Linux Games WIth Guns 316
ZaMoose writes: "Not to beat on the poor America's Army servers any further, but their sitrep for today featured the following interesting tidbit: "That's not all. We're also working on an in-game browser, linux port, and host of other features. Yes, we've been busy the past week!" (emphasis mine). For those not familiar with AA:Operations, it is a free (as in beer) first person shooter developed under the watchful eye of the US Army. It received mounds of praise at this year's E3 and was released to Windows users July 4th." Well, it says Linux server port, anyhow. And JD writes: "Apex Designs have announced that their GTA-style game Payback is coming to Linux. The port appears to already be fully playable as there is a status report here which includes some early screenshots.
(And their website doesn't require IE. :)"
...and you don't need a supercooled video card! (Score:1, Funny)
Insert "back in my day, we had lines of text and we LIKED IT!"-type ranting here...
Re:...and you don't need a supercooled video card! (Score:2, Funny)
"This is all part of a massive restructuring and revisioning of the US armed forces" said general Kaen to an attentive audience of soldiers, sergeants, and lieutenants.
"Congress has just allocated enough zorkmids to ensure that within 2 years our entire armed forces can be outfitted with blessed grey dragon scale mail and +3 silver sabers. But technological challenges remain. Izchak Inc. and other contractors are still looking for a way to bless bags of holding on an industrial scale."
Military watchers are certain that this new fighting force will be more than ready to defeat all of the forces of evil, including Osama, Sadam, Rodney, and Demogorgan, among many others.
"May the blessings of the RNG be with us all"
And... (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft only had the following statement: "All your 3D graphics libraries are belong to us."
The US Army was not available for comment.
America's Army (Score:1)
but my 3dfx with only 16mb won't run it,
blarg
Re:America's Army (Score:1)
Re:America's Army (Score:4, Funny)
I'm waiting for "Soviet Army." It will probably run in 16 colors on a 486.
Re:America's Army (Score:2)
The author makes a good point that the U.S. expected the same tactics out of Iraq that it saw from countries that paid for bargain-basement military training from the Soviet Union. The author was appearently an invaluable consultant in the Gulf War in correcting misconceptions the U.S. had on Soviet tactics and helped them guess what the Iraqis got for thier training dollar. Do you thnk the Soviets allowed their best training and tactics to be exported? Also, there were two main branches of the Soviet Air Force. One group that did long-range intercepts and one that appearently trained for air-to-air combat and nuclear strikes. The one branch was mustly full of bureacrats' kids looking for cushy jobs that let them drink themselves to sleep every night of the week. They had a reputationfor being sloppy, unprofessional flying missle platforms: take off.. let your ground controller vector you in, launch your missle, then land. It was these people that shot down the Korean airliner to cover up the fact they lied to Moscow about having fixed storm damage to an early-warning radar installation. These people wer also much more easily recruited by the CIA, so most of the U.S. intelligence was about this branch. It turns out that the other branch of the Soviet Air Force was comparable to the U.S.A.F> in terms of discipline and tactics.
Also, the Su-27 uses technologies not seen on us fighters at that time. Super light aluminum-Lithium alloys are expensive, yet the Soviets apopearently spared no expense on teh Su-27. It had a helmet-mounted targting system to backup the normal nose-mounted system. If a pilot could see a target, he could get missle lock, and the thrust vectoring on the missles pretty much allowed the pilot to fire as soon as he got lock. Not having to put the endemy plane in front of you is a huge advantage in a dog fight.
Re:America's Army (Score:1)
Re:America's Army (Score:1)
Re:America's Army (Score:1)
Recruiting Linux users... (Score:1)
Army of One 0.1-3.5.89 (Score:2, Funny)
0.1-3.5.89
"Osama Bill Laden" now has proper beard.
0.1-3.5.88
Changed OS Logos to "Axis of Evil" Flags.
0.1-2.7.34
Changed "Hand" cursor in XBill^H^H^H^H^HArmy of One to M-16 target.
Who says... (Score:3, Interesting)
AA Server Port (Score:2, Informative)
Web site slowdown (Score:1)
<Joke>Imagine a version of Quake for America's Army players</Joke>
Re:Web site slowdown (Score:2)
BTW: The site came up pretty much instantly for me, and I downloaded the game in about 5 minutes (from Nvidia, with swarming).
3d games on linux--Great! (Score:1)
payback game (Score:5, Funny)
I went to that link for "payback" and I laughed my head off when, on the right side of the screen I saw:
[platforms]
Re:payback game (Score:2)
Windows - In development
Why is this funny? It's a game that's been around on the Amiga for a long time.
