Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
XBox (Games) Games Idle

Gamers Pay To Play With Girls 408

taucross writes "A new site allows lonely Xbox 360 gamers to pay a prescribed fee for a few minutes of game time with one of the 'PlayDates', a girl who is paid to play video games. Gamers can choose to have a 'flirty' or 'dirty' experience with one of the PlayDates. Is this what we meant when we said we wanted 'adult gaming'?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gamers Pay To Play With Girls

Comments Filter:
  • May I be the first to say... WTF?!?

    No seriously? WTF?!?

    What's the point? It just exploits the hope of those guys to get a real date, without the actual hope of getting a real one.. Wait, scratch that... It will probably be hugely popular... *sigh*.

    Do the girls get paid to do it, just like camgirls? Ah, yes, it's right there in the article... Well, guess there is more dignity in doing that than undressing yourself before a cam. Perhaps they can combine it and make even more money: for each time you frag her, she has to remove one piece of clothing.... /ME runs to patent the idea ;-)

  • o.O (Score:4, Insightful)

    by whisper_jeff ( 680366 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:03PM (#31585838)
    The mind boggles.

    Seriously, how do you walk into a bank to ask for a business loan for this sort of thing?

    Wow...
  • History Repeats... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cosm ( 1072588 ) <thecosm3NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:08PM (#31585912)
    Age old product, sold via a new channel. Interesting, but not unexpected.
  • Re:Capitalism (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MindlessAutomata ( 1282944 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:12PM (#31585968)

    No, actually, I'm quite proud of myself for not thinking about this. At all.

  • Pathetic (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:19PM (#31586078)

    Pathetic. Save your money and go to a real prostitute.

  • by Helios1182 ( 629010 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:23PM (#31586142)

    I think the online dating sites now cater not just to those that are "too busy" for a social scene. They are filled with people who are sick of the regular social scene (e.g., bars) for meeting people. There are people from all professions, faiths, and interests on them at this point.

    This new service seems like it will be less rewarding and more expensive than regular dating sites.

  • by delinear ( 991444 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:24PM (#31586154)
    Not to defend this scheme in any way but I would guess the mechanism will be that one signs up via a website to pay for the service (somehow I can't see MS letting people spend Microsoft points on this), so I would assume that it's no worse than an age restricted web site on that front and you'll need to have a credit card to get access anyway.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:29PM (#31586250)
    This isn't a "dating" service. These girls are paid to play. They may have an interest in gaming, but they don't have any interest in the people who call. They're just there for the money.
  • Seriously!? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Aladrin ( 926209 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:36PM (#31586334)

    I'd love to find a girl that likes to play video games, and would enjoy playing them with me. Hell, I'm even inclined to give up my bachelor lifestyle for such a rare gem... But pay $9 for 10 minutes of playing a game with her over the net? I really, really don't think so.

    Now, if that was the prelude to getting an actual date with her, I could see it. (In other words, you have to prove you aren't a complete asshole while playing games.)

  • by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:37PM (#31586348) Journal

    This sounds more like a 'nerd' version of an escort service. Just far lamer - you don't even get points for being seen around town with a hot chick.

    Eh, I get to be seen around Orgrimar with a hot Orc chick, or in my case around Sol space station with a hot Betazoid ;)

  • Re:Nevada (Score:3, Insightful)

    by 19thNervousBreakdown ( 768619 ) <davec-slashdot&lepertheory,net> on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:44PM (#31586466) Homepage

    Most whores will be just as happy to talk to you.

    The difference is, if you decide you want to fuck, you can.

  • by Geeky ( 90998 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:44PM (#31586468)

    ...but it's not.

    Shame on you, CmdrTaco, for posting this. Shame on the organisation behind it for creating it. And every one of you assholes who immediately started joking about it, you disgust me.

    Why? Seriously.

    I'm genuinely ambivalent about even the world's oldest profession, of which this is arguably a very mild version. It doesn't disgust me, it's been around forever and seems to be a part of human nature.

    As long as noone's being forced into it, I don't have a problem with it. There are plenty of dysfunctional relationships out there, and it sometimes seems like a straightforward paid transaction is more honest.

