World's Greatest Gamers, Unite 105
SamMichaels writes "Zophar's Domain had news of a press release from Twin Galaxies, the people who've tracked the high scores in games since 1981 (got famous in 82). They're looking for the top gamers to be published in a special commemorative edition of Twin Galaxies' "Official Video Game & Pinball Book Of World Records", which is the industry's official record book. The search is for gamers of "every game, every genre and every platform, whether old or new"."
emulation w/o representation :) (Score:3)
Besides the obvious possibility of using capabilities like flash saves to get high scores, how do they determine if a player has used technology in an unfair (unjust?) way?
If you set the world record for a game on a MAME cabinet, does it count?
What if you set the record for a Nintendo game using the "Advantage"?
It reminds of that scene in The Wizard where the Lucas character had a power glove...
Re:why a book? (Score:1)
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:1)
Kind of reminds me of the Home Improvement episode, when the two older boys told their brother what their parents were doing in their bedroom, making all sorts of noise. ( Somersault competition, I think it was )
Who won?
Your mom won. She always wins!
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
I spent many of my early years in front of beloved Tandy 1000, which was my only computer until 1994 BTW. And I seem to be in perfect health, able to carry on a conversation with someone and happily married.
Well there you go then, the exception that proves the rule. Statistically speaking there's always somebody that turns out differently from the norm...
Re:Verification (Score:1)
This applies to arcade games, and MAME scores are verified by recording your game file into a MAME input file and then sending the recording to a site such as www.snipercade.com or marp.retrogames.com
Reminds me of an old Little House on the Prarie (Score:2)
My wife watches that show okay? I promise it wasn't me.
Anyways the episode is one where Grandpa's memoires are sent away to the big publishing company and what do you know : They want to make a book out of it! Just send us $XYZ thank you. Of course the scam was that to cater to his egotism/narcicism and a feeling that people really gave a crap (which they really don't) they'd get him to pay for the "first publishing" which of course would be the last.
Who, except for the people who are in such a book, would buy such a book? I highly doubt anyone...
Re:Hard to Keep Track of Early Games (Score:1)
I have been looking for a Pong... (Score:1)
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
And please define #1 nation, you seem to be a little to aggressive with that #1 stuff. Does anyone have to be #1? Why can't we all just get along. I will play my games, you will censor people and we will all be happy!
Let us go through these:
1) Then only criminals would have guns.
2) You would not be able to post your last comment becuase it might offend someone.
3) Kids working graveyard shifts would not be able to help their single mother pay bills
And that ends the lesson for today.
=-=-=-=-=
"Do you hear the Slashdotters sing,
How about... (Score:1)
Repetitive redundancy (Score:3)
No kidding? Are they world records?
Re: Will there be a section for females? (Score:1)
I can't say for certain since I haven't searched, but I'm fairly sure that there are females in the record book. Since the press release indicates that not everyone who holds a top score will get a feature in the book, there is a judgement call to be made for who does get in. I would hope that TwinGalaxies would ensure that at least one female would get in. For what it's worth, even though I'm not likely to have a shot at getting in, I'd be more than willing to give up a slot in the book (for high scores in Bank Heist, Frantic Freddy, Heist, Jungle Hunt, and...oh crap...I need to submit it...Venture [twingalaxies.com]) if it meant that a female could be included. Should a female be included in the feature section, certainly. Should TwinGalaxies start track seperate records for female, nope.
-sk
Snipes! (Score:1)
Eww...Burger Time... (Score:1)
Thanks for spoiling my trip down memory lane. Burn all Burger Time games!
-sk
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
That is fucking bullshit. Where do you get that from?
Plus you're doing what most ignorant North Americans do; you speak of Europe as one nation.
Granted, with the EU that's what it might look like soon, but they all are independent nations like Norway, which I'm from. Or Sweden. Or Germany, Belgium, France, Italy etc.
To be frank; you really sound like a 60-year-old with a grudge. Or a Nazi. Or both.
Re:emulation w/o representation :) (Score:1)
-sk
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:1)
No, I am not spamming, I just happen to think his games are great.
IHNJ, IJLS... (Score:1)
But you knew that.
K.
