Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Games Your Rights Online

China Enforces Even Stricter Regulation On Games 235

eldavojohn writes "Chinese gamers have a pretty hard life. From crackdowns on 'undesirable' games to bans on gangster games to delayed World of Warcraft expansions, they suffer. The worst part is that in order to qualify for operating in China, you face a maze of conflicting bureaucracy and regulation. Well, it just got a little worse. Now, if you want to operate, you need to hire a 'specialist' to oversee content, and you need to 'enhance socialist values' in your game. They also want to limit in-game marriages and how many player-versus-player combat sessions one can engage in. The circular issued from China's Ministry of Culture contained all the vague verbiage giving them easier reign over who operates and who doesn't. It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Enforces Even Stricter Regulation On Games

Comments Filter:
  • nuts (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Tom ( 822 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:32PM (#30160556) Homepage Journal

    It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?

    Are you nuts? It's a market that in a few years will be 5-10 times larger than the US market, taking into account that asian cultures are more open to gaming in general (see Korea for example). If there is any single market in the world that's worth it, it's China.

    Other industry has been there, done that. Car manufacturers all knew after the initial surprises that if they open a factory in China, their blueprints will be copied and another chinese factory somewhere else will produce the same cars for a cheaper price. Some stayed out of China for that reason. Until the chinese began to buy cars. Then, they had no choice but to do it, because they couldn't sell on the chinese market without having a chinese factory. They did it knowing full well the damage they'd sustain.

    Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

  • Re:No PVP? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tilandal ( 1004811 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:32PM (#30160558)

    Don't worry, as with all business in China you just have to know who to bribe.

  • Best Plan Ever? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:33PM (#30160576) Journal

    How about I develop a game that caters EXACTLY what the Chinese government would like, and then they use their overpowered censorship and propoganda to promote it and only it...

    Question Marks

    Profit?

  • by FunkSoulBrother ( 140893 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:47PM (#30160824)

    There is a software market in China? I mean one that generatess actual money, and doesn't just pirate everything?

    I guess 2% of a billion is a pretty big number.

  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:48PM (#30160834) Journal

    But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

    Game? Sales? China? They pay for games in China? Who'd of thunk it....

  • by boldtbanan ( 905468 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:49PM (#30160864)

    Mod parent up. This law is basically saying "You must hit all of these subjective benchmarks." That's code for "You must pay us enough money to agree that you are hitting all of these subjective benchmarks."

    Laws are rarely about what's good for the people. They're usually about what's good for the lawmakers. Occasionally the two coincide.

  • Re:Best Plan Ever? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Reason58 ( 775044 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:49PM (#30160866)

    That's a very profitable idea but you might want to consult with IBM [ibmandtheholocaust.com] about how history views those who comply with fascism for monetary return.

    I would definitely compare IBM's assistance in identifying, tracking and cataloging people for the Nazis during the Holocaust to PvP restrictions in World of Warcraft.

  • Re:No PVP? (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:54PM (#30160972)
    Mod parent up. This is how business is done in China. Anything from high finance to getting your kid into a good elementary school it's always about the who's, when's, and how much's of bribery. This mass of carefully crafted conflicting regulations is only the government officials fighting with each other over bribery turf. It is official policy. No one in China is ever prosecuted for this kind of crap unless they've run afoul of somebody higher up in political power. As soon as there is publicity, it's a signal that the person to be put on trial, innocent or not, convicted or not, has lost power and is now wearing a giant "kick me" sign.
  • Re:lol (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CannonballHead ( 842625 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @02:58PM (#30161036)

    By "take games seriously" are you referring to the people in their 20s that still spend all their spare time playing games? They need to grow up?

    Or do you mean the people that think games have are extremely influential on people... you think they need to grow up?

    Whether or not PvP is good or bad is one argument, but arguing that games don't really influence people is ridiculous. If nothing else, it consumes their time, for better or worse. Games - and all entertainment - is not a neutral activity, just as reading a book isn't. Movies, games, and books (and TV, radio, etc) all influence people; game creators, movie producers, and authors can push behaviors, points, agendas, etc. It's not the medium that makes something "neutral" or non-influential.

  • Re:Best Plan Ever? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Eevee ( 535658 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:09PM (#30161224)
    I can assure you that no matter how history views IBM, it hasn't affected IBM's stock prices one bit.
  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:10PM (#30161236) Journal
    I don't think that it'll take 10 years. Their present system is, at least, classifiable as "crony capitalism with state intervention", and the proles(both city and country) are getting the shaft to a degree that would please any sneering Dickensian oligarch(though, since they are getting the same shit slice of a larger pie, their anger hasn't yet become unmanageable).
  • by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:11PM (#30161244) Homepage
    I suppose y'all should have figured it out by now, but if not I'll spell it out and use small words. The Chinese government loves to pass new laws and announce new strategies. There is usually great fanfare, the press bleating like the contemptible sheep they are (the Chinese state-controlled press bleats too) and great discussions on the net as millions of electrons give their last and break up into neutrinos and photons. Then, six months later, nobody has heard of the act or law or whatever, because it's not enforced. This is the "secret" (pretty freaking obvious) of the Chinese government.

