Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Classic Games (Games)

US Company Buys Commodore Brand For $33 Million 410

inKubus writes "Tulip Computers International BV -- which has held the rights to Commodore since 1997 -- said Thursday it will sell the once-mighty Commodore computer brand to U.S.-based Yeahronimo Media Ventures Inc. for 24 million euros, or $33 million. A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name in the United States as well as release a new MP3 player and rerelease classic games."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Company Buys Commodore Brand For $33 Million

Comments Filter:
  • There goes (Score:4, Insightful)

    by temojen ( 678985 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:54PM (#11221397) Journal
    Another Canadian icon to the US attack-lawyers.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:56PM (#11221420)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Stick_Fig ( 740331 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:56PM (#11221422) Homepage
    How much you want to bet that this corporation will pretty much do nothing but get pissy towards a bunch of emulator/C64-on-a-chip authors and not actually do anything with the company's legacy?

    I mean, really, it's pretty much been empty promises since about 1992 from the Commodore/Amiga crowd, and the Commodore kicked the bucket.

  • oh goody (Score:5, Insightful)

    by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:56PM (#11221423) Homepage Journal
    A company whose primary product seems (from their website) to be a DRM scheme is buying the commodore brand - remember, this is the company that gave out schematics with their computers. Doesn't sound like it makes sense to me. The only people who care about C= are geeks who will know better...
  • Commodore is dead (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CharAznable ( 702598 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:57PM (#11221444)
    Branding is such a scam... Like putting the name Commodore on any crap box is going to make it magically like a C64 or an Amiga.. People are not that stupid... Same goes for Napster. The old Napster is gone, forever. Using the name won't make it anything like the real thing.

  • Re:It's dead, Jim. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by malfunct ( 120790 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:58PM (#11221455) Homepage
    Sounds fun, combating copyright infringement by releasing a device that will most likely play material that was obtained by infringing copyright :)
  • by chiefnerd ( 823986 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @03:58PM (#11221461) Journal
    Commodore rocked back in the day. However, about this new company declaring it will "go after" infringers: the only reason anyone still knows about the Commodore brand is because of the dedication of those who could be considered infringers on the name. Great tactic - use the community to keep a brand name from totally dying out, then turn around and unleash the legal dogs on the very ones who kept it viable. Whatever...
  • True Value (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Luminous ( 192747 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:02PM (#11221503) Journal
    Would the Commodore name have that value today if it wasn't for all the C-64/Amiga User Groups that kept the legacy alive for all these years? These are the same people that will get sued first, I'm willing to bet.
  • by shimbee ( 444430 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:05PM (#11221542)
    Names can't be copyrighted...they'd be taking action against uses of the name under TRADEMARK law.

    There are a couple of issues they might run into:

    1) continuous use -- has the trademark been in continuous use over the years? They can't just abandon it and pick it back up

    2) passing off - if no one else is "passing themselves off" as the Commodore computer company, they probably don't have an action.

    overall, if their investment plan is litigation, i think they are in a craptacular situation
  • Re:There goes (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:11PM (#11221604)
    The average Canadian is just too busy dogsledding to worry about the integrity of his company.

    Sincerely,
    Tucker Carlson
    CNN
  • Re:After all... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nocomment ( 239368 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:12PM (#11221621) Homepage Journal
    Actually I think the business plan goes something like this...

    1>notice people making joysticks with built-in games that play commodore games
    2>buy commodore name to sue those companies
    3>...
    4>profit!

    Once that plan is complete maybe they will buy Amiga.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:14PM (#11221637)
    ...was going to happen, this is precisely why I ftp downloaded the net's largest archive of C=64 games a few months back. I'd post a link, but the last thing that this company needs is a target for their money-hungry ways.
  • Re:Oh cool. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Average_Joe_Sixpack ( 534373 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:16PM (#11221661)
    That Jeri Ellsworth chick is already selling exactly such a device through the home shopping channel

    From an earlier interview I believe she only acted as a consultant to the company that actually produces the device, so she should be rather safe from that perspective. The company that produces the device plus anybody using that Commodore name for profit will be sued into oblivion.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:26PM (#11221776)
    There have been little improvement in video games since the c64 days. What's the different between skyfox on c64 and MS flight simulator 2003? graphics.. The gameplay is still the same. PS3/xb2/gc2 will have better graphics but not much else... there is no thinking outside of the box in the video game industry.. it's the same old same old recycling of ideas... the first first person shooter began with the stupid duck hunting game in nintendo in 86' and doom3 or hl2 is still same the same game play... lame. lame I tell you.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:27PM (#11221790) Journal
    New Amigas? Kinda late for that don'tcha think?

    When Jobs came back to Apple, people were saying "New Macs? Kinda late for that don'tcha think?"

    Not that that's going to happen here. They just want some trademarks to sue people over.

    Though I'd love to see the Amiga updated and rereleased, a la the newer Macs. One can dream.
  • Re:uh? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by shokk ( 187512 ) <ernieoporto.yahoo@com> on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:42PM (#11221934) Homepage Journal
    Remember that little C64 in a joystick [slashdot.org] that they recently started hawking on QVC? I wonder how clean their implementation really is, and whether they are violating the brand name.
  • by EnderWiggnz ( 39214 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @04:52PM (#11222017)
    i'm referring to Gould, and Mehdi Ali.

    you know - the ones who destroyed commodore, but thanks for playing the anti-semite card.
  • by Dogtanian ( 588974 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @05:05PM (#11222117) Homepage
    The question is, "would you care?"

    The people most likely to care are those who *know* the situation, your hypothetical 30-year old Joe Sixpack might get nostalgic about his old C64 or Amiga, but realistically, C= is a company from the past and doesn't have that much cachet nowadays.

    I don't think Commodore t-shirts will ever be fashionable in the way that Atari t-shirts became a couple of years back.

    Actually, the one thing that pisses me off about the Atari 'resurrection' is the gratuitous changing of the logo. The original was an absolute design classic; either the fuji on its own, or with the fuji and 'ATARI' name underneath.

    Hasbro did their own stupid variant when they owned it, now Infogrames have decided to alter the fuji itself (UGLY!), then stick it in the middle of the 'ATARI' name (where it loses impact, IMHO).

    The best reason I can think of for doing this is some tosser of a design consultant justifying his fee. Scum.
  • by lordDallan ( 685707 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @05:47PM (#11222428)
    If you look at Yeahronimo's website, there's talk about selling ringtones and realtones (presumably for cellphones).

    Maybe they want to make a C64 emulator for cellphones and sell/rent old C64 games to cellphone customers.

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...