  • by i ate my neighbour ( 1756816 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:52PM (#31586580)
    Really depends on your age. If you were born before 1990, you have probably paid for porn.
  • by BlackSnake112 ( 912158 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:55PM (#31586654)

    Unless you can actually see the 'girl', who says that it is not a guy with a girl avatar? Nothing in the article says they check to make sure that the girls are real girls. Sort of reminds me of the video for sweet emotion. In the end the girl was a real girl, but she looked nothing like what the guy thought.

  • by DrgnDancer ( 137700 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @01:55PM (#31586662) Homepage

    It's not really a dating service at all, it's more like phone sex or escort services (from the sounds of things it can be closer to either at your request). I've never understood either of these things. I mean, most normal people like the occasional porn, but porn is a non-interactive media. It's simply an ambiance that gets you in the mood (either by yourself or in whatever partner or partner + configuration floats your boat). This stuff is essentially lying to yourself. You're pretending that you have a real relationship (whether carnal or not) with this person who is essentially just hanging out with you because you're paying them.

  • Eh, kiss arse (Score:5, Insightful)

    by SmallFurryCreature ( 593017 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:05PM (#31586866) Journal

    I doubt you will be getting 8.99 per sessions if it lasts for 10 seconds and leave the paying customer humiliated. You will have to loose and complement him on his excellent skills.

    Really, if being a whore was about getting great sex while being paid, more women would do it.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:12PM (#31586964)

    audio via headset

  • Dirty or Flirty (Score:5, Insightful)

    by happy_place ( 632005 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:15PM (#31587032) Homepage
    And we all know that girls really only come in two varieties. Dirty or Flirty... sigh... as a father of many daughters, this just pisses me off... then again, videogame females have always been little more than balloon animals...
  • by jargonCCNA ( 531779 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:19PM (#31587104) Homepage Journal

    It bothers me because it tacitly encourages the continued objectification and marginalisation of women within gaming circles. I don't doubt for a minute that people will people will pay for the privilege of going onto the system and berating the women on the other end of the line for being women, because now they know who they're talking to. If there was a way to police the behaviour of the users of the system, that would be one thing. There can't be, though, so all this is is a perfect avenue for misogynistic gamers to hurt people.

    I'll put it this way: even if there were no pimps anywhere in the world, and every prostitute in the field did it because they enjoyed what they did, there would still be people out there who would pay for the ability to beat the shit out of them. Even if the women involved aren't being coerced into it, there's a significant number of men who will abuse the system in order to abuse women.

    And even there was, it still doesn't excuse all the disgusting, misogynistic comments on this article.

  • by Kitkoan ( 1719118 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:21PM (#31587154)

    Unless you can actually see the 'girl', who says that it is not a guy with a girl avatar? Nothing in the article says they check to make sure that the girls are real girls. Sort of reminds me of the video for sweet emotion. In the end the girl was a real girl, but she looked nothing like what the guy thought.

    While you might not be able to see the 'girl', I'm assuming the girls are required to use the mic as much as possible during the game. Like phone sex except they are to sound cute when playing and make flirty type comments about your playing skills.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:27PM (#31587254)
    fake all the outrage you want, that feminist still isn't going to fuck you
  • by stonewallred ( 1465497 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:27PM (#31587256)
    me! if you pay for porn, you are an idiot. there is so much free high quality (lol at least for porn it is) porn on the web it is silly to pay for it.
  • by kungfugleek ( 1314949 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:31PM (#31587328)
    in all seriousness, the girls could give the guys tips on how to pick up women. The game thing helps because these are (presumably) shy guy types that would find it awkward to talk to girls in any other situation. But put them in a virtual world with zombies to fight and they're right at home, like it's tea-time. Just saying, the venue makes the difference for shy types.
  • by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:33PM (#31587376) Journal

    Heh. I thought it was common knowledge by now, especially by the tech-savvy Slashdot users, but I guess humanity surprises me again.

    Plus, if you think software was the biggest problem, consider this: the larynx actually changes for boys at puberty, under the influence of testosterone. (Which is why they used guys castrated early for some roles in opera and such.) What sounds like a flirty girl on your headset can well be a 13 year old boy. Or a 10 year old girl, for that matter. Considering the pedo hysteria lately, I wouldn't rush to talk too indecently to someone you don't really know, based on just what they sound like. Just something to think about.