What IS funny is that it's a clone of Grand Theft Auto, not Grand Theft Auto 3 mind you, but Grand Theft Auto. It's old. I'd be curious to know how many people are actually eagerly awaiting a port of a clone of a game that's long since been outdone by GTA3.
Re:payback game (Score:1)
Re:payback game (Score:2)
So if you have a crap PC that cannot play GTA3, then this game would be a fun addition. As long as the price is reasonable for the featureset/graphics/audio of course. No more than $20.
Remember, the screenshots are from the software renderer, not the hardware renderer which would presumably allow for much more detailed models, textures and graphical "bling!".
Re:payback game (Score:2)
Re:payback game (Score:2)
Syndicate was cool, though. I should dig out my old floppies and my A1200 and relive that experience...
Correction Linux Server port (Score:1)
Sorry will have to wait on wineX support instead.
We're also working on an in-game browser, linux server port,
Re:Correction Linux Server port (Score:2)
Crappy.
Just Wonderful (Score:1, Insightful)
Please, just heap thousand-dollar bills on the ground and burn them. Delete them. Do ANYTHING but spend MY money on a game that is designed to simulate (as realistically as possible) the murder of human beings.
The only moral justification one could possibly come up with for this game is that it diverts funding from the actual murder of human beings.
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:1)
That said, I think the "planned" invasion of Iraq is retarded. But on the whole, a large fighting force is generally a good thing as it allows businesses in our contry to prosper by giving them the security that we aren't going to be all speaking chinese next week.
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:1)
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:1)
Has anyone noticed that the targets are red, not black. Maybe it's just my setup.
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:2)
There are some real evil fuckers out there, and the world would be a whole lot better without them.
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:2)
There are many other (types of) people who are evil & deserve to die, but I just picked one that I thought most sane people would agree with.
Re:Just Wonderful - you're a moron. (Score:2)
Re:Just Wonderful (Score:3, Insightful)
The games are a clever way to romanticize the military in the minds of reasonably intelligent and computer-savvy (god I sound like Jon Katz!) young folks in the hopes of boosting enlistment.
While you may well see it as perverse that 'murder' (warfare) could be viewed as romantic/fantasy by some, I'd have to say that it's been going on for a while now and that it's really nothing new. You could say the same for war movies which you may well see as depicting murderers as heroes. Such is life.
For me, I'd really like to see a military staffed by personnel who are as creative and knowledgable as possible. Games like this are a creative step in the right direction.
tax $$ (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:tax $$ (Score:2)
>A/C to thugs and degenerates.
I'm not really a thug or degenerate, but I play them on the internet.
You wanna pay the cable or the electric bill?
-l
Correction (Score:2, Redundant)
1984... (Score:1)
(Well, maybe I'm just being paranoid, as I've only just read it...)
Who are they trying to recruit? Linux users? (Score:2)
Apparently the army has never been to a Linux convention.
Re:Who are they trying to recruit? Linux users? (Score:2)
Ofcourse. To defend the GPL against certain terrorist companies that try to Take Over The World.
Re:Who are they trying to recruit? Linux users? (Score:5, Interesting)
These geeks were in Ft. Benning (which normally only trains infantry) because Ft. Jackson (whom normally trains these sorts) was booked solid.
Thus, I'd like to say that not only is the Army hiring Slashdot-reading linux-using teenagers, but that they're recruiting them in droves.
And, yes, it -did- look like a Linux convention for the first week or so, but they were all looking and -acting- like soldiers within a couple of months. Even the former three-pack-a-day gamers were partaking in nonsensical pushup competitions, and the platoon was top in the company for fitness scores.
It was a strange transition to see, watching the flabby, pale, quiet Linux kids turn into hardcore rope-climbing, gun-toting freaks.
And in a few months, when those same kids are done training at Ft. Gordon and get shipped out to the front line as communications geeks, I'll be very glad to have them there, while I sit on my once-again flabby, civilian ass and read Slashdot.
Peer-to-peer pioneer kills self (Score:1, Offtopic)
The New York Times [nytimes.com] tells us (after we register for free) that Gnutella developer Gene Kan has committed suicide. [nytimes.com] Let's see, he was young (25) and just over a year ago saw the company he started bought by Sun Microsystems [sun.com]. It would be wrong to jump to conclusions here. It would also be wrong to not start asking questions.
Re:Peer-to-peer pioneer kills self (Score:1)
Re:Peer-to-peer pioneer kills self (Score:1)
Re:Peer-to-peer pioneer kills self (Score:1, Insightful)
You make him out to be a saint, but he wasn't. No one is. He was filled with his demons and they finally overcame him. Think of how to stop this in the future. Don't spend time trying to make excuses for his criminal behavior, it doesn't help anyone.