--
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:2)
This should at least win an honorable mention for pathetic wastes of time. Speaking of which, does anyone remember the deal Activision used to have for their Atari 2600 games where, if you achieved a threshold score, you could take a picture of the television and send it in to get a free patch or badge or something identifying you as "Grand Master of Megamania" or somesuch? Those were so cool.
Tetris scores (Score:2)
On the other hand, I know I can do well enough to crack the top 20 in the Gameboy version. I guess fewer people posted their scores on it.
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:1)
I wasn't poking fun at his UID - and the comment was a JOKE. Then again, I'm certain that yours was too, but I just wanted to clarify.
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
:)
oh, juggling is a sport
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
Also, both sides are equal athletically in chess, and there is no room for "luck". In football you have to choose your offense and defense at the same time, guessing what the other is doing. In chess you can make the move knowing fully the opponents position at the end of your move.
Re:emulation w/o representation :) (Score:1)
I believe that the only scores acceptable in the book are those that have been made in a tournament. It's assumed that the people running the tournament are keeping things fair and watching out for cheaters. You are NOT allowed to simply submit your score unverified.
A lot of the scores in the book are artifically low, that's why. Especially in the home video/computer games, I've seen much higher scores. But there's no way to prove you got the score legit, therefore they don't qualify for the book...
During some tournaments a few years ago, I managed to make it in, though, for a few pinball machines :-) (Josh Lehan)
Super eurobeat from Avex and Konami unite in your DANCE!
Forget Tetris, what about Hextris? (Score:1)
Re:why a book? (Score:1)
On the ol' Nintendo (Score:1)
Oh wait... uh... yeah - I have the highest score ever! A million ducks!
Hmm... guess you're not impressed. Well... I beat Super Mario Bros. Can that count?
Re:Reminds me of an old Little House on the Prarie (Score:2)
The game list isn't complete. (Score:1)
BTW, I can beat anyone in either of these...
Must keep.. strait... face.....
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:2)
Not to criticize you or anyhing (because I think you have a great and valid point), but...
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
So ? The criminals have guns now. At least they know how to use them and won't shoot their friends by accident.
2) Well that's a good thing right ? I don't want to offend someone, that infringes on their constitutional right to happiness.
3) Kids should not be working. Period. In Europe it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to hold a job. This is because they recognise the importance of a stable home and an education. How can you study when you are flipping burgers until 4am ???
Re:the classic (Score:1)
Well, in two words: "I Am."
--Nolan
Hard to compile... (Score:1)
-Moondog
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
Record (Score:1)
Do ignominious records make it into the book?
Zork (Score:1)
Verification (Score:2)
Although I'm sure a lot of people stop and take a screenshot/photo when they make a big achievement, how easy would it be to forge/alter it. Photos are probably a bit "safer" than screenshots, because of the equipment that would be required to alter a photo, but I would imagine it would be fairly easy for a person to take a screen-shot of a decent score and then "enhance" it somehow. Is there any other way of verifying such things?
Atari 2600 Circus (Score:5)
---
Hard to Keep Track of Early Games (Score:2)
=-=-=-=-=
"Do you hear the Slashdotters sing,
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
why a book? (Score:3)
With a huge chunk of information like that, they could create a community around people who are trying to get high scores on video games. Message boards about your favorite games where you can communicate with other people who like the same games.
I realize part of the reason they are publishing this book is to stroke the egos of the people involved, but they could really do so much more. It's disappointing to see the opportunity to create a new online community wasted.
Score; 5 ROTFL (Score:1)
(ok I stayed in my chair)
the classic (Score:1)
Will there be a section for females? (Score:2)
The problem is that the gaming world seems to be terribly dominated by men. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a female section, like they do in the Olympics? That way, despite females probably not being very good at it (they are outnumbered and not as enthusiastic), there will still be a place for them to go.
I think that playing games is fun, but perhaps some people play them too much. I think playing games 24/7 is okay if you are doing it for money, but not if you are not, because it might just be dangerous. Thats why you are supposed to take a break every 2 hours for 15 minutes.
I stiull break those rules sometimes though, tee-hee :P
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
extra special value added feature... (Score:2)
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:1)
:)
hummer
How do they know if the score is not fake (Score:1)
Re:Forget Tetris, what about Hextris? (Score:1)
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:2)
_ _ _
I was working on a flat tax proposal and I accidentally proved there's no god.
