Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Games

Religion in Video Games 523

The Opposable Thumbs blog recently took a look at how religious themes are handled in video games. Most makers of mainstream games are hesitant, given the strong feelings of most consumers on the subject, but other companies are trying desperately to bring religion into the spotlight. Quoting: "Part of the problem is that the game industry is often touted as being a corrupting influence for the youth of the world. Criticism against the game industry has come from leaders as high up as the current Pope, and many of us who have been exposed to sermons bemoaning the influence that games and movies have on kids. Even when groups like the Christian Game Developers Foundation put out a video encouraging developers to create wholesome titles for kids, the attitude conveyed towards current members of the industry was contemptuous at best. Needless to say, games with heavy religious content are usually fringe projects, independently created and oftentimes sporting dodgy production values, because publishers wisely don't want to risk boycotts from legions of the faithful."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Religion in Video Games

Comments Filter:
  • by Hawthorne01 ( 575586 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:15AM (#30554070)
    Then worry about the religious content. If it's not a good game (or movie, or song, or book) you can stuff it to the gills with religious messages, and no one outside of your particular religious community will ever buy it. Build a better game (or movie, or song, or book) and the world will come to you. (See: Sufjan Stevens, C.S. Lewis, VeggieTales, etc.).
  • by Akira Kogami ( 1566305 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:17AM (#30554076)
    Or you can make a good video game based on religious themes, mythology, and history, rather than one with religious messages. A lot of religious mythology would make pretty awesome settings for games.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:20AM (#30554084)

    How about someone create a game that occurs during the inquisition when the ignorant Christians killed thousands of people who wouldn't convert to their religion?

  • by Darkness404 ( 1287218 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:20AM (#30554086)
    I don't really see how religion is needed in video games. Plenty of games have used religious influences heavily. Fantasy games often use elements of Norse, Egyptian, Greek/Roman, and Christianity/Judaism in their games and that hasn't been a problem. People don't like being fed propaganda from any religious group so games based on any particular religion usually will fail (the fact that they are usually done by second-rate developers and are low budget doesn't help them either). But more than anything else, there is no need. Look at some games, either A) They are done in a fantasy setting and therefore having a real-world religion as a major theme is simply unrealistic or boring B) The focus is action rather than storyline development, most gamers don't care if the Spy from Team Fortress 2 was an agnostic, Buddhist or a scientologist. C) Religion would take away key parts of character development, for example Fallout 3, choosing a religion would effectively either make your character a hypocrite, unrealistic or would make decision making too simple.

    In the end, I don't think there is a need for religion in video games. While it will always and has always been referenced, theres just no good reason to put it in.
  • by MightyMartian ( 840721 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:22AM (#30554090) Journal

    But the whole point of these Christian "developers", like Christian "rock/pop musicians" is not to put out a quality product, it's to get the faithful to fork over money. Obviously these kinds of products are not going to be marketed at the mainstream, because the mainstream could give a shit about a bunch of whacked-out Evangelicals and snake-oil dealers.

  • Religion (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Renraku ( 518261 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:22AM (#30554092) Homepage

    Religion does exist in video games. They aren't usually the same religions as we have meatside, however. I think that's what people are complaining about. The problem is if you let, say, World of Warcraft priests worship the Christian god, then people will automatically boycott when it doesn't follow a particular sect's beliefs. In fact, they'd have no combat skills at all if they followed the word of the Bible.

    Instead, religions are made up, relatively shallow, and may be based on the history that took place in the game. Sounds a lot like real religions, doesn't it?

  • by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:31AM (#30554114)

    They say they are interested in religion in games. Well, in fact there IS religion in quite a few games. In some cases a religious mythology forms the basis for the game's world, in other cases there are various religious characters who influence things and so on. That's not what they want. They want a game that evangelizes their religion. They want one that shoves it in your face, that tries to show it as The One True Way(tm).

    Well, games like that are basically always going to suck. Evangelism isn't fun. What's more, it turns off most people so major developers won't do it. When you have an inherently shitty premise and combine that with a shitty developer you are going to get a total crap fest.

