XBox Released 1062
Gallowglass writes: "Salon has written a review of the Xbox which damns with extremely faint praise." There was a big hoopla in Times Square last night, but apparently no one pied Bill Gates. So, for all you poor souls who lined up to give money to the borg: does it work? Any blue-screens yet? :) Update: 11/15 15:23 GMT by M : Okay, I'm sorry. That's green screen of death, not blue screen.
700Mhz Pong Machine (Score:4, Funny)
anyone else reminded of batman... (Score:4, Funny)
Microsoft: "What do you want to think today?"
YES! (Score:2, Funny)
That neon green Xbox logo sends out microwave pulsations to your brain to the beat of the Madonna song played on the WinXP commercials. Mysteriously, on our next visit to Best Buy, you pick up a copy of WinXP:
Wife: Honey, I thought you only ran Linux?
You: Microsoft for life, babe.
I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I withhold judgement until I PLAY it... (Score:2)
another news article (Score:5, Informative)
For a different perspective... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:We've seen this before (Score:3, Interesting)
When the Dreamcast was released, one of the big points they tried to make (to the point of putting the emblem on the console itself) was that it would run WinCE. Obviously, MS had a part in this, and it was the first time we'd really seen them step into the console market (aside from the sublicensing of some games).
Most developers, however, used Sega's proprietary OS instead of WinCE. There were only a handful of games that used WinCE, and not many were really high-profile.
So MS lost out - their plan to license their OS into the console market failed.
Then Sega makes the announcement - they're out of the console business - the Dreamcast is dead (long live the Dreamcast!).
On top of that, MS announces they are entering the console market, and Sega announces most of their signature games will be on the XBox.
It just seems a little too convenient, how Sega (who had at least some business relations with MS for their console) falls out of the way just before MS comes in.
I think too much.
A PS2 with different games (Score:4, Troll)
Halo is Yet Another First Person Shooter. I was expecting something revolutionary. Don't get me wrong, it's fun just like Half-Life and friends are fun, but it's simply other game of that style. It isn't a great leap forward. Arguably it isn't any leap forward.
Re:A PS2 with different games (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A PS2 with different games (Score:5, Informative)
Some of the higher quality TVs now will de-interlace incoming NTSC signals, and smooth out the picture by interpolating between the lines.
The result is that the picture looks like it has a higher resolution than it actually posseses.
So having NTSC input isn't as bad as it used to be.
Re:A PS2 with different games (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:A PS2 with different games (Score:4, Interesting)
Netscape 1 sucked on toast
IE1 sucked on toast with cherries on top
Netscape was usable
IE2 sucked on toast
Netscape 3 was great
IE3 was usable
Netscape 4 was big and bloated and didn't add anything useful
IE4 was great
Netscape 5... never happened
IE5 refined IE4 a bit
Netscape 6 sucked, from what I understand to be because it wasn't mature enough
IE6 was yet another refinement
Of course, Mozilla is another story...
Netscape is now yesterday's news and Microsoft is the 800-pound gorilla in yet another area. Netscape lost this battle primarily because they couldn't code as well as Microsoft... and they even had a serious head start (but does anyone really remember what a complete piece of crap NS1 was?)
When Microsoft decides to compete with someone they usually won't win in round 1 (at least if they play fair), but when you're a half-trillion dollar company, you can afford to both throw incredible amounts of resources at a problem and wait a few years for an industry-leading product to gel out of it. If the XBox is "as good" or "about the same" as a PS2 (better than being about the same as a PS/2, I think), then I would bet that the XBox-2 has a good chance to exceed the PS3.
I think the XBox's potential lies in the ability (I would assume) to easily port Windows code over to it. I'm not a Linux programmer, but I am a Windows programmer so that appeals to me. Of course, the day someone ports Linux to the XBox, I will laugh as hard as anyone else.
I'd love to see MAME ported to the XBox... that HD would hold all near-3000 ROMs. To me these days the consoles are more interesting now for the games that are distributed for them, but what they can be hacked to do.
In the meantime, enjoy the games!
Re:I do agree... (Score:4)
I personally dealt with this problem on the phone with multiple individuals who wanted Netscape between '95 and '98 but just didn't have the means to get it, and their OEM couldn't install it for them because of Microsoft's tactics. In the end, they all throw up their hands and just use IE 3/4 because that's what they had available and they've got better things to do for a week than try to figure out how to satisfy their browser preference.
