Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
XBox (Games)

Xbox 360 Launches In U.S. 551

Well, it's here. Braving long lines and launch parties, and even jail time, those that were willing to pony up the time and money have their hands on the first player in the next-gen war. 360 impressions are available all across the web, with [H]ardOCP and Gamespot offering exhaustive experiences for the interested gamer. The BBC, as always, offers a bigger perspective on the launch, and Gamasutra confirms that Microsoft is in for the long haul in the games industry. From the BBC: "Sony and Nintendo are planning to unleash their next gen consoles during 2006, giving Microsoft an edge over its rivals. The software giant is virtually tied with Nintendo for second place, way behind Sony, in a games market worth $25 billion globally. Microsoft has ambitious plans for its new machine. It said it expects to ship up to three million 360s worldwide within 90 days. But the company has admitted that the worldwide launch of the console could mean shortages in the run-up to Christmas. The console is due to hit Europe on 2 December and Japan on 10 December and some retailers are also warning about limited supplies."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Xbox 360 Launches In U.S.

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:30PM (#14092648)
    All SOLD OUT at Circuit City, Best Buy, Comp USA, Toys R Us, Game Stop... Some retailers claim single-digit shipments of consoles to their stores, but I honestly believe that the shipments were much larger, but these electronics store clerks get a fringe benefit of being able to purchase the newest electronics stuff before regular consumers get a chance to. Or maybe they are buying a whole bunch from the stock, then selling on ebay at high prices. So I figure that cuts the actual available stock in half, just due to this inside scoop.

    Anyway, I'm going to fire up Call of Duty on my Mac G5 so that hopefully that will quell my itch to play a video game.
  • by xero9 ( 810991 ) * on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:33PM (#14092689)
    Actually, I bought an original Xbox not to play games on, but to use as a media device. It really worked great for all the TV shows and movied I snagged off usenet. Simply put all my files in a shared folder on my computer and fire up Xbox Media Center on the Xbox, and watch what ever I wanted on a nice 35" TV instead of my 17" monitor. It wasn't until I discovered Rainbow Six 3 that I actually started to use it to play games.
  • by Shivetya ( 243324 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:34PM (#14092706) Homepage Journal
    you will see that this machine really is well done and offers lots of useful features. It is very well thought out and if you opt for the harddrive you get even more options.

    I was actually impressed with its ability to work with other devices to include an iPOD and PsP. The nice thing about this machine is that it really is expandable as wireless gives them many options. You will probably see an addon keyboard/mouse combo one day.

    There are many of us out here who don't need our PCs to program on, we have them for games, other entertainment, e-mail, and surfing. Give me an insta-on box with those features and I may just consider it. The XBOX360 is actually the first console I am seriously considering because of the potential.

    Playing DvDs is a bonus, if it means one less component I have to hook up or keep up with all the better. People harped on the PS2 for the same reason yet I know many who have one for that very reason.

    Just because its Microsoft doesn't make it wrong which seems to be your whole beef against it. (who made it)

    (allow me to run some IBM style emulator/vpn over the net with a wireless keyboard and I really really need a PC even less)
  • by managedcode ( 863136 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:41PM (#14092768)
    Disappointed lot of gamers. Release was very poorly managed with just 20 pieces for every store. Whether Microsoft made money or not, eBay and speculators are making money. The latest Winning bid: US $2,225.00
  • by Sundroid ( 777083 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:42PM (#14092784) Homepage
    partly to offer some kind of counter offense against Microsoft's Xbox 360 blitz, partly to rehabilitate itself from the DRM rootkit mess.
  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:42PM (#14092789) Homepage Journal

    once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet

    Not if it's hackable. If I knew the Xbox 360 were going to be hackable, I'd be more interested in buying one now, at full price. Since it might not be (odds are, even if it is, it will be a much bigger PITA than the Xbox) I'm not buying one until either hacks come out or the price comes down quite a bit.

