Minecraft Mod Adds Emulated 6502 Processor 96
New submitter Direwolf20 writes "The Red Power 2 mod for Minecraft has recently been updated, and it adds a fully emulated 6502 processor that can be programmed in assembly, but comes with a Forth interpreter. From the article: 'Eloraam calls it the 65EL02, because "it supports all the 6502, 65C02, and part of the 65C816 instruction set" as well as "a set of completely new instructions and two addressing modes. Since the 65EL02 is an 8-bit CPU, Eloraam didn't have as many options for programming environments as we have on today's 64-bit computers. While it's possible to program the 65EL02 in assembly language, for general use she chose to implement a Forth interpreter. Further technical information about RedPower Control's 65EL02 is available on Eloraam's blog RP Control Internals, and on the RedPower wiki's page for Red Power Control.' (Fair disclosure: The video linked in the article is mine.)"
That's great and all but... (Score:0)
Can it run Doom?
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:2)
No the question is can it run minecraft in minecraft... As that is the on going quest of many. It has been done to some degree at least in a primitive 2D form.
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:1)
run minecraft in minecraft
Already been done:
http://www.planetminecraft.com/project/mineception---minecraft-in-minecraft/ [planetminecraft.com]
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdnO1QZJ--M [youtube.com]
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:3, Informative)
No. But you'd know that if you had bothered to look up what a 6502 was [wikipedia.org].
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:1)
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:3)
No. But you'd know that if you had bothered to look up what a 6502 was [wikipedia.org].
Except that this is Doom we're talking about, and despite its x86-centric origins, it's been ported to just about every damn platform in existence. So there's probably a version out there for a 6502-based machine, along with others for the Intel 4004 [slashdot.org], the the Colossus [slashdot.org] and for a half-broken abacus some guy found on a skip.
Though in the case of the abacus, you do need floating-point beads apparently.
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:2)
I doubt the 6502 has the horsepower for it...
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:4, Interesting)
I doubt the 6502 has the horsepower for it...
You do know that you can run an Emulator with arbitrary speed? It is not the instruction set or register layout or memory model that is restricting performance. It's the hardware itself that puts a limit on that.
Heck, even if you use real hardware, you could produce a >1GHz 6502 CPU, if you wanted to do it. It will be identical to the 6502 in everything but the clock speed and some minor hardware layout alterations to cope with these speeds (even small bends in the wires start to act as an antenna at these speeds).
And if you use a software emulator (which this Minecraft Mod is for all intents and purposes), you can run it as fast as your host platform allows. This is why you can run a Nintendo Emulator at >200x the real speed of the original hardware.
Re:That's great and all but... (Score:0)
Wireframe Doom, possibly. Just recalling the "3-d" games I enjoyed on the C-64 & Apple ][ - Wizardry, Ultima II's dungeons, Elite, Sublogic Flight Simulator... Only wire-frame 3-d graphics for those games.
Yes, kinda, sorta.... (Score:2)
It can run Terminator.
Cool. (Score:-1)
So interesting AND newsworthy.
Holy crap... (Score:-1)
Eloraam is a chick?
Clock Rate? (Score:3, Interesting)
So what type of Mhz can you get out of this thing? Is it feasible on modern hardware for it to run at a clock rate equal to or higher than say, the stock speed of a Commodore 64? And what about I/O interfaces like audio, video and joysticks? How far can this really be taken?
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:3)
Since the C-64 (and PET, Apple ][ and others) had 6502 running at 1MHz, then that shouldn't be too hard to do, even allowing for the emulation running inside a game environment
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:3)
I remember playing games on a Sinclair Spectrum emulator running in a PC emulator on a Sun laptop which probably had a 40MHz CPU, so a 1MHz 6502 on a 3GHz x86 should be trivial even with a ton of overheads in a game.
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:1)
Oh, I just watched a little of the video and realized this isn't emulated using minecraft built-in materials and physics, its just a fancy plugin that lets you make computers in minecraft. Very cool, but not as cool as I originally imagined.
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:2)
Same here. Being a mod, it's basically just using Minecraft as the GUI for its virtual operations...
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:4, Interesting)
I've toyed with building the 6502 in redstone logic. If you know anything about the internals of the 6502, it actually lends itself to emulation better than, say, the Z80, since it doesn't use microcode and has a data path which is simply laid-out geometrically. Plus, there are quirks in the 6502's design which mean that the delay in getting a slow clock signal around the device wouldn't be a problem in practice.
