Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Australia Hardware Hacking PlayStation (Games) Sony The Courts Games Build

Australian Crackdown On Console Modchips Likely To Continue 89

angry tapir writes "Late last week an Australian court issued an injunction against a handful of retailers selling or importing hardware — commonly known as 'mod chips' — that allows unauthorized software to run on Sony's PlayStation 3. The court also required that the four parties that were the subject of the injunction actually hand over to Sony any PlayStation modchips they have. Sony's PlayStation 3 mod chip lawsuit could be just the first of many such cases in Australia, according to a lawyer who defended a client against Nintendo in a similar case earlier this year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Australian Crackdown On Console Modchips Likely To Continue

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 02, 2010 @02:05AM (#33446216)

    You're asking that about a country who had their elected prime minister axed and replaced earlier this year by his own party, and where recent elections resulted in a hung parliament where neither of the two major parties could form a majority.

    Answer: no, they don't, and Australia is generally getting pretty sick of it.

  • by mjwx ( 966435 ) on Thursday September 02, 2010 @02:23AM (#33446308)

    What is it with Australia? They want to filter the Intertubes in was that make Iran look like an island of freedom,

    That was a small group of religious extremists, who have since been smacked down. Getting a filter now is impossible, since the greens control the senate and the independents control the house (we had an election a few weeks back). The best they got was a "voluntary" filter from Australia's worst ISP's (most people in Australia have the choice of 5+ ISP's). In the mean time, my Amcom and iinet connections remain unfiltered.

    Would you like it if I said all Americans were naive blubbering vagina's like Rush Limbagh? (I cant be arsed googling the correct spelling). Not fair using the worst example of a people as the average is it?

    Are the people that propose these law actually elected and represent the views of the average Aussie?

    Is Joe Biden or John McCain a representative of the average American, how about Sarah Palin (no wait, dont answer that). Polly's always live in a world of their own and always seem surprised when reality crashes in on them. Same in every country mate.

  • Generic dongle? (Score:4, Informative)

    by SharpFang ( 651121 ) on Thursday September 02, 2010 @02:54AM (#33446438) Homepage Journal

    AFAIK, the modchip is a generic microcontroller ( ATmega164PA ) in a simple USB-pluggable board, and the actual jailbreak code is in the wild [kotaku.com].

    It could be easily done that the microcontroller board is given some minor extras and some legal, common, generic functionality, say, a USB-RS232 converter. Then the customer can buy the dongle, and turn it into a modchip using a PC and a simple package downloaded from torrents.

  • by timbo234 ( 833667 ) on Thursday September 02, 2010 @02:57AM (#33446454) Journal

    What is it with Australia? They want to filter the Intertubes in was that make Iran look like an island of freedom,

    Actually thanks to the recent election this filter is basically dead, it will never get through the senate.

    Are the people that propose these law actually elected and represent the views of the average Aussie?

    They're elected but the elections are on topics like the economy and boat people. Most Aussies think things like internet filtering and copyright are irrelevant side issues and don't elect politicians based on these issues, so nothing changes.

  • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Thursday September 02, 2010 @04:38AM (#33446880)
    The prime minister is not the president. The party selected a new figurehead, but the same party was still in power driving pretty much all the same decision. We vote for a local representative who is part of a major party. The party itself can have massive disagreements amongst themselves too, but ultimately the prime minister only shakes hands and kisses babies. Only an incredibly good prime minister actually has the power to sway negotiations within their own party. Clearly ours wasn't even good enough to keep his own job let alone have any impact on policy.

    When the prime minister was replaced nothing was lost, and nothing was gained. To the party's credit they did this right before the election too so even people who don't understand the Westminster legal system should appreciate that what was done is still quite democratic.

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...