The Xbox 360 Unveiled 675
You may or may not have caught the Xbox 360 unveiling on MTV Thursday night, but the internet will provide. A plethora of sites have photos, videos, commentary, specifications, and interviews about the new system. Your fellow readers have pulled together to provide links to: 1up.com, Joystiq, Gamespot, The BBC, CNN, NYT, Gamespy, Team Xbox, Voodoo Extreme, Anandtech, and eToyChest. The official Xbox 360 site opened last night as well for word straight from the source. For more official images Ourcolony.net has been 'solved', and now features an OurColony specific video preview. Finally, for commentary on the event, the Video Game Ombudsman provides an alternative to the press releases. From the post: "Kyle Orland (9:28:42 PM): The future of gaming is a girl in a blue dress?
Dan Dormer (9:28:47 PM): The future of gaming is a girl with a bag?
Kyle Orland (9:28:57 PM): She's the Xbox! OMG!"
Sweet! (Score:5, Insightful)
Why this strategy from MS? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is Microsoft making it difficult to write games that run on both PC (Windows XP) and XBox 360?
One of the primary reasons I use Windows is for games. If game developers stop writing for Windows because they move to XBox 360, then it'll make it even easier for me to go all FreeBSD or Linux or Mac OSX.
Wouldn't it have been easier for XBox 360 to have a Windows XP or Windows Mobile 2005 foundation with just a custom explorer interface to make it look less-PC?
Does it run old X-Box games? (Score:5, Insightful)
Aside from that, if the BBC site is correct, it seems that device is not a digital media hub at all. It seems rather stupid (to say the least) that they didn't think to make the thing a PVR. The last generation of boxes had the excuse, but a PVR / media station is almost an expectation of something which expects to occupy a permenant space by the TV.
Still, it'll be interesting to see what Sony produce. If they have sense, they will make it a PVR, and a media jukebox, and a kickass console with backwards compatibility. If it can do all those things when the XBox can't then I don't see they have much to worry about. Better yet if they make it hackable - not so hackable that people can easily pirate games but just enough that people can play around with the box and produce cool things for it.
Re:30 minutes? Actually its an infomercial. (Score:1, Insightful)
And the winner is... (Score:3, Insightful)
Well lets face it IBM. If XBox 360 wins (anyone noticed that you do 360 to end up back in the same place?) then its IBM processors at the core. If its PS3, then its... IBM processors at the core.
All those box numbers, all that volume, all those cheap servers.
XBox or PS3, doesn't matter as Intel lose.
(But please let it be PS3 that wins as its actually innovative rather than a re-hash of off the shelf stuff and (as ever with MS) no R&D).
Re:Backward compat (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why this strategy from MS? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:boy did it suck! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:PowerPC CPU? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:PowerPC CPU? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, these are stripped-down CPU cores.
Re:Does it run old X-Box games? (Score:4, Insightful)
And the reason the 360 doesn't function as a PVR is that there's no way to make money from it. Sure, you sell another 360, but you're probably losing money on that in the first place. Instead, Gates will announce a video-on-demand service at E3, you mark my words. Steal Jobs' thunder AND one-up Sony in one fell move.
Microsoft need one more big announcement to trump Sony at E3. They can't have revealed their hand yet. Likewise, Sony need to out-do Microsoft. And what do they have? Seriously, it feels that Microsoft might win this one.
Of course, Apple and Sony could band together. Jobs could announce video-on-demand for the iTMS (which is widely predicted) and Sony could announce that PS3 will be able to access the iTMS. Furthermore, Apple could license iPod production to Sony, so they can get out of that market as it plateaus to focus on turning iTMS into their primary revenue stream.
Idle speculation, nothing more.
Re:PowerPC CPU? (Score:3, Insightful)
PC games on the other hand, have to target a wider audience. It will probably be some time before PC games are designed with a multi-proc/core system in mind
Taking Advantage (Score:3, Insightful)
No kiddin'. It was years before PS1 games were taking full advantage of the hardware. Same with PS2 games; compare R&C Up Your Aresenal to Rayman or any of the other early PS2 games, or event the first R&C. Big, big difference. The good thing is, it keeps the console fresh.
The XBox wasn't that big of deal because it was essentially a PC. The difference between Halo and Halo 2 wasn't really that great. With the XBox 360 being a different beast, there might be a huge difference between the first run games and the later games, as people learn to take advantage of the hardware.
Maybe.
Re:Does it run old X-Box games? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's interesting that you mention iTMS. Imagine that Apple produced iPod2 which dumped AAC for something else which is supposedly superior. Would that be a dumb thing or a smart thing to do considering how much people had invested already in AAC?
As for the PVR, yes there is a way to make money from it. A shitload of money. You sell listings. You bundle them with your XBox Live Platinum subscriptions and make even more money. You sell video & music on demand. You bundle everything into an MSN sub and make even more money.
Re:Backward compat (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Backward compat (Score:4, Insightful)
Nintendo has NES, SNES and N64 emulators written and used as bonuses in Gamecube games.
$500? (Score:4, Insightful)
How in the hell is this box supposed to sell for less than $500, even after Microsoft's subsidy? I mean, holy crap. I think either of these things is going on:
Nvidia is the problem... (Score:2, Insightful)
After such a big embarassing loss to ATI on the X360, it is highly unlikely that Nvidia would agree to license their technology for inclusion in a software emulator on the new platform.
Interestingly enough, MSFT has made some acquisitions over the last couple of years that point to building such emulation (VirtualPC, JIT scode conversion technologies), but it might be for naught if there is a legal barrier on the graphics chip.
I know, sucks.
Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Backward compat (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly (Score:3, Insightful)
BTW the exact reason for the "not yet rendered" [it is actually rendering btw] is CD load time. The model for the city is in memory but not the textures [they're rotated out LRU style]. So if you drive super fast you're going faster than the CD can access/load the data [seems odd]. Thus the game engine just renders transparent surfaces.
If you drive fast enough you can occasionally see the green backing of the interstate signs blank and just have the white wireframe text up... it's funny.
Anyways, I find the game a sufficiently pleasant waste of time even with that shortcomming.
When I look at games like the old Splinter cells [chaos theory is good imo] they're nice looking games that are way too hard to play. I don't play for work
In GTA I can hop on a quadbike and go on a murder spree. That's not only fun but it's educational in case I have todo it in real life.
Tom
Re:But. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:PowerPC CPU? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's a nice thought (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sweet! (Score:3, Insightful)
...not Intel (Score:3, Insightful)
And I wouldn't be surprised if the OS of XBox360 is based on Windows. Perhaps Microsoft will follow Apple's example with the 68K to PowerPC transition and release a PowerPC based Windows PC that runs old applications in emulation.
After all, they already own VirtualPC...
Re:PowerPC CPU? (Score:2, Insightful)
Or from a different viewpoint, Apple paid for all the research the led up to the current Xbox chip.
Re:But. (Score:1, Insightful)
You'll note that it's too small to store a large quantity of ripped dvd images to play with a mod chip. That's not an accident.