"Tight" PDA/Handheld Console 86
david-currie writes: "Looks like a company called Technopop is developing a Gameboy-styled handheld console based on the Pentium I called Tight. This will allow you to download and play games like Quake and Tomb Raider and provide PDA features They also announce a titanium case and $100 price-point, which could be very nice ... " Total vapor of course, but it's a nifty goal.
Pentium Powered? (Score:2)
Maybe it's just me, but a PI with enough RAM is still usually more computer than most consumers know what to do with. Sheesh, my mom has a perfectly fine iMac and is already making noises like it isn't enough computer for her. Reason? Marketing.
You ask the average PDA or whatever user a few questions about how they use/would like to use their computers and you quickly(and I mean quickly) find that most all of them are usually happily within their range of usefulness(games not withstanding). The only complaints I hear about consistently are small screens and/or games run 'slow'(whatever that really means). A lot of this is pure psychology at work.
I want to get a Palm V when the prices bottom out. A PDA only has to do a few things for me and I'm not sure playing games is really all that high on the list, though I know that being able to play games on a PDA will means more powerful PDAs for the kind of work that I really want them to do :).
I certainly don't want or even expect the kind of performance that I get out of my desktop machine, but then again, I started piddling with a Commodore PET in 1980-81. You know, back when computers were still new enough to still be thought of as tools, not merely game engines ;)
A few Intresting Notes... (Score:2)
Keep in mind though, this is the only place i have seen/or can find this news...including the PDA only news places ( and they would have SNAPPED this up in a heartbeat ), anyone got any firmer links?
another rambling post brought to you by:
SgtPepper
Re:try the espresso (Score:2)
Re:Why the dig at BeIA? (Score:1)
"The romance of Silicon Valley was about money - excuse me, about changing the world, one million dollars at a time."
Re:Technopop (Score:1)
Any other tidbits you'd like to share?
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
Will the company be as bad as Nintendo? (Score:1)
Nintendo of America Inc., for instance, doesn't take kindly [nintendo.com] to amateur third-party development [parodius.com] on its consoles:
Nintendo's argument assumes that there are no legal copied games on the Internet, that no Nintendo-console-compatible games are free software or freebeerware. Nintendo also is indirectly slamming Sun's Java technology, an emulated platform commonly integrated into Web browsers.
ObTopic: Will Technopop be the same? Probably not. I assume that the standard GNU tools shipped with Free "BeerOS" 5 will be enough to make software for the Tight system. Is that right?
Coolness != design wins (Score:1)
For mass market production levels, cost is (almost) everything.
Coolness does tend to draw attention, but early on, that's about all any new part will get.
Re:Palm has Rogue and Infocom Interpreters (Score:1)
Tight (Score:1)
MP3? (Score:1)
Duck`
Re:comparison to the X-Box (Score:1)
Wake up. I'm not a fan of Microsoft either, but the cash they have is very real. I'm pretty sure they have mobilized a lot of people for X-Box, and they should be able to pull it off rather easily. The problem is whether the consumers will like the thing or not.
--
BluetoothCentral.com [bluetoothcentral.com]
A site for everything Bluetooth. Coming soon.
this just in (Score:1)
Re:Why degrade the game experience? (Score:1)
Egads! I was doing that as I read your message. Spooky.
Frankly, most people can't stand to watch certain kinds of movies with me because I tend to jump when the hero gets in a scrape. Oh, I have to go now. They're coming to refit my dinner jacket. The sleeves are always too long.
Anomalous: inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
Re:Good reasons for the higher price (Score:2)
Ti has about the strength of steel, and is slightly heavier (IIRC) than aluminum, but not by much. The reason for the expense of Ti is that it is difficult to work. It has to be machined at low speeds, because it heats up quickly, and can actually weld itself to cutting tools. It is tough to polish, cut, and can wear out stamps and other tools quickly. All this adds to the expense of a final product.