    They want you to be in violation of something. With all the legislation, it is impossible to comply with every single law without driving yourself out of business. Everyone knows it, and the Chinese government (at central, provincial, city, and district levels, which are all different and have little relation with each other) knows it too. They like knowing that they can shut you down at any time, but are usually content to let things go as long as you play ball. This kind of ball-play can be laissez faire for years or it can be an "I am altering the deal, pray I don't alter it further" kind of situation. You really have no way of knowing how it will turn out, and the government likes it like that. This is why it's so important to have buddies in government who can warn you of upcoming problems or give you some lamb's blood to mark yourself so the inspectors pass you over. I had one high muckety-muck vice-director of the municipal propaganda ministry hold my product in his hand as if he were weighing it, and said it was about 80% legal. I couldn't puzzle it out, either it's legal or illegal, how can legality be a percentage, and a guess at that! Later I got it...I felt pretty dumb. It was obvious, only my cultural blinders kept me from seeing it.

    And to those of you who are already hitting "reply" to say "durr, just like my country only my country is much worse", do you have a ministry of culture whose job it is to enhance socialist values? With lawyers and truncheons if necessary? You can joke all you like about capitalism taking over but there are plenty of true-believer Mao-worshipping socialists in the government.

  • Re:nuts (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Applekid ( 993327 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:17PM (#30161328)

    But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.


    #ifdef REGION_CHINA
            gameRules.PVP = false;
            gameRules.GroupRules.Max += 5;
    #endif

    If Duke Nukem puffs on a cigar to a backdrop of the US flag in a cutscene, I'd see either the content re-rendered with a different flag texture or just removed outright. The commercial response to censorship will be the cheapest and shortest workaround to get within the law, not a group-up redesign.

  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jaysyn ( 203771 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:22PM (#30161448) Homepage Journal

    You say this like the Chinese government could actually control 1.2 billion people if they really & truly yearned to be free.

    The population of China is like the elephant that can be fettered with a thin rope, because heavy chains were used during it's youth. They can only be restricted as much as they *let* themselves be restricted.

  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:24PM (#30161474)

    That goes without say. But "socialist values"? C'mon, China hasn't been socialist for quite a while now.

    Don't equate socialist with dictatorship. There are socialist dictatorships, but there are also socialist societies that are no dictatorships as well as dictatorships that are anything but socialist.

  • by Xaedalus ( 1192463 ) <Xaedalys @ y a h o o .com> on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:25PM (#30161506)

    "China's going to be a HUGE market!" is the China fallacy, which operates with the assumption that consumers in China are like consumers elsewhere, and that as soon as they get money they will become a gold mine.

    That is a fallacy that's been going on for three to four hundred plus years, and contributed directly to the downfall of the Qing Emperor, the Open Door policy, and all the other problems that China's been trying to recover from for the last hundred years. See, China's culture is very nationalistic and one of their flaws is that they believe they are the center of the Earth. In the mercantile age, that meant that China always exported its goods but would only accept silver from the West because western goods were always seen as 'inferior'. It almost bankrupted the British Empire, and did significant economic damage to the other Western countries, so they retaliated by basically taking over China's ports (and the whole country) to boot.

    To assume that once THIS happens then China will open up to the West is wrong. China will continue what it's doing right now with the currency, and with it's trade policies: accepting money (in the form of Treasury debt and other convertibles) and exporting its goods without buying our goods, because they do not want to be 'dependent' on us. This is at the heart of the Chinese currency manipulation problem - that China is doing exactly what it did 200+ years ago - hoarding monetary assets while not accepting imports from us and slowly bankrupting us. They're not doing it out of spite, they're doing it because to them, all other countries and cultures are 'inferior' to a degree and they want to be the center of the world - and the center never accepts help from the edges.

    That's why the best route for developers is to ignore China. Don't buy into the fallacy, because then you force China to accept your goods, and in doing so, you fix the imbalance.

  • Re:Bribes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by longfalcon ( 202977 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:31PM (#30161606) Homepage

    you're kidding right?

    Bribery and corruption are accepted in many Eastern (and Middle Eastern) cultures. everyone does it, and if you don't, you don't get to play.

    when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

  • Re:Bribes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by commodore64_love ( 1445365 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:32PM (#30161634) Journal

    So it's like our country - tons of laws that are rarely enforced, until the politicians decide to "make an example" of someone and then they use those laws to arrest anyone they desire to arrest, because we're ALL guilty to breaking at least one law. China's more like us than different.

