South Koreans Using Kinect To Monitor DMZ 133
Nerval's Lobster writes "The South Korean government is reportedly using Microsoft's Kinect motion-based game controller to monitor the heavily guarded DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) that separates the country from North Korea. The brainchild of freelance South Korean developer Jae Kwan Ko, the system is reportedly capable of differentiating between people and animals. (Hat tip to Kotaku, which originally ferreted out the story from South Korean publication Hankooki .) That makes it superior to the infrared systems already in use along the DMZ, which have a harder time determining whether a moving object is human. The Kinect-based system can send alerts of suspicious activity to the nearest military outpost. While the South Korean government reportedly installed the hardware at select portions of the DMZ last year, news about it is only emerging now—and details are relatively scarce, considering how this is a military project. Despite that secrecy, the South Korean government is playing up Jae Kwan Ko's contributions, highlighting him in the local media as an example of innovation and creative drive. Largely self-taught, he makes money by building apps for various mobile platforms—most of which, presumably, have nothing to do with detecting military threats."
Re: (Score:3)
It wasn't "necessary" for the past 50 years, it just makes the terrible cold war the Koreas are in a little easier by means of technology.
Re: Sad times (Score:1)
Re: Sad times (Score:4, Funny)
Why would we want to stop the influx of Undocumented Democrats?
Re: (Score:2)
I suspect the simple answer is that we have a constitution that forbids it(not that that stopped the NSA, but losing one battle doesn't mean we should surrender on the other)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
You must not have heard that borders and areas within 100 miles are "constitution free zones". I find it extremely convenient that these areas happen to correspond with 80% of the national population.
Re: (Score:2)
You must not have heard that borders and areas within 100 miles are "constitution free zones".
There is no such thing as a "constitution free zone". The constitution is the ultimate law of the land. Congress is incapable of lawfully making any exemptions to it.
It applies anywhere that the US congress, president, or other state or federal government personnel or officials exert any authority.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Forbids government monitoring of every person in the area without warrant.
Re: (Score:2)
The constitution forbits government intrusion into personal effects without a warrant, not public information / video.
When youre in public, you're fair game-- get over it.
Re: (Score:2)
The constitution forbits government intrusion into personal effects without a warrant, not public information / video.
When youre in public, you're fair game-- get over it.
You realize that's bullshit, right?
"Personal Effects" == "the shit you have in your pockets, right now."
This ain't NYC, they can't make you bunny-ear your pockets just because you're walking down a sidewalk.
Re: (Score:2)
Stuff in your pockets isnt "public", and I wasnt saying otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
Stuff in your pockets isnt "public", and I wasnt saying otherwise.
Then you probably should have used a different phrasing than, "When youre in public, you're fair game."
Re: Sad times (Score:5, Informative)
Forbids government monitoring of every person in the area without warrant.
First, the idea that a camera pointed at a border is somehow forbidden -- wouldn't want to monitor every person in an area without a warrant, now would we -- is silly. Someone call DOT and have them take down the freeway cams.
That said, we already employ vibration, and magnetic remote sensors, as well as cameras in both visible and infrared, plus software that helps determine if an event is human, animal or other in watching our borders (Canada and Mexico). It seems like a Kinect-based system would do even better. It'd stop CBP officers from responding to wolves tripping sensors.
http://www.policechiefmagazine... [policechiefmagazine.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Forbids government monitoring of every person in the area without warrant.
I don't think there is any such restriction on general monitoring. Police cars have license plate scanners, for instance, and government buildings have surveillance cameras. They are monitoring every person in the area without a warrant. Scanners like these wouldn't even identify people, they would just indicate that there is a person there. I don't think there's anything illegal about that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who, exactly, is an insurgent?
I mean, I'd place my argument, but it honestly sounds like you posted this just to be an easily destroyed straw-man, and I don't want to contribute to trolling.
Re: (Score:2)
You are an insurgent if you are not a member of homeland security or the united states military.
Re: (Score:1)
You must not have seen the Obama voters in Chicago rioting to celebrate Obama's victory.
