Nintendo Declares GCN Most Popular Console Ever 535
PhReaKyDMoNKeY writes "According to IGNCube, Nintendo has declared GCN the fastest selling console ever. Additionally, Nintendo claims that Luigi's Mansion is the most popular launch title in history as well. I couldn't seem to find the actual press release, but here's a related news story from Nintendo's site. I don't know how valid the claim is, since it's in their best interest to exaggerate, clearly, but it seems like the console demand in general is pretty high. " Now mind you every store in town seems to have plenty of Gamecubes in stock, but if you want an X-Box, you have to kill for it. Fortunately most people in a video game store are like 12, so I can destroy them with my mind bullets.
GBA (Score:3, Troll)
Of course, they could be lying.
Re:GBA (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't see any competition on the market at all. Fortunately, it isn't really a bad thing since the GBA and GC systems are pretty cheap, as are the games.
Take care,
Brian
--
Do you want a free Palm m100? [assortedinternet.com]
--
Re:GBA (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bandai Wonderswan Color (Score:2)
If you didn't know, the WSC is a Japanese handheld system that was never released in the U.S. It's a largely unremarkable system, but Square has been supporting it with re-releases of their old games. I've never considered getting one, since I own all of the Famicom and Super Famicom originals anyway.
< tofuhead >
colored GBAs (Score:2)
There are jet black GBAs, as well as spice orange ones, both made to match the black and orange Japanese GCNs like the purple GBA matches purple cubes. They'll be available soon.
You say you've got money to burn, eh? Go import some limited edition Suicune, Celebi, Hello Kitty, and Yomiuri Giants GBAs. I'm quite happy with my own LE models, particularly the Suicune model. (oooooh...shiny bluuuuue...)
< tofuhead >
Re:GBA (Score:2)
Mind Bullets? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Mind Bullets? (Score:2, Insightful)
How about the power... to move you?
Re:Mind Bullets? (Score:2)
That's telekenesis, Kyle!
Re:Mind Bullets? (Score:2)
what is there to be thankful about? (Score:5, Interesting)
At the conclusion of the interview (which involved searching my house to which I aqueisced) the agents told me that probably nothing would come of it, but the decision on whether to prosecute or not was up to the attorney general's office.
I'm still not entirely sure how my comment can be construed as an actual threat, but I do understand why secret service agents are a bit high strung about now.
Regards,
Lee
Re:Mind Bullets? (Score:2)
Appears to be a common mistake [spectatoronline.com]
The band consists of Jack Black and Kyle Glass who both play acoustic guitar and sing
In fact, I get more hits with google using 'Glass' than 'Gass'.
But, in fact the name is Gass according to the band's site [tenaciousd.com]
Press Release (Score:5, Informative)
Why you can still get them (Score:5, Insightful)
Two reasons:
* Nintendo shipped about twice as many GameCubes to start with.
* The second shippments have already arrived in many places.
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:3, Informative)
All this being said, I still haven't been able to get my GC yet....
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:3, Informative)
The initial shipment of X-Boxes was 200,000, whereas the initial shipment of GameCubes was 700,000. In addition, 97% of X-Box vendors claim they sold out during the first week, whereas 49% of GameCube vendors claim to have sold out. Nintendo claims a better launch than Microsoft. That makes sense in light of the total units, no?
Seems like there's enough numbers to prove Mark Twain correct yet again.
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:3, Insightful)
I love the way the initial shipment of XBoxes keeps decreasing in the eyes of the /. posters. First it was 350,000 units, then 300,000, and now it's only 200,000. And still Microsoft hasn't released numbers yet, so all of those are pure speculation. I'm guessing that the shipment was closer to the 350,000 mark, if not higher. As well, Microsoft is shipping 100,000 units per week through the holiday season.
Anyway, let's just wait until Microsoft releases some numbers before we go speculating too much, eh?