    BTW, why isn't China bankrupt yet? Perhaps it's because they watched the Soviet Union communist government fall, and they decided to evolve into a fascist state (privately-owned capitalist companies, but with strict centralized control).

  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by commodore64_love ( 1445365 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:39PM (#30161780) Journal

    >>>Is China > 50% of the market?
    >>>Will China be > 50% of the market?

    1.3 billion Chinese versus 0.4 billion Americans/Canadians + 0.5 billion Europeans + 0.1 Japanese
    57% > 43%

    Yes China will be >50% of the developed world's market. That's assuming they don't stumble due to an oil crisis (oil becoming scarce) which would prevent them from reaching US/EU/JP level of advancement.

  • Re:nuts (Score:4, Insightful)

    by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @03:45PM (#30161884) Homepage
    Yearning to be free?!? Where did that idea come from? Chinese people aren't "yearning" for anything. As a matter of fact, they are intensely grateful to their government for making the present prosperity possible. It's better in China today than it has been at any time in their 5000 years of history, and it's only improving. It's a damn sight better than the Mao years when he murdered tens of millions and the lucky ones merely froze in unheated factories and classrooms. Oh, maybe they should go back to Chiang Kai-Shek and the warlords? Let's see...Empress Cixi? Nope, unmitigated disaster there, too. Unequal treaties, Opium wars, should I keep going back? The government could decree that every citizen gets a boot to the head daily from the security guards at every community entrance, and they'd still proclaim loudly that China is better off than it has ever been - and they'd be right. And the reason is the government. If the government wanted, the entire nation would still be living in poverty. 1.3 billion starving poor: the Chinese called it "1949-1976".
  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @04:07PM (#30162254) Homepage
    Well, this is probably the most ignorant comment I've seen in a thread absolutely chock full of them. Where the F is India in your little calculation? Brazil? Moreover, a single Westerner has the buying power of many Chinese.
  • Re:Bribes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ae1294 ( 1547521 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @06:33PM (#30164992) Journal

    when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

    Madoff? REALLY are you that brainwashed? Do you have any idea how long that man was stealing money? The only reason ANYTHING happened to him was because of the crash.

    Enron? EVIL CEO Skilling is being held in a low-security prison in Englewood, Colorado. Enron's bankruptcy in 2001 eliminated more than 5,000 jobs and $1 billion in employee retirement funds. Skilling was sentenced to 24 years and 4 months but that's being reduced sloowly now that no one is paying attention. I think it's now down to 15 years after an appeal. 15 years in club fed translates into what? 7 years? He'll be out and cashing in his hidden assets before you make 1/10,000 of it and all he had to do was spend a few years kicking back and watching TV? HA count me in!

    You really should start making a list and checking up every year or so after the news has stopped caring.. Honestly that is a great idea for a website.. Hell maybe I will make one. It could be the next google.... Anyone wanna give me some startup money? I'll triple it within a year! Promise...

    As far as the rest. Do your own damn googling... I know you wont and even if you do have these people get out with no one ever even noticing.

    Keep living in your fairytale land where everyone gets a fair trail and justice is always severed. It must be a nice delusion, hell, maybe it's all those anti-depressants or something in those TV-dinners... Yumm...

  • Re:nuts (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Rakishi ( 759894 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @07:38PM (#30165894)

    You mean China should be growing more slowly and incompetently?

    Compared to India, China has been way ahead in terms of economic growth. It took India two decades and a major economic disaster to even approach China's growth and it's still not rivaling it despite another two decades. You know why it took so long? Because India's government was blocked from implementing economic reforms. Yeah, really useful form of government they had.

  • Re:Bribes (Score:3, Insightful)

    by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Thursday November 19, 2009 @11:55PM (#30167874) Homepage

    The biggest difference between bribery and corruption in China and in the West. When the finally do prosecute the people who took bribes and corrupted government they also pursue those people who paid the bribes, in fact the greater focus is on the one paying the bribe. In China where corruption charges are largely driven by politics (the majority are corrupt when your out of favour, you just get convicted for it) the people paying the bribes are pretty much forgotten about.

    As for China being a large market, that is a delusion, it might be a populace market but when you wages are cents on the dollar compared to western wages, that $40 game even when your forced to work a twelve hour day 6 days a week, is a whole lot of money letting alone dumping on top the cost of hardware and for online stuff and network connections.

    Which is why those in control of the corporo-fascist power structure like to so fiercely protect what little there is of it. China's market is pure and simple the ruthless exploitation of it's work force and environment in which they live and, this will continue until it collapse under the socio-economic and environmental pressures.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...