Re: (Score:2)
Homeland Security can beat the shit out of you and violate you in any way they want within 100 miles of the border without any recourse on your part. You have no say and you cant do a damn thing.
All to protect "Merica" from the boogymen.
Re: (Score:2)
What about monitoring the border like that violates the Constitution?
I'm very adamant about the 4th and privacy, but monitoring the stretch of the border with at most 100ft resolution does not seem to create mass violations of privacy.
We should be protecting our border.
Aside from this particular piece of tech, there are the Constitution Free Zones. That is a much bigger problem than some Kinect's looking for human shapes along side the border. I would choose the Kinect's at the border or over the Totalitari
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I'm not assuming that so much as I am asserting that it could be construed to be a violation of privacy depending on deployment(while leaving that crucial context out of my original post like an ass).
Re: (Score:2)
The 4th Amendment protects the rights of citizens to not have their things searched or siezed without a judicially sanctioned warrant based upon probable cause
And here I thought it protected people. Lets see,
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Yep, no mention of citizens, just people. Of course too many Americans seem to consider people to only consist of American citizens
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
While obviously someone illegally entering the country is breaking a law and subject to arrest and once officially arrested (here you have to be touched and informed that you are under arrest) can be searched, that is not what I'm talking about. What about if I legally cross the border for vacation reasons, once legally in the country (past the border) I can be legally searched since I'm not a citizen? How about people with a green card? Or my wife who theoretically can cross the border anywhere, carrying a
Re: Sad times (Score:5, Insightful)
The easy answer:
1) the liberals hope they'll vote for them because they tend to be poor.
2) the Republicans hope they'll vote for them because they tend to be Catholic and anti-abortion.
The real answer:
X) the corporations hope they'll work for them at sub-market wages because they're entitled to cheap labor.
It's telling that back when Bush Jr was governor here, he'd talk a big talk about cracking down on immigrants, then he'd be called into a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce, and he'd tone it down after that. He got to be president and his puppet masters had to make him come down against the Minutemen militia, despite the fact that no matter what your opinion of the second amendment is, just about every interpretation of it supports a regulated militia for the defense of our borders from invasion.
Re: (Score:1)
No, the real answer is that they are undocumented NON-citizens, so they can't vote.
And before anyone says "why would that stop them?" Many studies have shown that there is near zero voter fraud from non-citizens trying to vote. The attempts to require an approved government id to vote are not meant to stop voter fraud, they are meant to intimidate minorities into not voting.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe because the Mexicans haven't sent commandos to assassinate our President [wikipedia.org] or have an uneasy truce with the US?
Or because the Democrats view Mexicans as future voters, and the Republicans look at them as cheap labor?
Re: (Score:2)
And why isn't the US using this on our southern border?
Because Predator Drones, [cbp.gov] that's why.
Re: (Score:1)
Because we actually want them here. Outcry about "illegals" is only for handwaving and posturing, republicans don't want to pay $20 an hour for their gardening and lawn mowing so they actually do not want to stop the flow of undocumented immigrants they can under pay.
Can you imagine, a rich republican being forced to pay someone a living wage to clean their house or mow their lawn? Outrageous!
Re: (Score:2)
It wasn't "necessary" for the past 50 years, it just makes the terrible cold war the Koreas are in a little easier by means of technology.
How about those massive tunnels under the DMZ? The North continues to labor under the belief they will one day liberate the people of the south from evil, vampyric capitalists.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Play "patrol the boarder" on Xbox Live for just $19.95 per month! See how many illegal border crossings you can catch!
I think they were spending more than that on beer alone.
Re: (Score:2)
Sooo... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Damnit, you beat me to it. This system will be no match for the infamous Seventh Furry Battalion.
In other news North Korea attempted a raid (Score:5, Funny)
Witness describe a hoard of armed men running through the DMZ yelling "Xbox OFF!"
Re: (Score:2)
The secret battle cry of the North that signifies they are coming to liberate their brothers in the South: Ree Loy Jenken!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Ree Loy Jenken!!!
Chicken have at least I.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Witness describe a hoard of armed men running through the DMZ yelling "Xbox TURN OFF!"