    In terms of mainstream games, religion will continue to be a role in them as it always has been. Often it'll be fictional religions, since they are often set in fictional worlds. However you'll continue to see religious characters of one sort or another in games where such a thing is useful to the story. However you aren't going to see games designed around pushing a religion. Those aren't fun, and they won't sell well, so major publishers aren't going to fund them.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:44AM (#30554134)

    How about someone create a game that occurs during the inquisition when the ignorant Christians killed thousands of people who wouldn't convert to their religion?

    Or perhaps create a game that occurred in the 20th century and shows how atheists persecuted millions of Christians and Jews in the Soviet Union.

  • Re: article tag (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dexmachina ( 1341273 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:46AM (#30554146)
    Simple solution: If you do not want- do not buy. Developers aren't idiots. Religious video games will be industry standard when hell freezes over. That's sort of the main point of the article. At the same time, there's certainly a niche market for them. I don't enjoy racing games, that doesn't mean I'm opposed to their existence. Why should this be any different? Seriously, in cases like this the whole, "leave religion out of it," line is just retarded. On that note, Happy Newton's Birthday everyone.
  • Bullshit (Score:3, Insightful)

    by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:47AM (#30554150)
    First of all, not everyone is being completely adverse to religion. The marketing team behind Dante's Inferno actually hired a group of people to pretend to be Christians protesting the game. Even if such a thing would be considered poor taste, it's not going to affect game sales at all. The same people who would actually protest or boycott a game over religion would never buy your game anyway. Hell, I actually heard more about the game because some religious people were offended by the fake protest and made enough noise that it was picked up by a few news outlets. Free advertising right there.

    The other way to look at it is that games are trying to be a form of art. If they're not willing to tackle religion, they're just throwing away their legitimacy. Whether you're religious or not, I think you would agree that religion plays a major role in the world today and as such is an interesting topic to explore from a narrative standpoint. It's not even necessary to single out a religion by name, but exploring ideas such as polytheism, religious crusades, or corruption of religious institutions can add something interesting to a game. In fact, I think that an exploration of some philosophy is something that is sadly lacking from so many games today. If someone were to make a game exploring these themes I would be tempted to buy it, even if the gameplay weren't as good as another title in the genre.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:48AM (#30554156)
    Right after they make Total Eclipse [reason.com], showing the brutality of Stalin's Russia.

    Thousands of people killed by Christians during the Middle Ages was a horror. Millions of people killed by atheist Soviets was worse by at least an order of magnitude.
  • by Monsuco ( 998964 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:53AM (#30554170) Homepage

    But the whole point of these Christian "developers", like Christian "rock/pop musicians" is not to put out a quality product, it's to get the faithful to fork over money.

    In other words, rather then being the "snake oil" dealers you claim they are, they are just simply like every single business on the planet. They identify a market, then they look for a way to make money serving that market. There is clear demand for Christian Rock, and the customers obviously buy the music because they enjoy its message, just as one might buy a regular album (or especially a concept album) because one enjoys its message.

    The only problem with video games is they are expensive to produce and to buy. A series of Christian games might work, but it is a gamble. Books and songs require relatively less staff than a video game. Of course, a game with an underlying religious message could very much stand a chance at success, but an expressly "Christian Game" might not.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:54AM (#30554180)

    Or perhaps create a game that occurred in the 20th century and shows how atheists persecuted millions of Christians and Jews in the Soviet Union.

    Atheism is a religion.

  • Re:Bullshit (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Darkness404 ( 1287218 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:03AM (#30554202)

    but exploring ideas such as polytheism, religious crusades, or corruption of religious institutions can add something interesting to a game.

    You mean like what Tales of Symphonia did? If you haven't played the game I strongly recommend that you do as it basically covers corruption in religion, the morality of war, etc. All while being quite possibly the best RPG for the GameCube (not that there was much competition). (look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tales_of_Symphonia#Story [wikipedia.org] if you want an overview of the plot).

  • Let's be honest. (Score:1, Insightful)

    by flajann ( 658201 ) <fred.mitchell@g m x .de> on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:03AM (#30554204) Homepage Journal
    Let's be flat honest here.

    Are we talking about any religion, or just Christianity in video games?

    Christians will stop at nothing to ram their silly messages down our throats anyway they can. If we are talking Christian Propaganda being rammed down the throats of our kids in video games, then I am flatly against that.