And to the moderator who modded me troll, thanks.
There's no Linux CLIENT port (Score:5, Informative)
The funny thing is, ZaMoose quoted the website, but cut out that most important word, "linux SERVER port". Here's the real quote.
Hopefully next time timothy will actually visit the web page linked, and make sure that at least the emphasised, bold words correspong to reality.
Re:There's no Linux CLIENT port (Score:1)
Re:There's no Linux CLIENT port (Score:2)
Re:There's no Linux CLIENT port (Score:2)
A linux *server* port: (Score:1, Redundant)
Hmmm, did anyone actually read the article ?
Is says :
That's not all. We're also working on an in-game browser, linux server port, and host of other features.
Good! Americas Army is awesome. (Score:4, Informative)
And if you like CS, you will really like this. This game isn't CS where you can jump and shoot an awp and kill someone, you have to plan, ambush, take aim, act as a team. The levels are awesome, the HQ mission, where you have to invade a camp and rescue a POW, is fantastic. The tunnel level has a very detailed collapsed ends with cars trapped, where you have to take out the terrorists and not let any escape. The mount mckenna mission is nicely detailed, you have 2 teams, honor or loyalty, and must capture and defend 3 points. Surprising how many people think this is quake3, and Die
And they are going to release special missions, (For free!), where you can train in special ops, sharp shooting, navy seals, etc. Im sure each branch of the armed services wants a mission pack for them.
BTW, not sure how Homelan got to host all the servers (Are they they only game hosting service out?) But they seem to on top of it, switching servers around so people can play. Thou 4th of july was a bad time to release, 500,000 people couldn't play, only 10 servers and buggy code. Hopefully a patch will be out soon, oh yea, that's this slashdot topic!
"This was an honest disagreement about accounting procedures..." - President Bush - The art of spin control.
Only one problem with a Linux port... (Score:2, Funny)
the four words that would really make this cool (Score:3, Funny)
No Mac Port... or blood? (Score:1, Flamebait)
Buuuut, I guess us mac users are all a bunch of nerd-hippies who know better then to get brainwashed by the Army's propaganda.
Anyone else find it funny that this game lacks, blood, oil, and structural readjustment programs? Perhaps someone will release a mod that will allow you to cluster bomb innocent people in order to protect corporate interests overseas.
YaFPS for Linux? Again? (Score:2)
C'mon, what is this? The last thing Linux gaming needs is ANOTHER FPS ported.
What about a good 3D RTS Game (like Dark Reign 2, Homeworld, etc...) or some Race/Combat game (like POD, HiOctane or Wipeout)?
Where the heck are some good games to bring a little diversity to quality Linux gaming?
Anyone know an up-to-date RTS comming up for Linux? That would actually be news.
Too bad the game stinks (Score:2)
Now, a Linux Unreal II should be worth waiting for.
-m
Re:Too bad the game stinks (Score:2)
That's a feature, not a bug.
What may turn out to be the most effective feature of this game is that you have to go through training, and pass it, to play the game. It's thus hard to get back into the game if you're kicked out, and so the Military Discipline feature (which puts you in a virtual cell in the U.S. Military Prison at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas) deters bad player behavior.
Re:For gaming, it's gonna be windows (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:A large misconception (Score:5, Insightful)
Since when do courts decide the cause of human action?
Re:A large misconception (Score:1)
Re:A large misconception (Score:5, Insightful)
Am I the only one who sees the irony in this? What kind of subliminal message will people get while playing this game?
"How do I join the terrorist side?"
"You can't, you are always a terrorist"
"But I look like a US Soldier?"
"There is no difference... "
Mod this up. (Score:1)
Re:A large misconception (Score:3, Funny)
Every few minutes the battle halts and everyone has to pray towards Mecca. That's gonna suck bigtime.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Sure, every few minutes the terrorists stop and pray, and the US team, who appear in the game as NFL players, stop for a commercial break.
Re:A large misconception (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:A large misconception (Score:1)
Yeah, FARC and IRA have been busy killing loads of Americans, too. Like 9/11. Oops, Islamic extremists. Ok, Pan Am. Sorry, Islamic extremists again. USS Cole? Muslims. Embassy bombings? Muslims. 1993 WTC bombing? Muslims. 2000 LAX bombing attempt? Muslims. I won't even get the numerous murderous acts committed against Israel, since a surprising number of people seem to feel that is justified.