FTFY.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Witness describe a hoard of armed men running through the DMZ yelling "Xbox OFF!"
Silly concept. There's no way the hoard of armed men could get out of the treasure chest in which they're trapped.
dance dance revolution... (Score:2)
will the south koreans now see lines of north koreans on their borders dancing in front of the kinect sensors?
dancing is ... (Score:3)
Dancing is for decadent westerners.
Citizens of the glorious Peoples Republic do not engage in such degenerate nonsense.
easy workaround (Score:5, Funny)
Solid Snake : master of disguise (Score:5, Funny)
For years people have complained about how much of an idiot security guards have to be for Solid Snake to be able to sneak around under their noses by hiding in a cardboard box.
Now someone's actually built a system that would make it completely effective ... and they used video game controlers to do it. Coincidence?
(conspiracy theorists can now discuss the probability that Konami paid them to it)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
line up a grid of Dance Dance Revolution pads on the border
Attached to land mines!
Re: (Score:1)
line up a grid of Dance Dance Revolution pads on the border
Attached to land mines!
Make sure you get those steps right; you don't want to get a low score!
Why is the south doing this? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why is the south doing this? (Score:5, Informative)
I thought South Korea mostly welcomed people who were defecting from the north. If the North was trying to launch an attack of any significance I wouldn't expect the IR system would have a hard time identifying it.
Due to incident [wikipedia.org] after incident [wikipedia.org] the Korean troops have to be very careful who they let across the DMZ.
Re: (Score:2)
I thought South Korea mostly welcomed people who were defecting from the north.
Not really, if you asked people on the streets you'd find that they'd be happier if China took their pseudo-province with them and dealt with the people there. N.Korea is effectively an entire brainwashed country, and in some cases like another poster pointed out, filled with dangerous brainwashed people.
Not to forget that N.Korea's favorite past time is kidnapping young girls and women from S.Korea and Japan, giving them off as sex slaves to the higher ranking members of the military.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to forget that N.Korea's favorite past time is kidnapping young girls and women from S.Korea and Japan, giving them off as sex slaves to the higher ranking members of the military.
Don't suppose you have a recent source for this claim? While N. Korea is the kooky nation in Asia, I find this claim rather outlandish.
Re: (Score:1)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=north+korean+sex+trafficking [lmgtfy.com]
Then you click search tools and change "any time" to "past year". Plenty of sources.
Re: (Score:2)
So, google it myself eh? What a half assed response. But, since I was curious I did do that. The first result is a wiki article on the topic which doesn't mention any regular kidnapping of S. Korean and Japanese women for sexual slavery. Second one is a hubpages article which also says nothing on the topic. All in all, the first page of the google search mentions N. Korean women (especially women who flee N. Korea) getting exploited, but again nothing about regularly stealing women from countries that could
Re: (Score:1)
So not all that different from America then?
America isn't filled yet.
DMZ Is Not A Migration Route (Score:3)
Citizens of the North trying to go South do it through China, the Yalu River being a much easier, safer crossing. Only soldiers work the heavily mined and observed DMZ. Crossing the intra-Korean border is a really good way to get shot by either/both sides.
Big deal (Score:2)
Video monitoring at a Colo is pretty standard these days.
Differentiating between people and animals? (Score:2)
What are people insects or vegetables?
Re: (Score:1)
Most people divide creatures into "tasty" and "non-tasty". It simplifies things.
microsoft not responsible for war (Score:2)
microsoft not responsible for war
Re: (Score:2)
So That's what happened... (Score:1)
It wasn't Windows 8.1 sales that kept Microsoft out of the doldrums last year, they where selling X-Box/Kennect systems to the Koreans. All 20 of them.
I KNEW it wasn't that hokey "Pay us $45/year for Office" license scheme or that Windows 8.1 sales slump that was keeping them afloat. Remember Dell went private and PC vendors all where reporting 20% decreases in sales numbers. Oh no, they where cashing in on X-Box sales.
Sarcasm off now. What ever works, but using Kennect? Really?
Re: (Score:2)
Come on, now. There's a lot more than 20 Koreans, you know.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Only 20 North Koreans can afford an X-Box....