Then '98 comes out and even people with 32MB memory who had managed to download Netscape under '95 find that they can't "unload" IE, meaning that on their 32MB low-proc slow-disk machines with W'98 Netscape is DOG-SLOW while IE is still usable. End of game.
Not every guy on earth was a techie with a T1 back in '95 through '98 when the switch was happening. Most of the people in the marketplace at the time are CONSUMERS without the knowledge or the technical means to download and install Netscape alongside IE, much less figure out how to change registry entries, etc. to make Netscape the default browser even if sufficient hardware/bandwidth/install skill are available.
I'm not arguing about whether MSIE's win was "fair" or not, but it certainly was not purely on the basis of technical browser merit.
Re:A PS2 with different games (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward (Score:3, Insightful)
oh well
I'm not convinced. Fanboys deified Bungie and Halo years before anyone had ever seen the game. I think this is just yet another case of too much hype and people willingly buying into it. (And everyone ignoring that it is much, much easier for a game developer to *claim* they will do something than to actually deliver.)
Halo has been used a rallying cry by various factions, and those factions have changed dramatically over the course of its development. At first the Mac owners were screaming about Halo, because Bungie started as a Mac company. Then Windows users were using it as an example of game that you needed a PC for, that just couldn't be done on a console. Then Xbox fans were using it as a way of putting down the PS2. Of course none of these groups ever played the game, and in the end it turned out to be much less than everyone had built it up to be.
Re:too bad it was going to be a big leap forward (Score:3, Funny)
Now if they changed that to Master Chef - and had Lloyd Grossman flying around in a shiny suit - they might have a surefire hit.
Sad, sad commentary (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem here is that people instantly lambash the box without thinking of the ramifications. Basically:
- It's a strong PC with great graphics. In the living room. The centerpiece of the family community.
- It is a console to actually push competition and strengthen games. Other consoles from here on out are going to have to consider putting an ethernet card on board. Or a hard drive. Competition is always good (even non-franchise reliant Sony is getting stale at this point).
- It's just another system. It's not the antichrist. Bill Gates personally doesn't take a cut on each box (in fact, cuts are probably taken out of HIM).
Let's think about that first one a good deal. A real PC. In the living room of thousands of people -- people, additionally, who wouldn't have thought of putting a PC in their living room. Why doesn't this get more people excited? It does for me. Naysayers like to tout X-Filish conspiracy theories about MS owning the world. It's not going to happen. Other companies are going to expand, reject, and strengthen parts of the box with 3rd party peripherals and software. The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house will finally be realized.
Even if you completely reject the box and all it's strong points, you've got to admit THE CONVERSATION IS GOOD. Unfortunately, even with a thousand comments, Slashdot editors won't learn that this is one of the things we want to talk about. And quite frankly, I still like to follow the average Slashdotter's opinion over hype.
Re:Sad, sad commentary (Score:3, Flamebait)
What kills me, is people promoting Sony and Nintendo over MS, for reasons of business ethics! These companies are at least as predatory and monopolistic as MS ever was, in a nation that practically invented the concept.
your statements don't work (Score:5, Interesting)
you claim things are good (such as having a PC in the living room or having an ethernet or a harddrive on a console) but you don't explain why these things are good.
i'll tell you my take; both of those things are not good in and of themselves.
i don't have my PC in my living room, it's in my bedroom. the console is in the living room with the TV. i play different games on them, completely different (RTS, RPG on the computer, Gran Turismo, Mario, Zelda, Final Fantasy (which are not RPG IMHO) on the console.)
an ethernet connection on a console isn't some gaming messiah. there are currently no games which i could see benefitting from this on any console, nor any in the future. same with having a hard drive. great, it'd lead to faster and more saved games. dandy. personally i don't run out of space on my memory cards, but that's me. this by itself is not a reason to buy a console.
as this salon article says (and i hate salon), it's the games, stupid. great games sell consoles, mediocre games sell a few as will the flood of adverts that MS has put out.
but in the end, there are no interesting games for the console, thus it is uninteresting and will ultimately fail.
personally, i'm spending $700 on a new computer which has more than twice the power (and 5 times the storage space, and that's nothing) of the X-box. there are actually interesting games for this computer i'm buying; civ3, dark ages of camelot, max payne (which i still haven't played), et cetera.
anyway, this is a dead horse i'll stop beating it.