The complication is that the 6502 has two logical internal busses (the data bus and the secondary bus) which are connected by a set of bypass MOSFETs which are bidirectional: they can pass data in either direction. That's okay when you're realising the 6502 in analogue electronics (which is what transistors are, after all), but it makes it difficult in digital electronics. At the very least, you'd need to separate the one control signal into two (one for each direction). It's a bit of a mess.
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:2)
Oh yes, you from Edinburgh Uni too? In fact, we had to slow ours down to match the screen refresh rate.
And I suspect that the SPARC was 25MHz and the C compiler not especially good.
Rgds
Damon
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:2)
Re:Clock Rate? (Score:2)
MHz? Try just plain Hz. A "tick" (the minimum unit in redstone circuitry) is 100 ms. If you set up a circuit to run on both the rising and falling edges of the clock, you get a whopping 10 Hz.
That's vanilla Minecraft, it appears the mod may double the speed. It also appears that the 6502 emulator can run multiple operations per clock, but you're still talking about something a couple orders of magnitude slower than the original 6502 in operation. I don't use any of these mods since I'm almost exclusively a Multiplayer player (which means such mods have to be server-side) but have designed plenty of redstone circuits in the vanilla game. Even something as simple as a binary counter still has significant latency problems -- my 5-bit counter would take up to three or four seconds for all bits to stabilize after it was incremented, and in a worst-case scenario, a five-second reset signal was required to flip all bits to zero (otherwise the low bits flipping to zero after the high bits had already cleared could cause the high bits to flip again). Redstone is S-L-O-W.
Direwolf20! (Score:2)
Re:Direwolf20! (Score:1)
And if you either wasn't interested/got bored of minecraft and the vids are tickling your fancy.
And then got dissuaded by having to hunt down individual packages and modify the jars with several frameworks(its not hard but it can be tedious as hell).
I suggest you spoil yourself with some accessibility and head over to http://technicpack.net/ [technicpack.net] and grab a launcher.
Technicpack was originally created by some Goons just wanting to a create modpack with all the more technical mods, already configured and simple to install.
Was suppose to be an internal gig, but got spread around and gained a shitload of popularity after it got promoted on a webcast called Yogbox...and went from being hosted on a SA thread, to having its own webpage and package manager.
Re:Direwolf20! (Score:2)
installation (Score:0)
Has anyone figured out how to install this mod? Directions on the site don't exist.
Can't wait for the Mod API to be done. (Score:0)
Because FUCK Redstone, seriously, it is awful. It is so half-assed and broken most of the time.
This mod fixes everything wrong with it as well as integrating redstone in to the world better in general.
I just hope mods will have full control of block behaviour as well as the ability to create blocks of various sizes and effects.
If they do, this game is just about to be reborn.
Spout, while nice, just isn't there.
Simulative Regression (Score:0)
Minecraft is essentially a level editor without a game to edit. Except instead using current gen game engines to recreate old mario levels, they're using it to simulate old technology.
DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT SOME 2-BIT PROCESSOR ?? (Score:0)
Does anyone really care ?? Know what time ??
lda $ff
VIC chip rulez !! in 1981 !!
Re:DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT SOME 2-BIT PROCESSOR ?? (Score:4, Funny)
comment rebooted
Re:DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT SOME 2-BIT PROCESSOR ?? (Score:1)
Only queche eaters use base10 for that.
Re:DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT SOME 2-BIT PROCESSOR ?? (Score:0)
Real men write their own reset routine.
Re:DOES ANYONE CARE ABOUT SOME 2-BIT PROCESSOR ?? (Score:2)
Then only quiche eaters know that base10 was the only good option in Commodore basic at the time.
At what point does 'improvement' become a downside (Score:5, Insightful)
Given that, at what point do mods that improve minecraft's program-ability go too far and turn it from a perverse simulation game of enormous popularity into a really dreadful IDE?