Pentium? (Score:2)
Re:Marketroids won't allow cheap Titanium (Score:4)
From McMaster-Carr:
12"x12"x1/8" Acetal Copolymer = $10.74 (in black)
12"x12"x1/8" Titanium = $364.90
Funny how that basic material cost factors in.
-cpd
AHEM (Score:1)
Seriously, though, was there an article about Khronos and OpenML here a moment ago, or did I eat the bad cheese again? =P
[obligatory appendix so as to not be ENTIRELY off-topic.]
Anyways, this little thing sounds cool... and it runs BeOS? very nice...
about BeIA (Score:1)
--
BeDevId 15453 - Download BeOS R5 Lite [be.com] free!
What I want to know is: (Score:1)
Quake on a PDA? It's been done! (Score:2)
There's a port to the Apple Newton at the NewtonQuake homepage. [emeraldnet.net]
The Newton has a pretty large display though, and the screen shots look very nice. Haven't got a chance to play it, but it almost makes me want to get a Newton 2100 to replace my lost Newton 100!
Re:Drain the Batteries (Score:2)
Why not just go with a color palm pilot? Or for that matter, why not just get a color GameBoy?
Part of the point is to be able to run the old x86 games, hence the need for an x86 processor.
As for the power consumption, you are only considering Pentiums the way they were, using a 0.5 micron process, 3.3 volts, and a high Mhz. Today, they could be manufactured in the now obsolete 0.25 micron fabs. This would make for a lower voltage and lower power consumption. Besides, Intel would love to get some more life out of these fabs before overhauling them into something else.
They also won't need to run these full out. 100Mhz or even 60Mhz would be fast for the games they are talking about. Remember that they ahve a small screen, fewer dots to push around. Throw in some power saving technics and you lower the requirements even farther.
Finally, just because they are talking Pentium I now, doesn't mean that they will stick with it. The point they are trying to make is "x86 compatible processor." Maybe they will go with the Crusoe or an AMD chip, but for now, they want the Intel name, which doesn't scare off venture capitalists.
I still won't say that these won't be battery hogs, but they may not be as bad as you think.
Tight Hack (Score:1)
Re:Lovely (Score:1)
Unfortunatly, I forget stuff. Like to grab the bag containing everything.
I started stuffing it into the pockets of my military field jacket. After cleaning out the four pockets on the jacket and noting I had everything but the laptop in them, making them useless as actual pockets, decided sewing a couple of velcro pouches under the liner wouldn't hurt. I had a sub-notebook NEC on the front left, the phone and media on the right, and the cables and batteries between the hem and the waist drawstring under my arms.
Used to freak people out when I'd rummage inside the bulge under my left arm and emerge with a laptop.
And you guessed it! (Score:1)
boot loaders, then....
:obligatory drumroll:
Beowulf clusters!
And don't look at me that way. SOMEONE had to say it :)
Thanks, buddy...:P (Score:2)
Thanks buddy....some of us are browsing from work, and can get fired for downloading pics like that one.
Go ahead and troll....just don't lay traps like that one that could (if my boss had been looking over my shoulder when I clicked the link) put me out on the street, alright?
-- WhiskeyJack
Slashdotted again - how to prevent endemic problem (Score:3)
How can we prevent this in the future? Now that Slashdot has been Borgified by the Andover folks, they've got enough funding and computer resources to cache the front couple of web pages and pictures for the articles they post, so that most of the load can be absorbed there and only the small percentage of people who read the deeper links will have to hit the real site.
Technical comment:Yes, I know this only helps people who have real html pages, and doesn't do as much for javascriptified dancing animated Shockwave voice-recognition GUIs making it hard to find the actual content. I don't feel bad about this
Shameless commercial plug: Caching is your friend. In addition to the server capacity at Slashdot and the caches at your ISP, there are caching service vendors such as AT&T (that was the plug) and of course Akamai. Caching also does a better job of speeding up pages that use real HTML (and also imagemaps), and again I don't feel at all bad about making well-behaved user interfaces get better treatment.