It may not be PC to say the main terrorist threat against the US comes from Muslims, specifically middle eastern Muslims, but it's the truth. And no, that's not the same thing as saying all Muslims are terrorists. The actions from the people in that region over the last few decades has certainly lent loads to the image that the whole region is nothing but a breeding ground for terrorists.
Re:A large misconception (Score:1)
Ok, assuming that you are correct and the region is indeed a breeding ground for terrorists (I personally think you're wrong, but I'll play along), why do you suppose this is?
Think about it.
Re:A large misconception (Score:3, Insightful)
Ineffectual religious leaders who face being made irrelevant by the onslaught of technology and social progress. They fear basic human rights because it is the specter of equality of the sexes that threatens to unleash the pent up anguish of the long subordinated and denigrated women. They see in America and Israel obvious scapegoats to heap all of their society's ills upon. They fear education because it threatens to undermine their monopoly on wisdom and knowledge. The West glorifies everything that scares them the most.
They keep their subjects as dumb and seething as possible in order to legitimize their power. By giving their subjects a target, they have sown the seeds for terrorism.
Sounds a lot like the USA (Score:2)
Check. Glass ceiling, old boy's network. True, it's not the same scale, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
They see in America and Israel obvious scapegoats to heap all of their society's ills upon.
Check. Plenty of scapegoats. It's the commies. It's the terrorists. Whatever.
They fear education because it threatens to undermine their monopoly on wisdom and knowledge.
Check. How do you explain a 75% aproval rating for the current President? Ignorance and chest beating is how I choose to explain it. It fits with my agenda.
The West glorifies everything that scares them the most.
s/West/terrorist nations/ Check. This seems to fit in well with the whole scapegoat thing. Give a dis-similar group a common enemy, and watch the complaints of normal life (insufficient health care, traffic congestion, poor educational system, etc.) just fade away.
They keep their subjects as dumb and seething as possible in order to legitimize their power. By giving their subjects a target, they have sown the seeds for terrorism.
Not all of us are dumb and/or seething. Enough are that it doesn't seem to matter.
Yeah. It's flamebait. Maybe even tinfoil hat propoganda. It's not intentional, just seemingly unavoidable. Moderate as you see fit.
I smell a jingo! (Score:2, Insightful)
Note that I am a born and bread USA citizen. I am not Muslim, nor do my ancestors come from the Middle East... let me try to open your eyes... (note the list below is by no means exhaustive, complete, or detailed)
What about all those Muslims who had their mosques fire bombed? What about all those who looked like they might be from the ME, the ones who were killed, harrassed, etc... by Americans?
What about all of the Kurds and Iranians who were killed by the USA using Iraq as a proxy? Giving killing machines and technology and giving them the go-ahead-and-kill-them-iranians is surely a morally questionable act.
What about the attacks on Iraq, which killed thousands of innocent civilians? Oops, American extremists.
Ok, that Iranian civilian passenger (747 sized btw) airplane that was shotdown by the USA? Sorry, American extremists again.
How about the bombing of Afganistan, which killed hundreds of innocent civilians and lead to the starvation of hundreds more? Need I remind you, it was the work of the good ol US of A!
What about the USA's use of tried and true imperialism in the middle east? Its all about oil when it comes to the USA and the ME. Damn their holy land! Damn their Mecca! WE NEED OUR OIL!
I won't even get into the numerous murderous acts committed by the USA using Israel as a proxy against Palestine, since a surprising number of people seem to feel that is justified. Wait, those aren't USA supplied war machines? Thats not USA nuke technology? That wasn't Prez Dubya calling Sharon a man of peace, while at the same time calling Arafat a corrupt leader? Do a little search on "Sharon war crimes" in google. Not necessarily the kind of guy that I would call a "man of peace".
It may not be PC to say that the main terrorist threat against the Muslim world in the Middle East comes from the USA, specifically jingoists like yourself, who are too small minded and selfish to realize that their shit stinks too. Your justifications for killing are the same justifications that your "enemy" uses. Until people begin to realize that such reasoning is flawed, the violence will never end.
What surprises me is how people like you can't see the forest for the trees.
A wise man once said, "Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone". I hope you can try to think outside of what the TV has told you. The way you think is biased towards a particular political agenda. The way you think contributes to the furthering of violence in this world. Has the USA sinned against the Muslim nations of the middle east? Most definitely! So why are we so quick to throw stones?
"Because we have a right to defend ourselves", you say, in justification of waging war. "Because we have a right to defend ourselves", the Muslim extremists say, in justification of waging war against the USA. And the circle goes round and round till we all fall down.
Re:I smell a jingo! (Score:5, Insightful)
Then would you say that Native Americans would be justified in sending suicide bombers to your house?