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:2)
If you're looking for neutral commentary about the Xbox and GameCube, you're certainly not helping the situation. Nobody knows if Microsoft is shipping 100K units a week through the holiday season, least of which is you. According to most reports I've read over the last few days, the word was that Microsoft was actually having production problems due to difficulty obtaining all those PC components, and the fact that they burned up some equipment in the factory when they were "overclocking" their manufacturing line during crunch time.
But again, nobody really knows any of this, so this is just idle speculation on the parts of a lot of people. But I will say this, though - First off, if the truth isn't bad, then there's no reason to hide it. Why does Microsoft need to hide their launch/shipping numbers? It's certainly not because they're trying not to be unfair - No company would willingly offer its competitors such an easy advantage. And if Microsoft's ship numbers were actually worth reporting, you can bet your $330 DVD player that they would've reported them. Any victory in business is still a victory, no matter how small.
I don't think this is a case of a lot of anti-MS posters gang-banging on Microsoft for what they see as an attempt to cover their asses. I think it's a case of a lot of reasonably intelligent people calling bullshit when they see it. And I'm not a fanboy one way or the other, but I certainly smell something fishy here too.
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:4, Interesting)
Or not. Microsoft never releases sales figures. They just say "greatest" or "best ever" or other fuzzy statements. Check the article on the Reg a couple of weeks ago about Gates' keynote speech and associated press releases that played fast and lose with the XP sales figures. Microsoft won't admit the thing isn't selling until they quietly stop making the things.
Re:Why you can still get them (Score:3, Informative)
Target: "some mumbo jumbo crap, a nice menu"
Yevette: Electronics department, Yevette speaking"
Me: Hi, how many of the new X-Boxes do you have in stock, my kids are wanting one for Christmas and I was wondering if I should wait or go ahead and pick one up now.
Yevette: Lemme see, I see 6 in the case, and we may have a few more in the back. But with the Christmas rush coming and [I stop her there]
Me: Okay, I'll be down to pick one up tomorrow, thanks.
Yevette: Thank you for calling Target blah blah blah.
What do you mean you have to kill for them?
This is true, I actually called today before leaving work.
Supply and Demand (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft just failed to meet the demand for the XBox. Nintendo made several hundred thousand more units, so their supply is more suited for the corresponding demand. Yeah, it might be the best selling console, but that's just because there are more units out for sale.
And, if the Gamecube is a hundred bucks less, let Nintendo milk capitalism for all it's worth.
Re:Supply and Demand (Score:2)
If nintendo has a magnitude more boxen out there then the developers will look at the gamecube as a better moneymaker than the Xbox.
Man this looks exactly like how Atari Slit their own throats.. The Jaguar was an excellent system had the best graphics and audio of it's time and for several consoles after (It was better than the supernintendo) yet it died a horrible deah because it was impossible to buy and therefore never had a decent number of games for it. so it died.
Microsoft had better get their butts in gear and start cranking them out like madmen. Otherwise everyone that wanted an X box will be happy with t heir Gamecube by the time they are able to get an X box.
Re:Supply and Demand (Score:2)
Micros~1 didn't fail to meet demand. This is a very old trick. Purposely limit your supply, and when these things fly off the shelf really really fast, it will seem in the minds of Joe Six Pack consumer-types that these things must be really super-popular and therefore this is the product that he must have.
People are stupid. They assume that because something is hard to get, it must be popular. (in high demand). They completely ignore the SUPPLY side of the equation.
Re:Supply and Demand (Score:2)
Re:Supply and Demand (Score:2, Interesting)
It's not just a part of the game. Its a huge part. If X-Boxes are not readily available for the christmas season, I'd guess that there are a large number of families out there who will go for a 'reasonable alternative' in the GameCube.
In the long run, however, the battle will probably be won by the system that produces the most high quality games. For that reason, Microsoft bought the rights to 'Halo', and the president of Nintendo is planning on selling his 10 percent stake of the company [nwsource.com] and pumping the money into Games start-ups that support the nintendo system.
Re:Supply and Demand (Score:2)
Saw several opened xboxes available at two Target stores in the past few days. No 'Cubes in any store around here.
