UT2003 LiveCD 313
ztc writes "Gentoo has added a Unreal Tournament 2003 demo to a version of their Linux-based LiveCD. It has up-to-date nvidia graphics drivers, sound drivers, network drivers, etc. on the CD ready-to-play. LiveCDs have always been a great way to sway potential Linux-converts, but this should really impress them! You can download the iso here." A sneaky way to promote Gentoo. I like it.
WOW! (Score:5, Funny)
LiveCDs have always been a great way to sway potential Linux-converts, but this should really impress them!
Zealot: "And look at this!! You plug in the CD, and it runs Unreal Tournament!!"
Normal Person: "But... my Windows already does that."
Zealot: "But you don't understand! It's better because it's Linux!!"
Normal Person: "But it looks the same to me... ?"
Zealot: "Well, yeah, but that's the point! It looks the same, but it's on Linux!!"
Normal Person: "Er.. OK. Show me The Sims next!"
Zealot: "Give me a few hours to get Quake working..."
Re:WOW! (Score:2, Informative)
Sure!! Right here. [transgaming.com]
Re:WOW! (Score:2)
nwn is almost here [bioware.com]
as is WCIII [transgaming.com]
Re:WOW! (Score:2, Insightful)
Go Gentoo!
(Offtopic: I have been able to completely convert my laptop to a Linux only box thanks to Mandrake 8.2/Ximian Gnome. I use it primarily for development, and I dont think I'll ever need to boot windows on this machine again.)
---
Jedimom.com [jedimom.com], ever been in a turkish prison?
Re:WOW! (Score:5, Interesting)
I remember a couple of years ago, my former office mate was really getting into Linux. He got Samba working and was reaaaally happy about that. Today I understand why Samba's cool, but back then his demo didn't impress me.
Coworker: "Go to my Linux box under Network Neighborhood."
Me: "Ok"
Coworker: "See that directory there?"
Me: "You mean the folder called 'Public'?"
Coworker: "yeah!!!"
Me: "okay.. I'm in there."
Coworker: "YES!! I got Samba working!! Isn't that great?"
Me: "Umm.. you spent all of yesterday and today on that?"
Coworker: "Yeah! It was hard!" (if memory serves, he had a bit of trouble getting it to work on our network, we had some strange issues with it before he started messing with Samba. This was a startup company so the computers were basically band-aided together with whatever MS thought we needed...)
Me: "You realize that a sane person could recreate that trick on Windows by right clicking here, then clicking this checkbox here, then hitting apply, right?" (I was a bit of a smeghead then, still am today.)
After that day, a new policy was created that banned the use of the F-word above a certain number of decibals.
Piece of advice to Linux Zealots out there: Don't brag about features of Linux designed to keep up with Windows. To the uninformed, it makes Linux sound like an un-evolved OS.
Re:WOW! (Score:1)
Re:WOW! (Score:2)
The reason I said Linux was 'playing catch up' was because the reason Linux can read/write NTFS and FAT is because Windows is the dominant factor in most networks. (usually on the client side)
I don't intend to say that NTFS is superior or anything like that, I'm just saying that Linux has to wrap itself around the Windows world to get adopted.
When MS just has a few mouseclicks to make a network share work, and Linux has to be bent over backwards (at the time, it's not as true today) in order to work with Windows, then the perception is that Linux is trying to catch up with Windows.
The point I was making is that you're not going to impress a Windows user with a Linux advancement if the perception (technical merits wouldn't matter to the ill-informed) is that Windows is already doing it.
I'm a Windows guy, in case that's not blatantly obvious. When there's an announcement like "The new kernel supports USB!!!!" , my response is "Wow, it's about time. Soon they'll support light-pens too." If, instead, the article was like "USB has been implemented in Linux, plus there are default generic drivers that'll drive most mice and printers", then 'wow', it's cool.
I tried to make my point clearer, but I'm too tired to know if I succeeded. heh.