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:5, Informative)
It got my son interested in programming. Not this mod, but another. He actually programmed a pong game on his own over the course of a week using lua in a minecraft mod that has a computer that runs lua.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Since the only mod I know of that uses LUA and has programming, it very likely _is_ the same mod. RedPower2. This is just the newest version with a bigger "computer"
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:3)
Since the only mod I know of that uses LUA and has programming, it very likely _is_ the same mod. RedPower2. This is just the newest version with a bigger "computer"
Its not RedPower2.
http://computercraft.info/ [computercraft.info]
He also runs a minecraft server on our VPS.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:4, Interesting)
My son is the same, he's 11 and wanting to create Minecraft Mods has caused him to:
- Learn Java (he had a few brief experiences with Processing but now he's reading the Nutshell books)
- Decompile Minecraft
- Find and follow instructions on how to do all this (Web and YouTube it seems)
- Write his own mods
He's currently at the stage where he's letting his brother have his mods, and we're starting to talk to him about the implications of distribution (support, licensing etc.).
I'm doing very little except providing the right tools at the right time (IntelliJ has been excellent for navigating the code base).
Very impressed with Minecraft and how much he's been motivated to learn. I had tried to teach him some programming before but never really got anywhere, now he's so deep into aspects of Java that I can't really help him... and I've not had to utter a single word of encouragement or assistance.
Minecraft feels like it is the BBC Model B of his generation.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm looking forward to seeing what happens with 0x10^c, Notch's new game, which has an inbuilt and fully emulated 16 bit for each player. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a new ultra-low-power OS come out of it.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:0)
What are the odds that someone will make a virus for that emulated 16 bit computer?
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:1)
Well, there is more to it then that you see(though there is no denying the modders motivation and joys of hack'n'show)...Red Power started out with logic gate blocks and bundled signal cables.
They provided functionality for the player, not just as a gimmick.
Same applies for this mini computer, I belive part of the incentive was to add something bit more versatile and compact then hardwired circuts and logic blocks.
She released a frame-block, the idea is that you design a machine using whatever components you see fit(dohickies from her mod or from other mods) using the frames as a chassis, a motor block(s) can then translate the entire structure on block at a time when activated.(yes it supports recursion)
With the minicomputer as a microprocessor, you essentially got robotics in minecraft.
I have hopes that this will recreate the "look what i can do with my C64" era, kids playing multiplayer lego, and then suddenly bit by bit move from simple logic operations to assembly because they want to create more and more cool and complex stuff.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Given that, at what point do mods that improve minecraft's program-ability go too far and turn it from a perverse simulation game of enormous popularity into a really dreadful IDE?
When someone abandons cool things like forth and tries to implement Visual Basic.
--
BMO
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:0)
How else are you going,to get kids interested in building flip flops and alu's from scratch
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:1)
However, from the embedded video in this post [shroomery.org], it felt like I'm in a 3D VLSI design tool. Maybe in the future we'll be literally designing devices one block at a time. Either that or the Nazcas [wikipedia.org] have been playing Minecraft all this while....
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Given that, at what point do mods that improve minecraft's program-ability go too far and turn it from a perverse simulation game of enormous popularity into a really dreadful IDE?
Compare emacs to hurd and you'll see the lengths people go to to avoid doing something that looks like actual work.
Comment removed (Score:2)
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:1)
Minecraft as a game...pretty much sucks...the survival aspect did add to it...and quite recently Notch added the final boss, which gave you an overall goal to reach.
But it felt kinda tacked on, since building palaces don't really help you much in that goal when you could just build an bunker with much less effort, not that there isnt alot of things you must construct items, transportation, etc to help gather resources and being systematic about it certainly gives credence to free form building as a challenge.
But its the ingenuity and complexity to build shit that makes it fun and with mods its been transformed from Duplo to Lego Mindstorm.
Though I leaning towards the notion that the engineering challenges you set yourself, classify this directionless sandbox enviroment as a game. But specific game design whether from Vanilla or mods is mostly pointless, you don't use one mod like how counter strike was for Half-Life.
Its several mods at a time which adds shit ton of variation and possibilities by combining them.
That end-boss can go fuck himself, I'm building a automated cooling system for my Nuclear reactor.
Comment removed (Score:2)
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:1)
But just because YOU think it sucks doesn't mean other people feel the same. look at the Sims, i have NO fucking clue why but women just love that damned thing and funnily enough Age of Empires I of all games. My former boss showed me how you could bring in the females just by putting AoE I on the boxes in the window but when i watched them play...Did you know many women do NOT play that game like a guy does? i saw many build a big wall around their place and if any bad guys attacked they would just use priests to turn the bad guys on each other and then would just spend their time building stuff.