I haven't heard of any QA problems with either system, so I guess these returns are more the exception than the rule...unless a few people just didn't want them. I won't comment further on that, considering the overwhelming xbox fanboy populace here on /.
< tofuhead >
Based (Score:2)
CmdrTaco (Score:5, Funny)
At least CmdrTaco has found some group of people he can compete with and beat.
NYC (Score:4, Interesting)
X-Box games, controllers, systems and accessories on the other hand are in every single store in midtown.
Re:NYC (Score:4, Insightful)
Then again, I guess it makes sense for XBox stuff to be around, since a) there weren't as many XBoxes to sell at launch b) most of the people who got them were preorders and those came with a second controller anyway and c) the GC seems to have more games where people want four controllers to play with friends (Super Monkey Ball, Wave Race, and Smash Brothers next week).
Re:NYC (Score:2)
Re:NYC (Score:2)
Playstation 2 (Score:3, Insightful)
Besides, the X-Box and Gamecube are only marginally better hardware-wise, if at all, yet the game selection is horrid thusfar. I predict it will be like the original Playsation all over again, first to market does better even in the face of superior consoles that follow, through sheer numbers of available titles.
But if the Gamecube truly *is* more popular, we'll have to wait until about April of next year to see for sure..
Refreshing Change (Score:2)
Its refreshing to see Nintendo take the other tack- and talk about actual numbers.
I could release a new console, I'd call it Kylie ("just going to play with Kylie a couple of hours"), and issue a 'oh my god...' press release having sold ONE. I'm sure in a lot of territories the PS2 DIDN'T actually sell out for very long, but the common perception is that it was unavailable for MONTHS worldwide. I had no trouble buying mine!
Re:Playstation 2 (Score:4, Insightful)
The PlayStation 2, with over 20 million consoles sold, is more popular than the GameCube. Their launch records have nothing to do with that.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:In histroy != America (Score:2, Informative)
The population of Japan (according to the CIA World Factbook 2001) is approx. 126,771,662, whereas the population of the US (according to the same source) is about 278,058,881. So, unless these are some sort of freakishly large dwarfs i think your statement might be erroneous.
The reason... (Score:3, Redundant)
Re:The reason... (Score:2, Informative)
It does my heart good to see someone remind others that just because you can find it, doesn't mean it's not selling well...
And of course add on to this the fact that something like 100,000 more GC's are shipping every week.
Other fun facts:
Gamecube hardware made more money on its opening day than Harry Potter did in its opening weekend at the movies...
Gamecube sold twice as many units as Xbox did in its first week...
etc. etc. etc.
Re:The reason... (Score:5, Funny)
Pretty smart of them in my opinion. It would have been a bad idea if Nintendo had started shipping more X-Boxes than gamecubes
More reliable source for press release (Score:4, Informative)
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20011129/tc/nin
Mind bullets? (Score:3, Funny)
Although, now that I mention it, that would be kinda cool--think about it, a bew--*ack*
Ohhh! Look at me! (Score:2, Redundant)
Note that this is the same way SEGA started out with Dreamcast. Dreamcast destroyed the previous record for 1st day sales when it came out (9/9/99 by the way). Nintendo is saying they've done the same, basically.
Popularity in the video game market is way more than preliminary sales figures. We'll see who really has the best games about a year from now.
/me predicts Xbox. Let the flames begin.
Re:Ohhh! Look at me! (Score:2)
I have played Tony Hawk 3, Rogue Leader, Luigi's Mansion, Wave Race, and Super Monkey Ball and they are all fantastic. Super Smash Bros Melee is getting higher praise then the original, Extreme G is shaping up nicely, and Madden, Courtside, Fifa, Crazy Taxi, and Pikmin round things off so that everyone should have a game that they would buy the console for.
misc numbers (Score:2)
Goldman Sachs did a survey [cnet.com] among U.S. retailers in big cities, and so far 73% had sold out of the Xbox and 47% out of the Gamecube. Microsoft shipped an estimated 300,000 Xbox consoles around the nation, while Nintendo delivered some 700,000.