  • just say NO to Sony? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:46PM (#14092825)
    Is that the answer, then? don't buy a PS3 if you want to send a clear signal to Sony that their recent actions will not be tolerated.

    or do you not really care when faced with the prospect of not having your precious game console?
  • by HanzoSpam ( 713251 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:47PM (#14092839)
    I was actually impressed with its ability to work with other devices to include an iPOD and PsP. The nice thing about this machine is that it really is expandable as wireless gives them many options. You will probably see an addon keyboard/mouse combo one day.

    There are many of us out here who don't need our PCs to program on, we have them for games, other entertainment, e-mail, and surfing. Give me an insta-on box with those features and I may just consider it. The XBOX360 is actually the first console I am seriously considering because of the potential.


    That's the point I think is being missed. After everything is said and done, the thing is still, design-wise, pretty much a glorified PC. Microsoft has come out with a proprietary platform which they're using the gamer market to propagate. They can gradually add other functionality to increase it's market.

    Don't be surprised when it eventually evolves into what amounts to the Microsoft version of the Mac.
  • by rindeee ( 530084 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:48PM (#14092843)
    My sincere hope in that the console makers are moving to PowerPC arch is that this will increase the pace of Linux dev for 64bit PPC architectures. There has been a lot of good work done, but the pace has been a little slow. I'm not much of a gamer, but this is one of the many benefits that gaming brings to other markets.
  • by jferris ( 908786 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:51PM (#14092872) Homepage
    ...still holds true for the Xbox360. I am not a graphics whore, so Microsoft isn't offerring anything of interest to me. I own a DVD player, I already have a computer, and I don't plan on getting HDTV to have prettier games. At least Nintendo is attempting to innovate. And if their innovation doesn't pan out, they have a fallback plan - in that there will be an "accessory" for the Revolution that will allow you to use the new controller in some sort of an "old fashioned" controller shell. As for the PS3, it is going to be awfully powerful - and that is really all I know for sure about it. The problem here is not me, as a gamer, saying "Make me a prettier game!". It has come down to me saying "Make me a game that will take longer than a weekend to beat. And don't do it by requiring me to power up characters for no other purpose than to burn time or placing impassible FMV sequences in the fifteen minute or more range (are you listening Square Enix?)."
  • Re:eBay (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tonywong ( 96839 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:53PM (#14092884) Homepage
    How do you know it's not 2 microsoft marketing employees kiting up the price of a unit to hype it?

    The cost of such an astroturfing operation is the eBay listing fees and that's it. Pretty cheap for a lot of buzz.

    Just a thought.
  • Re:I don't know... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Zigg ( 64962 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:54PM (#14092907)

    Not free access. Many, many Nintendo reps (including president Iwata) have gone on record saying not free. You'll pay. You won't pay much, but you'll pay.

  • by nmb3000 ( 741169 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @02:58PM (#14092949) Journal
    Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort. But what the distillate is you're not going to buy it to watch DVDs on, you're going to play games with it. You're not going to surf the internet, you're going to play games with it. It won't transform you into some actuallized renaissance man (or woman) through shear wonderfulness of the Total Microsoft Experience, you will play games with it.

    See, that's the thing. I believe more people than you give credit will use it as both a media center and a game console. Essentially anyone living in a smaller space like an apartment will like the idea being able to play games, watch movies and listen to music--all in high-definition and surround sound--without having a big (and expensive) stack of components.

    In addition, the console brings something pretty new to the scene. Now, if you have video or audio stored on your computer you can play it on your 360 via wireless or wired networking. Why try to watch content on your computer from an uncomfortable chair using poor speakers watching on a small monitor when instead you can watch it from the comfort of a coutch on a large TV screen (YMMV here).