So maybe Minecraft is like that, who gives a shit about playing it the 'right" way when there are better things to do. I know I have a game (Just Cause II) where i never even fuck with the missions because i'm too busy doing crazy shit and blowing stuff up to care. I mean I'm using the grapple to tie the biker cops chasing me to trees like jedi and jumping out of flaming choppers and hijacking planes by riding them like a bronco, why would i care about your stupid mission?
In the end what matters is you are having FUN with a capital F, which sadly so damned many games seem to forget. Like Yahtzee at Zero punctuation said "its a sightseeing tour" where they take you from one set piece to another being led by the nose, fuck that. So I give the Minecraft guys credit (along with some of the other great indies like Torchlight series and Grimlock) because they remember that at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the "rules' or "goals" are, what matters is "Are You having FUN?" and from all the stuff being cooked up in MC I'd say that answer is a giant FUCK YES!
This ISNT a subjective thing...if a game does not have coherent, rules, obstacles and goals its probably going to be lacking...if it lacks any of these aspects its not a game at ALL.
Sims is a spin of of Sim City... although the scale is much lower and not as challenging, in the bare essence the same concept. Organize/build/budget a city, organize/build/budget your household.
There is nothing peculiar about your AoE example, its a strategy game...and the game is to devise your own strategy...if focusing on priests and walls works...it works! Its a risk if the enemy breaches the wall and reaches the defencelss priests...but its still within the scope of the game.
Now that said I'm defending Minecraft, not for its gameplay but for the fact that its more or less a platform, for modding and emergent gameplay.
That said...for most other computer games in the genres i care about...I CARE about the being provided a challenge...because that IS fun, its why games ARE FUN, game design is the art of providing play through interaction and stimulation. That does not exclude giving the player a wide range of options, but absolute freedom is pointless without limitations.
If you are annoyed that some people thinks games are objectively shit, then you should experience the smoldering rage of people who have had a decade with the one disappointing let down after another.
And yes, I am an angry cunt...
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Keep in mind, saying something isn't a 'game' doesn't mean it is not fun or is a bad project, it simply states that a particular label doesn't apply well to it. Will Wright did a good job of describing the category of 'toys' or simulations rather then 'games'... all go under the umbrella of 'fun' and can be awesome, but what they mechanically are is a bit different.
Comment removed (Score:2)
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:1)
How did you know? Sometimes you spend loads of time building up resources before you attack.
If you think that is weird...i once saw gyrls playing counter strike...IMAGINE THAT.
Also...just to finish this...fun is a louse description of..:ANYTHING!
If its FUN its a Game?! WTF!
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
> i have NO fucking clue why but women just love that damned thing and funnily enough Age of Empires I of all games
Generally,
Men love to Destroying. i.e. "Fuck it, or Fuck it up" (which is why First Person Shooters sell so well)
Women love Creating and Relationships (which is why The Sims has so many women playing)
It's not rocket science - to study game design is to study psychology, Yin / Yang, etc.
Re:At what point does 'improvement' become a downs (Score:2)
Though I wonder how much of the motivation for the VM was to make frames practicle. She has voiced displeasure for BuildCraft and Railcraft's way of having complex 'magic' blocks, but duplicating that functionliaty with frames requires a lot more logic then is often practicle.... so the VM fills that gap by adding its own magic back in.
Wow, just wow (Score:1)
Asperger's is one hell of a drug..
Molecules (Score:2)
When they drop the Lego blocks and start letting you play with things at a molecular level, give me a call. Until then. *yawn*
Re:Molecules (Score:2)
That would be kind of neat actually... have a simplified physics model based solely on gravitational attraction of proton, electron and neutron blocks, each with their relative mass. Based on that, you could build up algorithms for elements, cellular structures, etc. and keep most of the popular ones available. Then you'll get the really focused people building RNA etc. and attampting to build real-world models to see how the physics need to be tweaked to replicate real-world interactions.
Then we can get a little microbial Mario jumping on real mushroom fibers!
Re:Molecules (Score:2)
Well, i was also to be realistic.
Modeling at an atomic level is a bit much to expect with current hardware, but common molecules are large enough and easy enough to simulate that it should be possible.
Or at the least abstract out materials, like 'wood', 'steel', etc., and let you build that at a near-molecular level. Using Lego like blocks is rather limiting.