What about all of the Kurds and Iranians who were killed by the USA using Iraq as a proxy? Giving killing machines and technology and giving them the go-ahead-and-kill-them-iranians is surely a morally questionable act.
What about the attacks on Iraq, which killed thousands of innocent civilians? Oops, American extremists.
Ok, that Iranian civilian passenger (747 sized btw) airplane that was shotdown by the USA? Sorry, American extremists again.
So what you're basically trying to say is that the deliberate strike on civilians on 9/11 was a military action fully justified by past sins of the US govt?
What about all those Muslims who had their mosques fire bombed?
So any unjust act is an excuse to strap a bomb to yourself and take out a few kids?
That wasn't Prez Dubya calling Sharon a man of peace, while at the same time calling Arafat a corrupt leader? Do a little search on "Sharon war crimes" in google. Not necessarily the kind of guy that I would call a "man of peace".
There is plenty of blood on hands on both sides. There is a distinct difference, though. If Israeli soldiers kill an unarmed kid, there will be a big outcry from within Israel. Yet there is routine killing of kids by Arabs and only deafening silence from the Arab community. BTW, Arafat is no angel himself.
Your justifications for killing are the same justifications that your "enemy" uses.
You know why Bin Laden hates the US? Because the infidels dared to set foot on the holy land. You know why he hates the Saudi Government, because they let the infidels do it. And still you equate his motives with the US's.
So why are we so quick to throw stones?
Ummm...hello? Remember 9/11?
Muslim extremists say, in justification of waging war against the USA.
No, wars are fought by militaries. They are engaging in a terror campaign to try and demoralize the public.
Was Noam Chomsky one of the programmers? (Score:2)
Symmetrical warfare (Score:2)
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Re:A large misconception (Score:1)
Re:A large misconception (Score:3, Insightful)
Who knows what type of hidden messages they're putting on the TV? Or on the radio? Or in the clouds? (they have complete control over the weather, you know.)
There's no solid evidence of any effective hidden messages. If you can survive the propoganda of school and TV and movies and radio and billboards, I'm sure you can survive the propaganda of America's Army.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
I never said propoganda didn't work. I said hidden messages didn't work.
why would the millitary invest so much money in developing a game if they didn't anticipate a return?
Why do you treat that as evil, though? Yes, they expect a return. That doesn't mean that they're using nefarious mind control tricks; from what I've played, it looks like a large part is trying to calm people's fears about boot camp. You can choose how or whether it effects you.
Re:A large misconception (Score:1)
The theory behind this game is that the cost/benefit ratio will be much higher than traditional advertising. That is, it costs X dollars to recruit one soldier from commercials, and something less than X per recruit from this video game. All else being equal, this would in fact save American's tax money.
The argument is whether or not this provides more cost effective than traditional "propaganda." If it is, your concern is moot. If not, I'll agree with you.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Is that so bad? I mean really - the game is cool in case you haven't played it. Nice and fun. I would MUCH rather have the army spending money on something like this than buying a SINGLE 30-second ad during the superbowl. Judging by the demand it also seems to be a much greater success than any previous army type propoganda.
Besides which having the gov't develop cool computer games is the last thing we want to discourage.
Re:A large misconception (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, the game cost taxpayer money
The Army is trying to portray itself as a professional organization, where a soldier has many educational opportunities and other benefits that most of them would not have otherwise. They're trying to change the typical perception from "People who join the Army out of high school are losers, and had no choice." to "People who choose the Army are doing their country a great service and are fighting for our rights." When the shit hits the fan, the soldiers are the ones who pay the price
In the grand scheme of things, the game cost almost nothing. Ask a Vietnam Vet sometime of the reception they got when they came home. I guarantee it wasn't the patriotic flag waving you see today. (Everyone's a couch patriot). It's PR ploy, that's for sure
One day, I was walking in a freaking toy store, and there was an action figure "Infantry Platoon Leader". I looked at it with some friends, and we were like "Holy shit, we're an action figure!". This game is the same thing --- an action figure for gamers, that's all it is
Think of the costs of this game as the fee for living in a free country. Now, get off your pedestal and enjoy it like everyone else, it's only a game.
Re:A large misconception (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
1) I am not a US citizen... I never paid for this game. Thus I do consider it free.
2) It was developed to aid the US forces in tactical learning... it is a cheap superior teaching aid. They only decided to give a bit back to the people who funded it!
3) It is a propoganda aid for poor silly countries like mine to make us think that the US may not be so bad after all...