    Is the 360 some magical gift from God? Obviously not, but in the same token it's not the same game console we played back in 1985. Also, nobody should make it sound like it's a big Microsoft ploy to hype this up as much as they can. Sony is just as bad (if not worse in some ways) about hyping up anything new they release. Nintendo doesn't seem to be quite as bad, but they still do some crazy stuff [1up.com] to try and get attention [vgcats.com].
  • by micromuncher ( 171881 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:22PM (#14093215) Homepage
    http://www.theapplecollection.com/design/macproto/ Pippin.html [theapplecollection.com]

    - nuff said
    b00tl3g
  • by macrom ( 537566 ) <macrom75@hotmail.com> on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:26PM (#14093266) Homepage
    I was at Gamestop during the Dreamcast launch, and if employees got machines it was because they pre-ordered one just like the rest of the world. Games and accessories are usually available before the system launches (I saw those for Xbox 360 at Target this past weekend), and the supply problem is usually localized to the system itself. I can't remember if there was a ban on discounted games and accessories for Dreamcast, but it wouldn't surprise me.

    Employees don't get discounts on systems anyhow since there is virtually no markup on them. AFAIK, this holds true at other retailers.
  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:27PM (#14093275) Journal
    You mean improve it more than Apple giving Linus a dual G5 did?
  • Even at full price, [the XBOX 360 is] still sold at a loss.

    <critical>Maybe Microsoft could make some money off the machine if they knew how to actually design hardware rather than slapping a new case on a PC.</critical>

    Seriously, at $399 a unit, I'm absolutely shocked that Microsoft is still losing money on the thing. The CPU and the GPU are the two expensive components. In bulk, I'd have a hard time believing that they cost more than $150-$175 together. The rest of the hardware is relatively inexpensive stuff, costing maybe $50-$100 at most. That leaves me with a total of $200-$275 for manufacturing, making me wonder where the inefficiency is. Is Microsoft really that BAD at hardware design that they can't sell a $399 integrated PC at anything less than a loss?
  • Zero Hour (Score:4, Interesting)

    by neafevoc ( 93684 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:34PM (#14093352) Homepage Journal
    I was at the Xbox Zero Hour release party last night (in Palmdale, CA). It wasn't that crowded at the event. I didn't have a problem playing every game on the show floor. I'm sorry to say that I'm not all that impressed with the release titles. (Yeah, I know first generation.) I also had a chance to buy one last night, but I didn't (however, hundreds of others did).

    I am impressed how well Live is integrated with the console. When we got there, they gave us a free memory unit and helped us transfer our Live account on it. Then we were able to play on Live wtih the number of games that were available. I think Live will dominate over whatever Sony has to offer as far as online integration with the console.

    Despite being not overly impressed with any of the titles, there was one that my buddy and I played for over an hour. It was from Live Arcade (a number of small titles you can download from Live). The game was called Geometry Wars. Yes, strangely enough, it wasn't the multi-million dollar developed games that won my game of the show, but this small independently developed game you can download from Live.

    I'll wait around like I did with the original Xbox before I get one. Same thing goes with the PS3. Comes back to what we said many a time: good games make good consoles.
  • by badasscat ( 563442 ) <basscadet75@@@yahoo...com> on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:35PM (#14093354)
    That's the point I think is being missed. After everything is said and done, the thing is still, design-wise, pretty much a glorified PC. Microsoft has come out with a proprietary platform which they're using the gamer market to propagate. They can gradually add other functionality to increase it's market.

    What, you mean kinda like this [intellivisionlives.com]?

    The fact of the matter is every console is pretty much a "glorified PC" (or a "dumbed down" PC, depending on your perspective), and every single time - yes, every single time a new console is released, the manufacturer claims that it's going to do this, that and the other thing eventually, or that it's going to converge a whole bunch of devices into one. This is true going all the way back to the Odyssey II and Atari 2600, which also promised PC functionality. The Sega CD and NEC Turbo CD were the first (or among the first) to then promise home entertainment functionality once optical storage became the norm.