Re:WOW! (Score:3, Insightful)
Surely the game distributers would be on the losing end of a lawsuit.
Re:WOW! (Score:2, Insightful)
Is that a point worth bragging about?
Re:WOW! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:WOW! (Score:2)
Re:WOW! QWZX (Score:1, Funny)
Hint to the marketing department... (Score:2)
Even a link to a site with screen shots would be a plan.
Re:Hint to the moron poster... (Score:2)
The way it works (Score:1, Funny)
2. ???
3. Profit!
Okay, this is the 10000000th time someone posts that.
slashdot just posted a direct link to an iso (Score:4, Funny)
UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe a coffee maker built into my PC [pimprig.com] to keep me awake for days while playing.
Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me (Score:1)
Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me (Score:2)
Now show me Warcraft 3.
You start bugging me. Posting essentially the same at two places.
Warcraft 3 screenshot [mediasvar.se]
Do you need a video too? Now, shut up.
How does the FPS compare to Windows?? (Score:2)
Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? (Score:2)
I'm running with default everything. I may get a chance to actually play with it tonight (g/f was over the night I installed, and although a geek, some things take precedence over computers ;)
Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? (Score:2)
Oh well, I gotta upgrade for doom3 anyway.
Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? (Score:2)
Their "ragdoll" system is actually performing *both* halves of the IK solution in real-time. Prior to this, games (including Quake 3 and RTCW) had pre-animated poses and only used skeletal animation to interpolate between keyframes. See the dead bodies slumped against the wall or draped over a balustrade? In RTCW, they would be sticking *through* the wall or lying flat on top of the rail. Not very realistic. Now you see the difference?
UT2003 doesn't even take it as far as it can go - they only do full IK on dead bodies. They're still using traditional animation on the "living" models. Once they start doing that, you'll need some *hefty* CPU power to calculate all the animation. But it will be *so* pretty...
UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:3, Informative)
Under linux I get very choppy sound and an almost-kinda-sorta-playable slideshow after setting all the options to their min (ok I left the res at 800x600
While w2k gives me a reasonably playable game
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:1)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2, Informative)
When I bought my GeForce4 card and ran tux racer it was choppy and unplayable, I downloaded the drivers from nVidia, and now I can play UR2003, and the graphics are smooth as silk!
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
I am using the brand spanking new 1.0-3123 NVIDIA drivers
If it helps my complete specs are:
Celeron333a - ie the one WITH a cache and the 'blazing' 66mhz fsb
440bx based mobo which 192mb of pc66 sdram - hey its a celeron and it goes nuts if I OC the fsb AT ALL!
7200rpm 40gig drive for linux
7200rpm 30gig drive for w2k - fat32 partition for easier interoperability
SoundBlaster pci128 - aka es1370 based sound card.
DEC de4x5 based nic
and to top things of an ISA scsi card (please dont laugh out loud) to connect my scanner.
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:1)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
I do get similar SPECViewperf numbers b/w the two partitions. So maybe this is just a bad intereaction w/ my system and the beta level demo.
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:3, Insightful)
It's reallly ver simple. The OpenGL UT2003 drivers are pretty much unoptimized at this point. Remember, the main renderer engine for UT is D3D which means that the game will run faster in D3D mode. Using the OpenGL engine under Windows will probably yield the same crappy result. But then again a dual Celeron 333 is really not up to speed and doesn't even come close to the minimum advertised requirements for UT2003 (At least a PIII 700, etc..). Upgrade!
-adnans
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:1)
Does it come with the nvidia drivers? I'm just asking.
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:1)
Click through the selections, download the kernel driver and the GLX driver. RTFM (Even geeks have to do this, because it is not the usual
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
I have a P-III 850 dual proc system with a crappy old Geforce2 and it screams. While it sucked horribly at work in the P4-1.7 with some ATI card. I'm guessing the ATI card is half the problem with the win side... but It absolutely screamed at 1024x768 on my Linux box (and it only used one of the processors!)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2, Informative)
Im sure your doing something wrong.
try these commands
hdparm -t
hdparm -d1 -c1 -X69
do cat
make sure AGPGART is disabled and its running NVIDIA for the driver.
try enabling SBA and FW, the drivers disable them by default.
