Descent 3 for Linux Announced 69
GehRehmee writes: "Heresay's been floating about for some time now, but Loki has officially announced its intent to release the Linux version of Descent 3 "By July 2000". Quotables: "We're excited to see the Linux market growing and we're very happy to be a part of it," said Matt Toschlog,
president of Outrage. Jeff Slutter, who programmed the Linux version for Outrage, said, "We originally released a
dedicated server version of Descent 3 for Linux and are very pleased that Loki will now bring to market the full
client version." "
Games over telnet (Score:1)
Re:Games are a Bad Thing (Score:1)
heh, they don't need to see the games themselves run on Linux to accomplish that, they just need to have you keep Windows on the same machine.
Now if you really wanted to cause some damage to software development, make them run on BSD. (Oh wait, XFree 4.0 is out and it runs on BSD... too late!)
Don't Say "Don't Quote Me... (Score:1)
Re:Maybe that version will actually be bug free .. (Score:1)
Must be your hardware.
Haiku (Score:2)
Twisty chasms of mayhem
Blast haywire robots
Ishpeck is filled with glee! (Score:1)
When I get in a programming mode
Compile and run
It is so much fun
Re:Games over telnet (Score:1)
What ever became of GGI? I haven't heard a peep about it or Berlin in ages.
--
Re:support... (Score:1)
Re:Public Offering (Score:1)
Remember why we want these things. (Score:5)
1. The biggest problem facing the experienced Linux user is limited choice of hardware. You walk into a shop and of 20 devices for a particular use, anywhere from 5 to 18 don't support Linux.
2. Manufacturers don't bundle Linux drivers or contribute them to the Kernel simply because they don't think there are enough users to make money off.
3. The more applications run on a platform the more users it will attract. There is simply no way the person who bought a computer to play a particular game or run a specific program will use an OS that doesn't support that.
Therefore, by increasing the pool of applications we increase the userbase and by increasing the userbase we increase hardware choice. Already It has got the stage where I have not seen a new SCSI or Network card that doesn't support Linux ( with Linux specific instructions and/or drivers in the box ) for over a year now. Port more games and the same will be true for video cards, sound hardware and controllers.
As for Decent specifically. I didn't play it much before and probably won't start now. However there are people playing the old version on Windows who will at least experiment with the New version under Linux.
Loki's outlook is bright (Score:1)
Loki is not just porting games at random, they are targeting games that are already successful and that appeal to the existing Linux community. They have already developed some very useful porting tools that make the task easier with each additional game they port. I think they did an outstanding job with Heavy Gear II; especially when you consider it started as a D3D native game and their port included converting the engine to OpenGL. Not a trivial task, but they did it well.
I think Loki has a couple of interesting areas to branch into depending on how the game companies view and embrace Linux. If they start developing Linux ports in-house, then Loki can license their porting tools and/or do consulting when the companies need help.
An anti-example to your original point is Unreal Tournament. I do really enjoy the game, but I only play it under Windows. The reason? Their Linux version is not stable or particularly speedy on my nVidia based card. Heavy Gear II on the other hand runs very well under Linux. Ditto for Quake3A. Epic had GreenMarine inhouse doing the initial Linux port and updates, but now he has left for 3DRealms to work on Duke Nukem Forever. OpenUT has a developer with NDA access to the UT source, but he is on vacation now and we don't know when we will see ver 4.20 for Linux. Having a commited third party could make much more sense for game companies wanting to port to and support Linux. Continuing support can be as critical as the original development if you have problems.
Re:Loki's outlook is bright (Score:1)
I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to see the irony in all this.
--ryan. (icculus@loki.nospam.games.com)
Re:This is great but... (Score:1)
adding gfx drivers into the kernel is exactly what made windows as unstable as it is.
i hope that linus wont allow same thing happening in linux.
Re:This is great but... (Score:1)
http://www.linuxgames.com/followup/23 08.shtml [linuxgames.com]
3d glasses and descent (Score:1)
I just love 3d.
Thanks
.