...dave
Re:your statements don't work (Score:5, Informative)
I share your opinion with PC good for some games, console for others (although, I'll add sports games to the console). Now you mentioned "Gran Turisimo" and I mention "sports" for console. Once you play a game for, say, a month, you understand the AI and what to expect. The only way you get replayability is by playing the unpredictable human opponents. Especially for Racing and Sports games. Ethernet is a messiah for consoles, because I can play my football games over and over again, and still lose, cause there's always a better human opponent out on the net (and the computer isn't a challenge anymore).
Just my opinion.
C O N V E R G E N C E (Score:4, Insightful)
While we're at it, it would be nice if it would let me browse the web, or perhaps run some online games that are playable at some distance from a relatively large, low-resolution (640x480) screen (though I have an HD-ready high-resolution set, most don't). And you know, all these entertainment devices with their complex controls, some of which have a video output for interactive menus are getting a pain to control. Why can't they provide a web server interface to a device with a browser and appropriate plugins, and just be hubbed into the local room 'net?
The ability to run local entertainment software (i.e. games), networked or not, is a feature that comes for free if we're going to have enough "oomph" to do MPEG2 decoding. While you might want to use it for non-entertainment duties (i.e. checking one's bank acount, or ordering a pizza on-line), work isn't it's primary purpose.
THAT is what the XBox could be. Architecture should be open, so third parties can develop apps/add on hardware for it. Still, it should be useful enough on it's own to justify it's price. Whether the hard disk (if present) and or CD/DVD-ROM is integrated, or outboard (firewire?) is more of a stylistic issue -- today we have A/V receivers as well as separates.
In my search I have come across some neat tech by Sigma Designs (http://www.sigmadesigns.com, http://www.sigmadesigns.com/products/netstream_con sole.htm (watch the damn inserted space), and particularly the iDVD3036 [allwell.com.tw]). So decent convergence products are coming (say 2002).
But, if PC history tells us anything, the ones that succeed will be more open than the one's that don't. Unless Microsoft opens the XBox up architecturally and makes it easy for third party hacker developers, they will be among the convergence also-rans.
Re:huh?? (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's say I'm developing Spankman III: Out of Tissue and I've got some cross-promotional stuff going on with Kleenex and I have to ship by December 12th. It's November 15 and I'm not done.
Without a hard drive, I have to wait to ship until I'm done.
With a hard drive I can ship, even if the thing is still in beta because I can ask you - the player - to download patches later.
The Xbox means one thing to me: PC developers' bad habits can now follow them over to the console environment.
Bad idea.
Re:Sad, sad commentary (Score:5, Funny)
Repeat after me: "The whole point of a gaming console is to play games."
Most people don't buy consoles to double as a bloody servers. Sure, it can be done, and there's a lot of hack value there, but dude...get a clue! "The dream of having some kind of decent server in everyone's house" is NOT going to happen with an Xbox. Maybe with a good PC with a good OS, but NOT some mediocre gaming console. Compared to real PCs made in the last year or so, the xbox is by no means "a strong PC".
Lemme turn your argument around a little bit. Hey guys! I'm really excited. My furnace and air conditioner contain a Hitachi H8/3292 microcontroller, which is really a pretty hefty little CPU. I'm gonna hack the thing and run a server on my airconditioner! It keeps me cool in the summer, warm in the winter, it serves mp3s, and is now running Apache! Finally! The dream of running a server can be realized by the masses. w00t!
Bah.
So are you talking about the PS2 or the XBox? (Score:3, Offtopic)
However, you also have to consider that MS had said repeatedly they are NOT making a home PC, they are making a pure game console. To help drive that point home they have made the USB ports non-standard.
If you look at it from a point of connectivity, the XBox has ethernet but as far as the larger device market goes nothing else. The PS2 has both standard Firewire and USB ports, and also a SUPPORTED version of Linux (and Java in the works). You can use USB keyboards and mice you have sittig around from computers, or go to lots of stores and have keyboards to choose from as well as being able to hook up digital cameras with included cables.
Which one sounds more like a home PC hub to you? Remember, just because it doesn't have an Intel processor does not mean it can't be a computing device...
One last point - though I have a cable modem and DSL line (not for long though - thanks a lot Sprint!), people are still going to be using modems for a long time. Sony has realized this and is including a modem with thier ethernet/HD extension. MS has only ethernet which is great for some but not all users. I can't remember exactly what Nintendo was planning, but I think they had a combo modem/ethernet solution as well.
why so negative towards xbox? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?