Re:Good reasons for the higher price (Score:1)
Re:Quake??? (Score:1)
anyway... that would make it useful. you're right, as it stands, trying to play quake on a tiny screen with probably poor contrast would not be that much fun.
but, as it's a pentium, of course it'll run linux
Nope! It's hasn't been done! (Score:1)
Just open up the NewtonQuake.pkg with a text editor and go right to the last line, where you will find "April Fools!" The package dosn't even install.
Just like this "Tight" thing, but it made it onto Slashdot 18 days late
Re:Slashdotted again - how to prevent endemic prob (Score:3)
Slashdot should Cache linked sites in case of the Slashdot Effect
Sure, its a great idea, but it has a lot of legal implications. For example, commercial sites rely on their banner ads to generate revenue. If I cache one of their pages, this will mess with their statistics, and mess with their banner ads. In other words, this will piss them off.
Of course, most of the time, the commercial sites that actually have income from banner ads are able to defend themselves from the Slashdot effect. So perhaps we could draw the line at only sites that don't have ads. They are, after all, much more likely to buckle under the pressure of all those unexpected hits. But what happens if I cache the site, and they update themselves? Once again, I'm transmitting data that I shouldn't be.
So the quick answer is: Sure, Caching would be neat. It would make things a lot easier when servers go down. But I'm just not interested in dealing with the legal aspects, or the overhead required to ask permission (and do you really want Slashdot stories to wait 10 hours while I wait for a reply from someone in charge of a website to ask if its ok if I cache their server?). I wouldn't want people to cache Slashdot without asking my permission, so it seems only fair that I don't cache others either.
--
h0h0 vapor (Score:1)
Based on Pentium ? (Score:3)
broken link? (Score:1)
Pentium Jokes (Score:4)
PENTIUM I ??? WHY NOT CRUSOE!? (Score:1)
Who knows where I can find a list of links to new PDAs/Laptops that are going to be using Crusoe? (forgive the slightly off-topicness please moderators)
Marketroids won't allow cheap Titanium (Score:1)
Quake? (Score:1)
Quake??? (Score:2)
How to write successful vapor specifications that will appear on slashdot:
Take an already existing technology (like GameBoy)
Mix in hype words like "Download" "Quake" "PDA"
first german post (Score:1)
Re:h0h0 vapor (Score:1)
I'm even starting to believe the X-Box will hit before this.
Why degrade the game experience? (Score:2)
- tokengeekgrrl
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions
Re:Based on Pentium ? (Score:2)
Well, Crusoe would be the closest a Pentium you'll get into a handheld considering powerdrain. And they did demonstrate Quake on it...
Seriously, I doubt any such project would even get close to put their hands on color TFT's competing with business pda's. If you can't afford a PDA that can play quake, you'd better go for a console with dedicated hardware though not PC games.
But if it existed you could run linux on it - and building beowulf clusters using the wavelan
Hmm (Score:3)
speed (Score:1)
I mean a PI today is the same as a PII.
The faster the better.
-----
DemonStreet.com [demonstreet.com]
Re:PENTIUM I ??? WHY NOT CRUSOE!? (Score:1)
cheap PC yes, titanium, no (Score:1)
Well, firstly titanium would be totally redundant. Sure, if you were running over the thing with a 100 ton earth mover on a regular basis it'd be handy, but given the daily life of even the most abusive geek I don't think it'd be all the neccessary. There's got to be some better polymers that are scratch resistant, strong and adjust to temperature + humitidy well.
As for cheap handheld PCs, well soon enough, diamond keeps boasting about an up comming product along these lines. Until then, go to university equipement sales and electronic surplus stores and try to build something yourself. Given the rate of technological turnover lately it's prime time to go scavenger hunting!
Good reasons for the higher price (Score:5)
Titanium is stronger than steel and (I think) lighter than aluminum. It doesn't corrode. It obviously can stand a lot more heat than plastic, provides *much* more protection, and probably doesn't weigh much more. Now if it was common and cheap why would we even bother with the other materials?