    If Christians want to write their own video games for themselves, more power to them. I think the mainstream does wisely to avoid stuffing Christian rhetoric in their productions. It will turn off many non-Christians and non-religious people. Why do it?

    If you want your kids exposed to Christian Mythology, take them to church. Write your own video games, and clearly mark them as containing Christian Propaganda. And leave the rest of us alone.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:13AM (#30554238)

    So, you mean Blackwater: The Game isn't vaporware?

  • by interkin3tic ( 1469267 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:22AM (#30554270)

    "I wanted to create a game that had both an entertaining adventure but also hold true to the commandment of 'Thou Shalt Not Kill.'"

    Done: I am unaware of any game in which you actually kill people. Plenty of games in which your fictional character kills other fictional characters, but they're videogames, not real life.

    It's odd to me that religious types sometimes seem to put more emphasis on morality in fiction than they do in real life. It's not real. Why is this a thing to them? No one has ever demonstrated that violence in videogames or movies actually leads to desensitization for real-life violence, so that's not a valid reason. There's plenty of real-world violence going on, that should be higher priority.

    Virtual violence is repugnant to them is what I think it comes down to. That's fine, they should not play games with violence. I think this guy is basically doing the right thing, he's making his own game to fit his tastes, which is great. There aren't enough games like that. I still have to object to the mindset he seems to have: that virtual, in-game violence is somehow morally wrong.

    And most in-game violence to me seems pretty justified. Most involve shooting bad guys or bad aliens. GTA allows you to kill innocent bystanders, sure, but so far that's always been a player using free will to do so. The main story does involve murder, but nine times out of ten it's justified. Not great morality there, but pretty good considering it's not real.

    Some games actually suceed in making you feel guilty. Fallout 3 had oodles of opportunities to do evil, and plenty of times I ended up feeling pretty guilty.

    Having played some of those wisdom tree games, I very much doubt people who are out to make games as a vehicle to promote their own morality have NEARLY the skill it would take to make a game in which a player felt guilty for committing virtual sins, but that is a possibility.

    "It was important to do so, and it is not easy. You can defend yourself by stunning Enforcers, or thugs for a very brief time. The goal is the mission, and to avoid direct contact with the enemy as much as possible."

    That sounds like a watered down version of mirror's edge, a FPS/FPA* which combines parkour with bad guys with guns. You can stun an enemy to take his gun, then use it on other bad guys for a few shots, but the game really encourages you at most parts to flee and stun rather than get into a shootout. Not for morality reasons though, it's just easier that way.

    *I don't want to get into a semantic argument over marketing terms here, you know what I'm talking about.

  • by timmarhy ( 659436 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:23AM (#30554276)
    the only thing that you got right is that religion is a business like any other.
  • by nawcom ( 941663 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:24AM (#30554280) Homepage
    I've read some reviews of Left Behind - Eternal Forces [wikipedia.org] from Christians themselves, and even they felt that evangelizing Jesus and the general theme of the game sort of ruined the fun of it.
  • by paiute ( 550198 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:33AM (#30554318)

    A video game based on the Bible would be more violent than GTA and have to be rated M++ for all the sex.

  • by hackel ( 10452 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:58AM (#30554386) Journal

    Gamers--the people who really fuel the gaming industry (as opposed to the casual gamer) are a very unique market segment. They are, for the most part, people who actually *think*. A religious game targeted at this group would make no sense, as many of the responses to this story have demonstrated. Not only would I say the majority of the "gamer" market is probably atheist, but even the ones who do believe in something are much more likely to be independent in their thinking and what they believe, and not likely to take their religion from a third party source such as a video game.

    Now, certainly some religious mythology could be used to make some good games. And this is the sad part, I find. Game manufacturers are too afraid of offending the right-wing religious nutjobs who are out there monitoring everything. Even though these people in no way represent their market, they end up controlling so much and can even have a negative impact on sales. (Of course, as with GTA, it can also have the opposite effect.) I would like to see a Jesus vs .Mohammed-style deathmatch game. Of course then the Muslims would totally freak out for allowing their precious messenger to appear in a game.