I mean really, linking the xbox release with one totally negative article, while other sites have given it a much better outlook.
Please try to be fair here slashdot.
Re:why so negative towards xbox? (Score:2, Interesting)
But, in regards to the Gamecube, I have _no_ idea why it isnt hammered as well. do the
i recall hearing about an open game console. did this ever happen?
Re:why so negative towards xbox? (Score:4, Troll)
Is this my imagination, or does slashdot take its anti-microsoft bias into everything they do?
Well, you had to say it, didn't you? I'm not going to defend Slashdot posters, other gaming platforms, or even myself. What I will tell you is that this isn't restricted to the Slashdot crowd.
Go on over to the The GIA [thegia.com] and read their double-agent columns for a while. You'll get more than a few comments for and against the XBox. The one that really stood out to me though, was this one: YOU BIG BULLY! [thegia.com]
There's the truth right there. Microsoft has had years to get into the game, and only does so now. Why now? Where were they back when I was 13, playing Zelda or Sonic? The problem is, company profiteering notwithstanding, they're making it obvious that's all they're interested in. "Oh look! The gaming industry has lots of money! We can get some of that!"
Not the best way to make friends.
Besides that, have you actually read what the general gaming community thinks about the XBox? I've talked to random people I meet in gaming stores, and I hear the same damn thing every time. "The Xbox is the size of a Buick," or "The controller could kill small children," and even a "Microsoft makes shit, and I won't buy it." These are the very people Microsoft is trying to target, here. What makes you think Slashdot is going to be more forgiving than your average gamer? The Slashdot bias is assumed.
But head on over to Penny Arcade [penny-arcade.com] if you think Salon is being harsh. Dear Sweet Merciful God, this thing is the laughing stock of the entire gaming community, and they seem completely blind to it.
I've been gaming since I was 5. Xbox is a me-too, and I'm not impressed. Go home, little Xbox, I don't want to play with arrogant bastards like you.
Re:why so negative towards xbox? (Score:5, Funny)
You say this like it's some kind of big secret that the Slashdot crowd's feelings about Microsoft range from mild antipathy to deep loathing. Are you the same guy who visits Macintosh advocacy sites and wonders why there's no positive press on Gateway and Dell?
Re:why so negative towards xbox? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, I know MGS2 is supposed to make it to XBox, but that's exactly my point. I'm not going to buy the same game twice. Every major title on XBox is available elsewhere, with the exception of Halo, which I wasn't really impressed with. It's just another FPS (and it felt like a Tribes ripoff) added to the fact that FPS games really don't play well on consoles. I'm not saying the XBox is bad/evil because it's made by Microsoft, I'm saying that I see no real reason to buy one. Most of my "non hardcore" gamer friends feel the same. Their attitude is "I already have a PS2, I don't need another one." The hardcore gamers hate the thing because it's Microsoft. I have a feeling this will be a failed experiment for Bill and Steve.
Hardware reviews from Salon!?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? (Score:5, Interesting)
The reviewer is a contributing editor for gameslice apparently, but considering gameslice has had about 10 updates in the past year, I doubt he's working very hard in that respect.
Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? (Score:2)
What are you talking about? Salon has made it a staple of their content to deal with technical issues since they started publishing. Salon deals with many different issues, from P2P [salon.com] to penis grabbing [salon.com] to LSD [salon.com], and they have done most of it extremely well. Just because they do not focus exclusively on technology does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that they cannot write quality reviews of the latest game console.
Here, read this [nizkor.org] or this [nizkor.org]. I think it'll help you see more clearly.
- Rev.Re:Hardware reviews from Salon!?? (Score:3, Funny)
Its almost as bad as if Slashdot did movie reviews.
Er wait...
Resell Xbox games? (Score:2, Troll)
Re:Resell Xbox games? (Score:2)
Funcoland finaly gets X-Box games on the shelf for resale.....the next day the company is hit with a law suit for EULA and copyright infringment
No thanks. (Score:2)
If I wanted a PC, I would've bought one. I'd rather have the Playstation, which plays both the new AND old games, DVDs and CDs. It looks cooler, to boot.
Microsoft sure is spending a LOT of money on advertising though. I keep seeing Xbox commercials (or rather games FOR the Xbox). Judging by the pictures though, I still think the PS2 blows it away.