    The reality is people just don't care. A few do, and those are the kind of people that sued Mattel when they never actually released their promised keyboard component from lack of interest (they only had something like 4,000 orders, which meant they couldn't get the component cost low enough to make a profit). Those people can be very vocal. They're the real hardcore. They're on the internet complaining when companies don't release promised add-ons, they're the ones that always have to be the contrarians when someone like me points out that they're the minority.

    But they are the extreme, extreme minority. I agree with the parent poster who said as soon as the next hot console comes along, gamers will abandon the Xbox 360, because it really is about the games and only about the games, and it always will be. This is not going to be some great window into the living room. It is simply the console of the moment, and in five years it will be forgotten like every other console of the moment. MS is not creating some sort of home entertainment "standard" with the Xbox 360.

    It never ceases to amuse me how people say the exact same things every time a new console is released. "It's going to do all these great things besides playing video games! It's revolutionary!" Ha! So in other words, it's just like every other console ever.
  • Re:Fry's Line (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Saige ( 53303 ) <evil.angela@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:47PM (#14093492) Journal
    The Best Buy in Bellevue, WA, went around the front of the building, down the side, to the back of the parking lot, then down next to and finally around the back of the Home Depot. They managed to get MORE 360s than the 266 that were originally planned, and still ended up sending a significant number of people home with paid vouchers that guarantee them a system when enough show up.

    I was in line at 7 am Monday for the midnight sale - and was #91 in line. It was quite the experience being there. I don't regret it for a second. Especially since my 360 is worth it, I can tell already.

    (BTW, never thought much of it before, but being able to stream my music from my PC to my 360 as custom soundtrack for any game just is amazing - couple that with the media player and visualizations, and my 200 CD changer is now unnecessary)
  • by Winterblink ( 575267 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:47PM (#14093493) Homepage
    Just spotted this little bit of news [gamespot.com] at Gamespot about how half of surveyed "active" gamers said they would wait until they had choice before buying in to the next generation.

    Well at least I know I'm not alone. ;)
  • by Zo0ok ( 209803 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @03:48PM (#14093505) Homepage
    If you examine an XBox-retail-box (at least the one that have been available in stores for display) you can hardly find the Microsoft logotype anywhere. There are just a few small insignificant ones. Obviously Microsoft wants to let the XBox trademark live on its own without too much Microsoft association. Why? Are they not proud of the XBox or fear it will be another commercial failure? Do they think Microsoft makes people think of boring low-quality products? Does their MS logotype not appeal to children? Do they plan to sell the XBox in the future or split the XBox division from the company? Do they think that the XBox as a toy should not be connected with their Server/Business products? Any ideas? Anyone who knows?
  • Re:eBay (Score:2, Interesting)

    by marcop ( 205587 ) <(marcop) (at) (slashdot.org)> on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @04:00PM (#14093687) Homepage
    I am looking for someone selling an Xbox 360 box like sellers did with the original. In the frenzy of buying, buyers didn't realize that they were buying the packaging material only.

    Anyone find such an auction for the 360?
  • by Phisbut ( 761268 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @04:00PM (#14093691)
    What is the point of paying thousands to get one from eBay and then having to wait for shipping? Why not just pre-order? At worst it would take you 1 or 2 days longer than eBay.

    Not sure how much the shortage is actually real, but what I know is this morning, while eating breakfast, news reporters from several channels were talking about those people waiting in line since about midnight in anticipation of the store opening at 8am (for those stores that didn't take pre-orders). Then, when I got to work (at about 10.30am), I wanted to look at those "Sold out" banners Microsoft made for the retailers, so I went to downtown Montreal's Future Shop (equivalent of Best Buy up here), and there were still 2 core systems and 3 full-systems on the shelves... I could have just taken one to the cash register and brought it home, while a bunch of suckers didn't sleep last night waiting in line in the cold rain...

    Ordering from eBay and waiting for shipping is already pretty pointless, preordering is also useless over here apparently.