Soldier of Fortune Demo Also Available (Score:2)
Mirrors:
ftp://ftp.lokigames.com/pub/ demos/sof/sof-demo-x86.run [lokigames.com]
http://www.3ddownloads.com/s howfile.php3?file_id=87646 [3ddownloads.com]
Impressive..but.. (Score:1)
However, Linux gaming will never have a chance against Windows until they are released at about the same time. Descent 3, Civ: CTP, and other Loki games are out all well after the Windows version. I think it's unreasonable to expect Linux gamers who really want to get into a game to have to buy the Windows version and then repurchase the game for Linux (this is my understanding of what must be done). According to The Official Descent 3 Page [interplay.com], Descent 3 has been out since June 11, 1999. In other words, I can't imagine the market for this game being very high, considering most of the people who really wanted this game already have it. I know if I did I wouldn't be inclined to buy it again just to keep from rebooting.
Outrage = Parallax - Volition (Score:1)
Descent 3 is available from Tux Games (Score:1)
Nvidia TNT support (Score:2)
Anyone know how many boxes Loki games have been selling ? I certainly hope they do well. Hell, I might just buy one to show my support ( probably a strategy game since my TNT doesn't seem that well supported )
Bzzzztt. Wrong!
Support for the TNT/Geforce family has taken a big turn for the better with the current beta drivers from Nvidia for Xfree84 4.0. While the drivers are closed sourced for Intellectual Property reasons (supposedly to do with SGI technology), they almost on a par with the Windows drivers. Given that Xfree86 4.0 is still pretty new and that these aren't even v1.0 NVidia drivers yet, this is pretty encouraging and we may in the future see Linux drivers showing a few % improvement over the Windows drivers.
So anything you would consider playing under Windows on your TNT is probably playable on Linux now at similar performance levels. And since Loki distribute demos, you can try before you buy.
Cheers,
Toby Haynes
Re:Games are great! (Score:1)
---------------------------------
a bad sign. (Score:1)
Is Descent3 even still selling in the retail market? Don't suppose anybody has numbers on that?
When a single game, that's very old, and probably nobody in the PC world even cares about it anymore, when a single game like that makes news that it's being ported so long after the windows version, it's really a sign of how desparate the Linux world is.
The worst part is, since the game is so old now, it's not likely to sell terribly well, and the "powers that be" will take it, incorrectly, as another sign that people don't want games on linux.
I was one of the people who bought windows quake3 to play on linux just because there wasn't a single store in my town that sold the linux version, and I don't buy off the internet. (I'm more of a linux fanatic now, and I'd probably drive the 120 miles to buy it retail if it came out now)
what can we do? Is it really a good idea to buy these outdated, more expensive than windows (which are now probably in the $5 bin) games, simply to support the platform we love? Or do we sit back and wait, as linux grows, it's inevitable that games will be ported to linux in a more timely and more convenient fashion.
I'm sure the answer is somewhere in the middle, but it's very frustrating that we can't get more games to Linux faster without showing the interest is there, and the interest isn't really going to be there until more games come out on linux faster...
________
1995: Microsoft - "Resistance is futile"
Re:3d glasses and descent (Score:1)
---------------------------------
Re:Impressive..but.. (Score:1)
On a related note, anybody know if there's going to be a Linux version of Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force? It uses the Q3 engine.
---------------------------------
Re:Loki's outlook is bright (Score:1)
--
Daniel Vogel
Programmer
Loki Entertainment Software
Thanks Loki! (Score:1)
support... (Score:1)
i do hope half life will be ported soon..
Re:Games are great! (Score:2)
Old Sierra games can be played with FreeSCI and Sarien (again, check freshmeat).
--ryan.
(The guy who's working on Descent 3: icculus@spamsux.lokigames.com)
Anyone know anything about Quake? (Score:2)
Descent 3 (Score:1)
Yay.. now i have a reason to put a nic in my linux box and also recompile for the soundcard.. So i can totally oblitherate everyone in descent 3.
I used to play descent 1 like crazy on an old 14.4 modem 75mhz processor. I gave up playing after my sound card/modem combo blew up and i had no more sound card for 3 months (till i got money to buy a modem and sound card separately) by then i found irc.