    I could also easily see a MMORPG set in the middle ages with a heavy religious theme, which would be great--so long as it's accurate. Using religion to control your subjects just as it was used in real life.

    It's also too bad that it would be illegal to insert religion into "America's Army," because those people would be the perfect audience to receive it!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @01:59AM (#30554390)

    But I'm sure it makes you feel better that atheists did it because they didn't want to "spread their religion". Even though I'm rather quite sure the USSR persecuted Christians in order to, you know, spread atheism.

    "Spread atheism," my ass. They encouraged fucking pilgrimages to observe the corpsicle of Lenin! Know what they didn't encourage? Skepticism, rationality, or reason! The three cornerstones of atheism.

      They created a goddamn religion around themselves and the state, complete with holy relics and faith-based "science." That's not atheism, so stop repeating that drivel. I'm guessing you're American, since American schools are so damn terrified to teach anything related to politics, that it churns out countless poor saps who don't understand that the label a politician slaps on himself usually has nothing to do with what he is.

    For example: The "Union" of "Soviet" "Socialist" "Republics" was actually an Empire(1) of Anti-soviet(2) State-capitalist(3) Dictatorships.(4)

    (1) - The satellite countries were generally added by military conquest, not some polite handshake, so it was Empire, not Union.
    (2) - The Bolsheviks first borrowed the anti-Bolshevik slogan "All power to the soviets!" for themselves to confuse people like you, then when they had seized power, they disbanded the soviets (which were independent democratically run worker's councils) and told everyone that they were no longer a necessary component for the workers to control the means of production, because the will of the workers was now somehow metaphysically embodied in the premier. (Another religious theme!)
    (3) - A socialist economy, where the workers actually controlled the means of production, was never anything more than a vague promise to be fulfilled, maybe, someday in the USSR. A rationed "command economy" was put in place as a "temporary" measure only for wartime. It never ended, because it gave the party too much power to skim and control. The whole system operated like one huge corrupt mega-corporation, except that the middle managers had guns and the cubicles were prisons.
    (4) - The last is self explanatory. With only one candidate to vote for you don't even have the choice of the lesser of two evils, and you can't honestly call it a Republic.

  • Re:SimChurch (Score:5, Insightful)

    by hackel ( 10452 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:00AM (#30554402) Journal

    This is probably the most brilliant "Sim" game I've heard of since SimCity! I would buy this in a second, it is really a brilliant idea! And it would be GREAT education for kids!

  • by name*censored* ( 884880 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:22AM (#30554460)

    There's an obvious difference here. The Christians persecute others to spread their religion. Atheists persecute others for other reasons. In this case, it was to spread political ideas rather than religious ones. Religion is a direct cause of many murders while atheism cannot be blamed for it because there's nothing in the ideology about committing murder in the name of any superstition.

    ... Unbelievable. You come within a hair's breadth of the astonishingly-obvious-yet-no-one-sees-it fact that the problem is not religion, it is extremism, of which religion is only a subset (though when I say subset I should say intersection, since at least one religious person doesn't want to go on a killing rampage). Yet you suddenly take a 90 degree turn and start rambling about how religion encourages murdering, even though it's explicitly banned in many (perhaps most) major religion and is only justified by twisting the words and intents of said religion (which is easy if your audience are uneducated peons, as they were during the Crusades/Inquisition).

    Besides which, this should have rang alarm bells:

    Atheists persecute others for other reasons

    Quite frankly, I don't care if they're persecuting others to spread religion, spread ideology, or to sell chocolates. I don't care what they call themselves. The whole damn problem is the persecution. The reason, by comparison, is unimportant and interchangeable - that's the whole friggin' idea behind Skub vs anti-Skub.

  • by something_wicked_thi ( 918168 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:43AM (#30554532)

    How many people have Christians persecuted since, say, 1800?

    Women, gays, and blacks, to name the first three that pop into my head. That's >50% of the world's population right there. They may not be into killing and burning anymore, but they have definitely persecuted them.

    How many Christians have atheists killed for their Christianity?

    But I'm sure it makes you feel better that atheists did it because they didn't want to "spread their religion". Even though I'm rather quite sure the USSR persecuted Christians in order to, you know, spread atheism.