Because it *isn't* common or cheap, and it is very hard to work with. It's a metal reserved for high-stress and temperature environments -- the SR-71 is skinned in titanium. Before composites every aircraft designer would have loved to build a whole plane out of titanium, but only a few could afford it.
Titanium is just one of those raw materials (unlike steel, silicon, or aluminum) that is relatively rare and expensive. Like I said, if it was common we'd make everything from it and we wouldn't think of using steel and aluminum in cars, airplanes, and cases any more than we'd think of using tin.
Personally, I have doubts about making a titanium case by itself for $100, much less a whole computer. Maybe Magnesium, but the thing is named "Tight", not "Might".
Power vs Marketing (Score:1)
More processing power means faster multitasking.
I like to run multiple applications at once. A random example would be me running Winamp, encoding my latest Smashing Pumpkins CD on Bladeenc, browsing Slashdot, NYT, and Anand for news while taking a break from working on a presentation that's running in the background. My friend's P3 wouldn't even blink. My Pentium eventually starts lagging behind my user interactions by up to a few seconds. While that doesn't sound like much, when you expect near-instantaneous feedback, waiting five seconds for a window to redraw seems like an eternity.
Faster games are more fun; slower games detract from the entertainment.
You don't sound like a Quake or Unreal player, so I'll get down to the basics:
30 fps = no noticeable jerking
60 fps = silky smooth walking around
120 fps = large multiplayer battles without the computer choking
I run Quake 2 at 640x480 at about 30-40 fps. I can't run Quake 3 at a decent framerate without turning everything down, and I still have more than my share of framerate-induced deaths.
If you don't think shooters really matter, than try running FF8 on my setup...the full-motion video stutters, and everything runs about twice as slow as on a Playstation. It sure is pretty, though...
Code compiles, MP3 encoding, and other background tasks are directly affected by CPU power.
If time is money, CPU power saves a gold mine. Source code that would take a day to compile on my setup would take a few hours or less on my friend's P3. What happens when your computer chugs while you're burning a CD? You get a free coaster (depending on your buffer size).
I'm sick of every clueless user who's sick of upgrading complaining about "bloat" and "marketing" responsible for causing their cash drain. Do you like GUIs as opposed to command line? You need more CPU power. Do you like Starcraft as opposed to Zork? You need more CPU power.
Marketing for computers is like marketing for pop...Pepsi spends hundreds of millions on advertising annually, but no amount of nifty commercials would make me buy my cases of Mountain Dew if I didn't need the caffeine to stay/wake up.
telnet://bbs.ufies.org
Trade Wars Lives
Re:Drain the Batteries (Score:1)
Actually, the GameBoy is an interesting "What if?" What if Nintendo had never upgraded from the Snes? Would they have held their own against Sony better or worse? While the obvious answer would seem to be worse, the GameBoy shows that out of date technology can thrive as long as programmers will push it. There are some good games for it, so my brother tells me, but I've never been able to enjoy playing on that tiny, relatively colorless screen.
Of course, I'm a bitter Lynx owner. I keep thinking I'll bring that to work one of these days and when people ask me what it is I'll say, "Oh, it's my new PDA! It's called a Lynx," and see how many people I can fool.
Of course, Lynxes kill batteries PDQ, too. I would never try to use one without a "Lynx Battery Pack" (massive, almost the same size as the Lynx, uses D batteries) or a power adaptor. Of course, I have the old Lynx, I think on the newer version of the Lynx [atari-history.com] you can turn off the back light.
I don't know why some clever company never bought the rights to Lynx technology and tried to make it smaller and more energy efficient (as well as continuing to develop games for it). It blows away both the GameBoy Color and NeoGeo Pocket [oeonline.com] (which I own, and don't play that much... seems to be almost the same quality as Color GameBoy) in terms of processing power, and considering its age it should have been possible (by Moore's law) to improve it greatly as far as size and efficiency.