Can your board suppport AGP 4x? try turning that on in the drivers also.
You are probably doing something seriously wrong. Linux is faster than windows, and you should get better FPS in linux.
good luck and Next time dont post something like that with out trying everything.
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
Also, I think searching the 'net, finding the right hdparam command to run to make your system run fast, and adding that command to the correct text configuration file so it loads at bootup and downloading and installing a driver (ohh... click "open" after the download) are on completely different PLANETS of difficulty for the typical user.
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions (Score:2)
That's what we like to call Mesa software rendering.
You may want to actually install the NVidia accelerated drivers before you go to publish your results. ;)
Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, I don't know exactly what the LiveCD does, but I will say that if you're trying to impress them with the game, then I'm not sure that the Linux demo is going to be that impressive to Windows people. If I were a Windows-only user, I'd ask them what the big deal was, since I could play it on my Windows machine already. And I'd point out that, despite the fact that NVIDIA cards are pretty widespread, the demo on Windows supports a wider range of cards, including the lowly 3dfx Voodoo3. And that it doesn't require rebooting the machine.
If this were a Linux-only game that supported a wide range of hardware configurations and showed off graphical splendor that wasn't generally available on Windows, then that'd be impressive to lots of people. As much as my geeky side can be impressed by the idea of putting together a CD like this, I just don't see Windows people giving a hoot.
FWIW, I'm not a Windows user. I only use Linux at work and at home. Heck, I even wrote an article [linuxgames.com] on the Linux demo and how it came to be. But most Windows users are still puzzled about why a Linux port even exists. They're certainly not going to want you rebooting their machine just so you can boot up Linux and play it from a CD.
Reasons for the CD... (Score:4, Insightful)
The games.
Now we've got two or three big games being released for the Linux platforms. (UT 2003, NWN(when it's done?), Quake 3(I know released heap long time ago, but it's still a big game) Proof that Linux can run major market games. May help sway some people.
The future
What *I* would like to see is games released in this Live CD fashion. So that you don't have to worry about getting the latet drivers. It almost turns any computer into a gaming console. You just put in the CD, reboot, and play. Don't have to worry about clearing out hard drive space or buying a new hard drive so you have enough space. You don't have to worry about having the drivers that work with the game. It's all bundled up in the UT OS I don't know how it was for some people, but it was a PAIN trying to get Quake and Quake2 installed and running under Linux for me.
Heck you and some friends could burn off these CD's and head to your local internet cafe or Best Buy and play some UT over the net...hehehehe
Re:Reasons for the CD... (Score:2)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=38977&c id=4169301
Re:Reasons for the CD... (Score:2)
What linux needs is easy installability, easy maintainability and a good looking desktop. It's got everything else.
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:5, Insightful)
However, this can be the coup-de-grace for the people who are merely curious about Linux, even more so to those who are considering a switch. Observe:
It's a marketing tool. UT2003 is just a way to draw the bees to the honey. Besides, it'd be cool to carry around your UT2003 environment wherever you go...
Soko
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:1)
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
It's interesting how virtually all Linux users feel the need to defend themselves against their peers by either condemning Windows or distancing themselves from it (as was the case in this post) by putting a qualifying statement at the start or end of a message when that message might potentially be misconstrued as advocating some aspect of Microsoft Windows.
Slashdot needs to add checkboxes for posters to simply this process. "Check one or more of the following."
"Include random Windows bash."
"Make a funny random joke putting down Bill Gates."
"Include random glorification message about Linux."
"Include a statement so readers know beyond the shadow of any doubt I use Linux *most of the time.*"
"Make up a funny acronym for MCSE."