I used to destroy the best of them using the nick SERPENT! which was pretty unique since you couldnt type a ! in the player thing on descent. I renamed the player files to get the ! in there.
DRACO-
Public Offering (Score:1)
There are some other companies, but currently Loki is really the only company porting games to Linux on such a large scale. If they ever go public, it'll be a gold mine, I feel.
Also, they seem to be porting more and more games. Dare I hope that Starcraft or Diablo could be coming soon. That is, of course, if we're not stupid and spam Blizzard again....
Re:Anyone know anything about Quake? (Score:2)
It's not really a big shock. Things likq Q3 work best on hot-shot high-end geekster systems. People who own those things are also the most likely to have tried (and learned to love :-o) Linux.
Games are great! (Score:2)
You know what would be REALLY cool? Port some of the oldies! The original Descent, maybe Warcraft, the old Sierra games like Quest for Glory. I don't think the companies would mind--hell, more revenue for free never hurts, huh?
If I could properly waste my time in X as well as I do in windows, then screw Billy Gates!
-S
http://students.washington.edu/steve0/ [washington.edu]
steve0@u.washington.edu
Re:support... (Score:2)
The company involved (sierra or valve) has specicially stated they will not port it because they are worried that the port will be of inferior quality (and that this will reflect badly on the company?)
it is unfortunate, as myself and many of the people I know are playing counter strike [counter-strike.net] a lot and it will not be possible to play this under linux.
Descent 3 is a great game, I already own the windows version, but sadly I rarely play it, as it requires booting to windows. I'd love to be able to play it under Linux
--------
This is great but... (Score:2)
Linux has made great progress but it still has a long way to go to get into the gaming market. Come on developers... come to your senses!
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
NPS Internet Solutions, LLC
www.npsis.com [npsis.com]
Re:What if I already own D3 for Win? (Score:1)
I recon you could compare it with how companies license the Quake/Lith/Unreal engine. In this case
they also get the original game data.
IMHO it would suck a bit if you already own the Win32 version, particularly if there's nothing new besides a Linux executable.
Not that Loki aren't doing a great job porting and all, but perhaps they should make an upgrade offer or something for current owners?
Re:Loki's outlook is bright (Score:1)
On the other hand, I am glad to know that he is working for Loki now. Maybe things will get better for OpenUT. Hope, hope.
Games are a Bad Thing (Score:3)
Re:support... (Score:1)
Recently one of my friends had a LAN party, and we were playing halflife on it, and every time we started the LAN game it'd say something like:
gamedll_linux: dlls/hl_i386.so
Now, I have no idea why it says that, especially if there's no Linux port. Maybe someone else can shed some light onto this?
~~~
Re:Games are great! (Score:2)
Re:support... (Score:1)
It's quite possible that some framework was there to implement the linux client, but it never got further than that.
--------
Re:Maybe that version will actually be bug free .. (Score:1)
If you find yourself using the Linux version, and these bugs still exist, please report them in http://fenris.lokigames.com/, and I'll look into fixing them.
--ryan. (icculus@dontspamonme.lokigames.com)
Re:support... (Score:3)
The client (the graphical-fly-around-with-a-joystick-and-sound-and -motion-sickness) version is what Loki will be releasing. It even supports a gaming chair (The RockNRide [rocknride.com]).
I've got it all running here.
Screenshots are here. [lokigames.com]
My big white ass on the RockNRide. [lokigames.com]
--ryan. (icculus@lokiSPAMSUXgames.com)
BSD (Score:1)
Re:What if I already own D3 for Win? (Score:1)
Actually, Outrage did alot of the work on the client. After having a playable version of it, they found themselves too busy to put together the finishing touches, and handed it off to Loki.
No word yet on whether it will be downloadable/upgradable/etc...
Re:Nvidia TNT support (Score:2)
Well that's assuming you can set the stupid drivers up properly in the first place ! I'm just about tearing my hair out trying to get Quake II to work. And there's SFA documentation out there.