Actually, because they only use this new "system" on part of the DMZ, I figured they didn't use very many of them. Haven't a clue how many they actually used.
"X-Machine-Gun-Box!" (Score:2)
I see what they're trying to do here... (Score:1)
Wave for Kinect. (Score:2)
A convergence of Sci-Fi and reality (Score:2)
I hadn't thought of this with the Kinect controllers becoming available but with this application it appears we can now build the Marine Automatic Machine Gun from Aliens!, the UA-571C! [wikia.com] Should I just Kickstart it or what?
Just what I need to keep those pesky kids off my lawn!
Already exists (Score:3)
I give you the Samsung SGR-A1
http://www.mobilemag.com/wp-co... [mobilemag.com]
Re: (Score:2)
... it appears we can now build the Marine Automatic Machine Gun from Aliens!
You're about ten years too late. People have been building automatic sentry paintball guns for a long time. For example, here's [youtube.com] some footage from 2006.
Re: (Score:2)
I want live rounds.. not paintball stuff and AFAIK those are pretty much motion detectors on mounts right? This can discriminate so I could hit the specific target I'd want. We have to think out of the box here because just having an indiscriminate killing machine wouldn't be fun, right?
Easy! (Score:3)
It's a job for the Ananthropomorphic Infiltration Suit: http://i.imgur.com/ilwyj.jpg [imgur.com]
CIA Playing Warcraft (Score:2)
As the Korean military justifies buying video games for all their lounges.
"En, yeah, they are in the DMZ, yeah that's right, monitoring for incursions! Oh you want to see them, well I guess you could, they are surrounded by several million landmines, but go right ahead, I am sure accounting will appreciate your diligence..."
How long until they can connect it to a gun? (Score:3)
I wonder how long until they can connect it to a gun and have it automatically neutralize threats?
It's not hard to imagine a network of sensors and guns that can be used to automatically target infiltrators and neutralize them.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how long until they can connect it to a gun and have it automatically neutralize threats?
It's not hard to imagine a network of sensors and guns that can be used to automatically target infiltrators and neutralize them.
I'm fairly certain that automated 'defense' systems violate the Geneva Conventions.
Which translates to, "you're likely to see the US government use the system on domestic protesters long before you see it in actual combat between two nations."
Re: (Score:2)
They have those already; they are just very expensive, COTS (Common Off The Shelf) hardware has many advantages.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Probably not right away, if your goal is to kill the infiltrator then automated devices have been around for ages, search for "landmine".
deceptive titles: it's Kinect inspired software (Score:3)
what they are using is based on the same recognition semantics that the Kinect uses. bottom line: it's software that is inspired by how the Kinect works what uses their existing hardware thus saving oodles of money.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Blowback (Score:1)
Then the north will just arm their animals as a work-around.
You know, the Right to Arm Bears.
Re: (Score:2)
Then the north will just arm their animals as a work-around.
You know, the Right to Arm Bears.
in the north you have no rights at all.
Re: (Score:1)
Unbearable conditions?
Microsoft windows? (Score:1)
But are they actually using Microsoft Windows to monitor the Kinnects? That could bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "Blue Screen of Death".
What kind of range? (Score:3)
If that is the case then how can they be using them in the DMZ when you would want to detect people further out then that.
Re: (Score:1)
Don't the mines do that?
Is there more info? This makes no sense to me (Score:2)
Does anyone have any more info on what they're actually doing with these? Because it makes absolutely no sense to me. The Kinect's depth sensor has a maximum range of 6 meters, after that it's no better than a VGA webcam, and I'm pretty sure the things they'll want to identify are more than 6m away...
join or die (Score:3)
I think that is what it is up north.
Re: (Score:3)
Life.
Re:war is only a game (Score:5, Funny)
Let's see, USA has America's Army, PRC has The Glorious Mission, what does ROK call their war recruitment game?
"Who Wants To Eat Something?"
Re:war is only a game (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's see, USA has America's Army, PRC has The Glorious Mission, what does ROK call their war recruitment game?
"Who Wants To Eat Something?"
That would be the DPRK's version.