Re:Molecules (Score:2)
I do no think you comprehend the difference in scale between the molecular level and anything remotely recognizable or interesting to us. If your basic water molecule is 275 pm, and anything complex enough to be recognizable as "wood" would be something like 0.1 mm, you'd need something like 3 million building blocks. In addition, you're asking for many more degrees of freedom for position/angle of your basic building blocks as well as interactions between a much greater number of blocks. Here is something that could give you a better sense of how small things are:
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/begin/cells/scale/ [utah.edu]
Even if all of this were possible to simulate on our dinky little home computers, the time and effort it would take to actually build anything interesting would be far too much for almost every body.
Re:Molecules (Score:2)
Even if all of this were possible to simulate on our dinky little home computers, the time and effort it would take to actually build anything interesting would be far too much for almost every body.
The whole idea is that it only has to be done once, and only one assembler algorithm has to be produced. You wouldn't store a literal representation of the molecule and resulting substances, only a much lighter-weight symbolic representation, as is done with bmpmapping currently on advanced videogames.
And as I implied in my original post, you'd definitely not be able to get much more advanced than a single celled object (which, as you point out, is plenty advanced already). Creating an entire block of wood, atom by atom or molecule by molecule would run into significant limits, not the least of which would be that you'd need at least one atom on the storage medium to represent every atom or molecule in the object being built.
Re:Molecules (Score:2)
No i fully comprehend it, and until we reach that point things such as Minecraft are of no trust to me.
Re:Molecules (Score:0)
What you want sounds like the kind of simulations already done in projects like Folding@home. The GROMACS core is GPL, so you can check it. I may be wrong, but I don't think it's usual to simulate gravity for something small like individual atoms and molecules, gravity is too weak compared to other relevant forces when you're trying to simulate something of this scale.
You may also want to take a look at Foldit, it's proprietary freeware, but you may also be interested. It's a "gamification" approach to crowdsourcing, in this case, applied to protein folding.
How long? (Score:0)
So, how long will it be before someone implements minecraft IN minecraft?
Apropos... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Apropos... (Score:2)
why would someone go through the effort of decapping a real cpu to emulate it exactly, then write the emulator in javascript?
Reference implementation (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Apropos... (Score:2)
As I noted above, the 6502's design relies on the MOSFETs being analogue devices in various nontrivial ways, particularly the bypass MOSFETs between the data bus and the secondary bus. The 6502 is a good candidate for realisation in redstone logic; it would be much simpler and achieve a much higher clock rate than doing a Z80. But you can't just plug the reverse engineered 6502 into Minecraft. There's at least a little redesign that needs to be done.
So what's the fuss? (Score:1)
So the guy wrote an emulator of the 6502 processor and various perihipals as a native-code plugin for the game. Technically, it does not seem so special, as various 6502 emulators have been written before; they just usually have a more usable GUI than operating them from within a 3D game.
I would be much more impressed if they actually implemented a general purpose computer by only using readily-available in-game building blocks and mechanics without code extensions to the game engine. This has been done for Conway's Game of Life and a Turing Machine [rendell-attic.org] before.
Re:So what's the fuss? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:So what's the fuss? (Score:0)
Likewise a universal Turing machine in standard Minecraft blocks and mechanics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X21HQphy6I [youtube.com]
Re:So what's the fuss? (Score:2)
This article is news not because it was crazy accomplishment, but because it's a new tool/building block that opens up enormous new possibilities for creativity in Minecraft. Sure, if someone had ported Tetris as a mod into Minecraft, you would have a point, but this guy ported a processor, and that is something certainly worth getting excited about.
Re:So what's the fuss? (Score:2)
Yay! Virtual Schwarzenegger! (Score:2)
Has Arnie's code been open sourced yet?
I woul to run it in this emulator.
Re:Yay! Virtual Schwarzenegger! (Score:2)
Up or down? (Score:4, Interesting)
With that in mind, I found the following quote from the creator of this processor amusing:
Lawyers as cancerous mutation (Score:0)
Nick is cool. Totally separate from that though, he's also logical.
The odds that we're in an 'original' reality do seem to be close to zero. They drop further into insignificance every time that we find a new slot for life and a new causal agency promoting the emergence of intelligence.