[from Shacknews [shacknews.com]]
Granted, this was a bit farther back in November, but the numbers seem plausible.
And as always: "There are lies, damn lies, and marketing!" (or somethin like that)
X-box isn't hard to find here (Score:5, Interesting)
A friend that was visiting about two weeks ago bought one for her kids...she has lots of them, so getting 3 games and an accessory was no problem along with the console, but this bumps the total price to $500.
Still, its interesting that they're available this year at all. Remember PS2 last year? Impossible to find!
Re:X-box isn't hard to find here (Score:2)
And like you say...who wants an xbox without a football game, a shooter, and a racing or RPG game plus an extra controller for your friends? The DVD kit is probably popular too.
XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant... (Score:3, Interesting)
What really pisses me off about the XBox: You can't play DVDs without that remote. You can't just use your controller. And that remote is another 40-50 dollars. Also, you can't save games without your memory card (also another 40-50 dollars). Meanwhile... doesn't the god damn thing have a hard drive built in? To be able to get the god damn console you'll have to buy a package, and the package doesn't even contain all the good stuff. It'd cost around 600 to get my ideal set up?
No thanks.
Maybe I'll just wait to attack the 12 year olds too. The difference: I'll wait till after they buy the XBox and walk out of the store with it to attack them.
Me smarts.
Re:XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant (Score:4, Informative)
Re:XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant (Score:2)
However, I am quite sure of the DVD thing.
Re:XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant (Score:2)
I wish theyed sell a RF unit by itself & let me use my 'master of all electronics' universal 12 device remote for the box withotu paying extra for a remote I don't need...
Re:XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant (Score:3, Informative)
Where 40-50 dollars is actually 35 [ebgames.com]
memory card (also another 40-50 dollars).
Where 40-50 dollars is actually 35 [ebgames.com] again.
Or even less if you're willing to shop around a bit.
Re:XBox is pretty popular around here, but abudant (Score:2)
I know this is Slashdot, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
Wednesday night I paid $29.99 for my DVD remote kit at Target. I have been saving games since launch day on the hard drive without a memory card.
Now, start looking at your criticisms and think: Can I save PS2 games without a memory card? Will any amount of money allow my GC to play DVDs? This sort of rabid mentality adds to the ammunition of those who think the open source movement is populated only by irrational zealots.
Regarding bundling:
I bought my XBOX on the morning of the launch at a Wal-Mart with just the console, an extra controller, and one game, exchanging my TRU pre-order bundle deposit for another game, though they would have been happy to just refund my $. TRU was ecstatic that I cancelled and one clerk was dialing the next guy on the list before the first clerk had finished ringing up my game, so it was possible to do an end run around the bundles, and I don't see anything about post-launch bundling at all...where are these people shopping?
On competition:
A cheer rings out on
Launch success vs. system lifespan success (Score:5, Insightful)
Look where it [ign.com] is [cnet.com] now [ft.com].
Not to knock it -- I love my Dreamcast, and especially now it is an incredible value.
Ian
Re:Launch success vs. system lifespan success (Score:3, Insightful)
I would feel my Dreamcast had MORE value to me if Sega hadn't decided to throw in the towel on the system.
Stop making them? Okay, I can half-way understand that when there is a surplus of units.
But to stop making games for the system though? C'mon!? Some stores have stopped stocking the games. Many of the last games to be released were cancelled. And a lot of the best games that were out for the system are no longer in stores, hard to find online, and not even in the pawn shops. All that's left on the shelves are games that nobody wanted or games that everybody has.
Shen Mue 2 not being released though, that's the one that really bothers me.
At least there are still emulators [dcemulation.com] one can play with...
Re:Launch success vs. system lifespan success (Score:2)
The difference is Sega does not have Shigeru Myomoto. They do not have Mario, Zelda, Metroid! They did not have a cool wave racing game, a cool snow boarding game. (Two of the funnest games to play on N64... sure to continue on GCN.)