This is just too obsessive! (Score:2)
As fond as I am for the odd game or two it sort of disturbs me to see that some people take their game playing to such obsessive levels. When people started creating computer games back in the 70s I wonder if they ever realised quite how profoundly they would change society, and for the worse in many cases?
I feel that whilst computer games can be beneficial and relaxing when they're part of a normal live, they have an addictive quality which makes people spend far too much time playing them, to the detriment of their social skills. We're seeing it now - too many people here on /. seem to know more about how to win a Quake deathmatch than how to deal with the opposite sex for instance. Spending all of your formative years in front of a computer leads to a level of social skills rivalling autism. Indeed, many of the symptoms seem eerily similar.
Unfortunately, with recent statistics showing that computer gaming is an industry worth twice as much as Hollywood this trend seems to be accelerating. And parents nowadays seem more concerned with keeping their children quiet than fostering their social skills, which leaves them crippled when they finally have to enter the real world! How can this be right?
Personally I think that children shouldn't be allowed to play computer games while they're young. Things like this and television do them no good - did you know obesity is on the increase in the under fives? My kids will be encouraged to play and have fun instead, and when they deserve a treat I'll get out something wholesome like Mary Poppins that we can all watch as a family.
It's just not right to let your kids grow up knowing nothing other than Tekken Tag.
Re:why a book? (Score:1)
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:2)
Re:Burger Time (Score:1)
Re:MineSweeper (Score:1)
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:2)
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
Would you prefer to have people just watch TV instead without exerting any mental effort ? It doesn't take much brains to flip through 255 channels of boring, artificially flavored crap. How many episodes of V.I.P. can a person watch before going completely braindead and becoming yet another dead-end welfare statistic ?
And to riposte your statement that children enter the "real world" crippled and disillusioned, well you're looking at the scene through stained glass. They're not crippled, their view of reality is merely different. They can see through the FUD and spot what's wrong with the world, even though they probably lack the power to do anything about it. Games are, for the most part, an art form. Art is a means to freeze life into concrete reality. Therefore games are indirectly teaching about life, something you must have abandoned long ago.
Once again... (Score:1)
---
2-digit-barrier in BLAZEMONGER! (Score:2)
My best game ever I played for almost a full minute, and only got an 8.
DG
Hi Dan!
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
I spent many of my early years in front of beloved Tandy 1000, which was my only computer until 1994 BTW. And I seem to be in perfect health, able to carry on a conversation with someone and happily married. You make it sound like children who play games will be crippled socially. Now I will admit that there is alot more game playing then ever before, but this gross stereotype is wrong. There are always people in any one group that have problems. Be it a church group, gaming club, sewing group or anything else. You can't judge everyone by a few misfits.
I know MANY people that exercise everyday, are married with kids and also happen to love getting a headshot in TFC.
I will assume your account got hacked because anyone that says, "Things like this and television do them no good" I will assume is some 9 year old AOL kid who guessed your password and is trying to be flamebait.
=-=-=-=-=
"Do you hear the Slashdotters sing,
Civ 2 Test of Time (Score:1)
MAME Hiscores (Score:1)
has the pause function removed, and has its own encryption for recording games. These recordings are used on sites such as MARP (marp.retrogames.com) for tournaments and verifying hiscores on the main leaderboard.
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
Is it any wonder that things like Columbine happen when there are people with attidudes like yours out there ?
The original poster made a valid point, you seem more intent on flaming him than contributing to a reasoned debate. Didn't you know that's what differentiates Slashdot from all the other lame sites out there. At least usually there is intelligent exchange of views.
Please forgive my spelling and grammer, english is not my first language, perhaps as an outsider I have a unique insight into all that is wrong with our once great society.
I have three suggestions that would improve things over night, and move America from being the laughing stock of the world, back to being a force to be reckoned with.
1) Immediate outlaw of ALL guns in civilian hands. There is simply NO reason WHATSOEVER for a civilian to own a machine whose sole purpose is to kill.
2) First amendment to be repealed. Free speech these days seems to cover porn, and hate-speech. Not what our foundling fathers had in mind I am sure.