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
How are you posting on an Internet site without a PC? WebTV?
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
My Wintel box is an aging dual Pentium "Classic" 166MHz. I haven't booted it in about two years.
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
At least there's a consolation prize... (Score:2)
It's pretty sad when I have no interest in the system itself, but find more significance in the software that will become available for other platforms shortly after it's release.
Get the XBOX Bundles! (Score:2)
XboX, WinXP... In the UK know better (Score:5, Funny)
Check this picture
[virgin.net]
Or this other one
More on The Register [theregister.co.uk]
X-Box second edition to be released in March (Score:2, Funny)
The true potential for the XBOX (Score:3, Insightful)
The launch titles suck.. Rehashed fighting/racing/whatever games.. extreme sports, extreme driving, extreme first person shooters with a console controller..blech..
But what we've got is a pc.. Fast as hell nvidia chipset, hardrive, network card, dvd drive..
Tell me someone isn't going to turn that into some cool as hell hardware.. slap a bigger hardrive into, make an mp3 box.. slap an even bigger hardrive into it, turn it into a pvr..
Take it even further.. turn it into the convergence device people have been talking about for the past 10 years.. Except instead of paying 999.99 for it, buy it for 299 (or less when the price drops)..
I think as a piece of hardware its got great potential...
As a console.. well its motsos.. (More of the same old s..t)
lastly.. for your truly rabid anti-ms people..
The XBOX represents the only true way you can DIRECTLY damage microsoft through buying things.. Every unit they sell is sold at a loss.. Buy one.. Hack the hardware.. make it do stuff its not supposed to do.. And don't buy any software for it
Okay maybe the logic's a little spurious.. But it sounds good on paper
YES (Score:2)
It be great if half the people who bought them didn't buy a single game.
And when MS starts complaining, all I can ask is why they didn't see it coming. Of course, the XBOX will probably come with some shrink wrap agreement saying you can't do jack to it, so we'll all somehow be violating the DMCA if we try to hack it - no hack websites, because the government flunkies will bow to the will of MS (just like they did with the RIAA and MPAA).
Oh well, you can't keep a good hack down for long. I may actually put off buying a second "real" PC until we see what we can do with one of these.
Re:The true potential for the XBOX (Score:2)
But I look forward to hearing folks stories of hack attempts - it could bath new life into the Xbox :)
the problem is that, yes anastasia... (Score:2, Insightful)
you can build a better PC for the cost you're talking about. bigger harddrive will be $100, so for $400 you can build a better machine than the X-Box.
...dave
Re:The true potential for the XBOX (Score:3, Insightful)
The XBOX represents the only true way you can DIRECTLY damage microsoft through buying things.. Every unit they sell is sold at a loss.. Buy one.. Hack the hardware.. make it do stuff its not supposed to do.. And don't buy any software for it :)
Your logic is flawed. Which is of more use to Microsoft, a big pile of unsold Xboxen, or the cash equivalent? They lose -more- money if they have to scrap them.
As for hacking, hasn't the message [slashdot.org] got through yet?
Re:The true potential for the XBOX (Score:3, Informative)
Taking money from MS (Score:2)
But since MS is losing money on each unit sold, (at least it was reported that they are losing money per unit), isn't this like taking money from MS?
The console wars... (Score:5, Interesting)
Full Story [gamespot.com]
--GuntherAEPi
"
Halo (Score:2)
Maybe the reason it drew interest from us PC gamers was that Halo was announced ages ago as a PC/Mac game, a situation which changed dramatically when MS bought out Bungie?
I'm not alone in being extremely disappointed in Bungie over this. I remember desperately looking forward to Halo a year ago, but now I probably won't even buy it. (And not out of spite; by the time the PC version is out, I'm sure there'll be much more attractive games available. That's if the PC version ever gets done at all.)
Store "take overs"?? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Store "take overs"?? (Score:2)
I read in the paper this morning that FutureShop is being bought by Best Buy.
Get one on eBay (Score:5, Funny)
And the eBay stupidity begins... (Score:5, Funny)
The other auction of note is here [ebay.com], where the winner gets the box that the Xbox came in. The seller is very clear about the person only getting the box that it came in, yet the winning bid was still $366.
Was a crime committed here? Nope. They were just helping the fool part from his money sooner.