Tax Dollars (Score:2)
Nope. Your tax dollars. My taxes are in Euros.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Not for those of us who aren't USian as has already been pointed out
Besides, I'd rather see as much military cash as possible being spent on computer games if the alternatives are to spend it on bombs and bullets.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Ahhh, and the fact that you spell Microsoft with a dollar sign tells us that you're certainly a level-headed gent, one not likely infected with paranoia. I know I trust your instincts.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
In order to educate the American public about the U.S. Army and its career opportunities, high-tech environment, values, and teamwork, the U.S. Army is releasing the America's Army PC game; two game titles that communicate with each other. Recognizing that computer games and the Internet are great mediums for educating while entertaining, the U.S. Army has produced an exciting game in order to allow the public to virtually experience and learn about the U.S. Army.
They see it as education, you see it as propaganda, but either way, they have been very truthful about what they want to accomplish with this game. As to hidden messages, etc., maybe you should actually PLAY THE GAME before you start talking about things that you obviously don't have a clue about.
Re:A large misconception (Score:2)
Ever heard of plausible deniability? Ever heard of hiding a needle in a haystack? People snoop around in game binaries (for reverse engineering, for one) all the time, and anything that comes up will be immediately connected to the US government. Stick it in Windows, and you have it on a billion desktops, and it's very hard to definitively paste it on anyone.
Re:The significance of this (Score:1)
Re:what will happen... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Ever since 9/11, every news outlet has bent over backwards to avoid casting the military in a bad light. There was the small furor over "could this have been prevented?", but hardly a peep of criticism over what's going on has leaked out of the major news outlets. Nope, we can plan to invade Iraq and whatnot without any questions.
Everyone knows this game is a blatant piece of propaganda. Not that this makes it a bad thing (I liken it to "Black Hawk Down" in a way), but the fact that it comes straight out of the military means that it'll be dodged in favor of Doom 3 or GTA 3 or the like (most likely the latter, I'd guess).
The news media is so consolidated and conservative, there's no way they'd risk offending viewers or advertisers (the Army spends a lot on ads every year) when there are plenty of other easy targets should another school shooting spree occur. What, with the Internet and pornography and movies and music and other video games and drugs and parents and peer preassure aren't there enough things to blame for some kid's behavior?
Re:what will happen... (Score:2)
Get your news from the BBC [bbc.co.uk]. It's not perfect, but it's the best news service there is and since they don't have advertising they are not biased. And believe it or not they actually have a legal mandate from the Queen of England to be completely neutral and unbiased on all subjects! Those crazy Brits...
Re:what will happen... (Score:2)
They are Tony's bitch.
Depends on what side of the political spectrum you're on. Labour politicians have complained that the BBC is against them. The good thing about the BBC is that it is reasonably well protected from political interference -- if it wasn't I'm sure Thatcher would have shut it down or sold it.
Re:what will happen... (veering wildly off topic) (Score:4, Interesting)
The missions are set up so that you're either attacking or defending a base, and your team is always the Americans, and the other team always looks like terrorists. This creates an interesting unstated message to the game: American troops are exactly the same and have the same objectives as terrorists. I understand why the army doesn't want to encourage people roll-playing the axis of evil, but I'm not sure if this is the subtext they want to create either.
Of course it is a realistic portrayal of the way asymetrical warfare works. Everyone thinks they are fighting to defend freedom.
Re:what will happen... (veering wildly off topic) (Score:2, Insightful)
Um, yes that's the message in the game, but that's also life in the military. What do you think happens in war? Both sides are fighting to win, and there's one of two things that could happen. Either you're attacking or defending. We're in Afghanistan and granted few of the opposing forces are attacking us so we are on the total offense. Think about what would happen if they got a large force and started coming after our bases. Wouldn't we have to defend? Yes. In war there are not definite lines drawn on who does what. Both sides are going to be doing the same thing: eliminate the other side (or make them take enough casualties that they give up) and keep your side from being eliminated. That's war. What would you have us do? Not invade? Or not defend our bases when we are attacked? That kind of defeats the purpose of war now doesn't it?
Re:Nazis as freedom fighters (Score:2)
Re:Hmmm (Score:1)
Re:We need an anti-terrorist FPS (Score:1)
Re:We need an anti-terrorist FPS (Score:5, Insightful)
As for your statement that you're a non-racist, you could have fooled me. First you complain that America is multi-racial (your neighbour is from india and your wife from Africa), then say there is no such thing as a "pure" American. Unlike Greece, being American doesn't describe a single genetic or even an ethnic background. Being an American means that you live here and are a contributing member of society. You don't even have to be born here. I doubt that anyone where you were from would call me a Greek if I moved there regardless of how long I lived there or how well I spoke the language. I assume that by describing yourself as a non-racist you're implying that I am one. Where you get that idea I just can't figure out. You seem to be able to write english well enough, can you read it as well?