    No, they did it to spread communism. But the sister post here explains things better than I can. But let me leave you with one more thought. There's not a shred of evidence to support the superstitious belief that there's a god or almighty power or to support the various religions. We have no way to say whether Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Mormonism, or various others have it right. So why do people kill each other over these things? In light of this, the skeptical viewpoint is the only sensible one, and if we so far haven't been able to deal with that truth without killing people, then we need to figure out how. Trying to make everyone believe in the same superstition doesn't seem like a very workable solution here and religion has never been very good at tolerance. It's right there in the holy book that they're not supposed to be tolerant.

  • by NeutronCowboy ( 896098 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:47AM (#30554542)

    "Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby."

  • by NeutronCowboy ( 896098 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:49AM (#30554546)

    Newsflash: Hitler was at the very least a deist. Stalin was an equal-opportunity persecutor. Mussolini was a good Italian, and a catholic.

    Christians are not a persecuted minority. Get over it. You have no idea what actual persecution is like.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:55AM (#30554568)

    The same could be said about the legal system in the United States. Murder is clearly illegal, yet capital punishment is encouraged for violation of various laws. Additionally, leaders in our government and military have given orders to kill people, especially during wars, in some very cruel and inhumane ways. Shall we talk about atrocities committed in places such as Vietnam and Iraq? What about legalizing abortion and assisted suicide? Isn't the United States government (and many other governments around the world) contradicting itself in numerous ways?

    The purpose of the laws in the Old Testament were to benefit society and to benefit the people. However, in practice, they have been applied, misinterpreted, mutilated, and altered to promote greed, evil, and tyranny. Those who use the Old Testament laws to justify the Inquisition, for example, certainly aren't interested in using wisdom and justice to apply the law. They're interested in promoting evil and tyranny. Christ didn't come to change the law, but to do away with the abuses. There is not a single place where Christ says that the Old Testament was wrong. Instead, Christ took objection with how the law was applied.

  • by khellendros1984 ( 792761 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @03:10AM (#30554600) Journal
    s/Atheism/Agnosticism.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @03:34AM (#30554664)

    You can point out many instances throughout history where religion has been abused to justify atrocities. You're absolutely right that many evils have been committed in the name of religious principles or deities. However, it is generally not the religion or the philosophy that causes those atrocities, but rather the abuse of the religion or philosophy.

    Whether atheism is a religion or a philosophy isn't relevant here. Atheism has been the official policy of some of the worst tyrannical states of the 20th century. The abuses in the Soviet Union, for example, have been documented throughout the rest of this thread, so there's no need for me to repeat them. Atheism is a philosophy, and the belief or disbelief in said philosophy is a personal matter. However, it too has been abused to justify persecution.

    The problem isn't the religions or philosophies, because the modern forms of any of those denounce using the sword as a tool to convert unbelievers. The problem is when free will (a fundamental principle of Christianity, for example) is abridged, regardless of the philosophy or religion. Unfortunately, many seem unwilling to distinguish between a religion and those who seek to abuse a religion to persecute others.

  • by ChromeAeonium ( 1026952 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @03:54AM (#30554716)

    It is a hobby if you go around talking about how great it is [richarddawkins.net] to not collect stamps, and join not collecting stamp clubs [atheists.org], and read Not Collecting Stamps Monthly. [infidels.org] I get where that sentiment is coming from, I really do, and have to say I agree with it, but I don't think that it is always the case anymore.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @04:18AM (#30554748)

    That's because most of the bible is an account of human history and humanity, as we know, is full of violence and sex.

    Human history however, can be separate from promoting good values which other parts of the bible has.

  • Re:SimChurch (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ChromeAeonium ( 1026952 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @04:19AM (#30554750)

    Sure you don't want to call it Church Tycoon?

    I propose L. Ron Hubbard: The Video Game.

  • by roca ( 43122 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @04:36AM (#30554792) Homepage

    > Skepticism, rationality, or reason! The three cornerstones of atheism.

    The cornerstone of atheism is what the word means --- to believe in no god. Mao and Stalin may not have been the sort of atheists you like, but they were certainly keen on spreading their brand of atheism.