Hmm .. (Score:3, Interesting)
In spite of the fact that I already think that people are incredibly stupid, and in spite of seeing decades of evidence of the incredible stupidity of people on probably at least a weekly basis, stories like this (these eBay auctions) still somehow manage to boggle my mind and make me shake my head in wonder and disbelief. I find myself searching for possible rational explanations. So far the only explanation I can come up with that makes sense to me is that perhaps the bidders on these auctions were mostly foreigners with very poor English skills (possibly having recently moved e.g. to the US), who would not only easily have misunderstood the descriptions (understanding probably mostly just the main keywords), but would themselves (in a sort of naive trusting of people, and in good faith) never have believed or even considered that anyone would attempt such ridiculous auctions. If that was the case, I wonder if there would be any legal implications. Probably not, but still, if somebody deliberately and knowingly conned a naive immigrant with poor English skills, it seems a bit on the shady side.
Linu Xbox (Score:2)
X-Box Linux Contest. (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh yeah, I expect Salon to be unbiased with MS. (Score:3, Flamebait)
Slashdot editors are really scraping the bottom of the barrel in their overt attempts to bash Microsoft. They do so at any cost, and by that I mean regardless if it makes them look like biased buffoons or not.
Salon is the last place I go for anything remotely to unbiased reporting. Seems Slashdot wants to follow suit.
The X-Box should be judged for what it is, and that is an attempt to offer flexibility to developers to make the games they could only wish to create for the PC. Microsoft or not, I would love to see some real creativity in the market that didn't involve a regular game company.
Can Ms provide that? I don't know, but I won't slight them based upon a Salon review, in fact if Salon bashes them at all I see it as more of a reason to look at the product.
Salon's biased look at innovative games... (Score:5, Insightful)
Salon is overlooking something very critical. They run down the list of X-Box titles and call them boring and pedestrian, then detail FUTURE Sony titles that will be innovative...
But they don't mention any future X-Box titles which will innovate, other than a dismissive mention of the 2002 lineup which claims to have 'nothing ambitious'.
Are they forgetting that Sega has close ties with Microsoft? Jet Set Radio Future, the first franchise to effectively work cel shading into the game's stylistic approach, is due out for X-Box. In addition, Shenmue, the series which redefined how adventure games and peristent worlds work on Dreamcast, will be an X-box franchise from now on. US gamers will be getting Shenmue 2 on X-box alone.
If you're going to hold one console above another, at least consider all aspects of both, rather than forgetting a key area. That's just good journalism, whatever your preference for gaming platforms or your like/dislike of Microsoft may be.
Servers (Score:2)
X-mas (Score:2, Funny)
After all, who didn't get their first kick on computers on a VIC-20 or simular boxes...
Other reviews (Score:3, Informative)
Zdnet [zdnet.com]
Gamespy [gamespy.com]
Gamespot [gamespot.com]
FiringSquad [gamers.com]
TeamXBox [teamxbox.com]
Yahoo [yahoo.com] 2 [yahoo.com] 3 [yahoo.com]
--
"Can I run a linux cluster of those?"
How does it play DVD's? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How does it play DVD's? (Score:4, Informative)
My take on the whole thing (Score:4, Insightful)
What Xbox has going for it...
1 - PS2 is known as a more adult gaming platform. I just bought a PS2 and finding games for my 9 year old daughter is interesting. Maby MS can capitalize it if they are smart.
2 - Should be easy to port PC games to it. Something lacking in PS2/Nintindo worlds.
What Xbox has going against it....
1 - Sony rules the console market right now. Hands down. Nintendo has some a good new platform and more kiddy friendly games. Xbox has to compete with this
2 - Microsoft is used to being able to do what they want because they have a Monopoly. How will management react to situations when they are the small guy. It's like General Moters starting to offer blenders. They are not experts and the people the people who have been making them know a lot more about it and actually listen to there customers.
3 - Lack of vision. Ties into #2. Where's the killer app? Do you really think Gates and Balmer can envision great new games.
4 - Game makers won't produce for a console that hasn't got a proven track record. Why spend millions developing a game for a potential 50 people when I can do it for tens of millions across the world (PS2).
5 - Blue/Green screen of death will put off gamers. I bought a PS2 so I could get away from computer gaming and costant error messages and rebooting. When has anyone ever seen an error message on a Playstation or a Nintendo? I want drop in a game and play it never seeing an error message. PC users are use to getting them and can live with it. Console games don't and won't tolerate it. I gave up PC gaming because I got sick of upgrading video cards, getting more hard drive space, better processors. I just want to drop that disc in and play the game.