3) A 10pm Curfew for all people under the age of 18. This is common sense. No person of school-age has any reason to be on the streets at this time of night.
These simple measures could set us back on track to being the #1 nation, a title which these days seems increasingly to belong to the enlightened countries of Europe.
What do others think ?
What about MMORG's? (Score:1)
Maybe Ashren's Call could be judged by level, and EverCamp..erm Quest judged by who has the most uberloot and/or paid the most money for it on ebay.
On that note: (Score:1)
Don't laugh until you've done the research. Plane'arium workers consistently have large gardens, with many garden gnomes. Coincidence?
Unlike others of their kind, they worked out Step 2 early in the game.
---
First person? (Score:1)
Of the two most popular genres, FPS, and RTS, neither seem to base any real importance on points, just survival and time.
I wonder if there's a reason for the slow disappearence of 'points'?
Re:Verification (Score:3)
As for verification, on rgvc, there wasn't any. While I know that my scores were honest, I don't know it that held across all of the scores reported. Nowadays, there is more verification, but I'm not sure what all the codes that TwinGalaxies uses mean (ie most of my scores are listed as verified by referee [twingalaxies.com], but I sure as hell don't remember anyone else in the room when I posted that Bank Heist score.)
I know a lot of these games lose a lot when you go back to them, but this might be enough encouragement for me to go back to some of them, just to post higher scores. I remember in rgvc that Lafe Travis kept inspiring me to greater playing heights. This is inspiration on crack - "You mean I might get put in a book for this?!?"
-sk
Re:why a book? (Score:1)
-sk
So who has the high score for the... (Score:1)
Console games vs PC games (Score:1)
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
Chess is a serious game: Donkey Kong is not. Why? Because chess fully engages your intellect, while Donkey Kong and (most) video games merely engage your physiological reflexes.
Applying egalitarian principles to games (of all things) is a very bad idea. Some games are actually more inherently worthwhile than others. This is why brilliant people have written voluemes on chess, while the only thing that gets written about most video games is penned by bepimpled unwashed mid-adolescent boys.You forget that before we can land that ship on Mars or navigate the asteroid belt or guide a nanoprobe through the human bloodstream somebody is going to have to invent the requisite technology. And I'll bet you that your average 17-year-old chess player will go on to invent more significant tech than your average 17-year-old Donkey Kong player.
(So we're clear on this one, I'm writing this comment from the perspective of a 17-year-old chess player. Just thought you'd like to know.)
BACK OFF!!! (Score:1)
--Dave
Minesweeper Expert Mode (Score:1)
My "Accomplishments" (Score:1)
Finishing Adventures of Lolo 1 and 2 (3 is freakin' hard)
Finished Solstice.
Finished The Guardian Legend in one game. I think I died once though.
One game that is INSANELY HARD is the NES game Metal Storm after you enter a certain password. I think you have to finish the whole game in one life to get it or something... which isn't too hard.
When I was but a lad... (Score:2)
1... 2... 3... FLIP! I win again!
No one can....... (Score:2)
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:2)
look on reality.
I've met atlhetes that program, and barkeeps
that played amazing chess. Chess, like all forms
of entertainment, is simply that. It doesn't
reflect skill, it reflects experince.
Yes there is an a logic to chess, I will not deny that.
But is there any less logic to Football? I think
not. In fact, I bet they are about equal.
The point is this,
one) people do these things because they are
entertaining in some way. If its watching football, or
coaching chess. They are entertaining.
Its a simple fact that bordeom kills,
we all need amusement, we all desire entertainment.
So before you pass judgement on a person obsessed
with Donkey Kong, realize, somewhere, somebody
thinks your a fool for your obession with chess.
Re:why a book? (Score:2)
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
-- Brian
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:1)
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
---
Re:Verification (Score:1)
The Last Starfighter... (Score:1)
--Chemguru
Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:4)
I've whiled many a day away with drool on my chin trying to take out a shambler with a shotgun, but could these people perhaps be taking their fun a bit too seriously? As a game addict I still feel a bit embarassed when I see phrases like "stellar accomplishments", "inner genius", and yes... "athletes" used to describe the process of jumping over the barrels being hurled at me by a video gorilla named "Donkey Kong". Video games are no more an athletic sport than juggling or burping the alphabet. Sure it takes practise and some skill, but that doesn't make it a sport.