    You are committing the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman [wikipedia.org]

  • by X0563511 ( 793323 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @04:53AM (#30554822) Homepage Journal

    What you speak of is less the trappings of religion and more the trappings of assholes who want to feel better than you. I think every group is guilty of a few of these folks.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @05:16AM (#30554876)

    Don't forget the song of solomon expansion pack. Geared towards females to teach them that oral sex is god's work.

    Song of Solomon 2:3

    As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.

    Song of Solomon 4:16

    Come ... blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits.

    It also throws in unicorns [bible-topics.com] because girls love those.

  • by AlgorithMan ( 937244 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @05:21AM (#30554890) Homepage
    maybe the problem is that religious games (I don't know even one counter example) focus to much on conveying the religion and to little on stuff like A STORY, or GAMEPLAY... they're like most educational games, they just AREN'T FUN TO PLAY.
    http://www.cinemassacre.com/new/?p=3878 [cinemassacre.com]
    http://www.cinemassacre.com/new/?p=4069 [cinemassacre.com]
  • by mwvdlee ( 775178 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @05:24AM (#30554902) Homepage

    Atheists don't "not collect stamps", they believe collecting stamps isn't a hobby and can't ever be a hobby.

    (p.s. I'm not religious; neither theist nor atheist).

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @05:29AM (#30554912)

    I think his outcry would be more correctly aimed at people who buy a conformist product packaged in rebellious mannerisms. This isn't limited to Christian rock, of course, but it's one example of the oblivious nature of the general population to the subtlety of things. "I want the excitement of being loud and free, but the self-righteousness of conforming to God."

  • by QuantumG ( 50515 ) * <qg@biodome.org> on Saturday December 26, 2009 @05:37AM (#30554938) Homepage Journal

    Yes, unfortunately Christians think "you're a fucking nutbag, get away from me, and no I wont vote for you" is persecution.

  • by yndrd1984 ( 730475 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @06:09AM (#30555018)

    Worst case - converting to Christianity from Islam - can get you killed in many countries.

    To be fair, converting to anything from Islam can get you killed in those countries - it isn't really Christian-specific. Can you name someplace where Christians are hard-core persecuted significantly more than atheists or Jews?

  • by John Betonschaar ( 178617 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @06:11AM (#30555024)

    That's because most of the bible is an account of human history and humanity

    Most of the Bible is fairy tales loosely based on vague occurrences, from some parts of human history, in some parts of the world, transcribed so many times it has about the same amount of truth in it as a Monthy Python movie. I wouldn't dare calling it an account of human history, humanity is way, way more than just the few Christian tidbits recorded in Bible.

  • by LS ( 57954 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @06:19AM (#30555038) Homepage

    If there were people killing each other over stamps and forcing others to be collectors, then I promise you there would be not collecting stamp organizations

  • by selven ( 1556643 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @06:35AM (#30555070)

    The problem with these arguments is that 1930s Germany and Russia were just as religious as a devoutly Catholic state. Hitler took Christian Christmas carols and substituted God's name and Jesus's name with his own, in an attempt to make people worship him. Stalin did something very similar. The common pattern is that blind devotion to another being is dangerous. If you blindly worship your political leader, you're willing to slaughter people for him. If you blindly worship a deity (emphasis on the blindness here - Martin Luther was religious, but he saw the Church as a bunch of frauds), you're willing to slaughter people because his church tells you to.

  • by yndrd1984 ( 730475 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @07:02AM (#30555144)

    How many people have Christians persecuted since, say, 1800?

    Where to begin?

    Dark skinned people can be used as work animals because they're "Hammites" - cursed by God for the sins of Ham after the flood.
    Plenty of US states' constitutions barred non-believers from public office.
    Some people are still trying to enforce [latimes.com] them.
    Catholics and Protestants in Ireland.
    Some states won't allow single people to adopt kids - solely because that's the only legal way to bar gays from adopting.
    Then there's the whole gay marriage thing...
    And that's what I can come up with in two minutes while sleep deprived.

    But I'm sure it makes you feel better that atheists did it because they didn't want to "spread their religion".