I owned a DC. Their best games were available for other platforms like PS2. They had no 'killer games' to keep their system afloat. They could not compete with PS2, so they gave up.
Re:Launch success vs. system lifespan success (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm not putting the PS2 down - I bought it, and I like it. But so far I've been more impressed by the games Dreamcast had out by this point in its life than what the PS2 has out now. A console is only as impressive as the games you can play on it.
Re:Launch success vs. system lifespan success (Score:3, Insightful)
What really pisses off fanboys like you is everything you've ever said is wrong. The DC rocked, and measured objectively, is currently the best console on the market by any measure except hype, and potential graphics capability.
It's got the best games, the most games, the cheapest games, the cheapest hardware, the cheapest console by a factor of six, and the widest selection of games. The graphics simply aren't that inferior to anything else on the market right now, because one of the dirty secrets of the graphics industry is that it take about an order of magnitude improvement in graphics technology to really be noticable, and not get lost in non-optimized graphics engines.
The only hard part is that scavenging the games is hard now. But I'll put my DC collection up against your fanboy console choice anyday. I've got more Class A games in my collection then the XBox or the Gamecube has total games, period. You can almost combine the two.
And guess what? I can still buy one of the new ones if I want! What have you been doing the last few years?
Dirty secret: The DC was the best console in the late nineties. If you can find the games (try used shops), it's still the best for another year or so. If jackasses like you hadn't dissed it, Sega would have been rewarded for innovation, instead of penalized by a market dominated by fanboy idiots.
Uh Oh CmdrTaco (Score:5, Funny)
I hope you're not putting on the pounds, cause you're in danger of turning into the fat comic store guy from the Simpsons.
Re:Uh Oh CmdrTaco (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nice :-) (Score:2)
The N64 was purely a fluke in itself, between Silicon Graphics' shakey production schedule, and fighting against what was then expensive RAM/ROM considerations (remember that in the days the N64 came out, 64 Mb ram cost around $160+, and rom in the same size range was similarly expensive, hence why it was in the best interest for Sony to base everything around CD, sacrificing load speed), they were basically going on a wait and see schedule, and gaming fans rarely if ever follow suit...
violence in video games? (Score:5, Funny)
Its all about supply... (Score:3, Interesting)
Amigori
...and counterpoint. (Score:4, Informative)
Love the Gord. Fear the Gord.
The Gord knows all (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, it's more like, GameCube is a less powerful system, with few games, with less developer support, which doesn't play DVDs, didn't actually have strong opening sales, is aimed primarily at small children but with inappropriately fragile media, and is trying to enter a market which is already deliriously in love with it's competition.
Everyone who likes video games wants the PS2, and will buy the PS2 in preference to anything else. GameCube is relegated second system status in a market where few buy a second system, and then it's most commonly to correct their mistake of overenthusiastically picking up the less popular system (he backs this point up with hard numbers).
The point that it would take a couple of years for Nintendo to sell as many GameCubes as there are PS2s out there is a bit of an aside, an explanation of why the developer support is weak, since the GameCube market is going to be miniscule compared to the PS2 market for some time.
But the way he says it is entertaining.
Re:The Gord knows all (Score:2)
Damn! I bought a GC! And here I thought I liked video games!!
If I return it, can I like video games again? Will I have your respect if I buy a PS2!?
jackass...
Re:The Gord knows all (Score:2)
Re:The Gord knows all (Score:3, Insightful)
Note that it has not yet actually sold one million GameCubes.
Note also that you have a very weak grasp on the difference between hard facts and vague marketing hype.
Flavor? (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong, I'm definatley in the camp with GC being more powerful than the PS2 and will probably get one befoore too long. But the PS2 has quite a broad range of truly great titles - take Devil May Cry, MGS2, Frequency, SSX Tricky (GC also), Grand Theft Auto 3, ICO (amazing adventure puzzle game, light action), GT3, Rayman, Twisted Metal Black, Klonoa 2 (GREAT 2d/3d platformer), Zone Of The Enders, Herdy Gerdy (OK, not out yet but looks to be amazing). I left out a lot of decent games that while not amazing, are at least fun to play.
