More Video Games on Library Shelves 33
Joystiq has the link to an update on a previous story we ran covering the efforts of a gentleman to add video games to library circulation stock. Since then, the program has really taken off, and Gaming Target has an update on how the project is going. From the article: "Circulation numbers have been brisk. With two week loan periods and late charges of only 25 cents a day, people are jumping at the chance to check out games, any game. I don't know why it's surprising, but people (adults and children, but mostly children) will pull stuff off the shelf and check it out without even looking at what game it is they're getting out."
The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:2)
Heh heh! I'd love to see something like this done with the classics. Check out a game and get a copy of Alice In Wonderland, or Dante's Inferno. With some creativity, some of these books may even be read! How about that, a useful Trojan Horse!
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:-1)
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:2)
Until someone can scientifically prove that reading books is in fact better in some dimension that we can all agree is critical, I will continue to point out the pretension and elitism of such statements.
Shakespeare can be skipped, with no ill effect, except for those who intend upon pursuing the arts. Nothing Shakespeare wrote is original, nor has he cornered the market on those storylines.
Personally I take a good story anywhere I can find it, books, games, movies, TV, word of mouth. Exactly what sensory input I use to absorb it is really irrelevant.
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:1)
Bookstores today a filled with uptight pretentous assholes who look down upon those who read sci-fi, fantasy or comics (save for a few authors in each repective genre), considering them garbage, all the while reading whatever bestseller or political trash book they can find. It makes me not want to read!
Also, Shakespeare sucks, Dostovevsky pwns.
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:3, Insightful)
I believe that playing games is far superior to watching television. Rather than sit in front of the idiot box to be entertained, I believe its better for the mind to interact with your entertainment, to have some thought (or at least reflexes?) put into your form of entertainment.
Now as for reading, I believe that this is superior to games and television. I'm not being elitist. I have friends who haven't voluntarily read a book in their life. The result? Their ability to read, write, and speak has been crippled. They can't spell even moderately complex words. They read at the speed and comprehension level of someone 1/2 their age. When they speak, they don't make use of some our our language's more interesting adjectives, verbs, etc. It really is unfortunate. Say what you want, I still think that reading helps all these things immensely.
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:1)
My experiences with many of my non-reading friends is very similar. I went to school with a guy who plays games about as frequently as I do, but didn't do much reading when he was younger; his command of the English language doesn't extend beyond the level of video game text... it's simple, gets the point across, but it doesn't sound like a highly educated person (which he is) wrote it. Kids should have to read more... even if it isn't the "classics". As far as I'm concerned, Dickens sucked. But Tolkien? There's some pretty advanced reading in some parts of his work. If you can survive The Silmarillion (which I couldn't), you've got a great ability to understand English. I could follow parts of it, but some of it I had to read several times to understand what he was saying. Don't make them read "the Classics" just because they're "the Classics". Read well-written stuff from non-traditional sources, too. Most of all, just spend time reading things! Our whole society's communication system in about 20 years is going to be "OMGWTFBBQ r u coming over 2nite?" unless kids learn the written word... and while games are good, they don't teach this incredibly valuable skill.
Re:The only hope for today's youth ... (Score:2)
This is Great! (Score:0)
It is also helpful to see if the reviews for a game are actually truthful or just meaningless propoganda!! Check out your closest Library for the Gems waiting for you!
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:without even looking? (Score:1, Funny)
And it is great! (Score:2)
Impact (Score:2)
Re:Impact (Score:5, Interesting)
In other words, I doubt the game companies are fretting. If anything, it's free try-before-you-buy advertising.
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Re:Impact (Score:2)
DVD burner+mode chip+Library card = new game for your collection.
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Of course, both are valid questions, and tricky to answer. I guess you could find a community with no library but a book store, and then add a library, and see how book store sales change.
In any event, the book publishing industry generally does not like libraries (and this is not a new thing), because they are seen to reduce sales. But they don't dare go after them directly, because there would be a large public backlash ...
Re:Impact (Score:1)
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Not me though, I replay and reread just about everything.
Re:Impact (Score:2)
Re:Impact (Score:2)
I personally don't see how this can be true. Libraries, in general, provided a guaranteed minimum sales base for many publications that would go missing if they were discouraged from existing. For many small publishers, libraries are the only real source of bulk purchasing, especially for journal periodicals and more technical or obscure hard cover works. And for bigger "mass market" publications, they've got little competition since any given library will only buy one or two titles, which will end up on lengthy reserve lists if popular. Really, if it weren't for libraries, I'd think books would sell less due to the reduced visibility of literacy in a culture.
Re:Impact (Score:1)
Probably because its free to borrow (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Probably because its free to borrow (Score:2)
There was a system like that, but you had to pay full retail price, but if you didn't like it for any reason, return it for full refund(more like deposit).
The place was called Electronics Botique.
CD/DVD Scratches (Score:4, Interesting)
If libraries start providing video games as well, I sure hope they have a way to protect the discs as much as possible and keep them running like new.
When I was a kid (Score:3, Interesting)
No Arguments over ESRB (Score:4, Insightful)
If there was ever a good argument for keeping the original game in storage and loaning a single playable duplicate of that game (disc media, anyway), this would be it. Rental stores, too. You could replace a stolen copy (and report it), and the sale of older items (destroying the copies) would fetch a better price.
Duh (Score:0)
people (adults and children, but mostly children) will pull stuff off the shelf and check it out without even looking at what game it is they're getting out."
Yeah, and if I had to hazard a guess as to why, it's probably because they already know what game they want to check out before they even enter the library.
Seriously, these people buy magazines that do nothing but talk about games. You think they are going to walk into a library and think "duh... dunno what this game is all about, I'd better read the box to find out"?
If anything's the story here, it's that libraries don't just appeal to casual gamers, but avid gamers as well, which means the effect on game sales might be larger than previously anticipated.
Hmmm... A Way Around The System? (Score:2)
We're also not above using a little luck to add to the collection either. Shortly after its release, a copy of Gran Turismo 4 was found abandoned in one of the study carrels. For six weeks it sat in the lost and found with no one to claim it. After that it was processed and placed in the collection and gone out steadily ever since.
I remember reading in the original article that they had troubles getting certain titles, since they were bound by library policy to order titles (for significant markup!) via an "approved" supply chain.
If I lived near that library (and I could prevent another patron from walking off with it before they find it), I'd leave my almost new copy of Culdcept there for them to put into circulation. While I liked the game, the single player AI felt a little unfair. As a game which is essentially a mix of Magic: The Gathering and Monopoly, it would be a better play in 2-4 player games, which would be more likely to be played by some patrons of the library rather than myself.
Re:Hmmm... A Way Around The System? (Score:1)
Re:Hmmm... A Way Around The System? (Score:2)