  • by ardor ( 673957 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @04:38PM (#14094257)
    Its not ethical to spend your money? So everyone should spend all money thats not absolutely necessary to the 3rd world?
    Why do you have a computer then? Why do you have a house? Why don't you live in a small hut with 15 other people?

    This "we should spend the extra $$$ to the 3rd world" is nonsense. Fine, spend it! But be aware that the poor WILL NOT GET THE MONEY. Instead, your money will end in the pockets of the ultra-rich 1% in the 3rd world.

    You want to help? Push your country to open trade with the 3rd world countries. THIS is what everyone wants over there. The first world countries do not want this in order to protect their economy. Instead, they spend millions and finance the life of the upper class over there.
  • by Generic Guy ( 678542 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @05:44PM (#14095101)
    I bought an original Xbox not to play games on, but to use as a media device.

    I agree, although I should point out that the original Xbox also works great as a game player -- an emulation game player. After sturggling for years waiting for the Dreamcast's SNES emulation to improve, I finally bought an Xbox and softmodded it. Now I have XBMC for tonnes of media playback, and some really nice SNES, Genesis, and even a few PSone games under emulation. All with just one gizmo cluttering under the television.

    With a new dashboard (Unleash) and big hard drive, you can even set up a nice menu system the kids can pick and play what they want without messy cartridges or Discs. Until the new Xbox 360 can do all that, I can't even drum up a yawn for it.

  • by MBraynard ( 653724 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @05:50PM (#14095160) Journal
    Don't be such a retard. Who, exactly, wouldn't sell an Xbox 360 for 10k if they had the chance? There are very few people for whom the difference between having a 360 and 10k is negligible.
  • Re:Zero Hour (Score:2, Interesting)

    by tajgenie ( 932485 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @06:34PM (#14095643)
    I think a big problem that many people (including me) have with Xbox Live is that you have to pay for it. On you computer you don't have to pay for anything but internet access to play online. The Xbox 360 (and the original xbox for that matter) are pretty much computers with limited feature OSes. Even on the original Xbox you could install linux, and have a fully functional computer. The Xbox live has nothing to do with lack of capability, Microsoft (and surely all companies would enjoy this approach, not just microsoft) just wants to make an extra profit off of this service. I know there are a lot of games on the Xbox that would have incredibly enjoyable split screen gameplay, but these games are Live Only. Xbox live is not cheap, nor is it expensive, but I would guess most people pay more for Live than for their games.

    How many of you pay to play a MMORPG? How many of you play diablo II still, or GuildWars because you don't want to pay every month? I know I would be playing WoW right now if it was free to play online. Yet obviously, the MMORPG servers are centralized, and usually can't afford to run without these payments. Does Xbox Live suffer this same problem?

    Take Half-life 2 for instance. On steam, all online games are free to play online (imagine the userbase that would be lost if Counter-Strike had a monthly fee). Can you honestly belive that there isn't a similar loss of players on certain console games because of this? This is all possible because people host thier own servers. All Xbox live is doing is taking away your power to host your own server, and charging you for it.
  • Re:I admit it (Score:3, Interesting)

    by kai.chan ( 795863 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2005 @08:08PM (#14096519)
    Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System. They also make media apps. Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us.

    How long do you think this "competition" will last? The console market is not currently profitable at Microsoft, but they have their sights at the long term. And do you know what the long term goal is? Allow me illustrate to you their goal with evidence from Microsoft's hisotry of business practices:

    Microsoft will keep throwing money at the problem to gain market share. And once they get rid of Sony, they will eventually out-last Nintendo as well. And when they do, do not expect Microsoft to provide any innovation.

    They are notorious for taking over markets and then stop putting any Research and Development money into their monopolies. In other words, since they are saving money on R&D once they have a monopoly, they make profit for years to come. At the same time, Microsoft stifle innovation because the money that consumers give them gets no return in terms of R&D.

    As consumers, we lose when Microsoft takes over a market. Microsoft's entry into the console market DOES NOT benefit us in the long run.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...