---
Another card game (Score:1)
I'm CERTAIN that I've been "ASSHOLE" more than anyone here! So there! Count me in!
platforms? (Score:1)
Does Meatspace count as a gaming platform??
I mean, Hell, I was never any good at Joust and my railgun sucks in Quake 3, but I'll take on any of you in a game of Charades [umd.edu]!
-the wunderhorn
Re:the classic (Score:1)
Re:Will there be a section for females? (Score:2)
I look back on my youth and some of my fondest memories involved staying up late having a sleepover at a friends house and playing video games until the sun came up. We did not care who scored the most points or who "fragged" the other players the most, but enjoyed the companionship and the act of playing the game itself. It's a shame that today's geeks feel the need to prove themselves by showing that they are better than everyone else. Not only is this childish and petty, but it ensures that at least one player does not have a good time playing.
Sorry if this sounds too wistful, but I just don't understand the desire for such trivial competitions.
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:2)
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:1)
Ah the commadore. Simpler days...
Hextris score (Score:1)
Re:Atari 2600 Circus (Score:1)
-sk
Re:On the ol' Nintendo (Score:1)
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
The persuit of happiness, yes. But not happiness.
--
Re:What about MMORG's? (Score:1)
You do realize "Sims" don't have a "winning condition" programmed into the game - that doesn't make them "less" of a game.
Q. How do you "win" at Simcity?
A. Whenever you accomplish whatever goals *you* set for yourself within the confines of the rules of the game.
And on that note, I would argue, that, yes, you *can* win in MMPRPGs (It's Massive MultiPlayers Role Playing Games). You have a character template (skills, each character will have) and you max your base stats (str, dex, int, etc) and those skills. That character is "finished."
You take your character to level 75 in EQ. They are "maxed"
Or you take your Diablo 2 char to Level 100. That character is "finished."
That is "winning."
> I could think of a couple good ways to measure Ultima Online
You missed:
o) Most money
o) Most rares
o) Most kills
o) Least deaths
etc.
Cheers
Re:This is just too obsessive! (Score:1)
"What would a good law-abiding citizen be doing walking the streets at midnight?"
"Whatever the hell they want to be doing!"
And controversial speech is exactly what the founding fathers had in mind.
After all, they were controversial, they were having a revolution!
--
Re: Atari 2600 Yar's Revenge (Score:1)
Yar's Revenge had to have been my favorite 2600 cart. I remember scoring somewhere in the 2,000,000 area. That's gotta be some sort of record. Eh?
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
I mean, on defense there is the: 4-3, 3-4, 4-3 and 3-4 blitzes and their millions of variations, the cover 2, zone, the zone blitz, the 46 popularized by the Chicago bears, ad nauseum.
And on offense: the flying wedge(illegal now), the shotgun, the I formation, the split wing, the single wing, the pro formation, the T formation, ad naseum.
A good coach has thousands of plays in his or her playbook and so does the opposition. A lot to take account of, therefore necessary for a good strategy to overcome one's weaknesses. Unlike chess where their is only one skirmish, football(and soccer for that matter) can have 100 or more skirmishes. Though, much like chess, football can be played by those ignorant of strategy. But, like chess, they often lose.
Don't forget that like football, chess is nothing more than a game.
Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? (Score:1)
I admited it.
I'm glad to see somebody has reconized my point,
for it wasn't just a lame attempt at a troll.
As somebody pointed out, chess and football
both simulate war, and that is very true.
Its life's nature to conquer, to be as sucessful
as possible. Which includes, murder, killing,
theft, and any number of other not so plesant
possibilties.
So yes, they are both forms of playing war,
but if you look around you, that competiviness
is in everything, and my belief (Not, not a flame
or a fact, but a BELIEF). Is simple, we all
run around trying to amuse ourselves, and trying
to better ourselves. The only reason I even
commented in the first place, is because of
a judgement. Don't judge people, for I promise
you, somebody is judging you. Makes it a very
pointless circle.
What tha' (Score:2)