  • by Bearhouse ( 1034238 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:35PM (#31587404)

    Shame on the organisation behind it for creating it.

    Well, OK, it's kinda pathetic and tacky, I grant you that. But at least the poor people performing the service can be warm and safe at home, not risking their health, or worse, on the street. Most will be guys, anyway...

    Shame on you, CmdrTaco, for posting this.

    You've lost me there...this is supposed to be 'news for nerds', after all...

    And every one of you assholes who immediately started joking about it, you disgust me.

    Well, like I said, this is /. What do you expect them to do - climb out of the basement and spend the money on a real hooker instead?

    Oh, and while we're on the topic of sanctimonious posts, many people would be upset by your blasphemy.

    Still, I see you've been modded funny, so I guess I'm gonna get 'whooooshed' for this post!

  • by brkello ( 642429 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:40PM (#31587484)
    So, in other words, it doesn't matter what women do, there are still going to be jerks that objectify them. So women might as well do whatever they want. If they choose to make money off of these people or people who legitimately want this service, that is their choice.

    You on the other hand want to take away their right to choose to this. Quite frankly, your post is more offensive than the majority of the posts on here. Women can take care of themselves. They aren't being forced to do this. Most people are saying things in jest, you are speaking (unless I am way off base) in seriousness. Your post strikes me as more misogynistic than the others. Would you object if a bunch of attractive, muscled men offered the same thing to women? Of course not. It's ok to objectify men as sexual object, but not women? You are the one with the problem.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:45PM (#31587556)

    This is all moot anyways.

    RealDoll + DARPA artificial intelligence is 5 years away

  • by Geeky ( 90998 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:47PM (#31587572)

    I was kind of missing the fact that you keep getting modded as funny and taking you at face value. I'm bored, I'll carry on doing so for a while.

    If women aren't being coerced into it, and there are guys that abuse them, they have a very simple option...

    If you're serious, I kind of suspect you live in the PC world of academe (as your sig suggests). Have you ever met, and spoken to, any strippers or prostitutes? Quite a few of them would be rather patronised by your disgust.

  • by fastest fascist ( 1086001 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:49PM (#31587602)
    Interesting that you choose to make the actions of deranged individuals a gender issue, yet imply you are for gender equality.
  • by Paradoks ( 711398 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @03:05PM (#31587826) Homepage

    do they adequately verify that these "girls" are actually human females?

    You say that like it matters.

    They're certainly not all attractive, 20-something genetic girls on the porn hotlines, so why would this be different? What matters is what you perceive, given that it's a pretend world regardless of how hot and sexy the worker is.

    Anyway, I, for one, welcome aliens practicing their English and sexual skills by impersonating a porn human.

  • Huh? Wha...? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @03:14PM (#31587922) Journal

    Huh? What's wrong with joking about it anyway?

    And if you're offended by us joking about this, you may want to completely avoid the likes of George Carlin (joking about rape for example) or Jimmy Carr (joking about such topics as kids with leukemia) and really most comedians out there.

  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @04:10PM (#31588600) Journal

    I'm a girl, I game, and if I needed the money, sure - why wouldn't I make a few bucks flirting with some random yahoo while playing an FPS?

    Because you live in a society where people who sell their soul for money get to look down on people who sell their bodies for money. I'm not entirely sure how we ended up like this either...

  • by thesandtiger ( 819476 ) on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @05:39PM (#31589674)

    Well, I can say that some of it comes from the fact that a group traditionally out of power (women) have been the ones who've been able to sell their bodies. But, speaking to your larger point, I agree - it's amazing to me that people will not even question (much) selling out their very selves, but cry "Ick! Unclean!" at something trivial like a sexualized encounter, in the US.

  • Re:Seriously? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @09:59PM (#31592796)

    really? so why are you posting comments over here instead of going outside for real human interaction>?

  • Re:Dirty or Flirty (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Macgrrl ( 762836 ) on Wednesday March 24, 2010 @12:50AM (#31594058)

    This pisses you off as a father of daughters... how do you think us women gamers feel?

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...