As for your ideas about American history, you really need some schooling. The United States is currently the oldest continuous government in the world. There are older nations to be sure, but none of the governments that were in power in 1788 are still around today in the same form they were then. Our system has not changed. That kind of stability, especially when you consider the unparalleled expansion and growth we've enjoyed, says that we are good at solving our own problems. Youth violence is a figment of the media's imagination. We didn't "invade" Vietnam, we were invited by the south Vietnamese government. We didn't even invade north Vietnam. We did kill over a million NVA and VC troops (too few if you ask me), but we did so in the process of attempting to preserve south Vietnam's soverignty, hardly an invasion. As for our reaons for doing so, they were a bit deeper than a desire to be "macho." Our war in Vietnam was a war by proxy with the Soviet Union, much like the recent conflict in the balkans was a war by proxy between Greece and Turkey. A war which, by the way, we had to step in and put a stop to because the "european community" couldn't seem to do the job itself. I'm not sure what your description of the US as a "bastard nation" is supposed to mean exactly. Bastard means illegitimate, and no government is more legitimate than ours, at least if you subscribe to the ideas of Thomas Jefferson or John Locke.
Just so you know, what we're doing now is not called playing "good cop." We're done doing that because its been made abundantly clear to us that it doesn't work. Trying to make everyone like us and feel all warm and fuzzy about the US is what led to the WTC and pentagon being bombed (a plane loaded with fuel IS a bomb) So instead we're now playing BAD COP. If you want to understand the nature of our current foreign policy, read this book [the-prince...avelli.com] and all will be clear. You might not like the United States, but then you're in no position to act on your dislike beyong harassing tourists. This means that your opinion, like that of europe in general when it comes to the US and what we do internationally, is essentially irrelevant. If you REALLY hate us so much, I suggest that you start a petition to have Greece withdraw from NATO and cease all trade with US based companies. Or you could take the easy way and just move to Cuba. That is what life is like where the US doesn't extend its power.
Oldest form of government (Score:2)
As for the rest, the opinion of the rest of the world seems pretty much to be that if the US wants to take sides and beat the crap out of one side in some piss-poor third world conflict then nobody is going to stop them, but it still doesn't make the action moral. Politically convenient and domestically popular, for sure, but morality's a tricky thing when you're slaughtering natives by the mass-grave load.
Re:We need an anti-terrorist FPS (Score:2)
You make it sound like the Americans acted alone. They acted in concert with a host of other nations. The game isn't called axis & allies for nothing. The British also had something to do with Mussolini and Hitler. Americans are more responsible for nuking the hell out of millions of Japanese civilians.
Being an American means that you live here and are a contributing member of society.[chuckle] Tell that to the INS. I am both of these things, but not an American ;)
Same with most countries. But have you seen this process in action? It's non-trivial to say the least.
Saved for posterity:As for your statement that you're a non-racist, you could have fooled me.
I see....
trying to make everyone like us and feel all warm and fuzzy about the US is what led to the WTC and pentagon being bombedThat was a really tragic thing that happened that day. But do you know why Osama Bin Laden particularly despises the US? It has more to do with American interests in Saudi Arabia. (Don't get me wrong, Osama Bin Laden is responsible for some truly heinous acts)
read this bookI've never read this book, but isn't that Machiavelli's book on how to maintain your power? Rule with an iron fist, be foul while seeming fair and that whole lot? You really meant to quote this?
FYI, I am a non-american, temporarily living in the US. As such, I get to experience the American propoganda machine first-hand. You may not realize this, but american media is completely skewed towards US interests. (If you are really interested, I know of a few interesting examples of this)
Have you ever been to Manhattan? People there sometimes act like they're the center of the world. American seem to sometimes forget that the rest of the world exists too.
I read an article once, that 9-11 shocked a lot of Americans because, "they were surprised and shocked to realize that the rest of the world does not view them as they view themselves."
To fill in the blanks, it is a common perception that Americans are ignorant trigger-happy self-important bullies.