Oh well, I look forward to the day when they finally come out with a handheld system that is more advanced than the Lynx or the TurboExpress.
Yeah, I know, I'll get moderated down by some youngster who hates to hear us old guys grumbling about things, "back in the day." But here's the Atari Lynx FAQ [atari-history.com] for those browsing at -1 ^_-
Re:Good reasons for the higher price (Score:1)
Pound for Pound Ti is going to be amongst the strongest metals you can get. So while it is more dense then Aluminum it is considerably stronger.
The Mountain Bike industry takes particular advantage of this fact. Titanium provides the ideal metal for making a bike. Once the frame is made it won't fatigue under stress like Aluminum, is lighter and stronger then a similar steel frame, and unlike composites it won't shatter or crack if you crash
That is why all the semi-pros out there who buy their own bikes ride on Ti. They know that baring a severe accident they aren't going to have to replace their bike with any frequency.
Yes it is a pain to work with, but for anything that is going to take any degree of abuse, this is the way to go.
Is this pertinant to a portable game system? I doubt it, but it needed to be said anyway.
Quincy"Oomp omp went the little green frog one day..."
Be is an EVIL company (Score:1)
"Why shouldn't I use open source software for my appliance project?
If time to market is a critical consideration for an Internet appliance project, BeIA makes far more sense than using open source software. Also note that open source licensing conditions often require the release of improvements to the community as a whole-in other words, to one's competitors."
These people are -still- just trying to make money off of their efforts--capital, profit, that's all they care about, it's disgusting! They try to make end-users like us appriciate them by releasing BeOS for free, but in fact BeOS never would have had a chance at it's current price and they know it. I'm not saying it's a bad OS at all, but their corporate execs need to get their heads out of their asses.
EMYL,
Re:Pentium Powered? (Score:1)
years you can't run commercial programs on an
outdated computer anymore. Sure, the average user
only needs a basic word processor with a spell checker and now-a-days a WWW browser. When I'm at home for a break and need my Slashdot fix I can use the decade-old Hyundai 8088 with 640k memory to log into a shell account and read Slashdot via Lynx. But can my mom use it to boot up this year's copy of Turbotax? Why not? All the calculations in taxes are simple addition and subtractions, ya don't need a Pentium II for that. The problem is that programmers have gotten lazy, don't think about optimization anymore and God Forbid that a company writes a program that doesn't run in some bloated GUI.
Re:Why degrade the game experience? (Score:1)
I love Tomb Raider, but that level is like falling into Hell.
At least it isn't "a maze of twisty little passages, all a like" or maybe it is, just updated for a 3-D engine.
Re:It's Possible! (Score:1)
Cheers,
x1r0k3wl
Re:comparison to the X-Box (Score:1)
Only that the X-Box has the backing of the company with the highest valuation in the US stock market, and with billions of cash at the bank
Actually if you had been paying any attention to the stockmarket you would have noticed that Microsoft lost that position to Cisco Systems a week or two ago. It no longer is the King. Not sure what the story looks like after this last weekend, but I'm pretty sure Cisco took less of a beating then M$ did.
Quincy"Oomp omp went the little green frog one day"
Re:Why the dig at BeIA? (Score:2)
Re:A few Intresting Notes... (Score:1)
>somehow be related to the Dreamcast? Hmm...a supersized VMU?
I'd be surprised. They already have a relation with SNK (makers of the excellent Neo Geo Pocket Color (it's only downfall is the reflective lcd (which I appreciate, I get damn close to the advertised 40 hours on one set of batteries(if only nyko would make an ngpc version of their wormlight(WONDERFUL product)))) (oops) and there is already a DC-Link available for the NGPC, so I'd expect Sega to take that route if that's what they're looking for...