Granted, there's nothing like Pikimin or Luigi's Castle for the PS2 (unique games like that is a great reason to get a GC). But I have to say there's a lot of great variety out for the PS2 to satisfy just about any taste, even not considering the rather huge PlayStation library you have access to as a bonus.
Re:Flavor? (Score:2)
No, it's like saying you don't like racing games.
TWW
Some interesting info on the GC (Score:2, Interesting)
I have the crazy theory (Score:2)
Just a thought.
Re:I have the crazy theory (Score:2)
I have a DVD player, I have a computer. I want something to play games on - and the only thing that does exactly that on the market (with fun games) is the GameCube.
Volume shipments were much different. (Score:2)
Both of these, of course, pale to the 20 Million PS2 units out there.
Re:Volume shipments were much different. (Score:2)
Did CmdrTaco ever work in a Convenience store? (Score:3, Funny)
:)
Parody. Not a statement of facts. (Score:3, Funny)
Disclaimer: This post is either a parody or a bunch of opinions, whichever the author chooses it to be at any given time. It is a work of pure fiction and as such must not be taken as statements of fact, slander or libel. All persons, places or things mentioned herein are objects of the author's imagination. Any similarities to persons, places or things in the real world are coincidental and unintentional.
There are tons of GameCubes in the stores, but you'll have to kill for an Xbox, eh? Well let me tell you something: Xbox is a Microsoft product, and as such, I believe it sucks. For the uninitiated, I'm a biased, zealous, and most of all, sworn by blood oath Microsoft hater... who cares though? I got 50 Karma! Of course, this is because of some of my better posts, which ironically don't include any anti-Microsoft stuff. Well at least not excessive amounts of anti-Microsoft stuff. And I do admit that one of my computers has Windows 98 on it, but only because:
So where was I? Oh yeah, I was talking about how the Xbox sucks but went off on a big tangent. The Xbox sucks because it's a Microsoft product. Unless it will run Linux and NetBSD, in which case, it's quite possibly an adequate device when used as a cheap computer. Perhaps it could even serve as a good platform for graphics, as a "poor-man's SGI" (phrase shamelessly jacked--Be made that one up back in the days of their "one processor per person is not enough" days when they were still a cool company) of sorts. Anyone know how to cluster these things? (Or, even better, does anybody know how to take an Xbox, GameCube and PS2 and make one big graphics computer out of them? That would be a cool hack. Don't laugh--I know a guy who buys disposable cameras and uses the parts in real systems because it costs far less than buying the parts individually.)
Well, here I done gone off on a tangent again. Anyway, I don't quite think that I want to support Microsoft by purchasing an Xbox. It's bad enough that I sometimes cause some of their code to be executed by allowing my laptop to boot that virus.
Oh yeah, but there was an opposing viewpoint that I wish to include here, just so you folks don't say i'm a biased, zealous, and most of all, sworn by blood oath Microsoft hater, because that's what I am anyway. :-) Someone commented in another story that Microsoft actually loses money on each Xbox, in the hopes of making big bucks from video game sales. So even after everything else I said above, about not wanting to support them, etc., if it's true that they lose money, then I could buy an Xbox to run Linux and NetBSD and just not buy any games for it. Then, I'd actually unsupport them! I mean, hey, I might build a 10,000 Xbox cluster someday!!!
Now let's see, I have to say something that's actually on topic, right? Hmmm, I'm at the Karma cap, so I must be doing something right, right? Well, for anybody who might be thinking of moderating this Offtopic, here's the ontopic stuff: The GameCube looks like a great toy.
This post is Copyright 2001, rice_burners_suck. All rights reserved.
Oh well.