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
Among the technical crowd the Gnu/Linux paradigm vs. the Windows+extend office paradigm for computing is deeply controversial. If one wants to discuss any minor issue they need to preface their remarks to alert their audience that they are trying to address a minor issue and not the deep issues which strain the community.
You see the same behavior from almost any minority group which alienated from some societal trend on any issue. While I have no personal experience on this issue I bet if you went to slashsoccor any positive comment about football or basketball would need a similar disclaimer.
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
You're saying you need to reboot with linux, but you dont need to reboot with windows??
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? (Score:2)
Perhaps update and see if that fixes it. (It was this patch announcement that my comment was based upon.)
Patch available at www.unrealtournament2003.com (among other places).
cool idea, unless (Score:1)
Re:cool idea, unless (Score:2)
XFree86 does support [xfree86.org] your Radeon 7500 and 8500, anything more recent you're on your own ! ATI doesn't offer [ati.com] any better drivers, just "support" by the way of links (www.linux.org ... yeah riight, like that's gonna solve my problem).
Re:cool idea, unless (Score:2)
It's always fun to get the latest whizbang hardware...until you find out the manufacturer doesn't give a rat's ass about linux. Thank god for Nvidia, even if they *are* closed-source drivers.
Dang, keep this quiet! (Score:2)
Linux Games (Score:2)
Oh, and yes I will be downloading the demo - phorm
Re:Linux Games (Score:2)
The people are trying to make money off their software sales, and to do that, you have to sell to the largest market. Right now, that largest market is windows.
Yes, it would be great to see a game come out *nix first. But, if it was my company, I'd release it to windows first, since that is where the largest market share is.
Re:Linux Games (Score:2)
Re:Linux Games (Score:2)
something else (Score:2)
Re:Linux Games (Score:2)
However, both differences are fairly marginal, so I doubt they'll get people changing their OS just for that.
Re:Linux Games (Score:2)
Are you sure your PC has enough cooling? I had severe stability problems with my Athlon Linux system whenever I ran 3d games on my GeForce4MX, but finally I saw an error message that google indicated was linked to hardware problems, and the light went on.
One can of compressed air and some moist paper towels later, I had cleaned a bunch of dust out of the CPU's heat sink and had improved airflow through the case tremendously, and boom, all my stability problems went away.
Of course, using the latest NVidia drivers and specifying mem=nopentium in my /etc/grub.conf (or /etc/lilo.conf) file to work around the Linux kernel's problem with AGP on Athlon helped too, but the big thing was cleaning my case.
Gentoo Newbie (Score:2, Insightful)
It's a fantastic distro for those of you with a pretty strong system, I highly reccommend it.
Cool--They make a PPC Linux (Score:2)
So, that brings the Linux for PowerPC distros to the following, and I bet I'll forget one:
-SUSE
-Debian
-RT Linux
-Mandrake
-Linux PPC
-Yellow Dog Linux
-Gentoo Linux
-MkLinux
-HA Linux
I wonder if the UT2003 code is targeted to x86 or whether it cares. I would presume it does care a lot. A "Windtunnel" G4 has all the necessary specs, otherwise.
Question (Score:2, Informative)
Answer (Score:5, Informative)
FTP mirrors (Score:5, Informative)
Re:FTP mirrors (Score:3, Informative)
Re:FTP mirrors (Score:2)
I salute you. I also am thinking about grabbing my laptop and heading over to torgerson to get it locally....
~Will
Nothing new... (Score:3, Funny)
About The LiveCD (Score:1)
Oh, and with very small modifications you can make a cluster out of these cds. Neato, eh?
Re:About The LiveCD (Score:2)
Now what I really want is a nice bootable Xmame disc. I've got the whole mame rom collection and it'd be cool to shuck a dvd to a friends' house, throw it in the pc, and boot into a graphical frontend and start gaming.