D3 Linux will be Pay-Only (Score:1)
Incentives (Score:1)
Anything Constructive? (Score:1)
(okay, maybe the graphics in the kernel stuff)
what's with that?
anyway, heres the deal:
i will buy any game that is ported to linux by loki that i already own for windows just for the sake of commercial linux support, but i can safely say i will never pay for anything else to do with linux.
DISCUSS.
==
It's bush league psyche-out stuff, man.
Laughable, man.
Re:Supports "Rock-n-Ride" ???? (Score:1)
http://www.lokigames.com/~icculus/rnr/
Eyes play tricks, probably not funny (Score:3)
Quotables: "We're excited to see the Linux market growing and we're very happy to be a part of it," said Matt Toschlog, President of Outrage.
What I read:
Quotables: "We're excited to see the Linux market growing and we're very happy to be a *port* of it," said Matt Toschlog, President of Outrage.
Re:Games are great! (Score:1)
I might be alone in thinking that it shouldn't take more than ten minutes to find a switch, but I rather doubt it.
Re:Games are great! (Score:1)
Re:This is great but... (Score:1)
Speaking of coming to your senses, the idea of Microsoft porting one of their games is absurd.
Re:Games are great! (Score:1)
http://www.freecraft.org/
You need the original Warcraft CD for the graphics, or can use a free graphics set already in development [though in need of a little help]. Any graphic artists out there want to lend a hand?
Download at http://fgp.cjb.net/
Linux Games Market (Score:3)
It's also great that more companies are joining in on the Linux gaming market. I think that with the additional stability and power provided by Linux, gaming can become an even more enthrilling experiance. Soon I hope to be able to never again see a BSOD while playing Half-Life or Tiberian Sun.
I think that this is one of the many steps that the new Linux gaming market is taking toward Linux becoming an equal competitor with Windows as a gaming platform. When that happens, what will you need Windows for again? This could be the final blow that crushes Microsoft once and for all. Except that Microsoft isn't paying attention. While Microsoft is tied up in the antitrust hearings, the Linux community may have finally achieved total superiority over Windows in all aspects. Or very near to it. This is a very exciting time. We may be ready to actualize the prophecy and take over the world.
Re:This is great but... (Score:1)
[root@caffeine /root]# lsmod
Module Size Used by
nls_iso8859-1 2020 1 (autoclean)
nls_cp437 3548 1 (autoclean)
vfat 9180 1 (autoclean)
fat 30464 1 (autoclean) [vfat]
joy-sidewinder 4308 0
joystick 7076 0 [joy-sidewinder]
emu10k1-joy 2808 0 (unused)
emu10k1 45956 0
soundcore 2372 4 [emu10k1]
NVdriver 431584 7 (autoclean)
nfsd 144060 8 (autoclean)
lockd 30984 0 (autoclean) [nfsd]
sunrpc 52516 0 (autoclean) [nfsd lockd]
tulip 25252 1 (autoclean)
siri
Re:Nothing impressive. (Score:1)
(*shrug*)
--ryan. (icculus@lokinospampleasegames.com)
Actually... (Score:1)
Resource utilization: Win32 vs. Linux (Score:1)
I'm wondering, though, how efficient Linux is or isn't in regards to outright speed and resource utilization vs. the same game on a Win32 platform. Is it faster or slower? Does it use more or less CPU/RAM? How about framerates and resolutions? How about SMP?
That solves one problem.. (Score:1)
Re:Nothing impressive. (Score:1)
That said, we at Loki have near simultaneous release of titles very high on our priority list.
--Sam
HOw are Lokis ports selling ? (Score:2)
Re:Loki's fate is doomed (Score:2)
Yeah, but will they ? If the developers from Loki can do the port cheaper, faster, and more effectively, then why would they want to do it internally ? I mean, if company (X)'s developers have never used Linux before, then would it be cheaper for them to port say a Direct3D game, or would they hire the experts ? And Loki are certainly making a name for themselves as experts when it comes to porting games.
Re:Matthew 15, 21-28 (Score:1)
Do you intentionally post flamebait... (Score:1)
What if I already own D3 for Win? (Score:3)
Re:Games are a Bad Thing (Score:1)
Re:Loki's fate is doomed (Score:1)