Just the opposite where I work (Score:2)
Now mind you every store in town seems to have plenty of Gamecubes in stock, but if you want an X-Box, you have to kill for it.
Totally the opposite in the Walmart electronics department where I work. Gamecubes are seen for maybe ten minutes at the most on our shelves. I can't remember the last time I sold an Xbox. My theory is that everyone who wanted a CAN$449 console and DVD player already got theirs a year ago.
Ummmmm (Score:2, Funny)
My father declares himself to be "The emperor of california" but it dosen't make that either.
Dude (Score:2)
LS
There is NO Xbox shortage. (Score:3, Insightful)
Or Maybe They're Just Misplaced (Score:3, Interesting)
I think all their crafty marketing tricks are involved in over-advertising the thing, to the degree where there are X-Box banners and fliers everywhere, but nary a gamecube one to be found. They just spent so much money that they saturated the ad space. That's what creates the illusion that they're so hot, walking in to the store and seeing big green X's everywhere will overwhelm most people.
Re:Or Maybe They're Just Misplaced (Score:2)
I'm glad someone mentioned this.
Am I just warped, or am I the only person laughing my ascii off whenever I walk into a store and see that there are no XBoxes, but under all of the XBox banners, posters, stickers, displays, and demo units, there are almost always plenty of Gamecubes?
I have already decided to buy both the XBox and the Gamecube anyway -- but I've not been able to actually GET an XBox. At least Nintendo had no problems getting those Gamecubes out, so I'm not totally out of luck.
I'm not sold that it will work... (Score:2)
Nintendo's Mario franchise goes back to Donkey Kong. They milk this for all it is worth, and it has quite a fan base. We played Mario Kart 64 for months (still do occaisionally). It isn't a particularly amazing game, but the fact that you are playing SMB characters (complete with Stars and Turtle Shells) just makes it a little more enjoyable.
Nintendo has a family of franchises with well known characters.
As a result, Nintendo doesn't NEED to carpet bomb the media. They need to maximize their profits. They aren't subsidizing the hardware, nor do they NEED a huge initial adoption. They'll have a successful holiday season. Realize that the abysmal failure of the N64 was only a failure compared to the NES/SNES dominance. They shipped 30m units over time and made some cash. When the Pokemon craze hit, they rode that all the way to the bank.
Nintendo's MAJOR problem is that they squeezed the Third parties too hard, and they bolted for the PSX instead of the N64. While the N64 has some AMAZING games (great replay factor, Bond, Hang Time, Kart... all playable for years), the companies that were "MADE" selling NES games stayed through the SNES but left to the PSX.
The shame is, I'm mostly interested in Nintendo games. However, because of whatever business decisions Nintendo made, I may pick up a PSOne or PS2 for some games that bolted in this time that my fiancee really wants.
Microsoft has a problem, NOBODY trusts them. If you are a game maker, you have to see the shit that they pull in the PC space. Nintendo's garbage let Sony pull off a coup, they established themselves as the non-game company. As a result, game makers weren't threatened by Sony.
Sega (my brother has owned all their systems since the Master System) has LOTS of great games. Their franchises aren't as good as Nintendo's, but they innovate and create new ones all the time. However, their hardware was NEVER impressive, and they NEVER had third parties like Nintendo. You used to buy a Sega system for their games, now you can get them wherever. I still play some of my Genny games.
The problem with Microsoft is that they have their own games division. They also have shown that they will hide APIs, etc., to help their products over the competition.
If I was a game maker, I might take their subsidies to make games, but I'd be VERY nervous about cozying up too much. I would guess that the independant game makers helping XBox with games are hoping that XBox does well enough that they do well, but not too much that MS EVER has the power that Nintendo did 15 years ago.
Sony was SMART with the PSX. They didn't carpet bomb the airwaves. They let the system get a following. People slowly fell in love with the system. Sony was a new player and played it smart. They courted developers.