    Killing people to spread Communism isn't the same thing as killing to spread atheism, atheism alone doesn't tell you to kill anyone (nor does it endorse any other moral stance). Christianity is based on a book that bluntly says to stone certain people to death, that repeatedly discusses the proper way to practice slavery, that says God approves of some kids of genocide (yes, in order to spread His religion) - you have to add something else (like a specific interpretation) to avoid endorsing the bad stuff.

  • by Tom ( 822 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @08:15AM (#30555270) Homepage Journal

    The Christians persecute others to spread their religion. Atheists persecute others for other reasons.

    Atheists persecuted nobody, ever, in history.

    However, Atheists can also be Nazis, Communists, Drug Lords or whatever else causes them to persecute someone. Surprise! So can christians, muslims, hindus, etc.

    You're confusing one attribute of a many with his cause for action. You could just as well have said "blonde people persecute others" or "homosexuals persecute others" or "people with white shirts persecute others", because you will certainly examples of that. Except, of course, that anyone with half a brain will realize that the shirt colour, hair colour or sexual orientation had very little to do with the persecution, and it was (in I'd dare to guess at least 95% of the cases) the religious or politicial ideology that was the actual cause.

    But, I do think it's high time to persecute these religious fanatics and put them in their place, once and for all. Attacks on people's minds should be viewed just as much a crime as attacks on people's bodies.

  • by darthdavid ( 835069 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @08:24AM (#30555284) Homepage Journal
    Man I fucking hate that phrase. There are plenty of nonreligious people in the military and plenty of people who don't turn to god just because they're in a life threatening situation. I know you were making a joke but every time that old chestnut gets dragged out it makes a mockery of those who are willing to put their life on the line for country and kin knowing that if they're right in their beliefs then death is nonexistence and if they're wrong then it's probably some sort of hell (most religions take a rather dim view of non-believers...). Seems a hell of a lot braver than someone who goes into combat expecting to go to heaven if they buy the farm...
  • by cfa22 ( 1594513 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @09:33AM (#30555418)
    I agree. Here's a nugget from the wikipedia page for the phrase: James Morrow has been quoted as saying "'There are no atheists in foxholes' isn't an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes."
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @10:07AM (#30555540)

    My sons and I have been batting around game ideas for many years now, and we've considered the subject of a religious-themed game many times. We're pretty much agreed that it would not be possible to make a game that is both good from a gameplay perspective and at the same time good from a faith or doctrinal perspective.

    1. First, there's the Sincerity Problem. Religions are inherently concerned with serious, ultimate issues of life after death. There's nothing game-like about the subject matter at all. Any attempt to introduce playfulness cannot help but be insincere.
    2. Next, there's the Suspension of Belief Problem. Play and story-telling is heavily dependent on fantasy, role-playing, and suspension of belief. Religion, however, is exactly the opposite. It depends on belief. Any attempt to introduce fantasy elements into religion would be irreligious, by definition.
    3. Finally, there's the Doctrinal Problem. The whole point of gameplay is to explore alternatives and play with different scenarios and story lines. But it is not possible to play with a religious story line. The story line is part of the teaching, and the teaching is about absolute truth (see Sincerity Problem), so there are no valid alternatives.

    Now, it would be possible to make a good/UNserious religious game. The Chronicles of Riddick is an excellent example of an invented religion that works wonderfully well to drive the story, define characters, and provide motivation.

    As an aside, there are very few accurate portrayals of the peacefulness of religion in fiction. Religious people are almost always shown as fighting, torturing, and basically steam-rolling people into believing. But no true believer would ever do such a thing, of course. The power of religion is in having the capital-T Truth, and Truth never has to be forced, it just is. Real preachers and teachers use moral suasion, not war.

    However, there seems to be an inexhaustible supply of political extremists who are only too happy to cloak themselves in the language and symbolism of religion to take advantage of people. Nazism, for example, often appropriated religion [wikipedia.org] to serve its political ends. No doubt this is what Islamic extremists are doing today.

  • But... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @10:34AM (#30555610)

    Plenty of video games already have magic and make-believe.

  • by OeLeWaPpErKe ( 412765 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @10:37AM (#30555626) Homepage

    Wait a second. Christian rock is bad because it doesn't have the macarena ?

    Check again ... bad ?

    Boy, I'd heard tastes differ, but I had no idea.