6 - The goofy Balmer/Monkey/music crap that the Salon article talked about. If you have to dance around on stage and talk like a motivational speaker your not selling stuff in the console market. When Grand Theft III is released or the next version of Final Fantasy they don't even need to air a commercial. They could send it to the stores and put it on the shelf without a word and it will sell out. Microsoft ain't cool. Sony is, Nintendo is some what.
I could go on and on. I can't see Xbox being anything but a niche market. Microsoft bit off more than they can chew with this one.
Salon investors and editorial slant... (Score:3, Interesting)
Also part of that investor group was Wasserstein Perella Group, Inc., which has done M&A transactions for AOL (http://www.wassersteinperella.com/about/transacti ons.htm).
It's a stretch, but not a BIG stretch. AND this is off 10 minutes of research.
Microsoft is clearly the industry leader... (Score:5, Funny)
What an unbiased article... not. (Score:3, Interesting)
So for the first time, I actually dared to entertain warm thoughts toward Microsoft.
Yeah, no kidding that he doesn't normally like Microsoft. I would never have guessed it from the consistently cynical tone of his article.
I'm no big fan of MS either, but jeez. Would a little unbiased journalistic integrity be appropriate? Hmm.
As it is, I don't think that I know anything more about how good the XBox is after reading the article than I did beforehand -- because I don't even begin to trust the opinions of the journalist with his obvious baggage of preconceptions.
XBox in Canada (Score:3, Informative)
Xbox crashes (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:No GTA3...... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:No GTA3...... (Score:2)
....well atleast my other point can stand
Re:No GTA3...... (Score:2)
I know the graphics sure are purty.
Re:Come on (Score:2)
if I am buying a console today, I would hopr it would be 110% of a gaming machine since that is why I am buying the damn thing.....I think the grafics in the PS2 stomp the graphics in a gaming PC with the GF3. games run smooth on PS2, the look good and there is little hastle using the controler.....Halo's controls suck...MS should have taken some Ideas from the snes and golden eye.
Re:Come on (Score:2, Interesting)
if I am buying a console today, I would hopr it would be 110% of a gaming machine since that is why I am buying the damn thing
Well you do need power for other things like putting real AI in drivers in GTA4.
I think the grafics in the PS2 stomp the graphics in a gaming PC with the GF3. games run smooth on PS2, the look good
I respectfully disagree. What resolution does the PS2 normally run at when connected to a TV? I know that lots of people foolishly compare a console game running a 512x384 or whatever with a PC running at 1024x768, ignoring the fact that the PC is pushing >4x as many pixels. In any case I have yet to see a stunning game on the PS2, whereas on a GF3 running at high rez something like Quake 3 (yup it still rocks with every feature turned on) roxxors. Operation Flashpoint offers graphics, AI and features that consoles can only dream of.
Re:Come on (Score:5, Interesting)
We played some other PS2 titles (which I forget the name of, although one was a Sar Wars title) and I came away thinking "hmm so basically, scenery of one type or another scrolls towards you, and you steer" This seemed the basic premise of most of the games. In some you could shoot things as well, whilst others you just avoided obstacles (snowboarding was one excuse). The annoying thing that all these games had in common, is that you are never *really* in control of your ship/board/car/shopping trolley etc as the game will just not let you move outside of the "approved" area of the scenery. For example, I couldn't fly out of the canyon in the SW game. But there was no apparent reason for this, it was just arbitrary.
The only other basic type involved 2 psuedo 3d avatarsviewed in 3rd person who face off in some osrt of kickboxing fight. The game appeared to be won by pressing everything on the controller at the same time rapidly.
Apparentley, GT3 is hailed as one of the best if not the best console game. Hmm well if a very pretty version of "horace goes skiing" is the state of the art, I'll stick to me PC this time around. With games like Star Wars Galaxies and Planetside from Sony coing next year, it's gonna be a blast.
