properly), you can seriously mess your arm up if you try to pull away suddenly.
Parent
how is this funny? (Score:5, Funny)
Also the company claims that the arm isn't that strong. Yet the physics behind the arm and the leverage is sure to make engaging the machine in a friendly game of arm wrestling into something which is needlessly dangerous.
Re:how is this funny? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:how is this funny? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Thuuurs ur problem! (Score:5, Funny)
I think you probably would get hurt tangling with an arcade machine that has 150 mechanized appendages...
Re:Thuuurs ur problem! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Thuuurs ur problem! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
theory and practice (Score:5, Informative)
Recall the players (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:theory and practice (Score:5, Insightful)
If you are going up against a machine, it will just keep pushing back with the same strength, even when your eyes are saying "I give up!"
Parent
Re:theory and practice (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Prizes for winning (Score:5, Funny)
Finally (Score:5, Funny)
Violent video games (Score:5, Informative)
The game was just fine until one day accident occurred. As a matter of fact, this was not the fault of the game design itself. A smartass attempted to hit the padding with a jump-side-back-kick with spinning, and missed, and broke his non-kicking leg as it was landed on the wrong place (well, as a witness myself I must say I'm not so sure whether he had planned any landing afterall).
Needless to say, the game was recalled for 'causing violent accident'.
Violent video game is OK as long as the players don't attempt to hurt themselves in most embarrass ways.
BTW, below is the no-full-page-ad of the headline story:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?co
sigh (Score:5, Funny)
Re:"Even women should be able to beat it" (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:"Even women should be able to beat it" (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:"Even women should be able to beat it" (Score:5, Insightful)
So the average man is stronger than the average woman... but it's still not OK to acknowledge that?
I took a sociology class with a crazy liberal lesbian instructor (she was nice and earnest, just not a good teacher). Anyhow, we were shown some statistic about women vs. men along the lines of "Men are stronger [taller, something like this] on average". In refuting the (larger) argument, the instructor pointed to this particular statistic and said "It doesn't take into account that some women are stronger [taller, whatever] than some men!"
I just wanted to scream out "YES IT DOES!! DO YOU KNOW WHAT AVERAGE MEANS??" but it was a lost cause; most students were just as gung-ho about being "equal" and "correct", etc. I didn't have the energy to refute every problem in that class.
Really, pointing out facts should not be frowned upon. If, on average, men are stronger than women, why shouldn't one say that? Using said facts to oppress would be a problem, but facts are facts, no matter what happen to be our beliefs or prejudices.
I mean, if I say "People hailing from Western Africa have darker skin than those from Western Europe", is there anything wrong with it? Of course not. It just becomes a problem when I add, "and so we can subjugate them." I leave it up to you to decide who "we" are and who "they" are.
Parent
Re:Ob. Colbert (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Semi-karma whoring (Score:5, Informative)
Easy. Lifting your elbow up provides an advantage through leverage. AKA cheating. Next time your buddy gets his elbow off the table while arm wrestling, kick him in the nuts.
Parent