    Given that as little as a century ago a (very) large majority of music was purely religious, I'd take that "tools the 'other side' has used for centuries with a hefty helping of salt).

    Most of those "brilliant" themes you refer to being used in songs, imho, sound suspiciously familiar to someone with a decent knowledge of, heh, 16th century music. Very familiar indeed. One regularly recognizes long parts of those symphonies. Using strategic silences for suspense and dramatic effect has been done in operas since before the first letter was written in the bible.

    The fact that those themes are repeated is logical in a way, since that old music is still how music is taught even today. Which, honestly, is a good thing. You can't teach someone more than 2 notes or patterns longer than 5 seconds with any recent song.

    The "successful music" you refer to is merely the "big mac" version of last centuries' game feast. Yes they take very little time and effort to "enjoy to the fullest" (most take me less than a second to do that), but they're lacking in every single department. They're not satisfying, you cannot listen to them for even the paltry 2 minutes they last, most are rightfully identified as "noise", they're bad for the ear (and for the stomach if played at the "advised" volume), they lack depth, it is a rarity to have any kind of message in there, and ... They're "big macs". There's loads of music out there that you can listen to for 2 days continuously and still not be revolted by.

  • by Kjella ( 173770 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @10:41AM (#30555654) Homepage

    A society who has no death penalty or sense of objective morality historically leads to less & less morality and more violence.

    Yeah, because the US with its death penalty and religious freaks has less criminals per capita and less violence than Europe.

    I agree that killing people for not converting to Christianity is wrong. But, by definition, those who practice such things are not Christians.

    No, you're just pretending that all the Christians you don't like aren't Christians. Christianity was spread by killing those who wouldn't convert, it's well documented that's how it happened here in Norway (around 1000 AD) and the Church was fully supporting it. Most famous are of course the Crusades that were blessed by the Pope himself, but there are many more. They only stopped most the killing because the competition was dead, the roman mythology, the greek mythology, the norse mythology, the keltic mythology, all dead. And if you think the missionary efforts during colonization weren't backed up with a lot of lethal force, you are dreaming. The african tribal religions, the Mayan religion, the Aztec religion, the native American religions were all crushed by conquest and forcibly raising the population in the Christian tradition. You're just reaching for the moral high ground but you stand on a pile of skeletons.

  • by c_forq ( 924234 ) <forquerc+slash@gmail.com> on Saturday December 26, 2009 @11:50AM (#30556120)
    I think you are missing the point of the phrase. At my place of work we recently had an employee collapse and be rushed to the hospital, after returning he stated "man, it is amazing how religious you can become when you have no control over your fate". He was not religious, but found himself praying almost constantly while he was in the hospital. The no atheist in the foxhole refers not to bravery or willingness to fight for something you believe it, but rather the reaction people have when their fate is taken out of their own hands in awful, grim situations. It's not about wanting heaven, it's about hoping to live.
  • by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:04PM (#30556188) Journal

    I agree that killing people for not converting to Christianity is wrong. But, by definition, those who practice such things are not Christians.

    If you limit the definition of Christian to those who only follow all the rules of Christianity, no one is a Christian. How many so-called Christians do you know who eat shellfish?

  • by mdarksbane ( 587589 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @12:48PM (#30556508)

    Which is something I believe old veterans have been doing to movies, songs, and sagas of war since man first stuck a pointy bit of flint on a stick and called it a spear.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:00PM (#30557010)

    > How many people have Christians persecuted since, say, 1800?

    Well, there's the psychological persecution of all gay people about how there's supposedly something wrong with them, that is about 10% of world population so, 600 or so million people.

    Then there's the whole issue of all the children sexually abused and molested by christian clergy, which goes up to several millions.

    So quite a few, in fact.

  • by couchslug ( 175151 ) on Saturday December 26, 2009 @02:29PM (#30557198)

    "Man I fucking hate that phrase. "

    Me too. I was an open atheist through my 26 years in the USAF, found plenty of agreement, and when I pointed out to the questioning theists that I was volunteering to serve to protect _our_ freedom they promptly chilled out.

    Atheists don't have imaginary playmates to delude us into doing what we prefer to do anyway (affirmation is the purpose of religion) yet we manage to function quite well.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...