Question... (Score:2)
The reason I ask is that if the former is true, then it makes Linux more attractive to me as a gaming machine, particularly if it can handle initiating those drivers while it's running. One thing that annoys the hell out of me is that games in Windows think they need to be installed first. I can understand wanting to have a save-game folder, but I find it ridiculous what all needs to be copied over to the computer.
Re:Question... (Score:2, Informative)
so people ask, "Oh, what's the big deal if i can play it in windows?" well with this disk you can play it anywhere in a matter of minutes. it's there to show what Gentoo is like and how it can be used. and like most of what Gentoo does, it's optimized for the newest and best hardware, so there are many people left out in the cold. they'll be supported later as new versions come out, but that's not why it was made. it was made to show linux's potential.
Re:Question... (Score:2)
Modern game systems aren't exactly suffering now from it. B'sides, I have a gig of RAM.
Re:So this things plays UT2003 w/o installing linu (Score:2)
The downside is that us Win2k/NT (and presumably Linux) users are used to having their machine up all the time.
However, I'd be happy to dedicate an OS-less machine just to gaming.
great... (Score:1)
Boot time (Score:5, Funny)
Poor dude > What's all that writing?
Zealot > That's it booting. You don't need to worry about that.
Poor dude > Why's it taking so long?
Zealot > That's the amazing thing! Gentoo compiles the kernel, the libraries, the compiler, the compiler again, X, AND unreal tournament before running it! So it runs really fast!
Poor dude > So how long does it take to get working?
Zealot > About 3 days from pressing the power on button. But it's fast!
Re:Boot time (Score:2)
And now you know why linux doesn't have a bigger market share.
ATI Cards (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ATI Cards (Score:4, Informative)
This is false. To cut down on traffic over the AGP bus, Epic used texture compression. Specifically, they used S3TC/DXTC, which is supported by every major, modern 3D video driver on Windows (i.e. their target audience). This extension is currently supported by only two drivers on Linux: the ones from NVIDIA [nvidia.com] and the ones from Xi Graphics [xig.com]. The XiG drivers support the Radeon cards, but are pay-to-use drivers. However a time-limited demo is available for free. (The server must be restarted every 25-30 minutes or so, in the demo, as I understand it. Buy the real thing, and you get unlimited use, naturally.)
Epic has also said they're working with ATI and PowerVR (makers of the Kyro cards) to improve the binary-only drivers that each of those companies provides for their cards under Linux. If and when these drivers are released, they will be free-as-in-beer.
Again: it is the failing of the drivers under Linux to support a required extension, not Epic. Without that extension, performance would be terrible, so it isn't an option of just turning it off.
Re:ATI Cards (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ATI Cards (Score:2)
ATI has written their own binary-only drivers for the Radeon 8500 cards. These appear to be a branch of the binary-only drivers they provide for their FireGL cards, since the hardware is related. I do not believe (but also do not know) whether these drivers are based on DRI or not. They could be, since the license allows such a thing to be made. As of this writing, these drivers do not include S3TC/DXTC and thus cannot play UT2003. ATI and Epic are supposedly working together to remedy this situation and I am told that new, compatible, binary-only drivers will eventually be made available.
Xi Graphics also provides drivers for many cards. Their updated drivers are compatible with UT2003, which makes the Radeon 8500 playable under Linux. A demo of these drivers is available (although it is limited to short periods of use after which time the X server must be restarted) for free and for the full server you must pay a fee.
PowerVR has their own binary-only driver based on the DRI project available for their Kyro and Kyro 2 cards. As of this writing, these drivers do not include S3TC/DXTC and thus cannot play UT2003. PowerVR and Epic are supposedly working together to remedy this situation and I know that updated, compatible, binary-only drivers will eventually be made available.
NVIDIA provides their own drivers and they run UT2003 just fine. They are, as is well-known, binary only.
Hope that clears this all up. Most of this can be gleaned from this article on LinuxGames about UT2003 [linuxgames.com].