Before I get flamed by all the console lovers, I should state that I fully recognise that the console has a place - it's damm sight cheaper than a PC for start (My video card cost more than a PS/2), and is more easily accesible by non "hardcore" gamers who just want a bit of a laff with their mates round the TV with the aforementioned beer and pizza, and not to have to spend the first few days of playing any new game, writing macros and message binds, and downloading the essential addons and extra maps you need to play in the "big league" - in many ways, the very flexibility offered by the PC as a games platform provides many more potential ways to cheat. And cheating is what ruins many an online multiplayer gaming experience - just ask any Counterstrike player. These games are effectivley being driven onto the private LAN tournament scene where inspections of the players kit whilst in play are possible leaving just the casual games on the 'net. Serious tournaments are almost impossible on the Internet because of the cheating opportunities available by simply hacking the models or game client. These client mods are undetectable by the server. So, with the "closed" nature of console games (ie you can't write your own config scripts or alter the models, sounds and textures ) perhaps there will be a resurgence of serious Internet based multiplayer play. That is, until the consoles start to look so much like a PC that they suffer the same fate...
OK the ramble factor has reached the "shut up now scoot" stage so I'll not bore oyu any more
Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! (Score:2, Troll)
Oh, that's not fair. He understands it, alright. I've got one word for you: "Bob".
Re:HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! (Score:2)
Re:Hoopla indeed. (Score:4, Interesting)
But it is essentially.. at least, according to Cringley, it's the expansion into new areas like gaming consoles that Microsoft desperately needs in order to keep growing at the necessary rate to avoid going bankrupt.
Look at it from a positive consumer viewpoint -- as previous slashdoters have mentioned, Microsoft are essentially selling a half-decent PC at below cost. Get yerself an X-Box, get Linux running on it, and have a good laugh at them.
Re:Hehe (Score:4, Informative)
But if you like FUD, let it flow...
Re:Hehe (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Hehe (Score:2)
Re:XBOX advertisement blitz (Score:2)
Re:XBOX advertisement blitz (Score:5, Informative)
Kindly get your facts straight.
Re:XBOX advertisement blitz (Score:2)
yeah but they were working from a sequal that had a huge hit in the original....they basicly said...people won't worry if the graphics are the best since they know they will be at least as good as the original. so lets just show cut sceens.
Re:XBOX advertisement blitz (Score:2)
Re:Penguins crashing through windows.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Penguins crashing through windows.... (Score:2, Interesting)
It might not mean a linux port worthy of writing games for, but it would be a linux port. After all, the dreamcast port doesn't support GLX, as far as I know.
Besides, as has been said many times: X isn't linux :)
Nationalism is yesterdays news (Score:2)
industries are based? It's quite possible to
make games for it regardless of where the hardware
is made. There's no good reason that you should
choose to identify more with an american company
than a japanese one -- they're all just people.
Breaking News - Musicians are stupid! (Score:2)
I, for one, would be pissed off to find out that Bad Religion got no money love out of Crazy Taxi. Music can make a game, it shouldn't be given to a megacorporation without compensation.
-sk
Re:Breaking News - Musicians are stupid! (Score:2)
I'll assume that this is mostly because The Offspring provided the music.
Bad Religion probably did rake in some change for Tony Hawk 2, though.
Re:Linux on xbox (Score:2)
Right, because he likes innovation- in fact he recently claimed to have been personally responsible for the rise of open source because of the way dos/windows commoditized hardware. Innovation warms his heart, just like heartburn.
Re:No more BSOD (Score:5, Insightful)
Michael, this is neither funny nor professional. You're doing more to reinforce Slashdot's reputation as a childish, "M$ sux0rs linux 0wnz j00" site than any hundred Anonymous Cowards.
I've almost never agreed with Jon Katz's editorials. But I've always felt that squelching his opinion by banning him from my front page was wrong. You, Michael, have crossed that line. I'm banning you from my front page. I know that will cut my story count in half, but at least I can read the front page with the resonable expectation that I won't have my intelligence insulted.
*: That's the XDK in "XDK Launcher".
**: Sorry 'bout the annoying pop-unders, but that's the only crashing demo reference I could find through HardOCP on short notice.
Re:No more BSOD (Score:3, Informative)
Mod the man up. I just pointed out the mistake to Michael (the poster of the story) now.
That's an XDK tossing up an error several months ago. And it's not a crash: it's looking for the media.
Re:What PC users have always known, verified (Score:3, Interesting)
My guess has always been that playing the Monotonous-FPS-of-the Month on a Windows box rots the part of the brain that allows irony to be detected.
As for the XBox, I'm not buying it, or the GameCube, or the PS2. Got enough classic consoles to keep me happy, the ones that were made back when gameplay mattered... not just the same three lame styles of games with purtier and purtier pixchurs every year.
~Philly
Re:Salons review.. (Score:3, Insightful)