Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sony PlayStation (Games)

PS3 Unreal Tournament 3 Delayed 70

Dr. Eggman writes "Gamasutra breaks the bad news from over at Midway. Midway states that Epic Games' Unreal Tournament 3 for the PS3 has been delayed into the first quarter of 2008. No official reason has been give for the delay, as only CEO David Zucker of Midway has released information. The PC version is still on track for a November release." Additional details from a Midway Conference call are available on Next Generation.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

PS3 Unreal Tournament 3 Delayed

Comments Filter:
  • by the computer guy nex ( 916959 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2007 @11:46AM (#20838209)
    ... for a bad PS3 christmas. GTA IV and UT3 were supposed to keep their sales numbers respectable.
  • by SynergyBlades ( 1004560 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2007 @11:48AM (#20838245)
    Yes, it's currently expensive, and that's fine if you don't want to buy one, but ultimately this delay is nothing to do with its lack of popularity or high price, rather everything to do with getting the engine up to speed on the PS3. It's still coming out before the 360 version, even if that is only to do with the 360 needing extra time to support mods, so it's not like they're leaving the PS3 version until last; if they thought no-one owned a PS3, they wouldn't be making a PS3 version at all.
  • by king-manic ( 409855 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2007 @11:50AM (#20838279)
    Did anyone stop to think that the reason they have delayed the release of the PS3 version of the game is that nobody owns a PS3? It's the lowest selling system in the current generation, eclipsed by both the XBOX 360 and the Wii. The primary reason for this is that there is such a high price tag. I think that Sony made a mistake when they decided to go with such high-end hardware for their console. For the price of a PS3, I could buy both a 360 and a Wii. So, would I buy one console, and limit myself to the expensive games released for said console, or would I prefer to buy two consoles, opening up the opportunity to play a wider variety of games with the same quality as that of the more expensive alternative? I think the answer is obvious.

    No because a low install base doesn't stop you from shipping. Perfect dark wasn't stalled simply because the n64 had low numbers .The PS3 launch price in Canada is within $50 of the PS2 launch price. Sony misjudged which direction the US dollar was going in not the machine as a whole. The machine itself is very nice. Sony might have made a mistake in the price tag, they badly misjudged how the economies of it's two largest markets were going but I think the delays are due to the newness and complexity of the architecture. It's a lot easier to get near optimal results from an API that has many experienced programmers (Dirext X) and universal shaders help (360). The Ps3 takes more work to get juice out. Many have already pointed this out. It likely has a higher maximum performance but takes more tinkering to get there.

    I got a ps3 and a wii so I got games covered. Casual and pretty/hardcore. The answer isn't so straight forward as most of the games on the 360 have PC peers/superiors. So it's really about how much money you have and what you play.
  • by nuzak ( 959558 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2007 @01:32PM (#20839985) Journal
    I feel sorry for people who derive personal validation from the control scheme they use in their games.

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...