Re:We need an anti-terrorist FPS (Score:2)
I'm not really sure how to respond to your statement that we nuked "millions" of Japaneese. First of all the combined death rate for both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs was less than half a million people by 1950. Our immediate kill rate was about half that. We fire bombed Tokyo in March of '45 with conventional explosives and killed over 100,000 people and injured over a million. We did far worse to the Germans during the strategic bombing campaign of Europe. Second of all I can't figure out why you have a problem with us bombing them in the first place. Would you rather we literally did kill millions of Japaneese with bombs and grenades during a land invasion? It is hard to estimate exactly what that death toll would have been if we hadn't used our bombs. Japan had about 2 million troops and ten million civillians who were primed to fight to the death. The founder of Sony said that he was glad we nuked Japan because he and all of his friends were set to be the first line of defense in the upcoming land invasion. Those nukes saved millions of lives.
As for Vietnam, if we'd fought the war to win instead of fighting to play politics we just might have won. Fighting to win means defeating the enemy and dead men are by definition defeated. I'd have made the same statement had the war been with the Russians instead.
I don't particularly care why Osama Bin Laden hates us. He is not in charge of Saudia Arabia. If he doesn't like the fact that we are there then perhaps he should have worked to pursuade his own government to kick us out.
In many ways New York is the center of the world. In just about every enterprise or affair that is of an international nature, New York is a major hub of activity if not the center ring. Its no coincidence that New York is where the UN is. I have been to Manhattan. Its been said that the curse of New Yorkers is that they can quite literally go through their entire lives and never meet anyone who thinks differently than they do. Back when Nixon defeated McGovern in '72 by winning 49 out of the 50 states, people in Manhattan were stunned because, as one movie critic put it, "I don't know anyone who voted for him!" Manhattan is not the United States as a whole however. Most of the country views New York and its cross continent cousin LA with a mixture of amimosity and amusement. We can't figure out whether to hate them or just laught at them.
You really should read The Prince. Its usefullness is in that it teaches one how to best deal with those who cannot be reasoned with. Fear and power are the only language that some people and some cultures understand. Trying to sit down and work out your difference with barbarians is a collossal waste of time. Far better to beat the shit out of them and leave them living in abject horror of you. The truth about America is that we are strongly isolationist. We're not particularly interested or eager to go out and meddle around in the affiars of other countries. The general consensus is that idiots in other places can be as stupid as they want, as long as it doesn't cause problems for us it doesn't matter. We are slow to anger, but once we are enraged we are easily the most deadly of all adversaries. Al Queda and the middle east in general is about to learn the same lesson that the Japaneese learned, we are not soft, we are not cowards, and we will not stop until our enemies are defeated or dead.
I am sorry you're having problems with the INS. You need to understand however that the purpose of the INS is to ensure that yahoo's and other undesirables don't move here. Many european nations have policies of open immigration and from what I understand its becoming a real problem. People come there from the 3rd world and live off welfare created from the socialism that europe is drowning in. We don't want lazy good for nothings here. We want people who are willing and eager to work, people who are talented and will contribute to our gene pool instead of pissing in it. Our immigration policies make it difficult to come here for the simple reason that if someone is willing to apply the effort necessary to overcome that difficulty then they are the kind of person we want here. I personally believe we should do away with our current policy of limiting immigration based on country of origin and instead base it upon ability and and/or educational achievement. We should encourage the best and brightest to move here instead of telling the 101st person from Zimbabwe, who happens to be a Magna Cum Laude honor's graduate, that he or she can't move here till next year because of the 100 that were in line in front of them.
As for the idea that American's are ignorant, we have more college graduates than anywhere else in the world and our universities are the best in the world. Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech, Princeton, Brown, Stanford, University of Chicago, these are all in the US. That isn't to say that ALL outstanding universities are here, after all there are places like Oxford and Cambridge. Its just that in no other place is are there so many outstanding universities. Any perception of American's as ignorant is evidence of ignorance itself. Even so, itt's hard not to feel self important when your nation leads the world in just about anything and everything you can think of that ammounts to a hill of beans. Mostly however we feel not so much self-important as confused as to why so much of the rest of the world just doesn't have its act together. War, famine, massive inflation and high unemployment, we don't have those problems here because we have our act together. We're not being drowned by marxist bullshit in the guise of socialism. The United States has been around for a little over two hundred years. We've achieved more in that time than anyone. We are a nation of immigrants, of peoples who came here from every place and chose to work together to build a nation and a future for their childen and their children's children. The fact that we have been so successful should say something to the world.
Lee
Re:Killing people is as American as apple pie. (Score:2, Insightful)
To quote Ahhonld, "Yes, but they were all bad."
Seriously though, all these complaints calling this a "murder-simulation" seem to be making one serious error. They don't take into account that some people are just evil and should be killed.
Sorry to bust your bubble, but take off the rose colored glasses and look around. The world is not this magical place were everyone is really good inside and they just can't help themselves from blowing up inncoent people because of thier circumstances.