Microsoft seems to think that it get bully its way into the market. I'm not sold on that. Sony has a following because the Third Party companies LIKE working with them. They have GREAT game support. Nintendo has a GREAT audiance (including people over 21... most of the people I know want the new Nintendo system). Microsoft would be smart to play this cool and use their DirectX similarities to get games to the market.
If you are launching a game for the PS2 AND PC, there is little reason not to make it a three-way launch for the PS2/PC/Xbox. The Xbox's superior hardware should help it with games on the PS2 AND Xbox.
MS shouldn't be playing for this Xmas, they should be playing for next Xmas. PS2's market lead is HUGE, they need to be careful in playing catchup.
Personally, I think that the market will be a two company market, Sony and Nintendo. As long as Nintendo's franchises remain popular AND they can sell the systems at a profit/break even, there is NO reason for them to be a software only player. Sega's hardware always seemed flimsy and while their games were always fun, they don't have the nostalgia factor that Nintendo has,
The Tickle-me Elmo effect is a LOT easier to do with a doll than a game system that costs $500 with accessories...
Alex
Are you dyslexic? (Score:3, Insightful)
No, the correct acronym is NGC (Nintendo Game Cube).
Re:Are you dyslexic? (Score:3, Informative)
Funny, lots of X-Boxes, no Cubes here... (Score:4, Funny)
Of course it doesn't help that the local EB has blown five (5) X-Box demo kiosks since 2 weeks before release and have finally given up and dismantled the thing. (That's five blown consoles in one store in less then a month!) I know of alot of people that canceled their preorder or decided to go with a Cube because of that.
Someday I'll own a Cube......
why some people buy x-boxes (Score:2)
tuxracer would absolutely rule on one of these...
Very cool (Score:2, Informative)
Found here [nintendo.com].
Stinknuggets (Score:2)
You have to kill for an X Box??? (Score:2)
Of course, who wants to have to experience the green screen of death [hardocp.com] in the middle of a game? The thing doesn't even have a 3 button keyboard with Ctrl-Alt-Del. As described [slashdot.org] on /. of course.
Maybe not most popular ever, but.... (Score:2)
I'm not dissing the XBox just because it's MS. (even though I feel like I should). I'm dissing it because the only reason there is to buy it right now is DoA. And frankly I don't like that game that much.
However the XBox is a computer. A better computer than the one I have anyway. And it's only 300$!! If I could jam linux on that hard drive it would rock. Cheap servers will cool chassis for all! It may be big for a console, but it's small compared to an ATX tower.
I own a GameCube. The reason for that is, well reasons, are Mario, Luigi, Samus Aran, Smash Bros, Donkey Kong, oh yeah LINK/ZELDA woo ha!
Games for GameCube I must have = many
Games for XBox I must have = 0
Maybe Nintendo is lying about GameCube being the most popular console ever, and I wouldn't doubt it. They're probably adding up number from around the world or something. But who cares about that?
Re:Not quite. (Score:2)
Re:Not quite. (Score:2, Redundant)
Or maybe there is something I'm missing?
The Bros. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Xbox isn't out of stock... (Score:2)
Re:Gamecube? I just bought a Dreamcast (thanks to (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm happy with mine. I wonder if Sega will get some sort of incentive to produce or at least translate more DC games from its surge of sales.
Re:Dolby Digital? (Score:2)
Aside from which, some of the things he mentioned are very usable for games from a visual standpoint. HD video output is naturally much better than standard A/V or even S-Video out if you have a HD screen to view it on, since standard NTSC and PAL TVs don't even show standard 640x480 or 800x600 at full quality thanks to their interlacing and weird pixels.
Personally, back when I still had an N64, I had it set up to send the RCA video to a good quality A/V switch so that when I wanted to play multiplayer I'd put it on the TV, but when I wanted to play with myself (err...) I'd press the switch button and send the N64 output to the video input on my ATI card, set the card's input to fullscreen in my OS, and play games on my 21" ColorSync monitor. Much better visual quality than on the TV--more detail, cleaner, crisper, and perfect for a PC gamer who appreciates what a monitor can offer over a TV.