-jay (it's late (for me) and I'm probably not making much sense)
Re:Good reasons for the higher price (Score:1)
Re:Why degrade the game experience? (Score:1)
I remember being a sophomore or junior and playing Tomb1 on the family PC, coming across the raptors for the first time, getting bit, hearing my mom scream, hear myself start screaming along with her, hearing my dad yell at both of us.....
ah...tomb raider. don't spread this around...but sometimes I get this innate desire to lock my door, shut the blinds...and use windows 98.
it kinda sux owning descent 1-3 and tomb 1-3 and not being able to use them.
Agenda for someone smarter than I:
"Provide PDA Features" ? (Score:2)
Might not be vapor for long (Score:1)
Here's one that surfs & gets full motion video (Score:2)
I think it uses some sort of wireless LAN protocal as the video has be broadcast locally, such as at a sports stadium.
try the espresso (Score:2)
http://www.ibuypower.com/product -pc/pocket-epc.htm [ibuypower.com]
Re:broken link? (Score:1)
http://beos.about.com/compute/beos/library/week
I'm getting no DNS entry for both the beia and technopop.com websites. Maybe it is so vaporwarish that it disappeared as soon as someone wrote about it?
Why the dig at BeIA? (Score:3)
Also, they state that some of the things that BeIA includes is not required? Bullshit. Protected memory, and a reliance on a GUI interface? Well, how do they think people are going to choose things with a D-pad? With a CLI? And wouldn't protected memory be a bonus, to keep your little toy from crashing while in the hands of young-uns?
Nice try kids, but trolling BeOS users is pretty weak. This thing will never see the light of day.
Technopop (Score:1)
It looks like they do BeOS stuff. Anyone know if this is going to be BeOS-based?
Oh. And they "make industrial strength games!!!"
I'm guessing from the host names involved that this is the Real-Time Strategy, Real-Time OS project. If anyone gets to the server, mirror it for us!
host www.beia.org
www.beia.org is a nickname for quantum3d.beia.org
quantum3d.beia.org has address 209.220.46.173
host quantum3d.technopop.com
quantum3d.technopop.com has address 209.220.46.173
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
But "Tight" *doesn't* run BE! (Score:1)
coolest feature (Score:1)
Re:Based on Pentium ? (Score:1)
Do you *have* one?
(Don't get me wrong: I'd *love* to have one. But if it doesn't come out in the next few months, I won't...)
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
Re:Based on Pentium ? (Score:2)
I know that's not the 1 Watt Transmeta talks about, but they are talking about 5 Watts for their newer CPU's. However, the Mobile Pentium you can buy right now, at least less vapor as Transmeta.
Breace.
Vapor != Obsolete Tech. (Score:2)
Re:speed (Score:1)
They are both made by Intel, and have the same instruction set, but what do *you* mean by 'the same as'? Especially if you are talking about P/PMMX o/c'd vs P-II, I'd love to hear your explanation.
Re:Pentium? (Score:1)
Ouch!
Re:AHEM (Score:1)
Re:Technopop (Score:1)
Well, if you'd take a moment to actually read the page, you'll see that at the bottom there's a section where they say they're not going to be using Be.
Re:Pentium Jokes (Score:1)
Re:try the espresso...and try to find a power plug (Score:1)
Re:Lovely (Score:1)
Re:Palm has Rogue and Infocom Interpreters (Score:1)
  - Mike
Re:forget the color (Score:1)
whoops... no space in the URL (Score:2)
Re:Why degrade the game experience? (Score:1)
Re:Why the dig at BeIA? (Score:1)
My point? I dunno...
--
Peace,
Lord Omlette
AOL IM: jeanlucpikachu
Drain the Batteries (Score:3)
--
old and stale (Score:1)
time for slashdot to review articles and submission a little sooner and maybe follow the links to see if they even still exist?
It's Possible!` (Score:3)
http://www.ticalc.org/arch ives/files/fileinfo/40/4042.html [ticalc.org]
http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/36/3 634.html [ticalc.org]
http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/34/3 439.html [ticalc.org]