The more interesting question in this area is whether lawyers are deliberately introduced as a random illogical agent of mutation, It's hard to find a purpose for them otherwise.
If so, does "BOISE" actually stand for "Buggered Offensive Irrational Sophistic Ego", or would that be attributing a modicum of (warped) intelligence to where there is only stinking putrefaction?
Re:Up or down? (Score:1)
See Descartes.
I could see a simulation controlling my physical actions or stimuli, but the chance that a conscience thought as we know it is so predictable that you could actually stimulate me in the right way to get me to think exactly what you want is pretty far fetched.
I'm in for 2! (Score:1, Insightful)
Nothing says "fun in gaming" like a 6502 processor emulator. When I'm sitting down to play games, I often find myself thinking, "God, I wish I could do some assembly-language programming in this game". I don't think there's any question that was the biggest weakness of Call of Duty 4, Modern Warfare 3: Black Ops - there were no emulated 8-bit processors.
And there are actually some out there who don't understand why computer geeks are sometimes the butt of jokes.
Re:I'm in for 2! (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, programmers shouldn't program in their off time, just like artists shouldn't draw and singers shouldn't sing. Which, unfortunately, a lot of people believe.
"What are you doing?" parents and peers always say. "You're wasting your life." And they keep doing it because they want to.
I say screw people like you, and more power to people like them.
Re:I'm in for 2! (Score:0)
It’s because those parents' and peers jobs have nothing to do with what they really love, and so they see it as a waste of time to do it in private.
And they think that everybody else failed at life just as much.
Re:I'm in for 2! (Score:0)
No, it's because programming is what Richie would have done and not what the Fonz would have done. All parents want their kids to be like the Fonz.
Re:I'm in for 2! (Score:2)
Jeez, lighten up, Francis. I love the idea of someone writing assembly language programs with a bunch of blocks in Minecraft. It's one of the reasons why I really appreciate the Slashdot community. I would much rather a gamer create logic gates with blocks than rape and kill ho's with his psychopath RPG character and get points for it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having little in-jokes in a game. Bach wrote a piece of music that can be played backwards and forwards and upside-down. To the average music listener, it doesn't mean squat, but to a musician, it's very cool.
People "like them" or people "like you"? Where is all this hostility coming from? Don't be so defensive. Just because someone is laughing at you does not mean they don't like you. Enlightenment is not "standing up for yourself" it's "not feeling the need to stand up for yourself".
You've got to admit, it's just a little bit funny that a game developer created a fully-emulated 8-bit processor in his game.
Re:I'm in for 2! (Score:0)
Man, your really missing the Mark cop killing and beating up hoes is hella fun. When is the minecraft GTA mod coming out? I have my cop killa cd ready.
6502 in Animal Crossing (Score:2)
Do an ATmega328 next... (Score:4, Interesting)
What's inside? (Score:4, Interesting)
What's the emulated hardware organization like? The 6502 didn't actually have designated input or output instructions, so as I recall, a programmer had to read or write to specific memory locations that were hardware mapped to various devices, especially peripheral devices.
Discounting the memory mapped IO locations, how much RAM does the emulated system have to play with? What sort of firmware is loaded into the emulated ROM?
Re:What's inside? (Score:2)
Re:What's inside? (Score:2)
Not really... I was talking about programming it in assembly, not from inside the Forth operating system.
Although it is apparent that it can be expanded to 64K of RAM... I also get the impression that there is no firmware.
Nonetheless how do you program this in native 6502? Effectively making one's own operating system?
Re:What's inside? (Score:2)
wow (Score:0)
this is the first thing i've ever read about minecraft that i actually understood... i know what a 6502 is.. i can (with a little refresher.. after all, it has been a couple decades) even write assembly for it..
but for the life of me, i still don't know what the fuck minecraft is or why it is remotely relevant to anything.
Apple revival? (Score:0)
So does this mean all old Apple code will run too?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_II_Plus
JJ
Yo daWG.... (Score:3)
Re:Yo daWG.... (Score:0)
Nah, Minecraft already ran in a computer in your computer. This puts a computer in *that* computer. That's right, we put a computer in the computer in your computer!
(God forbid you run Minecraft on a VMWare instance!!!)
Compiler Options (Score:1)
I wanted to do and Share (Score:0)
This is a sshare page for everyone but I am looking and seeing many worhless comments hare. So I recomment you a page its http://www.duckgame.net