It's been slashdotted, here it is (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It's been slashdotted, here it is (Score:3, Funny)
a live CD is... (Score:2)
(Some people were wondering)
KNOPPIX (Score:2)
PC "Consoles"? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:PC "Consoles"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Besides, you'd have to deal with driver updates (since some drivers provide better performance, you'd better believe I want to use those) as well as providing support for hardware released after the game (Quake III had damn well better be able to run on my GF4!)
It's a cool idea, but not very workable anymore. Back in the day where it was VESA/Soundblaster, this was workable (didn't games used to come like this?) Nowadays, I don't see how it could work except for a very specific config.
I'll give this the benefit of a doubt though, and despite being a Windows user, I'll download the ISO and compare performance.
219 megabytes... (Score:2)
Anyone else notice this little detail?
Use a floppy disk (Score:1)
So every time I boot up the cd to play it I'm going to have to set my Player name, my character model, my screen resolution, configure my mouse and keyboard, and all the other preferences?
You don't have to do that on three out of the four currently popular video game consoles (GameCube, PS2, Xbox), which also store their software on read-only media. They have something called a "memory card" used to store game settings. (The fourth popular console is the Game Boy Advance system, which puts both read-only and read-write storage in each cartridge.)
Know what? PCs have "memory cards" as well. Just stick a FAT12 formatted disk in the floppy drive.
Re:Great.. they have a Linux version but... (Score:2)
Re:specs? (Score:1)
What will the recommended system requirements be?
Operating System: WIN 98/ME/2000/XP
CPU: Pentium III or AMD Athlon 733MHz processor (*Pentium® or AMD 1.0 GHz or greater RECOMMENDED)
Memory: 128 MB RAM (256 MB RAM or greater RECOMMENDED)
Hard Disk Space: 3 GB
CD ROM or CD/DVD ROM: 8X
Audio System: Windows® compatible sound card (*Sound Blaster® Audigy(tm) series sound card RECOMMENDED) (NVIDIA® nForce(TM) or other motherboards/soundcards containing the Dolby® Digital Interactive Content Encoder required for Dolby Digital audio. Also RECOMMENDED)
Video System: 3D Accelerator card with 16 MB VRAM (*32-128 MB VRAM RECOMMENDED) 16 MB TNT2-class DirectX® version 6 compliant video card. (*NVIDIA GeForce 2/ATI Radeon RECOMMENDED)
DirectX® version 8.1 (Included on game disc
Multiplayer: Internet (TCP/IP) and LAN (TCP/IP) play supported. *Internet play requires a 33.6 Kbps or faster modem
Lock up the machines physically (Score:1)
drop by a local library, university, or retailer, pop in a Knoppix cd, cruise the 'net and send a few emails, then pop out the cd and reboot the machine.
That is, unless the machine's case is locked in a cabinet so that the user can't use outside software. The library would claim that outside software may contain viruses. Besides, how are you going to fit drivers for every single network card and every single modem, including winmodems, on one CD?
Games keep people on windows (Score:1)
If you want to show someone the power of the Linux Desktop, grab Knoppix [knoppix.com]
Re:Games keep people on windows (Score:1)
No, no...its sheepshifting (Score:2)
Gentoo has a different development model than most distros. There is a lot more user contribution in improving it than most; users often write code upgrades. Also, the user forums are INCREDIBLY active. So they are most likely looking to add users who already have some knowledge of Linux, but want to augment it.
This is one compelling reason: you run Linux? Want to run Wine, but its not working for you? We've got it running - even WineX. Oh, and here's UT as well.
Seems like a good way to get the flock to join a new fold.
I myself switched to Gentoo because I was tired of downloading source packages under Mandrake and going through the "find and compile the library that is needed" game whenever I downloaded a program that was too new or too small to be in the distro (its considerably easier to do this type of thing with Gentoo, plus they have more packages), and adding packages that weren't part of the install was sending me into RPM oblivion.
How is this off topic? (Score:2)
Moderators, try using some objectivity! Sheesh.